Abstract
Innovation has never been as important as it is now to solve the problems caused by COVID-19 and the socioeconomic crisis. In this context, and within the framework of an economy based on knowledge and change, economic and social agents need open innovation to generate competitiveness and development. For their part, universities need to increase technological production as a source of innovation. In the literature there are models of innovation, but they do not present a method to move from basic to technological research. Aim of this work was to fill, in part, this gap. Under the qualitative approach, the Open Innovation model, the Technological Maturity Levels method and the Pedagogical Accompaniment model were selected to develop a post-COVID-19 route to intensify innovation. The article contributes to knowledge with a methodology that allows expanding the performance of researchers and raising the technological level of universities towards competitiveness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alván De la Cruz, A., Harman Canalle, U.: Aspectos básicos. Guía para el usuario sobre la CTI en el Perú. Volumen I. Lima (2020)
De Miranda, R.L., Irgang, L.F., Gomes, G., Dos Santos, I.R.: Competitiveness influence on global innovation of nations: a cross-sectional analysis. Ind. J. Manag. Prod. 12, 964–978 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i4.1338
Hermundsdottir, F., Aspelund, A.: Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124715 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124715
Del Carpio, H.A., Del Carpio, P.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Montes, J.C.: Science, technology, and innovation articulation of local public university with economic and social agents. In: International Conference on Virtual Campus, JICV 2021, pp. 21–24. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2021)
Stoimenova, B.B.: Regional innovation systems and university competitiveness. Int. J. Innov. 7, 227–235 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i2.353
Franco, M.: Entrepreneurship, competitiveness and innovation. Sustainability 12, 6576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12166576
Iida, K., Ishida, T., Nishimura, N.: Consideration on academia environments for creating medical innovation. Yakugaku Zasshi 142, 75–84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1248/YAKUSHI.21-00183
Janas, M.: Konkurencyjność i innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw sektora MŚP w Polsce. Stud. Ind. Geogr. Comm. Polish Geogr. Soc. 33, 176–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.334.11
Androniceanu, A.-M., Kinnunen, J., Georgescu, I., Androniceanu, A.: A multidimensional approach to competitiveness, innovation and well-being in the EU using canonical correlation analysis. J. Compet. 12, 5–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.04.01
Dobrzanski, P., Bobowski, S., Chrysostome, E., et al.: Toward innovation-driven competitiveness across African countries: an analysis of efficiency of R&D expenditures. J. Compet. 13, 5–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.01.01
OGEIEE: Innovación en la industria manufacturera y en las empresas de servicios intensivos en conocimiento. Análisis de los resultados de la ENIIMSEC 2018. Lima (2020)
CONCYTEC: Resolución N° 020-2022-CONCYTEC-P. Formalizar la aprobación de la Directiva N° 001-2022-CONCYTEC-P, “Uso de la metodología Nivel de Madurez Tecnológica (TRL)” (2022)
Ramírez-Montoya, M.S.: Innovación abierta, interdisciplinaria y colaborativa para formar en sustentablidad energética a través de MOOCs e investigación educativa. Educ. Knowl. Soc. (EKS) 19(4), 11–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20181941130
Baron, M.: Open innovation capacity of the polish universities. J. Knowl. Econ. 12(1), 73–95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0515-8
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., Grande, M.: Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 21, 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086
García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Digital transformation in the universities: Implications of the covid-19 pandemic. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 22, 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25465
Knopik, T., Oszwa, U.: E-cooperative problem solving as a strategy for learning mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 22, 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25176
Gómez-Gómez, M., Hijón-Neira, R., Santacruz-Valencia, L., Pérez-Marín, D.: Impact of the emergency remote teaching and learning process on digital competence and mood in teacher training. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 23, 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.27037
Baena, G.: Metodologías de la investigación. Serie integral por competencias, 3a ed (2017)
Páez, P.N., Jiménez, W.G., Buitrago, J.D.: Las teorías de la competitividad: una síntesis. Rev. Repub. 2021, 119–144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21017/REV.REPUB.2021.V31.A110
Del Carpio, H.: Modelo de articulación de la ciencia, tecnología e innovación de la universidad pública con agentes económicos y sociales. Lambayeque, 2021. Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo (2022)
Kitaguti, K.K., de Resende Shimura, F., Jacintho, J.C.: Prospects of competitive process innovation business in Brazil: critical factors for competitiveness, productivity and growth. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 8, 976–1000 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i3.522
Del Carpio Ramos, H.A., Del Carpio Ramos, P.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Technological research methodology to manage organizational change. In: Conde-González, M.A., Rodríguez-Sedano, F.J., Fernández-Llamas, C., García-Peñalvo, F.J. (eds.) TEEM’19 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (León, Spain, October 16th–18th, 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 168–176. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019)
Landazury, V.L.F., Ferrer, M.F.: Innovación como eje transversal de los modelos de negocio en las organizaciones, una revisión del constructo teórico. Rev. EAN 81, 129–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.N81.2016.1559
OECD/Eurostat: Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th edn. OECD, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg (2018)
Lewandowska, M.S.: Eco-innovation and international competitiveness of enterprises results for European Union Member States. Comp. Econ. Res. 23, 37–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.03
Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)
Yañez-Figueroa, J.A., Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Measurement of the social construction of knowledge: validation and reliability of the K-Social-C instrument. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 12, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00868-x
Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Co-creation and open innovation: systematic literature review. Comunicar 26, 9–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-01
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.: Método basado en Educación 4.0 para mejorar el aprendizaje: lecciones aprendidas de la COVID-19. RIED-Revista Iberoam Educ a Distancia 25, 49–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32320
Costa, J., Matias, J.C.O.: Open innovation 4.0 as an enhancer of sustainable innovation ecosystems. Sustainability 12(19), 8112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198112
Sattiraju, V., Ligade, V.S., Muragundi, P., et al.: National and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) IP Policies: Comparison of Indian HEIs’ IP Policies from a Global Perspective. J. Knowl. Econ. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13132-022-00915-0 (2022)
Ley 30220: Ley Universitaria. Normas Leg D Of El Peru (2014)
Suglobov, A., Orlova, K., Kalliopin, A., et al.: Intellectual property policy of universities: specific regulation Política. Tempos e Espac em Educ 14, e16155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16155
UNPRG: Resolución N° 608-2021-CU. Aprobar el Reglamento de Porpiedad Intelectual de la Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo (2021)
Alonso de Castro, M.G., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Successful educational methodologies: Erasmus+ projects related to e-learning or ICT. Campus Virtuales 11, 95–114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2022.1.1022
Kozanitis, A., Ménard, L., Boucher, S.: Continuous development and education follow-up of new university professors: effects on the use of teaching strategies. Práxis Educ. 13, 294–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.13i2.0003
Méndez, C., Colomina, R.: Analysis of Accompaniment Situations for the Improvement of Inclusive Teaching. Rev. Int. Educ. para la Justicia Soc. 9, 145–163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.1.007
Ministerio de Educación del Perú: Manual de acompañamiento pedagógico a docentes de II.EE. multigrado. Lima (2019)
UNPRG: Informe complementario sobre Líneas de Investigación de la Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Del Carpio Ramos, H.A., Del Carpio Ramos, P.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Montes Ninaquispe, J.C., Chirinos Cuadros, H.Y.d.P., Zárate Aguinaga, E.A.M. (2023). Accompaniment Methodology of Open Innovation in Local Universities After COVID-19. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds) Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. TEEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0941-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0942-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)