Skip to main content

Abstract

Innovation has never been as important as it is now to solve the problems caused by COVID-19 and the socioeconomic crisis. In this context, and within the framework of an economy based on knowledge and change, economic and social agents need open innovation to generate competitiveness and development. For their part, universities need to increase technological production as a source of innovation. In the literature there are models of innovation, but they do not present a method to move from basic to technological research. Aim of this work was to fill, in part, this gap. Under the qualitative approach, the Open Innovation model, the Technological Maturity Levels method and the Pedagogical Accompaniment model were selected to develop a post-COVID-19 route to intensify innovation. The article contributes to knowledge with a methodology that allows expanding the performance of researchers and raising the technological level of universities towards competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alván De la Cruz, A., Harman Canalle, U.: Aspectos básicos. Guía para el usuario sobre la CTI en el Perú. Volumen I. Lima (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Miranda, R.L., Irgang, L.F., Gomes, G., Dos Santos, I.R.: Competitiveness influence on global innovation of nations: a cross-sectional analysis. Ind. J. Manag. Prod. 12, 964–978 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i4.1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hermundsdottir, F., Aspelund, A.: Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124715 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Carpio, H.A., Del Carpio, P.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Montes, J.C.: Science, technology, and innovation articulation of local public university with economic and social agents. In: International Conference on Virtual Campus, JICV 2021, pp. 21–24. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stoimenova, B.B.: Regional innovation systems and university competitiveness. Int. J. Innov. 7, 227–235 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i2.353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franco, M.: Entrepreneurship, competitiveness and innovation. Sustainability 12, 6576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12166576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iida, K., Ishida, T., Nishimura, N.: Consideration on academia environments for creating medical innovation. Yakugaku Zasshi 142, 75–84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1248/YAKUSHI.21-00183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Janas, M.: Konkurencyjność i innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw sektora MŚP w Polsce. Stud. Ind. Geogr. Comm. Polish Geogr. Soc. 33, 176–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.334.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Androniceanu, A.-M., Kinnunen, J., Georgescu, I., Androniceanu, A.: A multidimensional approach to competitiveness, innovation and well-being in the EU using canonical correlation analysis. J. Compet. 12, 5–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.04.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobrzanski, P., Bobowski, S., Chrysostome, E., et al.: Toward innovation-driven competitiveness across African countries: an analysis of efficiency of R&D expenditures. J. Compet. 13, 5–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.01.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. OGEIEE: Innovación en la industria manufacturera y en las empresas de servicios intensivos en conocimiento. Análisis de los resultados de la ENIIMSEC 2018. Lima (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. CONCYTEC: Resolución N° 020-2022-CONCYTEC-P. Formalizar la aprobación de la Directiva N° 001-2022-CONCYTEC-P, “Uso de la metodología Nivel de Madurez Tecnológica (TRL)” (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramírez-Montoya, M.S.: Innovación abierta, interdisciplinaria y colaborativa para formar en sustentablidad energética a través de MOOCs e investigación educativa. Educ. Knowl. Soc. (EKS) 19(4), 11–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20181941130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baron, M.: Open innovation capacity of the polish universities. J. Knowl. Econ. 12(1), 73–95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0515-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., Grande, M.: Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 21, 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Digital transformation in the universities: Implications of the covid-19 pandemic. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 22, 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knopik, T., Oszwa, U.: E-cooperative problem solving as a strategy for learning mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 22, 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gómez-Gómez, M., Hijón-Neira, R., Santacruz-Valencia, L., Pérez-Marín, D.: Impact of the emergency remote teaching and learning process on digital competence and mood in teacher training. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 23, 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.27037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baena, G.: Metodologías de la investigación. Serie integral por competencias, 3a ed (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Páez, P.N., Jiménez, W.G., Buitrago, J.D.: Las teorías de la competitividad: una síntesis. Rev. Repub. 2021, 119–144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21017/REV.REPUB.2021.V31.A110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Carpio, H.: Modelo de articulación de la ciencia, tecnología e innovación de la universidad pública con agentes económicos y sociales. Lambayeque, 2021. Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kitaguti, K.K., de Resende Shimura, F., Jacintho, J.C.: Prospects of competitive process innovation business in Brazil: critical factors for competitiveness, productivity and growth. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 8, 976–1000 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i3.522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Del Carpio Ramos, H.A., Del Carpio Ramos, P.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Technological research methodology to manage organizational change. In: Conde-González, M.A., Rodríguez-Sedano, F.J., Fernández-Llamas, C., García-Peñalvo, F.J. (eds.) TEEM’19 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (León, Spain, October 16th–18th, 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 168–176. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Landazury, V.L.F., Ferrer, M.F.: Innovación como eje transversal de los modelos de negocio en las organizaciones, una revisión del constructo teórico. Rev. EAN 81, 129–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.N81.2016.1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. OECD/Eurostat: Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th edn. OECD, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewandowska, M.S.: Eco-innovation and international competitiveness of enterprises results for European Union Member States. Comp. Econ. Res. 23, 37–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yañez-Figueroa, J.A., Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Measurement of the social construction of knowledge: validation and reliability of the K-Social-C instrument. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 12, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00868-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Co-creation and open innovation: systematic literature review. Comunicar 26, 9–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.: Método basado en Educación 4.0 para mejorar el aprendizaje: lecciones aprendidas de la COVID-19. RIED-Revista Iberoam Educ a Distancia 25, 49–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Costa, J., Matias, J.C.O.: Open innovation 4.0 as an enhancer of sustainable innovation ecosystems. Sustainability 12(19), 8112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sattiraju, V., Ligade, V.S., Muragundi, P., et al.: National and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) IP Policies: Comparison of Indian HEIs’ IP Policies from a Global Perspective. J. Knowl. Econ. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13132-022-00915-0 (2022)

  33. Ley 30220: Ley Universitaria. Normas Leg D Of El Peru (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Suglobov, A., Orlova, K., Kalliopin, A., et al.: Intellectual property policy of universities: specific regulation Política. Tempos e Espac em Educ 14, e16155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. UNPRG: Resolución N° 608-2021-CU. Aprobar el Reglamento de Porpiedad Intelectual de la Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alonso de Castro, M.G., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Successful educational methodologies: Erasmus+ projects related to e-learning or ICT. Campus Virtuales 11, 95–114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2022.1.1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kozanitis, A., Ménard, L., Boucher, S.: Continuous development and education follow-up of new university professors: effects on the use of teaching strategies. Práxis Educ. 13, 294–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.13i2.0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Méndez, C., Colomina, R.: Analysis of Accompaniment Situations for the Improvement of Inclusive Teaching. Rev. Int. Educ. para la Justicia Soc. 9, 145–163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.1.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ministerio de Educación del Perú: Manual de acompañamiento pedagógico a docentes de II.EE. multigrado. Lima (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. UNPRG: Informe complementario sobre Líneas de Investigación de la Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilda Angélica Del Carpio Ramos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Del Carpio Ramos, H.A., Del Carpio Ramos, P.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Montes Ninaquispe, J.C., Chirinos Cuadros, H.Y.d.P., Zárate Aguinaga, E.A.M. (2023). Accompaniment Methodology of Open Innovation in Local Universities After COVID-19. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds) Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. TEEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0941-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0942-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics