Abstract
Echolocating bats analyze the echoes of self-generated ultrasound pulses to reconstruct three-dimensional images, enabling them to navigate in the dark. When they behave in proximity to conspecifics, bats are exposed to conspecific pulses with similar spectrotemporal characteristics of their echoes. Although the echolocation pulses emitted by bats have high intensity, the intensity of the echoes is decreased by attenuation and its scattering in the air. Intense sounds emitted by these bats or other sources can impair bat’s ability to detect their echoes. Similarly, a stream of echoes from the environment and conspecific pulses creates an acoustically complex situation wherein bats differentiate and extract their target echoes from a mix of other sounds with similar acoustic characteristics. Here, we review previous studies that investigated how bats deal with acoustic interference in three conditions: auditory masking, clutter interference, and jamming. It was found that bats could improve the signal-to-noise ratio of echoes in the presence of noise, which resembles the Lombard effect observed in other animals. Emitted pulses are modified temporally and spectrally in response to conspecific sounds, implying that echolocating bats can actively separate acoustic characteristics to mitigate mutual interference among a group of conspecifics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams AM, Davis K, Smotherman M (2017) Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats. Sci Rep 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41641
Amichai E, Blumrosen G, Yovel Y (2015) Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20152064. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2064
Bates ME, Stamper SA, Simmons JA (2008) Jamming avoidance response of big brown bats in target detection. J Exp Biol 211:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.009688
Bates ME, Simmons JA, Zorikov TV (2011) Bats use echo harmonic structure to distinguish their targets from background clutter. Science 333:627–630. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202065
Behrend O, Kössl M, Schuller G (1999) Binaural influences on Doppler shift compensation of the horseshoe bat Rhinolophus rouxi. J Comp Physiol A 185:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050413
Blickley JL, Blackwood D, Patricelli GL (2012) Experimental evidence for the effects of chronic anthropogenic noise on abundance of greater sage-grouse at Leks. Conserv Biol 26:461–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01840.x
Brumm H (2006) Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0158-x
Brumm H, Todt D (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891–897. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1968
Brumm H, Voss K, Köllmer I, Todt D (2004) Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol 207:443–448. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00768
Butman JA, Suga N (2016) Synaptic mechanisms shaping delay-tuned combination-sensitivity in the auditory thalamus of mustached bats. Hear Res 331:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.013
Chiu C, Xian W, Moss CF (2008) Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:13116–13121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804408105
Chiu C, Xian W, Moss CF (2009) Adaptive echolocation behavior in bats for the analysis of auditory scenes. J Exp Biol 212:1392–1404. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.027045
Chiu C, Reddy PV, Xian W, Krishnaprasad PS, Moss CF (2010) Effects of competitive prey capture on flight behavior and sonar beam pattern in paired big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. J Exp Biol 213:3348–3356. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.044818
Corcoran AJ, Moss CF (2017) Sensing in a noisy world: lessons from auditory specialists, echolocating bats. J Exp Biol 220:4554–4566. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.163063
Cvikel N, Borissov I, Boonman A, Amichai E, Yovel Y, Levin E, Hurme E (2015) On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20142274. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2274
Dechmann DKN, Heucke SL, Giuggioli L, Safi K, Voigt CC, Wikelski M (2009) Experimental evidence for group hunting via eavesdropping in echolocating bats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:2721–2728. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0473
Dechmann DKN, Kranstauber B, Gibbs D, Wikelski M (2010) Group hunting - a reason for sociality in molossid bats? PLoS One 5:e9012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009012
Elemans CPH, Mead AF, Jakobsen L, Ratcliffe JM (2011) Superfast muscles set maximum call rate in echolocating bats. Science 333:1885–1888. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207309
Falk B, Kasnadi J, Moss CF (2015) Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats. J Exp Biol 218:3678–3688. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.122283
Fawcett K, Jacobs DS, Surlykke A, Ratcliffe JM (2015) Echolocation in the bat, Rhinolophus capensis: the influence of clutter, conspecifics and prey on call design and intensity. Biol Open 4:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.201511908
Fitzpatrick DC, Kanwal JS, Butman JA, Suga N (1993) Combination-sensitive neurons in the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurosci 13:931–940. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.13-03-00931.1993
Fujioka E, Mantani S, Hiryu S, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2011) Echolocation and flight strategy of Japanese house bats during natural foraging, revealed by a microphone array system. J Acoust Soc Am 129:1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3523300
Fujioka E, Aihara I, Watanabe S, Sumiya M, Hiryu S, Simmons JA, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2014) Rapid shifts of sonar attention by Pipistrellus abramus during natural hunting for multiple prey. J Acoust Soc Am 136:3389–3400. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4898428
Fujioka E, Aihara I, Sumiya M, Aihara K, Hiryu S (2016) Echolocating bats use future-target information for optimal foraging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4848–4852. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515091113
Gillam EH, Montero BK (2016) Influence of call structure on the jamming avoidance response of echolocating bats. J Mammal 97:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyv147
Gillam EH, Ulanovsky N, McCracken GF (2007) Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:651–660. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0047
Götze S, Koblitz JC, Denzinger A, Schnitzler HU (2016) No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats. Sci Rep 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30978
Habersetzer J (1981) Adaptive echolocation sounds in the bat Rhinopoma hardwickei. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 144:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326841
Hage SR, Jiang T, Berquist SW, Feng J, Metzner W (2013) Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:4063–4068. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211533110
Halfwerk W, Lea AM, Guerra MA, Page RA, Ryan MJ (2016) Vocal responses to noise reveal the presence of the Lombard effect in a frog. Behav Ecol 27:669–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv204
Hase K, Miyamoto T, Kobayasi KI, Hiryu S (2016) Rapid frequency control of sonar sounds by the FM bat, Miniopterus fuliginosus, in response to spectral overlap. Behav Process 128:126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.017
Hase K, Kadoya Y, Maitani Y, Miyamoto T, Kobayasi KI, Hiryu S (2018) Bats enhance their call identities to solve the cocktail party problem. Commun Biol 1:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0045-3
Hase K, Kadoya Y, Takeuchi Y, Kobayasi KI, Hiryu S (2022) Echo reception in group flight by Japanese horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon. R Soc Open Sci 9:211597. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211597
HechavarrĂa JC, MacĂas S, Vater M, Voss C, Mora EC, Kössl M (2013) Blurry topography for precise target-distance computations in the auditory cortex of echolocating bats. Nat Commun 4:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3587
Heil P, Neubauer H (2003) A unifying basis of auditory thresholds based on temporal summation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:6151–6156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1030017100
Henson OW (1965) The activity and function of the middle-ear muscles in echo-locating bats. J Physiol 180:871–887. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007737
Hiryu S, Hagino T, Fujioka E, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2008a) Adaptive echolocation sounds of insectivorous bats, Pipistrellus abramus, during foraging flights in the field. J Acoust Soc Am 124:EL51–EL56. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2947629
Hiryu S, Shiori Y, Hosokawa T, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2008b) On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 194:841–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0355-x
Hiryu S, Bates ME, Simmons JA, Riquimaroux H (2010) FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:7048–7053. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000429107
Jakobsen L, Brinkløv S, Surlykke A (2013) Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals. Front Physiol 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00089
Jarvis J, Bohn KM, Tressler J, Smotherman M (2010) A mechanism for antiphonal echolocation by free-tailed bats. Anim Behav 79:787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.004
Jarvis J, Jackson W, Smotherman M (2013) Groups of bats improve sonar efficiency through mutual suppression of pulse emissions. Front Physiol 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00140
Jones G, Sripathi K, Waters DA, Marimuthu G (1994) Individual variation in the echolocation calls of three sympatric Indian hipposiderid bats, and an experimental attempt to jam bat echolocation. Folia Zool 43:347–362
Kalko EV, Schnitzler H-U (1993) Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170257
Kloepper LN, Kinniry M (2018) Recording animal vocalizations from a UAV: bat echolocation during roost re-entry. Sci Rep 8:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26122-z
Kothari NB, Wohlgemuth MJ, Moss CF (2018) Dynamic representation of 3D auditory space in the midbrain of the free-flying echolocating bat. elife 7:1–29. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29053
Lawrence BD, Simmons JA (1982) Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats. J Acoust Soc Am 71:585–590. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387529
Lengagne T (2008) Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea. Biol Conserv 141:2023–2031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.017
Luo J, Moss CF (2017) Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:10978–10983. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711892114
Luo J, Kothari NB, Moss CF (2017) Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:6605–6610. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702671114
Maitani Y, Hase K, Kobayasi KI, Hiryu S (2018) Adaptive frequency shifts of echolocation sounds in Miniopterus fuliginosus according to the frequency-modulated pattern of jamming sounds. J Exp Biol 221:jeb.188565. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.188565
Masters WM, Raver KAS (1996) The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals. J Comp Physiol A 179:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216134
Masters WM, Jacobs SC, Simmons JA (1991) The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus: some consequences for echo processing. J Acoust Soc Am 89:1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400660
Masters WM, Raver KAS, Kazial KA (1995) Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation. Anim Behav 50:1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80041-7
Metzner W, Zhang S, Smotherman M (2002) Doppler-shift compensation behavior in horseshoe bats revisited: auditory feedback controls both a decrease and an increase in call frequency. J Exp Biol 205:1607–1616
Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging, echolocation and audition in bats. Naturwissenschaften 71:446–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455897
Neuweiler G (1990) Auditory adaptations for prey capture in echolocating bats. Physiol Rev 70:615–641. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1990.70.3.615
Norman AP, Jones G (2000) Size, peripheral auditory tuning and target strength in noctuid moths. Physiol Entomol 25:346–353. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00203.x
Parks SE, Johnson M, Nowacek D, Tyack PL (2011) Individual right whales call louder in increased environmental noise. Biol Lett 7:33–35. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0451
Penna M, Pottstock H, Velasquez N (2005) Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the temperate austral forest. Anim Behav 70:639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.022
Portfors CV, Wenstrup JJ (1999) Delay-tuned neurons in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat: implications for analyses of target distance. J Neurophysiol 82:1326–1338. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1326
Schnitzler HU, Denzinger A (2011) Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 197:541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0569-6
Schnitzler H-U, Grinnell AD (1977) Directional sensitivity of echolocation in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 116:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605516
Simmons JA (1971) Echolocation in bats: signal processing of echoes for target range. Science 171:925–928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3974.925
Simmons JA (2012) Bats use a neuronally implemented computational acoustic model to form sonar images. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.007
Simmons JA (2014) Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar. J Exp Biol 217:2834–2843. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.104380
Simmons JA, Moss CF, Ferragamo M (1990) Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol A 166:449–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192016
Slabbekoorn H (2013) Songs of the city: noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Anim Behav 85:1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.021
Stanley CQ, Walter MH, Venkatraman MX, Wilkinson GS (2016) Insect noise avoidance in the dawn chorus of Neotropical birds. Anim Behav 112:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.003
Sumiya M, Fujioka E, Motoi K, Kondo M, Hiryu S (2017) Coordinated control of acoustical field of view and flight in three-dimensional space for consecutive capture by echolocating bats during natural foraging. PLoS One 12:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169995
Surlykke A, Kalko EKV (2008) Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey. PLoS One 3:e2036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002036
Surlykke A, Moss CF (2000) Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2419–2429. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1315295
Surlykke A, Boel Pedersen S, Jakobsen L (2009) Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:853–860. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1505
Surlykke A, Jakobsen L, Kalko EKV, Page RA (2013) Echolocation intensity and directionality of perching and flying fringe-lipped bats, Trachops cirrhosus (Phyllostomidae). Front Physiol 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00143
Takahashi E, Hyomoto K, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y, Ohta T, Hiryu S (2014) Adaptive changes in echolocation sounds by Pipistrellus abramus in response to artificial jamming sounds. J Exp Biol 217:2885–2891. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.101139
Taniguchi I (1985) Echolocation sounds and hearing of the greater Japanese horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon). J Comp Physiol A 156:185–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610860
Tressler J, Smotherman MS (2009) Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 195:923–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-009-0468-x
Ulanovsky N, Moss CF (2008) What the bat’s voice tells the bat’s brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:8491–8498. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703550105
Ulanovsky N, Fenton MB, Tsoar A, Korine C (2004) Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271:1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2750
Warnecke M, Bates ME, Flores V, Simmons JA (2014) Spatial release from simultaneous echo masking in bat sonar. J Acoust Soc Am 135:3077–3085. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4869483
Wohlgemuth MJ, Luo J, Moss CF (2016) Three-dimensional auditory localization in the echolocating bat. Curr Opin Neurobiol 41:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.08.002
Yovel Y, Melcon ML, Franz MO, Denzinger A, Schnitzler HU (2009) The voice of bats: how greater mouse-eared bats recognize individuals based on their echolocation calls. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000400
Zhang Y, Lin A, Ding J, Yang X, Jiang T, Liu Y, Feng J (2019) Performance of Doppler shift compensation in bats varies with species rather than with environmental clutter. Anim Behav 158:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hase, K., Kobayasi, K.I., Hiryu, S. (2023). Effects of Acoustic Interference on the Echolocation Behavior of Bats. In: Seki, Y. (eds) Acoustic Communication in Animals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0831-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0831-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0830-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0831-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)