Skip to main content

Analytical Framework and Research Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards Healthy Settlements

Part of the book series: Urban Sustainability ((US))

  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

As presented in Chap. 1, this study aims to formulate recommendations for developing healthy neighborhoods in China’s suburban environments by investigating the health performance of suburban residents and the factors of the neighborhood environment influencing the health. Three research questions are proposed: (1) What is the health performance of the residents in SCHEs of Guangzhou? (2) What factors derived from SCHEs’ living environment affected the health performance of residents, and how? (3) How have the institutional factors in housing development caused the health implications of the neighborhood living environment?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Referring to the eight super large, packaged and gated communities developed from the late 1990s, lasting one decades. Including: Country Garden (Huanan Biguiyuan), Huanan New Town (Huanan xincheng), Agile Garden (Yajule Huayuan), Guangdi Garden (Guangdi Huayuan), Clifford Estate (Qifu xincun), Star River (Xinhewan), Global Villa (Jinxiu xiangjiang), Nanguo Olympic Garden (Nanguo aolinpike huayuan).

  2. 2.

    Sampling frame is the operational definition of the population.

  3. 3.

    http://fac.arch.hku.hk/upad/apnhr/wplogin.php?redirect_to=%3A%2F%2Ffac.arch.hku.hk%2Fupad%2Fapnhr%2Fwpadmin%2F&reauth.

  4. 4.

    Source: http://luopu.panyu.gov.cn/.

  5. 5.

    Source: http://www.nancun.gov.cn/ShowInfo.aspx?id=20120704102500265554943000625000.

  6. 6.

    The number of residents is calculated based on the interview with housing managers in GV, please refer to the Appendix 1.

  7. 7.

    = 22230*(1–21.46%). According to the Sixth Census of Panyu District, 21.46% is the percentage of the residents younger than 20 among the total residents in LNT.

  8. 8.

    = 29520*(1–18.76%). According to the Sixth Census of Panyu District, 18.76% is the percentage of the residents younger than 20 among the total residents in AG.

  9. 9.

    = 17421*[1–20.14%]. According to the Sixth Census of Panyu District, 20.14% is the percentage of the residents younger than 20 among the total residents in GV.

References

  1. Bhatti M (1994) Environmental futures and the housing question. In: Bhatti M, Brooke J, Gibson M (eds) Housing and the environment: a new agenda. Chartered Institute of Housing, Coventry, pp. 14–33

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M (2003) Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landsc Urban Plan 65(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00236-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M (2006) Perceived residential environment quality in middle- and low-extension Italian cities. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 56(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2005.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carp FM, Zawadski RT, Shokrkon H (1976) Dimensions of urban environmental quality. Environ Behav 8(2):239–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657682004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu RLH (2000) Environmental sustainability of Hong Kong’s housing system and the housing process model. Int Plan Stud 5(1):45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/135634700111819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eicher C, Kawachi I (2011) Social capital and community design. In: Dannenberg AL, Frumkin H, Jackson RJ (eds) Making healthy places: designing and building for health, well-being, and sustainability. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, pp. 117–128. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-036-1_8

  7. Felce D, Perry J (1995) Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil 16(1):51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank L, Engelke P, Schmid T (2003) Health and community design: the impact of the built environment on physical activity. Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graham JW (2009) Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol 60(1):549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He JJ, Jia B (2007) Sustainable residential landscapes: a case study in Guangzhou. China. Landscape Research 32(2):241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701231747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu W (2007) Residential area planning principle and design method. China Architecture & Building Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson RJ, Kochtitzky C (2003) Creating a healthy environment: the impact of the built environment on public health. Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse Monograph Series, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li L (2007) A home of one’s own: ways of life in privately governed commodity housing estates in urban China. ProQuest

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li P (2008) The reform and opening up of Panyu. Nanfang Daily Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Y, Hu P, Treiman DJ (2012) Migration and depressive symptoms in migrant-sending areas: findings from the survey of internal migration and health in China. Int J Public Health 57(4):691–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0314-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mair C, Roux AVD, Galea S (2008) Are neighbourhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? a review of evidence. J Epidemiol Community Health 62(11):940–946. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.066605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marans RW (2003) Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 65(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00239-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moser G (2009) Quality of life and sustainability: toward person–environment congruity. J Environ Psychol 29(3):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Northridge ME, Sclar ED, Biswas P (2003) Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health 80(4):556–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jtg064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pacione M (2003) Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—a social geographical perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 65(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paulhus DL, Vazire S (2007) The self-report method. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology 1(2007):224–239

    Google Scholar 

  22. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts RE, Vernon SW (1983) The center for epidemiological studies depression scale: its use in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 140:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.1.41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen Y-C, Zhang M-Y, Huang Y-Q, He Y-L, Liu Z-R, Cheng H, Tsang A, Lee S, Kessler RC (2006) Twelve-month prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in metropolitan China. Psychol Med 36(2):257–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291705006367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin S-C, Kim M-K, Yun K-S, Kim J-H, Lee M-S, Moon S-J, Lee M-J, Lee H-Y, Yoo K-J (1991) The center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale: its use in Korea. J Korean Neuropsych Assoc, 752–767

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singleton R Jr, Straits BC, Straits MM (1993) Approaches to social research. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stokols D (1992) Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol 47:6–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stokols D (1996) Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot 10(4):282–298. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stokols D, Altman I (1987) Environmental psychology. Percept Cognitive Image City 12:23–90

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor SE, Repetti RL, Seeman T (1997) Health Psychology: what is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annu Rev Psychol 48(1):411–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Turcu C (2013) Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. J Environ Planning Manage 56(5):695–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.698984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman G, de Hollander A (2003) Urban environmental quality and human well-being: towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landsc Urban Plan 65(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Verheij RA (1996) Explaining urban-rural variations in health: a review of interactions between individual and environment. Soc Sci Med 42(6):923–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00190-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Walmsley DJ, Lewis GJ (2014) People and environment: behavioural approaches in human geography. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu F, Shen J (2015) Suburban development and governance in China. In: Suburban governance: a global view. University of Toronto Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianyao Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, T. (2024). Analytical Framework and Research Method. In: Towards Healthy Settlements. Urban Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1207-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics