Skip to main content

Participation of Malaysia Under the Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Protocol

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Colloquium on Administrative Science and Technology

Abstract

The ozone hole in Antarctica has created a major buzz in the environmental protection realm. This devastating event has escalated the environmental concerns and has also spawned a series of environmental protocols. This paper highlights the two environmental protocols namely, the Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Protocol. Furthermore, the paper also focuses on the involvement of Malaysia under both protocols. This paper is designed to not only review the essences in both protocols but also analyses the measures taken by Malaysia under these protocols. The literature review has revealed numerous efforts that have been administered by Malaysia to comply with the obligations under both protocols. These measures are taken into action to not only fulfil the commitments under the protocols but also to create a better nation gearing towards sustainable development and a cleaner environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Portmann, R. W., Daniel, J. S., & Ravishanka, A. R.. (2012). Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide: Influences of other gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1593), 1256–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. UNDP. (2007). Protecting the ozone layer. Malaysia implementing the Montreal protocol, 37. www.undp.org.my. Accessed 30 May 2012.

  3. UN. (2003). International regimes on ozone layer. http://www.unescap.org/drpad/vc/orientation/legal/3_vienna.htm. Accessed 4 July 2012.

  4. CIESIN. (2012). The Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. http://www.ciesin.org/TG/PI/POLICY/montpro.html. Accessed 3 May 2012.

  5. Elzen, M. G. Jd, Swart, R. J., & Rotmans, J. (1992) Strengthening the Montreal Protocol: Does it cool down the greenhouse? The Science of the Total Environment, 113, 229–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bank, T. W. (2011). Environment Montreal Protocol. http://go.worldbank.org/KXM814CLA0. Accessed 3 May 2012.

  7. Meyer, R. J. (2004). History of Montreal Protocol, FDA regulations of CFCs and background to meetings. http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=montreal%20protocol%20history&source=web&cd=2&sqi=2&ved=0CFwQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fda.gov%2Fohrms%2Fdockets%2Fac%2F05%2Fslides%2F2005-4148S2_01_FDA-Meyer.ppt&ei=NwG2T_L3GMO4rAfJx9TJBw&usg=AFQjCNHnZIWoU3l__U8g6iZG8AIVISfZ8A. Accessed 3 May 2012.

  8. Biermann, F., & Simonis, U. E. (1999). The multilateral ozone fund: A case study on institutional learning. International Journal of Social Economics, 26, 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Fleming, E. L., Frith, S. M., Hurwitz, M. M., Kawa, S. R., Jackman, C. H., Krotkov, N. A., Nash, E. R., Nielsen, J. E., Pawson, S., Stolarski, R. S., & Velders, G. J. M. (2009). What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reagan, R. (1987). President reagant on Montreal Protocol ratification (O. o. t. P. Secretary, Ed.). Washington, D.C.: The White House.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel, J. S., Solomon, S., Sanford, T. J., McFarland, M., Fuglestvedt, J. S., & Friedlingstein, P. (2012). Limitations of single basket trading: Lessons from the Montreal Protocol for climate policy. Climate Change, 111, 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Z. X. (2009). Multilateral trade measures in a post-2012 climate change regime? What can be taken from the Montreal Protocol and the WTO?. Energy Policy, 37, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norman, C. S., DeCanio, S. J., & Fan, L. (2008). The Montreal Protocol at 20: Ongoing opportunities for integration with climate protection. Global Environmental Change, 18, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DOE. (1999). Malaysia’s success story in implementation of the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Environment Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Razman, M. R., Hadi, A. S., Jahi, J. M., Idrus, S., Mohamed, A. F., & Shah, A. H. H. (2011). Transformation for better living environment in urban region: Application of the principle of transboundary liability and the Montreal Protocol experiences. Akademika, 81, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Razman, M. R., Hadi, A. S., Jahi, J. M., & Shah, A. H. H. (2010). Pengalaman Malaysia terhadap pendekatan kuasa dalam proses rundingan Protokol Montreal ke arah pemnbangunan mampan. Malaysia Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  17. UNEP. (2011). Status of ratification. http://ozone.unep.org/new_site/en/treaty_ratification_status.php. Accessed 30 May 2012.

  18. Razman, M. R., & Jahi, J. M. (2010). Kelestarian dalam perjanjian alam sekitar pelbagai hala: Sudut pandangan Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohamed, N. (2012). Institutional strengthening for the ozone unit, department of environment. http://www.undp.org.my/page.php?pid=105&action=preview&menu=main. Accessed 30 May 2012.

  20. Boyer, B. (2003). Implementing the Montreal Protocol. http://www.unescap.org/drpad/vc/conference/ex_my_235_imp.htm. Accessed 3 May 2012.

  21. Luken, R., & Grof, T. (2006). The Montreal Protocol’s multilateral fund and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 56, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Velders, G. J. M., Andersen, S. O., Daniel, J. S., Fahey, D. W., & McFarland, M. (11 Jan 2007). The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson, T., Hohnen, P., Dalziell, J., & Cook, G. (1998, 23 April 2012). Greenpeace: Guide to Kyoto Protocol 46.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schlamadinger, B., & Marland, G. (1998). The Kyoto Protocol: Provisions and unresolved issues relevant to land-use change and forestry. Environmental Science & Policy, 1, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, H., Berrensa, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., & Weimer, D. L. (2004). Would developing country commitments affect US households’ support for a modified Kyoto Protocol?. Ecological Economics, 48, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zilahy, G., & Huisingh, D. (2009). The roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1057–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaku, K. (2011). An inconvenient truth-global warming on greenhouse gas (ghg) reduction under Kyoto Protocol regime to post Kyoto Protocol in Asia. Procedia Engineering, 8, 515–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. UNFCCC. (2011). Fact sheet: The Kyoto Protocol, 1–8. http://unfccc.int/files/press/backgrounders/application/pdf/fact_sheet_the_kyoto_protocol.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2012.

  29. UNFCCC. (2012). Kyoto Protocol. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php. Accessed 23 April 2012.

  30. Graham, B., Hinchy, M., Fisher, B. S., & Tulpule, V. (1998). Climate Ccange negotiations: The Kyoto Protocol, presented at the Australasian Mining and Energy Taskforce Conference, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  31. French, H. W. (2002). Japan Ratifies Global Warming Pact, and Urges U.S. Backing (New York Times, Ed.). New York: The New York Times Company.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (2005). Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto Protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting, 40, 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Feroz, E. H., Raab, R. L., Ulleberg, G. T., & Alsharif, K. (2009). Global warming and environmental production efficiency ranking of the Kyoto Protocol nations. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1178–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fletcher, S. R. (2005). Global climate change: The Kyoto Protocol. Congressional Research Service, 1–16. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climate-talks.net%2F2005-ENVRE130%2F&ei=2EokU46yFof_rAee5IDYDw&usg=AFQjCNH0K3hGbYQgpXFT0y9dSwk0pAjTTA&sig2=ZpJHKEjDUDVd_p4toNNAVQ&bvm=bv.62922401,d.bmk. Accessed 4 July 2012.

  35. Dagoumas, A. S., Papagiannis, G. K., & Dokopoulos, P. S. (2006). An economic assesment of the Kyoto Protocol application. Energy Policy, 34, 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bloch, M. (2012). What is Kyoto Protocol? http://www.carbonify.com/articles/kyoto-protocol.htm. Accessed 21 May 2012.

  37. Korhonen, R., & Savolainen, I. (1999). Contribution of industrial and developing countries to the atmospheric CO2 concentrations—impact of the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Science & Policy, 2, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McKitrick, R., & Wigle, R. M. (2002). The Kyoto Protocol: Canada’s risky rush to judgment (169), 41. www.cdhowe.org. Accessed 23 April 2012.

  39. Babiker, M., Reilly, J. M., & Jacoby, H. D. (2000). The Kyoto Protocol and developing countries. Energy Policy, 28, 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lo, S.-F. (2010). The differing capabilities to respond to the challenge of climate change across annex parties under the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Science & Policy, 13, 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nentjes, A., & Klaassen, G. (2004). On the quality of compliance mechanisms in the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy, 32, 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta, J., Olsthoorn, X., & Rotenberg, E. (2003). The role of scientific uncertainty in compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to the climate change convention. Environmental Science & Policy, 6, 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Oh, T. H., & Chua, S. C. (2010). Energy efficiency and carbon trading potential in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2095–2103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Grubb, M. (2000). Economic dimensions of technological and global responses to the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Economic Studies, 27, 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shrestha, R. M., & Timilsina, G. R. (1999). The additional criterion for identifying clean development mechanism projects under the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy, 30, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Springer, U. (2003). The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A survey of model studies. Energy Economics, 25, 527–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Selamat, S., & Abidin, C. Z. A. (2012). Renewable Energy and Kyoto Protocol: Adoption in Malaysia. 3. http://publicweb.unimap.edu.my/~ppkas/home/index.php/news/articles/29-renewable-energy-and-kyoto-protocol-adoption-in-malaysia. Accessed 21 May 2012.

  48. Lim, S., & Lee, K. T. (2012). Implementation of biofuels in Malaysian transportation sector towards sustainable development: A case study of international cooperation between Malaysia and Japan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1790–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Saidur, R., Masjuki, H. H., Jamaaluddin, M. Y., & Ahmed, S. (2007). Energy associated greenhouse gas emissions from houshold appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 35, 1648–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lau, L. C., Tan, K. T., Lee, K. T., & Mohamed, A. R. (2009). A comparative study on the energy policies in Japan and Malaysia in fulfilling their nations’ obligations towards the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy, 37, 4771–4778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mohamed, A. R., & Lee, K. T. (2006). Energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: Energy policy and alternative energy. Energy Policy, 34, 2388–2397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude for the financial support from MOHE (Minister of Higher Education) under the Long Term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS), LRGS/MARP/Grant (1) 600-RMI/LRGS 5/3 (4/2011) and UiTM under the Research Intensive Faculty (RIF), 600-RMI/DANA 5/3/RIF (205/2012) given to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maisarah Makmor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Makmor, M., Ismail, Z., Hashim, R. (2015). Participation of Malaysia Under the Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Protocol. In: Hashim, R., Abdul Majeed, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Colloquium on Administrative Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-45-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics