Abstract
Mobile outdoor games for groups of children have emerged recently as a credible technological proposition and as an area of research and development that promises substantial benefits for children regarding a more active lifestyle and the development of social skills. This chapter examines specifically the design of Head Up Games, which are outdoor games that support embodied interaction and where players are collocated, e.g., in a playground, alley, park; the traditional loci of children’s play over centuries. Designing such games and the emerging gaming experience presents its own set of challenges, such as designing the interaction of a group, ensuring pace in the game, and fairness for different contexts and groups of players. Not least, the added value of enhancing outdoor play and games with technology needs to be ensured. We describe some of the lessons learned from the design of a few of these games, how different design methods may contribute to the design process, and methodological issues concerning the early design, the prototyping, and the evaluation of these games.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The notion of prototype fidelity was introduced by Virzi (1989) as a measure of how authentic or realistic a prototype appears to the user when it is compared to the actual service. Paper mock-ups of an interactive system are a typical low-fidelity prototype that allows a user to experience a simulated interaction and to help identify areas of improvement. The notion of fidelity was enriched in later years (McCurdy et al. 2006) to distinguish between different dimensions along which prototypes may seek achieve higher or lower realism of the intended design intent, namely visual refinement, breadth of functionality, depth (detail) of functionality, richness of interactivity, and richness of data model.
References
Bekker M, Beusmans J, Keyson D, Lloyd P (2003) KidReporter: a user requirements gathering technique for designing with children. Interact Comput 15:187–202. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00007-9
Benford S, Rowland D, Flintham M et al. (2005) Life on the edge: supporting collaboration in location-based experiences. In: Proceedings Chi 05. ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp 721–730
Brynskov M, Ludvigsen M (2006) Mock games: a new genre of pervasive play. In: Proceedings 6th conferences Designing Interaction systems ACM, University Park, PA, pp 169–178
Costikyan G (2002) I have no words and I must design: Toward a critical vocabulary for games. In: Proceedings of the computer games digital cult conferences, pp 9–33
DeKoven B (2002) The well-played game: a playful path to wholeness. Writers Club Press, San Jose
Dindler C, Eriksson E, Iversen OS et al (2005) Mission from mars: a method for exploring user requirements for children in a narrative space. In: Proceedings of 2005 Conference Designing Interaction for Children, pp 40–47
Druin A (1999) Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Chi Is Limit. ACM, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, pp 592–599
Fullerton T, Swain C, Hoffman S (2004) Game design workshop. Focal Press, San Francisco
Gielen MA (2008) Exploring the child’s mind—contextmapping research with children. Digit Creat 19:174–184. doi:10.1080/14626260802312640
Hennessy E, Heary C (2005) Exploring children’s views through focus groups. In: Greene S, Hogan D, (eds) Researching children’s experience Approaches Methods. Sage Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, pp 236–252
Hughes L (1983) Beyond the rules of the game: why are Rooie Rules nice? In: Manning, F. (ed) The world of play Leisure press, New York
Kern D, Stringer M, Fitzpatrick G, Schmidt A (2006) Curball - a prototype tangible game for inter-generational play. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos
Lundgren S (2008) Cover story - designing games: why and how. Interactions 15:6–12. doi: 10.1145/1409040.1409042
Markopoulos P, Read JC, Macfarlane S, Höysniemi J (2008) Evaluating Children’s Interactive Products: Principles and Practices for Interaction Designers. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
McCurdy M, Connors C, Pyrzak G, et al. (2006) Breaking the fidelity barrier: an examination of our current characterization of prototypes and an example of a mixed-fidelity success. In: Proceeding of Sigchi In: Proceeding of Sigchi conference on human factors of computer system ACM, New York, pp 1233–1242
Medlock MC, Wixon D, Terrano M, et al. (2002) Using the RITE method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Usability Professionals’ Association
Rogers Y (2011) Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. Interactions 18:58–62. doi: 10.1145/1978822.1978834
Rogers Y, Price S, Fitzpatrick G, et al. (2004) Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In: Proceeding of IDC 04. ACM, Maryland, pp 3–10
Rossiter JR, Lilien GL (1994) New “brainstorming” principles. Aust J Manag 19:61–72
Salen K, Zimmerman E (2003) Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, Illustrated edition. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Scaife M, Rogers Y, Aldrich F, Davies M (1997) Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. In: Proceeding of Sigchi conference on human factors of computer system ACM, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, pp 343–350
Sellen KM, Massimi MA, Lottridge DM, et al. (2009) The people-prototype problem: understanding the interaction between prototype format and user group. In: Proceeding of Sigchi conference on human factors of computer system ACM, New York, pp 635–638
Soute I, Lagerstrom S, Markopoulos P (2013) Rapid prototyping of outdoor games for children in an iterative design process. In: Proceeding of 12th international conference IDC, ACM, New York, pp 74–83
Soute I, Kaptein M, Markopoulos P (2009a) Evaluating outdoor play for children: virtual vs. tangible game objects in pervasive games. In: Proceedings of the 8th International conference on interaction design and children. ACM, Como, Italy, pp 250–253
Soute I, Markopoulos P, Magielse R (2009b) Head up games: combining the best of both worlds by merging traditional and digital play. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 14:435–444. doi:10.1007/s00779-009-0265-0
Stroebe W, Nijstad BA, Rietzschel EF (2010) Chapter four—beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: the evolution of a question. In: Zanna MP, Olson JM (ed) Advance exports society psychology Academic Press, pp 157–203
Valk L de, Rijnbout P, Bekker T et al (2012) Designing for playful experiences in open-ended intelligent play environments. In: Proceedings Iadis international conference on game and entertainment technologies lisbon. Portugal, pp 3–10
Verhaegh J, Soute I, Kessels A, Markopoulos P (2006) On the design of camelot, an outdoor game for children. In: Proceedings 2006 conference on interactive designing child ACM, Tampere, Finland, pp 9–16
Virzi RA (1989) What can you learn from a low-fidelity prototype? In: Proceedings human factors ergonomics society annual meeting, pp 224–228
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soute, I., Markopoulos, P. (2014). Designing Interactive Outdoor Games for Children. In: Nijholt, A. (eds) Playful User Interfaces. Gaming Media and Social Effects. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-96-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-96-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-95-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-96-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)