Skip to main content

Classification of Pump Failure Using a Decision Tree Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICREEM 2022 (ICREEM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

The oil and gas sectors employ pumps extensively. The dependability and good operation of the pumps contribute significantly to the manufacturing line’s efficiency. Nevertheless, breakdowns can occur for a variety of causes, and a single failure can result in severe production delays and economic losses. Therefore, it is of the highest importance to anticipate future errors and swiftly address their root causes. Traditional pump maintenance and fault detection methods are ineffective in detecting possible defects. However, with the rapid rise of industry 4.0, the growing use of sensors, and the use of artificial intelligence techniques, smart plants may automate their operations to greatly enhance their efficiency and quality of output. Given that, Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) is essential for optimal machine performance. Meanwhile, Predictive Maintenance (PdM) is an emerging topic within maintenance methodologies with the objective of predicting failure prior to its occurrence in order to schedule maintenance only when it is necessary. These solutions have benefited pump maintenance decision-making by addressing complexity issues, reducing downtime, enhancing overall reliability, and reducing pump operating costs. This study examines the use of the classification learner to predict pump failure. The vibration sensor data for the pump were employed for prediction in the MATLAB software using the classification learner machine learning method. According to the dataset, the variable of interest is the machine status, which is categorized as normal, broken, and recovering. On the basis of the confusion matrix and the evaluation of the true positive rate (TPR), the false negative rate (FNR), the positive predicted values (PPV), and the false discovery value, the actual result was anticipated (FDR). The experimental result reveals that the accuracy of the training model was 91.94%, whereas the accuracy of the testing model was 74.4%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alrabghi A, Tiwari A (2015) State of the art in simulation-based optimisation for maintenance systems. Comput Ind Eng 82:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McKee KK, Forbes G, Mazhar I, Entwistle R, Howard I (2011) A review of major centrifugal pump failure modes with application to the water supply and sewerage industries. In: ICOMS asset management conference, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Yuan J, Luo Y, Zhang W (2021) Fault prediction of centrifugal pump based on improved KNN. Shock Vib 2021

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kulkarni SJ (2017) Factors affecting pump performance-an insight into research and investigation. Int J Res Rev 4(8):39

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bachus L, Custodio A (2003) News product and services book review know and understand centrifugal pumps, p 2003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harihara PP (2007) Sensorless fault diagnosis of centrifugal pumps [online]. https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/157904

  7. Yedidiah S (1996) Performance characteristics of centrifugal pumps bt - centrifugal pump user’s guidebook: problems and solutions. In: Yedidiah S (ed) Springer, Boston, MA, US, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruiz-Sarmiento JR, Monroy J, Moreno FA, Galindo C, Bonelo JM, Gonzalez-Jimenez J (2020) A predictive model for the maintenance of industrial machinery in the context of industry 4.0. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103289

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vilarinho S, Lopes I, Oliveira JA (2017) Preventive maintenance decisions through maintenance optimization models: a case study. Procedia Manuf 11:1170–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Çinar ZM, Nuhu AA, Zeeshan Q, Korhan O, Asmael M, Safaei B (2020) Machine learning in predictive maintenance towards sustainable smart manufacturing in industry 4.0. Sustainability 12(19)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrés D, Salinas M (2022) Predictive maintenance of induction motors using deep learning anomaly detection using an autoencoder neural network and fault classification using a convolutional neural network. Degree Proj Technol

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harihara PP, Parlos AG (2012) Fault diagnosis of centrifugal pumps using motor electrical signals. Centrif Pumps

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamal B, Sherif El-Gizawy HA, Supervisor T (2016) Condition-based monitoring system for diagnostics and prognostics of centrifugal pumps condition-based monitoring system for diagnostics and prognostics of centrifugal pumps

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Centre of Graduate Studies (CGS) and Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruwaida Aliyu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Institute of Technology PETRONAS Sdn Bhd (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aliyu, R., Mokhtar, A.A., Hussin, H. (2024). Classification of Pump Failure Using a Decision Tree Technique. In: Ahmad, F., Iskandar, T., Habib, K. (eds) ICREEM 2022. ICREEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5946-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5946-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5945-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5946-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics