Skip to main content

Impacts of the Ukraine Conflict on European Human Rights Law: Challenges and Resilience of Multi-layered Regional Mechanisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Impact of the Ukraine Conflict

Abstract

The Russian invasion of Ukraine that occurred on 24 February 2022, has caused serious violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL), and thereby, has had significant impacts on various fields of international law. In particular, unprecedented challenges are posed to the multi-layered systems of human rights protection that have been developed over many years in the European region, where both Russia and Ukraine are located. This contribution will examine the impacts of the Ukraine Conflict on European human rights law and reactions thereof to Russia’s aggression in four points: (1) institutional sanctions imposed by the Council of Europe (CoE), which expelled Russia as an aggressor state; (2) judicial responses to human rights violations caused by the invasion by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR); (3) fact-finding investigations into the military invasion and relevant issues by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE); and (4) the actions taken by the CoE and the European Union (EU) institutions for ensuring individual and State responsibilities for the aggression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    UNGA (2022) para 1.

  2. 2.

    PACE Opinion 193 (1996).

  3. 3.

    RCC (2009).

  4. 4.

    Burdov v Russia (no 2), para 137.

  5. 5.

    2010 Federal Law.

  6. 6.

    RCC (2015).

  7. 7.

    RCC (2016).

  8. 8.

    RCC (2017).

  9. 9.

    RCC (2020).

  10. 10.

    Ilaşcu and Others v Moldova and Russia.

  11. 11.

    Georgia v Russia (I).

  12. 12.

    Georgia v Russia (II). See also, Mamasakhlisi and Others v. Georgia and Russia.

  13. 13.

    Ukraine v Russia (re Crimea).

  14. 14.

    Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia.

  15. 15.

    CoM, Decision of 24 February 2022.

  16. 16.

    CoM, Decision of 25 February 2022.

  17. 17.

    CoM, Decision of 10 March 2022.

  18. 18.

    PACE, Opinion 300 (2022) of 15 March 2022, paras 19–20.

  19. 19.

    CoM, Resolution of 16 March 2022.

  20. 20.

    Buscemi 768.

  21. 21.

    Dzehtsiarou and Coffey.

  22. 22.

    Jahn.

  23. 23.

    Obata 9.

  24. 24.

    Ní Aoláin.

  25. 25.

    Steininger.

  26. 26.

    ECHR 068 (2022).

  27. 27.

    ECHR 073 (2022).

  28. 28.

    ECHR 116 (2022).

  29. 29.

    ECHR 204 (2022).

  30. 30.

    ECHR 222 (2022). Pinner v Russia and Ukraine; Aslin v Russia and Ukraine.

  31. 31.

    ECHR 227 (2022). Oliynichenko v Russia and Ukraine.

  32. 32.

    Cyprus v Turkey, paras 43–46.

  33. 33.

    Batura and Risini.

  34. 34.

    Georgia v Russia (II), para 142.

  35. 35.

    Tigroudja.

  36. 36.

    These issues are currently under scrutiny in the work of the Drafting Group onEffective processing and resolution of cases relating to inter-State disputes (DH-SYSC-IV), operating under the authority of the Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH).

  37. 37.

    Analysis of statistics 2022, 7.

  38. 38.

    ECtHR Resolution, para 2.

  39. 39.

    Fedotova and Others v. Russia, paras 68–73.

  40. 40.

    Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia, para 389.

  41. 41.

    Kutayev v Russia, paras 75–80; Svetova and Others v Rusia, paras 23–28.

  42. 42.

    Kutaev, paras 8–9; Svetova and Others, paras 11–12.

  43. 43.

    Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia, para 393.

  44. 44.

    Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia para 459.

  45. 45.

    Dzehtsiarou.

  46. 46.

    Risini and Forde.

  47. 47.

    President of Russia, 11 June 2022.

  48. 48.

    President of Russia, 11 June 2022.

  49. 49.

    Emtseva.

  50. 50.

    A/HRC/RES/49/1.

  51. 51.

    OSCE, Permanent Council, Decision No. 1117.

  52. 52.

    SMM Daily Report 54/2022.

  53. 53.

    Press Release, OSCE, 31 March 2022.

  54. 54.

    See in general, see Szpak and Kolodziejska.

  55. 55.

    Moscow Mechanism Report in April 2022, 1–3.

  56. 56.

    Moscow Mechanism Report in July 2022, 4.

  57. 57.

    ODIHR Interim Report.

  58. 58.

    ODIHR Second Report.

  59. 59.

    Moscow Mechanism Report in April 2022, 94.

  60. 60.

    Moscow Mechanism Report in July 2022, 115.

  61. 61.

    Press Release, ECHR 084 (2022) of no 11884/22.

  62. 62.

    Venice Commission, CDL-AD(2021)027, 6 July 2021.

  63. 63.

    The last reform was undertaken in July 2022 and entered into force on 1 December 2022.

  64. 64.

    Ecodefence and Others v. Russia, paras 89–118, 123–186.

  65. 65.

    Moscow Mechanism Report in September 2022, 2.

  66. 66.

    Moscow Mechanism Report in November 2020.

  67. 67.

    OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution, paras 35–36 referring to ‘a special international criminal tribunal’ to prosecute and punish those responsible for crimes including aggression.

  68. 68.

    The first declaration accepted ICC jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed on Ukrainian territory from 21 November 2013 to 22 February 2014; The second declaration extended to encompass ongoing alleged crimes committed throughout the territory from 20 February 2014 onwards.

  69. 69.

    Calling for a Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression.

  70. 70.

    Heller.

  71. 71.

    Wilde.

  72. 72.

    PACE, Recommendation 2231 (2022).

  73. 73.

    PACE, Resolution 2436 (2022).

  74. 74.

    CoM, CM/Del/Dec(2022)1442/2.3, para 3.

  75. 75.

    PACE, Recommendation 2245 (2023), para 8.3.1.

  76. 76.

    PACE, Resolution 2482 (2023), para 7.

  77. 77.

    CoM, CM/Del/Dec(2023)1457bis/2.3, para 6.

  78. 78.

    European Parliament, Resolution 2022/2655(RSP).

  79. 79.

    Press Release: European Commission, 30 November 2022.

  80. 80.

    European Parliament, Resolution 2022/3017(RSP), para 3.

  81. 81.

    Statement by President von der Leyen.

  82. 82.

    CoESG, Information Documents.

  83. 83.

    In-Depth Analysis: Tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine, 12–13, 18–19.

  84. 84.

    PACE, Doc. 12462.

  85. 85.

    EULEX statement.

  86. 86.

    A/RES/ES-11/5, paras 3–4.

  87. 87.

    PACE, Resolution 2436 (2022), para 11.9.

  88. 88.

    PACE, Resolution 2448 (2022), para 10.

  89. 89.

    CoM CM/Del/Dec(2022)1442/2.3, para 3.

  90. 90.

    PACE, Resolution 2463 (2022), para 13.6.3.

  91. 91.

    CoM, 1452nd meeting, CM(2022)187-final.

  92. 92.

    PACE Resolution 2482 (2023), para. 19.3.

  93. 93.

    CoM CM/Del/Dec(2023)1457bis/2.3, para 7.

  94. 94.

    European Parliament (n) para 14.

  95. 95.

    European Council, CO EUR 3 CONCL 2, para 8.

  96. 96.

    Maksym Vishchyk, “Insight from Ukraine: Revitalizing Belief in International Law”, Just Security, 18 March 2022.

References

UN Documents

National Legislation and Judgments

International Cases

  • Aslin v Russia and Ukraine (App no 31233/22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdov v Russia (no 2), ECtHR, App no 33509/504, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction of 15 January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyprus v Turkey, ECtHR (GC), App no 25781/94, Judgment on Just Satisfaction of 12 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecodefence and Others v. Russia, ECtHR, App nos 9988/13 and Others, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction of 14 June 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedotova and Others v. Russia, ECtHR (GC), Application Nos. 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14, Judgment of 17 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia v Russia (I), ECtHR (GC), App no 13255/07, Judgment on Merits of 3 July 2014; on Just Satisfaction of 31 January 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia v Russia (II), ECtHR (GC), App no 38263/08, Judgment on Merits of 21 January 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilaşcu and Others v Moldova and Russia, ECtHR (GC), App no 48787/99, Judgment of Merits and Just Satisfaction of 8 July 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutayev v Russia, ECtHR, App no 17912/15, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction of 24 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamasakhlisi and Others v. Georgia and Russia, ECtHR, App nos. 29999/04 41424/04, Judgment of Merits and Just Satisfaction of 7 March 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliynichenko v Russia and Ukraine (App no 31258/22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinner v Russia and Ukraine (App no 31217/22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetova and Others v Rusia, ECtHR, App no 54714/17, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction of 24 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukraine v Russia (re Crimea), ECtHR (GC), App no 20958/14 38334/18, Decision of 16 December 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia, ECtHR (GC), App nos 8019/16, 43800/14 and 28525/20, Decision of 30 November 2022.

    Google Scholar 

Council of Europe

  • Analysis of statistics 2022, ECtHR, January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoESG, Information Documents SG/Inf(2023)7 of 31 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, Decision CM/Del/Dec(2022)1426bis/2.3 of 24 February 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, Decision CM/Del/Dec(2022)1426ter/2.3 of 25 February 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, Decision CM/Del/Dec(2022)1428bis/2.3 of 10 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, Resolution CM/Res(2022)2 of 16 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, Decision CM/Del/Dec(2022)1442/2.3 of 15 September 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, 1452nd meeting, CM(2022)187-final, 14 December 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoM, Decision CM/Del/Dec(2023)1457bis/2.3 of 24 February 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR, Resolution on the consequences of the cessation of membership of the Russian Federation to the Council of Europe in light of Article 58 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Doc. 12462 of 7 January 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE Opinion 193 (1996) of 25 January 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Opinion 300 (2022) of 15 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Recommendation 2231 (2022) of 28 April 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Recommendation 2245 (2023) of 24 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Resolution 2436 (2022) of 28 April 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Resolution 2448 (2022) of 22 June 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Resolution 2463 (2022) of 13 October 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE, Resolution 2482 (2023) of 26 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 068 (2022) of 1 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 073 (2022) of 4 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 084 (2022) of 10 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 116 (2022) of 1 April 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 204 (2022) of 16 June 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 222 (2022) of 30 June 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release, ECHR 227 (2022) of 1 July 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venice Commission, CDL-AD(2021)027, 6 July 2021.

    Google Scholar 

Journal Article

  • Buscemi, M. 2022. Outcasting the Aggressor: The Deployment of the Sanction of ‘Non-participation.’ American Journal of International Law 116: 764–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzehtsiarou, K., and D.K. Coffey. 2019. Suspension and Expulsion of Members of the Council of Europe: Difficult Decisions in Troubled Times. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 68: 443–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obata, K. 2022. Aggression by Russia against Ukraine and the Council of Europe and the European Convention on Human Rights” (Roshia niyoru Ukuraina Shinryaku to Yōroppa Hyōgikai・Yōroppa Jinken Jyōyaku). Jinken Hanrei Ho (Human Rights Jurisprudence Journal) 4: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steininger, S. 2021. With or Without You: Suspension, Expulsion, and the Limits of Membership Sanctions in Regional Human Rights Regimes. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 81: 533–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpak, A. and J. Kolodziejska. 2023. The Use of the OSCE Moscow Mechanism and International Humanitarian Law in the Russian Aggression Against Ukraine. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. Published online: 19 February 2023.

    Google Scholar 

Scholarly Blog Article

OSCE

  • Interim Report on Reported Violations of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Ukraine, ODIHR, 20 July 2022 (ODIHR Interim Report).

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution on the Russian’s Federation war of aggression against Ukraine and Its People, and Its Threat to Security Across the OSCE Region, Birmingham, 2–6 July 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE, Permanent Council, Decision No. 1117 of 21 March 2014, Deployment of an OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE Rapporteur’s Report under the Moscow Mechanism on Alleged Human Rights Violations related to the Presidential Elections of 9 August 2020 in Belarus, by Professor Dr. Wolfgang Benedek, No. 358/2020, ODIHR.GAL/68/20/Corr.1, 5 November 2020 (Moscow Mechanism Report in November 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) Daily Report 54/2022 Issued on 7 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Release: Chairman-in-Office and Secretary General expressed regret that no consensus reached on extension of mandate of Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine, 31 March 2022. https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/514958.

  • Report on Violations of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity Committed In Ukraine Since 24 February 2022’, OSCE, ODIHR.GAL/26/22/Rev.1, 13 April 2022 (Moscow Mechanism Report in April 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on Violations of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity Committed in Ukraine (1 April – 25 June 2022), OSCE, ODIHR.GAL/36/22/Corr.1, 14 July 2022 (Moscow Mechanism Report in July 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on Russia’s Legal and Administrative Practice in Light of its OSCE Human Dimension Commitments, OSCE, ODIHR.GAL/58/22/Rev.1, 22 September 2022 (Moscow Mechanism Report in September 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Second Interim Report on Reported Violations of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Ukraine, 14 December 2022 (ODIHR Second Report).

    Google Scholar 

European Union

Miscellaneous

  • Calling for a Special Tribunal for Crime of Aggression and Other Updates on Ukraine, 4 March 2022.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Negishi, Y. (2023). Impacts of the Ukraine Conflict on European Human Rights Law: Challenges and Resilience of Multi-layered Regional Mechanisms. In: Furuya, S., Takemura, H., Ozaki, K. (eds) Global Impact of the Ukraine Conflict. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4374-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4374-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4373-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4374-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics