Skip to main content

Creativity and Early Talent Development in the Arts in Young and Schoolchildren

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Creativity, Talent and Excellence

Abstract

This chapter argues and provides research evidence that creativity can be nurtured in young schoolchildren through early arts education in preschools and primary schools. The data presented in this chapter lend supports to the hypotheses that early arts education inside the classrooms and outside the schools is associated with creativity in typical schoolchildren. Implications and limitations for implementation will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, J., Mendelovits, J., Beavis, A., McQueen, J., & Adams, I. (2004). Evaluations of school-based arts programmes in Australian schools. Australia: Department of Education, Science & Training, Australian Government, Australia Council for the Arts, Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P., & Swann, M. (2010). Pupil perceptions of learning with artists: A new order of experience. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 5(2), 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. M., Horowitz, R., & Abeles, H. (2000). Learning in and through the arts: The question of transfer. Studies in Art Education, 4(3), 228–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2000a). The TALENT approach: An integrated model for promoting quality education in Hong Kong. Education journal, 28(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2000b). Identifying gifted and talented students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 22(2), 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2005). Family environment and talent development of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2007a). Leadership competencies among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: The connection with emotional intelligence and successful intelligence. Roeper Review, 29(3), 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2007b). Musical aptitude and association responses in music listening among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 29(5), 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2008). Assessing visual arts talents of Hong Kong Chinese gifted students: The development of the impossible figures task. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(3), 364–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung-Yung, J. W. Y., Cham-Lai, E. S. C., & Mak, C. (2008). The impact of music education policy on creative music making in the school music curriculum. In C. C. Leung, L. C. R. Yip, & T. Imada (Eds.), Music education policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 97–110). Hirosaki, Japan: Hirosaki University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, A. S., Papandrea, F., & Bennett, J. (2007). Assessing cultural values: Developing an attitudinal scale. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2010). Possibility thinking and wise creativity: Educational futures in England? In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 289–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2011). Approaches to creativity in education in the United Kingdom. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 129–139). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Arts education, key learning area curriculum guide (primary 1 to secondary 3). Hong Kong: The Education Department, HKSAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2003). Visual arts curriculum guide. Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2006). Guide to the pre-primary curriculum. Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau. (2011). Gifted education: Rationale and principles of gifted education Policy in Hong Kong. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=2377&langno=1

  • Education Commission. (1990). Education commission report No. 4. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F., Kolloff, M. B., Cole, S., & Moon, S. M. (1988). A three-stage model for gifted education: 1988 update. Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2012). Art & creative development for young children (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Gengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2000). Teaching for talent: Lessons from the research. In C. F. M. van Lieshout & P. G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talent across the life span (pp. 231–248). Philadelphia: Psychology Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A development model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18(2), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haanstra, F. (2000). Dutch studies of the effects of arts education programs on school success. Studies in Art Education, 42(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, J., Kinder, K., Lord, P., Stott, A., Schagen, I., Haynes, J., Cusworth, L., White, R., & Paola, R. (2000). Arts education in secondary schools: Effects and effectiveness. Berkshire, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., Cheung, P. K., Wong, T. K., & He, M. (2011). How effective is a drama-enhanced curriculum doing to increase the creativity of preschool children and their teachers? Journal of Drama and Theatre Education in Asia, 2(1), 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., He, M., & Lee, K. (2010). Creative partnership between children’s art groups and primary schools in Hong Kong: Promoting creativity and communication skills in schoolchildren (A technical report submitted to City University Start-Up Grant). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., He, M., Tjia, L., Lee, K., & Choi, S. (2011). A pilot study on promoting arts education in preschools (A technical report submitted to Arts Development Council). Hong Kong: Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., & Lau, S. (2006). Drama education: A touch of the creative mind and communicative-expressive ability of elementary school children in Hong Kong. International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., & Lau, S. (2010). Formulation of policy and strategy in developing creativity education in four Asian Chinese societies: A policy analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(4), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., Lee, K., & Choi, S. (2010). Quality Thematic Network (QTN) on drama in education: The second report (2009-2010) (A technical report submitted to Quality Education Fund). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., Lee, K., & Choi, S. (2011). Quality Thematic Network (QTN) on drama in education: The third report (2010-2011) (A technical report submitted to Quality Education Fund). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalongo, M. R. (1990). The child’s right to the expressive arts: Nurturing the imagination as well as the intellect. Childhood Education, 66(4), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., & Ivcevic, Z. (2010). Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 380–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S. (2010). Creativity and assessment in Chinese arts education: Perspectives of Hong Kong. Research Studies in Music Education, 32(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. (1990). Self-description questionnaire I – Manual. NSW, Australia: University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Co. (2001). War for talent: Organization and leadership practice. New York: McKinsey & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moga, E., Burger, K., Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2000). Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2010). The cost and benefits of creative partnerships. Newcastle, UK: Creativity, Culture & Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. C. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Rickoff, R. (2010). Should eminence based on outstanding innovation be the goal of gifted education and talent development? Implications for policy and research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • To, L. D., Chan, Y. P., Lam, Y. K., & Tsang, S. Y. (2011). Reflections on a primary school teacher professional development programme on learning English through process drama. Research in Drama Education, 16(4), 517–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual research edition – Verbal tests, form A and B, -figural tests, form A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking—drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test for creative thinking—Drawing production (TCT-DP). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., & Wood, S. (2010). The Integrated Curriculum Model (ICM). Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (2001). The relationship between arts and academic achievement: No evidence (yet) for a causal relationship. In E. Winner & L. Hetland (Eds.), Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes (pp. 17–31). Los Angeles: The Getty Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (2007). Visual thinking in arts education: Homage to Rudolf Arnheim. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work described in this chapter was supported by three grants from the Arts Development Council and the Quality Education Fund of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the City University Start-Up Grant. Correspondence regarding this manuscript should be addressed to Anna Hui, Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, HKSAR, China (e-mail: annahui@cityu.edu.hk).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna N. N. Hui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hui, A.N.N., He, M.Wj., Liu, E.S.C. (2013). Creativity and Early Talent Development in the Arts in Young and Schoolchildren. In: Tan, AG. (eds) Creativity, Talent and Excellence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-93-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics