Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptualizing Key Performance Indicators for Building Critical Infrastructure Resilience Through Public-Private Partnership

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Operations Research ((LNOR))

  • 679 Accesses

Abstract

Disasters has implications for the sustainable development goals and affect the functional performance of critical infrastructure. Public-private partnership is recognized as a medium to build the resilience of critical infrastructure. While previous literature provides valuable insights into public-private partnerships in building critical infrastructure resilience, key performance indicators for a public-private partnership in critical infrastructure resilience is yet to be established. In this study, a systematic review was conducted to propose a set of KPRI in PPP in critical infrastructure resilience. Using a three-stage literature search, 95 publications were selected for content analysis. A total of 23 key performance resilience indicators were proposed and subsequently grouped under five categories namely, System performance, Human resource, Social, Record Keeping and Equipment KPRI. Considering this study as a pioneer, this study will provide an in-depth information and knowledge needed for stakeholders in critical infrastructure resilience such as policymakers and infrastructure operators in building the resilience of critical infrastructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hutton, R.B., et al.: The role of sustainable development in risk assessment and management for multinational corporations. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 15(1), 89 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zio, E.: Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152, 137–150 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldosouky, A., Saad, W., Mandayam, N.: Resilient critical infrastructure: Bayesian network analysis and contract-based optimization. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 205, 107243 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, D.W.: An exploratory assessment of infrastructure resilience to disasters. Int. J. Disaster Resilience Built Environ. 11(4), 519–533 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Col, J.M.: Managing disasters: the role of local government. Public Adm. Rev. 67, 114–124 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trump, B.D., et al.: Social resilience and critical infrastructure systems. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds.) Resilience and Risk, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, pp. 289–299. Springer, Dordrecht (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Shao, J.: Model assessment of public–private partnership flood insurance systems: an empirical study of Japan. Geneva Pap. Risk Insur.-Issues Pract. 47(1), 79–102 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruhlov, V., et al.: Public-private partnership in cybersecurity. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2020. CEUR-WS (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gim, C., et al.: The resilience work of institutions 97, 36–43 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Newlove-Eriksson, L., Giacomello, G., Eriksson, J.: The invisible hand? critical information infrastructures, commercialisation and national security. Int. Spect. 53(2), 124–140 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy, D.R.: Privatizing political authority: cybersecurity, public-private partnerships, and the reproduction of liberal political order. Polit. Gov. 6(2), 5–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kozine, I., Petrenj, B., Trucco, P.: Resilience capacities assessment for critical infrastructures disruption: the READ framework (part 1). Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 14(3), 199–220 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haraguchi, M., Lall, U., Watanabe, K.: Building private sector resilience: directions after the 2015 Sendai framework. J. Disaster Res. 11(3), 535–543 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carr, M.: Public–private partnerships in national cyber-security strategies. Int. Aff. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Auzzir, Z.A., Haigh, R.P., Amaratunga, D.: Public-private partnerships (PPP) in disaster management in developing countries: a conceptual framework. Procedia Econ. Financ. 18, 807–814 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Givens, A.D., Busch, N.E.: Realizing the promise of public-private partnerships in US critical infrastructure protection. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Protect. 6(1), 39–50 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabriela, P., Mircea, B.; Risk assessment in public private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure in the recovery after the global crisis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Risk Management, Assessment and Mitigation, RIMA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Busch, N.E., Givens, A.D.: Achieving resilience in disaster management: the role of public-private partnerships. J. Strat. Secur. 6(2), 1–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steijn, B., Klijn, E.H., Edelenbos, J.: Public private partnerships: added value by organizational form or management? Public Adm. 89(4), 1235–1252 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dunn-Cavelty, M., Suter, M.: Public-private partnerships are no silver bullet: an expanded governance model for critical infrastructure protection. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2(4), 179–187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding, S.X., et al.: A novel scheme for key performance indicator prediction and diagnosis with application to an industrial hot strip mill. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 9(4), 2239–2247 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim, C.S., Mohamed, M.Z.: Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 17(4), 243–248 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ika, L.A.: Project success as a topic in project management journals. Proj. Manag. J. 40(4), 6–19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner, J.R.: Handbook of Project-Based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organizations. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Müller, R., Jugdev, K.: Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott–the elucidation of project success. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 5(4), 757–775 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seda-Sanabria, Y., Matheu, E., Stephan, R.: Dealing with disasters: developing an integrated regional resilience strategy. In: Chavoshian, A., Takeuchi, K. (eds.) Floods: From Risk to Opportunity, p. 225. Int Assoc Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Provan, K.G., Kenis, P.: Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18(2), 229–252 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murdock, H.J., De Bruijn, K.M., Gersonius, B.: Assessment of critical infrastructure resilience to flooding using a response curve approach. Sustainability 10(10), 3470 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dvir, D., et al.: In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors. Res. Policy 27(9), 915–935 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shokri-Ghasabeh, M., Kavoousi-Chabok, K.: Generic project success and project management success criteria and factors: Literature review and survey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Falagas, M.E., et al.: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22(2), 338–342 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meho, L.I., Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: a comparison of Scopus and web of science. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(11), 1711–1726 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Ageeli, H.K., Alzobaee, A.S.J.A.: Critical success factors in construction projects (Governmental projects as a case study). J. Eng. 22(3), 129–147 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martins, A.A., et al.: Framework for sustainability metrics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46(10), 2962–2973 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, J., Wang, Q., Zhou, H.: Establishment of key performance indicators for green building operations Monitoring—an application to China case study. Energies 13(4), 976 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bie, Z., et al.: Battling the extreme: a study on the power system resilience. Proc. IEEE 105(7), 1253–1266 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. He, F., Zhuang, J.: Balancing pre-disaster preparedness and post-disaster relief. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(1), 246–256 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kong, J., et al.: Optimizing the resilience of interdependent infrastructures to regional natural hazards with combined improvement measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 210, 107538 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wen, M., et al.: Resilience-based component importance measures. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 30(11), 4244–4254 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Labaka, L., Hernantes, J., Sarriegi, J.M.: A holistic framework for building critical infrastructure resilience. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 103, 21–33 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Manyena, B., Machingura, F., O’Keefe, P.: Disaster resilience integrated framework for transformation (DRIFT): a new approach to theorising and operationalising resilience. World Dev. 123, 104587 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Madni, A.M., Jackson, S.: Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 39(4), 85 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rehak, D., Novotny, P.: Bases for modelling the impacts of the critical infrastructure failure. In: Cozzani, V., DeRademaeker, E., Manca, D. (eds.) Cisap 7: 7th International Conference on Safety & Environment in Process Industry, pp. 91–96. Aidic Servizi Srl, Milano (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rey, B., et al.: Interdependencies between industrial infrastructures: territorial vulnerability assessment. Chem. Eng. Trans. 31, 61–66 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daugherty, P.J., et al.: Is collaboration paying off for firms? Bus. Horiz. 49(1), 61–70 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gilpin, D.R., Murphy, P.J.: Crisis management in A Complex World. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Barabadi, A., et al.: A holistic view of health infrastructure resilience before and after COVID-19. Arch. Bone Joint Surg. 8(Suppl 1), 262 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ganguly, A.R., Bhatia, U., Flynn, S.E.: Critical Infrastructures Resilience: Policy and Engineering Principles. Routledge, Milton Park (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Chatterjee, C., Mozumder, P.: Hurricane Wilma, utility disruption, and household wellbeing. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 14, 395–402 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Labaka, L., Hernantes, J., Sarriegi, J.M.: A framework to improve the resilience of critical infrastructures. Int. J. Disaster Resilience Built Environ. 6(4), 409–423 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Li, D., et al.: A hybrid method for evaluating the resilience of urban road traffic network under flood disaster: an example of Nanjing China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29(30), 46306–46324 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Eguchi, Y., Hattori, Y., Nomura, M.: Comparative assessment of validity of gradient wind models for a translating tropical cyclone. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 1–19 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang, Y., et al.: Towards resilient civil infrastructure asset management: an information elicitation and analytical framework. Sustainability 11(16), 4439 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Parmenter, D.: Key performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lamprou, A., Vagiona, D.: Success criteria and critical success factors in project success: a literature review. RELAND: Int. J. Real Estate Land Plann. 1, 276–284 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper constitutes a part of a PhD research project being conducted at the School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment at Western Sydney University, Australia. The authors acknowledge the Western Sydney University for funding the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia

    Godslove Ampratwum, Robert Osei-Kyei & Vivian W. Y. Tam

Authors
  1. Godslove Ampratwum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Osei-Kyei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vivian W. Y. Tam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Godslove Ampratwum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Jing Li

  2. Department of Real Estate and Construction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Weisheng Lu

  3. Department of Emergency Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Yi Peng

  4. School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Hongping Yuan

  5. Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Daikun Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ampratwum, G., Osei-Kyei, R., Tam, V.W.Y. (2023). Conceptualizing Key Performance Indicators for Building Critical Infrastructure Resilience Through Public-Private Partnership. In: Li, J., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Yuan, H., Wang, D. (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2022. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3626-7_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation