Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Iranian Politics ((STIRPO))

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Between 1997 and 2013, the trajectory of the Islamic Republic of Iran was rerouted into two quite opposite directions. This change came about through two presidential elections and the circulation of power afterwards, albeit within the same system and under the same leadership. Changes in trajectory, though had implications for the political participation of advocacy NGOs. However, the literature of political science still lacks an analytical tool of study explaining the systematic variation between sets of opportunities and constraints that can exist within one political regime. This study is an effort to do deal with this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Abootalebi, A. R. (1998). Civil society, democracy, and the Middle East. The Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal, 2(3), 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. (1998). Women’s movements and gender politics in the Brazilian transition. In J. Jaquette (Ed.), The women’s movement in Latin America: Feminism and the transition to democracy. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, S. (2012). Introduction: Researching the effects of neoliberal reforms on local governance in the Southern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 17(3), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavatorta, F. (2010). The convergence of governance: Upgrading authoritarianism in the Arab world and downgrading democracy elsewhere? Middle East Critique, 19(3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavatorta, F., & Durac, V. (2015). Politics and governance in the Middle East. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. H. (2010). Autoritarismes démocratique et démocraties autoritaires au XXIe siècle: Convergences Nord-Sud. Mélanges offerts à Michel Camau, and: Démocraties et authoritarismes: Fragmentation et hybridation des régimes (review). The Middle East Journal, 64(2), 316–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dassen, A. (2010). Networks: Structure and action steering in and steering by policy networks. Enschede: CHEPS/UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, P., & Daugbjerg, C. (2012). Explaining governance outcomes: Epistemology, network governance and policy network. Political Studies Review, 10, 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, D. (2009). Abécédaire de la Societé de Surveillance. Paris: Syllepse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. (1993). Non-governmental organizations as agents of democratization: An African perspective. Journal of International Development, 5(3), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthrone, A. (2004). Is civil society the answer? Middle East Series. Washington: Carnegie Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydemann, S. (2007, October). Upgrading authoritarianism in the Arab world. The Saban Centre for Middle East Policy, 13. The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. J., & Jackson, D. (1993). Contemporary Government and politics: Democracy and authoritarianism. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall Canada Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jad, I. (2007). NGOs: Between buzzwords and social movements. Development in Practice, 17(4), 622–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korten, C. (1990). Getting to the 21st century: Voluntary action and the global agenda. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubba, L. (2000). Arabs and democracy: The awakening of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 11(3), 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governance. Social and Legal Studies, 9(3), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinetto, M. (2003). Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the Anglo-governance school. Political Studies, 51(3), 592–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R. (2004). State power and politics in the making of the modern politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(08), 1243–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivetti, P., & Moheimany, M. (2015). Upgrading civil society in Iran: Dynamics of adaptation. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mei.edu/content/map/upgrading-civil-society-iran-dynamics-adaptation.

  • Skelcher, C. (2000). Changing images of the state: Overloaded, hollowed-out congested. Public Policy and Administration, 15(3), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Moheimany .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moheimany, M. (2021). One Regime, Two Trajectories. In: NGOs, Policy Networks and Political Opportunities in Hybrid Regimes. Studies in Iranian Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6224-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics