Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introducing Critical Participatory Action Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Action Research Planner

Abstract

This chapter begins by describing the thirty-five year history of how this book came to be. It outlines the overall structure of the book and what each chapter is intended to achieve. The authors define critical participatory action research as a collaborative commitment to engaging in iterative cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting to address untoward consequences of social practices, often rooted in global concerns (that is, concerns connected to social movements such as protecting the environment, or advocating for women’s rights). The chapter illustrates what it means to engage in critical participatory action research by presenting Recycling at Braxton High School, one of five examples that recur throughout the book. Critical participatory action research is presented as a crucial contribution to the field of action research that includes a number of different types of action research done for unique purposes by individuals in varied contexts. Further, critical participatory action research requires extension of the roles of researcher-practitioner and theorist-practitioner, and expansion of the conceptual basis of practices and theories of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Yolngu people are members of a variety of Indigenous tribes who are all speakers of the Yolngu-matha family of languages in North East Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory of Australia.

  2. 2.

    The real father of action research turned out to be Jacob L. Moreno (1892–1974) who developed the idea in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s. (See Altrichter and Gstettner 1991; Gunz 1996.)

References

  • Altrichter, H., & Gstettner, P. (1991). Action research: A closed chapter. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organisational defences: Facilitating organisational learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organisational Learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravette, G. (1996). Reflections on a black woman’s management learning. Women In Management Review, 11(3), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller, M., Maguire, P., & McIntyre, A. (Eds.). (2004). Traveling companions: feminism, teaching, and action research. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (2006). Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 421–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascante Fernández, C. (2007). Situación y perspectivas de la investigación-acción en España (The situation and perspectives of action research in Spain). IV Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación-Acción Participativa (The Fourth International Congress of Participatory Action Research). Valladolid, Spain, October 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1993). Challenging the professions: Frontiers for rural development. London: ITDG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. A. (1972). Action research and organisational change. London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadds, M. (1995). Passionate enquiry and school development: A story about teacher action research. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L., & Ledington, P. (1991). Information in action: Soft systems methodology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., Smith, L. T., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916/1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden, M. (1983). Participatory research at work. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 4(1), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1976/1977). Developing hypotheses about classrooms from teachers’ practical constructs: An account of the work of the Ford Teaching Project. Interchange, 7(2), 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2006). Reflecting where the action is: The selected works of John Elliott. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Thorsrud, E. (1976). Democracy at work: The report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Leiden: M. Nijhoff Social Sciences Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., Thorsrud, E., & Trist, E. (1969). Form and content in industrial democracy: Some experiences from Norway and other European countries. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J., Pitt, J., & Welsh, J. (Eds.). (1993). Profiles of participatory action researchers. Ithaca: Cornell University, Department of Urban and Regional Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. (1972). An introduction to the theory and practice of action research in work organisations. Human Relations, 25(6), 529–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly? (pp. 29–37). New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, V. J., & Rogers, T. (2008). Action science: Linking causal theory and meaning making in action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp 252–265). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough, K. (2008). Dealing with messiness and uncertainty in practitioner research: The nature of participatory action research. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 431-457. www.cssescee.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText/CJE31-2/CJE31-2-goodnough.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough, K. (2010). The role of action research in transforming teacher identity: Modes of belonging and ecological perspectives. Educational Action Research, 18(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunz, J. (1996). Jacob L. Moreno and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 4(1), 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., Hansson, A., & Qvale, T. U. (2008). Action research and the challenge of scope. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 63–76). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (trans. J.J. Shapiro). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice (trans. J. Viertel). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of communicative action, volume II: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (trans. Thomas McCarthy). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms (trans. William Rehg). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., Gillette, A., & Tandon, R. (Eds.). (1982). Creating knowledge: A monopoly? New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. (1991). If action research were tennis. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), Action learning for improved performance (pp. 102-115). Brisbane: Aebis Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. (2005). Owning the discourse: Seizing the power! Paper prepared for the Betty Watts Award presented as part of the Australian Association for Research in Education 2005 Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G., & Hastings, G. (2006). Developing different forms of student feedback to promote teacher reflection: A 10-year collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1006–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S. (1997a). Killing the angel in academe: feminist praxis in action research. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S. (Ed.). (1997b). International action research: A casebook for educational reform. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, M., Kohl, J., & Kohl, H. (1990). The long haul. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. (2008). Systems thinking and practice for action research.In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 139–158). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). Systems methodology for the management sciences. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (1989). Improving schools and teaching through educational action research. Singapore Journal of Education (Special Issue), 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (1991). Action research and post-modernisms. Curriculum Perspectives, 11(4), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational Action Research, 18(4), 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2012). Researching educational praxis: spectator and participant perspectives. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 885–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988a). The action research planner (3rd edn., substantially revised). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988b). The action research reader (3rd edn.). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed., pp. 559–604). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. (1985). Participatory action research in Norway. Trondheim: ORAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (pp. 155–169). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. A. (2008). The teen guide to global action: How to connect with others (near and far) to create social change. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: The Centre for International Education, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 59–69). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marika, R., Ngurruwutthun, D., & White, L. (1992). Always together, Yaka Gäna: participatory research at Yirrkala as part of the development of Yolngu education. Convergence, 25(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, R. (1991a). Action research: A short modern history. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, R. (1991b). Western institutional impediments to Aboriginal education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 297–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, R. (1991c). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, R. (Ed.). (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, R. (2002). The role of the scholar in action research. In M. P. Wolfe & C. R. Pryor (Eds.), The mission of the scholar: Research and practice (pp. 1–16). London: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S. E. (1990). Action research: A multidimensional analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S. E. (1997). Themes and tensions in US action research: Towards historical analysis. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International action research: A casebook for educational reform (pp. 2–16). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S. E., & Somekh, B. (Eds.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, R., & Darcy, M. (1975). The militant observer: A sociological alternative. Geneva: IDAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (Eds.). (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasmore, W., & Friedlander, F. (1982). An action-research program for increasing employee involvement in problem-solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 342–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, M. (Ed.). (1991). Action learning in practice. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, M., & Burgoyne, J. (2008). Action learning. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp 319–332). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. A. (2008). Some trends in the praxis of participatory action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp 49–62). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (Ed.). (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1980). Action learning: New techniques for management. London: Blond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandkull, B. (1980). Practice of industry: Mis-management of people. Human Systems Management, 1, 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (Ed.). (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1991). The malaise of modernity. Concord: House of Anansi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R. (1991). The power of balance: Transforming self, society, and scientific inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmington, A. (1980). Action research: Its methods and its implications. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 7, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, G. (1989). Professional self-knowledge versus social justice: A critical analysis of the teacher-researcher movement. British Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (2009). Dialogic inquiry as collaborative action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp 50–62). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, ‘How do I improve my practice?’ Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1989). Introduction to action research for the twenty-first century: Participation, reflection and practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(5), 502–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.). (1996). New directions in action research. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia

    Stephen Kemmis

  2. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

    Robin McTaggart

  3. Victoria University, British Columbia, Canada

    Rhonda Nixon

Authors
  1. Stephen Kemmis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robin McTaggart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rhonda Nixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kemmis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R. (2014). Introducing Critical Participatory Action Research. In: The Action Research Planner. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation