Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Monetary Policy in India: A Sustainable Development Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Development Insights from India

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter attempts to evaluate the performance of monetary policy in terms of its effectiveness in influencing the rate of economic growth and controlling inflation. The importance of these two policy objectives comes to the fore, especially when viewed through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations. Growth is critical for combating poverty and undertaking redistributive measures to mitigate inequality within nations (SDGs 1 and 10), whereas managing inflation, especially food inflation, lies at the core of strategies designed to end hunger and achieve food and nutrition security (SDG 2). The performance evaluation undertaken in the paper is based on a review of relevant literature in the Indian context, focusing especially on the post-liberalization period. Given the centrality of monetary policy measures in the Indian government’s response to the economic pandemic wrought by COVID-19, perhaps such an appraisal is needed now, more than ever before. To begin with, a brief overview of the conduct of monetary policy in India provides the necessary background for the remaining analysis. The effectiveness of monetary transmission in affecting aggregate demand and output in the Indian context, especially in recent times, is examined thereafter. The phenomenon of inflation, especially food price inflation and the efficacy of monetary measures in controlling it, is discussed next. Findings from the literature are then used to assess recent liquidity measures of the Indian government for economic revival in pandemic times and conclude.

The authors would like to thank the editors for this opportunity to contribute to this volume in honour of Prof. Ramprasad Sengupta, one of the finest economists in our country. In particular, the first author, who has been a student of Professor Sengupta at JNU, is extremely grateful to him for the many lessons he imparted in class and through his exemplary sincerity as a teacher and practitioner of the discipline. The authors would especially like to thank Soumyen Sikdar for extremely helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft. Lastly, the usual disclaimer applies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recommendations of landmark committees such as the Chakravarty Committee in 1985, Narasimham Committees (I and II) in 1991 and 1998, the Tarapore Committee in 2006, the Raghuram Rajan Committee in 2008 and the more recent Urjit Patel Committee in 2014 (which led to setting up of Monetary Policy Committee in 2016) have profoundly influenced the path of monetary reforms in India. These have also been shaped by detailed recommendations made by various Working Groups constituted by the RBI from time to time (e.g. Working Group on Sterilization in 2003, Working Group on Operating Procedure of Monetary Policy in 2011, etc.).

  2. 2.

    Prohibition on the issue of fixed interest, ad hoc treasury bills since 1997–98, steady reduction in the statutory liquidity ratio or SLR (from 38.5 in 1990 to its statutory minimum of 25% by 1997) and enactment of the FRBM Act in 2003 (which put a stop to direct government borrowing from RBI 2006–07 onwards) were three important milestones that served to limit automatic fiscal accommodation by monetary policy. The first contributed to emergence of a market for government securities and transition to market-based interest rates (even as it raised cost of borrowing for the government). The third enhanced ‘space’ for using monetary policy by reducing the scope for monetization and imposing strict constraints on size of the fiscal deficit (Ray, 2013).

  3. 3.

    The repo (short for repurchase) and reverse repo rates are used by the RBI, under the LAF to temporarily inject and withdraw liquidity, respectively, into and from the commercial banking system. The collateralized transactions involve lending to and borrowing from the commercial banks against government securities. These stand reversed within a very short time span as they simply involve digital entries, with no change in title of the holder of the securities used for the transactions.

  4. 4.

    E.g. higher magnitude of the weight for inflation gap indicates that the central bank cares more about inflation than unemployment. So it is more likely to raise interest rates to curb inflation when it exceeds target, even if that comes at the cost of lowering output and raising unemployment (Carlin & Soskice, 2015).

  5. 5.

    It has also been suggested though that Taylor rule is appropriate for emerging economies only after suitable modifications (Taylor, 2000).

  6. 6.

    E.g. Lags in the effect of interest rate changes on the output gap range from two to three quarters (Mohanty, 2012; Patra & Kapur, 2010) and on inflation, from three quarters (Mohanty, 2012) to as much as two years (Chand and Singh, 2006). Real appreciation of the rupee has also been found to lower output with a lag of two quarters (Patra and Kapur, 2010).

  7. 7.

    For instance, results depend on whether a forward-looking or backward-looking specification is used for the IS curve in empirical models. Moreover, use of restricted forms of the IS equation that ignore relevant factors such as real exchange rates and asset prices which also affect aggregate demand (especially private investments) may also lead to misspecification.

  8. 8.

    Kapoor and Ravi (2009 and 2010) exploit the natural experiment presented by this policy change and analyse two rounds of NSSO data, classifying households on the basis of age (e.g. households in which the head is a senior citizen and those where the head is below 60 years of age). Using a regression discontinuity approach, Kapoor and Ravi (2009) estimate substantial short-run impact of the hike in deposit rates on consumption expenditure on non-food, non-essential items (including durables, education, clothing, travel, medicine, etc.). However, consumption resumes its average value in the longer run, which they surmise this could be due to income effects (i.e. higher interest income leading to higher consumption in the long run). Using a difference-in-difference estimator, Kapoor and Ravi (2010) compare consumption of two groups of households (those where head is senior citizen vs those where head is not senior citizen). They find that consumption patterns were similar prior to 2001, but differed significantly in 2005 and attribute this difference to the hike in deposit rates for senior citizens between 2001 and 2004.

  9. 9.

    See Dastidar and Ahuja (2019) for a recent survey on the determinants of private corporate investments in India.

  10. 10.

    Fulford (2013) also shows that credit availability may have adverse long-run effects by undermining savings and hence future income streams. A theoretical model is used along with empirical analysis based on NSSO data to study the dynamic effects of enhancing access to credit.

  11. 11.

    After the RBI increased the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio to 90% for home loans of up to Rs. 30 lakhs or less (that fall under ‘affordable’ category in urban areas) in 2015, there was a surge in housing loans in the following year (RBI press release 2016–2017/1277).

  12. 12.

    Typically, expectations about future house price are based on the past trends. Using the past housing prices as proxy for house price expectations, Arora et al. (2020) show that real estate prices influence credit markets in Indian cities (Tier 1 as well as Tier 2 cities), with causality running from house price to credit. The result that housing prices are causing credit is indicative of the role of expectations in driving credit demand for housing.

  13. 13.

    Even for studies that focus only on the post-1991 period, there is wide variation in the exact time period covered. For instance, the periods covered in some of the studies are as follows: Aleem (2010)—1996(Q4) to 2007(Q4); Das (2015)—March, 2002 to October, 2014; Kaur and Dastidar (2019)—May, 2001 to March, 2015; Kaur (2016)—1996 (Q1) to 2013 (Q3); Khundrakpam and Jain (2012)—1996–1997 (Q1) to 2011–2012 (Q1); RBI (2013)—2000–2001 to 2010–2011; Sengupta (2014)—1993–2012; Singh (2011)—March, 2001 to June, 2012; to mention a few.

  14. 14.

    Holtemoller and Mallick (2016) also use SVAR model to show the impact of global food prices on food price and wholesale price inflation in India over the period 1996 (Q1) to 2013 (Q2).

  15. 15.

    Bhattacharya et al. (2019) examine evidence on factors that weaken monetary transmission to output and inflation in the context of advanced and emerging economies in a meta-analysis framework.

  16. 16.

    The RBI regularly conducts various enterprise surveys on capacity utilization, inventories, etc. (e.g. OBICUS or Order Book, Inventory and Capacity Utilization Surveys), to capture investment plans, business confidence, etc. This data can also serve as proxy for investment plans of the private sector. The problem is that this data covers a limited sample with potential issues of inter-temporal comparability owing to changes in the underlying sample and so on. These may be among the reasons that such data is still not widely explored in the empirical literature.

  17. 17.

    ‘Deflationary’ expectations led to prolonged periods of high real interest rates in a number of industrialized countries, jeopardizing prospects of recovery in business investments and pushing nominal interest rates into the negative zone!

  18. 18.

    Periodic episodes of currency crises in Latin America in the 1990s and 2000s decades as well as the Asian crisis of 1997 have demonstrated the difficulties of managing fixed exchange rates with international capital mobility. Fiscal indiscipline and institutional weaknesses (e.g. weakly regulated financial and asset markets) have time and again jeopardized macroeconomic stability in emerging markets, especially in the face of volatile capital flows.

  19. 19.

    E.g. Large fiscal deficits may lead to downgrading of credit ratings by international agencies like Fitch, Moodys, etc., that raises countries’ borrowing costs in international markets.

  20. 20.

    Since commodity markets clear relatively quickly, this shows up in greater price fluctuations, compared to imperfectly competitive goods markets with sticky prices, that respond to cost changes only with lags.

  21. 21.

    E.g. The presence of under-regulated commodity exchanges and futures markets may contribute to speculation and volatility in commodity prices.

  22. 22.

    Frankel’s (2008) arguments are in context of advanced economies like the USA and a set of emerging economies from Latin America, where he observes fall in inflation, in response to rise in policy rates. However, his finding for Mexico is the opposite, where commodity prices increase following a rise in real interest rates.

  23. 23.

    E.g. High price of commodities in the futures markets signals persistence of high commodity prices in times to come (Frankel, 2008).

  24. 24.

    On 20 April 2020, the price of oil (West Texas Intermediate (WTI) benchmark oil price index) became negative (−$37.63) as economic activity came to a standstill and demand for oil crashed due to the global lockdown (Nawaz, 2020).

  25. 25.

    While global food prices rose sharply in 2016, individual country experience with food inflation over the same period showed wide variation (see Bhattacharya and Jain, 2020 for details).

  26. 26.

    Holtemoller and Mallick (2016) find that global prices were important in affecting food inflation during the years 1999/2000, 2005, 2008 and 2010.

  27. 27.

    Quarterly growth of the Chinese economy reported in July, 2020 was just over 3%, exceeding the 2% recovery that was expected in the post-COVID scenario (Mc Donald, 2020).

  28. 28.

    The operation of the Keynesian multiplier may be impaired during the pandemic as marginal propensity to consume (MPC) may be unusually low. Further, the second and subsequent rounds of the multiplier may be severely limited in the presence of large-scale job losses, especially if these are concentrated in sectors where MPC is relatively high. Those losing jobs may receive transfer payments, but spending out of such transfers would not be coming back as income to the unemployed, limiting the effectiveness of the multiplier.

  29. 29.

    The repo rate was reduced from 5.15 to 4.40% from with immediate effect. The marginal standing facility (MSF) rate and bank rate was reduced to 4.65% from 5.40%, and the reverse repo rate under LAF was reduced by 90 basis points to 4.0%.

  30. 30.

    Rs. 500 per month is being transferred to the bank accounts women holding Jan Dhan Accounts (meant for those below poverty line(BPL)) for three months.

  31. 31.

    The fiscal stimulus in other large emerging nations stands at 4.4% for Indonesia, 4.9% for Argentina and 11% for Brazil (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1107572/covid-19-value-g20-stimulus-packages-share-gdp/).

  32. 32.

    Ways and means advances (WMA) are temporary advances (maximum expiry of three months) by the RBI to both the Central and State governments to meet temporary mismatches/shortfall in revenue over expenditure.

  33. 33.

    The liquidity coverage ratio, introduced as part of Basel III reforms on Banking supervision, requires banks to hold enough high-quality liquid assets such as short-term government debt (which can be sold off) to meet short-term debt obligations.

References

  • Acharya, S. (2010). Macroeconomic performance and policies, 2000–2008. In S. Acharya, R. Mohan (Eds.), India’s economy, performance and challenges: Essays in honour of Montek Singh Ahluwalia (pp. 39–81) Module 3. OUP New-Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adolfson, M. (2001). Export price responses to exogenous exchange rate movements. Economics Letters, 71(1), 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, N. (2020). Petrol, diesel price increased all over India, Mint, 7 June, 2020. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/petrol-diesel-price-increased-all-over-india-for-first-time-in-80-days-11591506701429.html. Accessed on 20th July, 2020.

  • Agrawal, P., Sahoo, P., & Dash, R. K. (2010). Savings behaviour in India: Co-integration and causality evidence. The Singapore Economic Review, 55, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiyar, S., & Anklesaria, S. (2008, April 16). India disproves Friedman on inflation. Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/swaminathan-s-a-aiyar/india-disproves-friedman-on-inflation/articleshow/2956991.cms

  • Alam, Q., & Alam, S. (2016). The determinants of inflation in India: The Bounds test analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 544–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleem, A. (2010). Transmission mechanism of monetary policy in India. Journal of Asian Economics, 21(2), 186–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, R., Ding, D., & Tulin, V. (2014). Food inflation in India: The role for monetary policy. IMF Working Paper No. 178. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, R., Peiris, S., Saxegaard, M. (2010). An estimated model with macrofinancial linkages for India. IMF Working Paper 21. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, R., & Prasad, E. S. (2010) Optimal price indices for targeting inflation under incomplete markets. Working Paper 16290. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, R., Prasad, E. S., & Zhang, B. (2015). What measure of inflation should a developing country central bank target? Journal of Monetary Economics, 74, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, R., & Tulin, V. (2014). Disentangling India’s investment slowdown. IMF Working Paper 47. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, K. (2001). Optimal monetary policy changes to relative price changes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 48(1), 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, P. M., Dastidar, A. G., & Das, M. (2020). Inter-linkage between credit and housing prices in India: Some preliminary findings. In M. Datta, R. Mahajan, & M. Bose (Eds.), Business, economics and sustainable development: The emerging issues (pp. 291–308). New Delhi: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, P., & Sankaranarayanan, K. C. (1998). Liberalization and inflation in India. Yojana, 42(11), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athukorala, P. C., & Sen, K. (2004). The determinants of private saving in India. World Development, 32(3), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishna, P. (1991). Pricing and inflation in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, P. (2007). Growth and inflation. Yojana, 51, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., & Mauro, B. W. D. (Eds.). (2020). Mitigating the covid economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes. London, Centre for Economic and Policy Research: CEPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, R., & Bhattacharya, S. (2008). The RBI’s monetary policy reaction function: Does monetary policy in India follow an inflation targeting rule?. In Annual Conference on Money & Finance. IGIDR. Mumbai, January 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M. J., & Ramey, V. A. (2001) The cost channel of monetary transmission. In NBER macroeconomics annual 2001 (Vol 16, pp. 199–256), 2002. National Bureau of Economic Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C., Paustian, M., Penalver, A., & Taylor, T. (2010). Monetary policy after fall. Paper presented at Jackson Hole Symposium Wyoming, 28 August

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddies, C. (1999). Monetary policy and public finances: Inflation targets in a new perspective. IMF Economic Review, 46, 293–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benassy-Quere, A., Marimon, A. R., Pisani-Ferry, J., Reichlin, L., Schoenmaker, D., Mauro, B. W. (2020). COVID-19: Europe needs a catastrophe relief. VoxEU. Org, 11 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Berananke, B., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the black box: The credit channel of monetary transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., & Blinder, A. S. (1992). The federal funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission. American Economic Review, 82, 901–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., & Blinder, A. S. (1988). Credit, money, and aggregate demand. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 78, 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, B. B. (1984). Public expenditure, inflation and growth: Macroeconometric analysis for India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, B. B., & Lodh, M. (1990). Inflation in India: An analytical survey. Artha Vijnana, 32(1), 25–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R., Patnaik, I., Shah, A. (2011). Monetary policy transmission in an emerging market setting. IMF Working Paper 5, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R., Tripathi, S., & Chowdhury, Roy, S. (2019). Financial structure, institutional quality and monetary policy transmission: A meta-analysis. NIPFP Working Paper No. 274, 18-July-2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R., & Jain, R. (2020). Can monetary policy stabilise food inflation? Evidence from advanced and emerging economies. Journal of economic modelling, 89, 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhusnurmath, M. (2008). Murphy’s Law for Central Banks. Economic Times, February 4. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/Myth-n-Reality/murphy-s-law-for-central-banks/

  • Blanchard, O., & Gali, J. (2005). Real wage rigidities and the New Keynesian Model. Journal of Money, Banking and Credit, 39(1), 35–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brahmananda, P., & Najraj, G. (2002). Inflation and growth in the world: Some simple empirics, 1970-99. Macroeconomics and monetary policy: Issues for a reforming economy (pp. 43–66). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, W. H. (1979). Macroeconomic theory and policy. HarperCollin Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, W., & Soskice, D. (2015). Macroeconomics: Institutions, instability and the financial system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catao, L. A., & Chang, R. (2015) World food prices and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 75(C), 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. G., Kohler, M., & Upper, C. (2009). Financial crises and economic activity. NBER Papers 15379, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, L., & Varma, K. O. (2015). Efficacy of new monetary framework and determining inflation in India: An empirical analysis of financially deregulated regime. NIPFP Working Paper No. 153, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, S. (2007). Our fight against inflation. Yojana, 51, 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, R. (2010). Understanding the nature and causes of food inflation. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(9), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, S. K., & Singh, K. (2006). How applicable is the inflation targeting framework for India? The India Policy Forum. National Council of Applied Economic Research, 2(1), 123–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, I., Hoffmann, M., & Schabert, A. (2006). Inflation dynamics and cost channel of monetary transmission. European Economic Review, 50, 995–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, L. J., & Eichenbaum, M. (1992). Liquidity effects and the monetary transmission mechanism. NBER Working Paper No., 3974. National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, S., & Haldane, A. G. (1995). Interest rates and the channels of monetary transmission: Some sectoral estimates. European Economic Review, 39(9), 1611–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. (2003). Modeling money, price and output in India: A vector autoregressive and moving average approach. Applied Economics, 35(10), 1219–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. (2015). Monetary policy in India: Transmission to bank interest rates. IMF Working Paper No., 129. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. (2020). Seven ages of India’s monetary policy. Speech delivered at St. Stephen’s College, University of Delhi on January 24, 2020. Available via Reserve Bank of India—Speeches. https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_SpeechesView.aspx?Id=1092. Accessed 3 July, 2020.

  • Dash, M. (2016). Impact of macroeconomic factors on inflation: An assessment on Indian economy by using vector auto-regressive modelling. Journal of Decision Sciences Applications, 1(1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastidar, A. G. (2015). India’s experience with export-led growth. In J. Ghosh (Ed.), India and the world economy. ICSSR research survey in economics (pp. 21–64). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastidar, A. G., & Ahuja, R. (2019). A perspective on the slowdown in private corporate investments in India. In S. Bandyopadhyay & M. Dutta (Eds.), Opportunities and challenges in development: Essays for Sarmila Banerjee (pp. 31–50). Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, R. H. (1990). Extended Phillips curve for the Indian economy. Indian Economic Journal, 38(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dua, P. (2020). Monetary policy framework in India. Indian Economic Review, 55, 117–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F., & Mishkin, F. S. (1995) The decline of traditional banking: implications for financial stability and regulatory policy. NBER Working Paper No. 4993, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. (2003). Alternatives to inflation targeting monetary policy for stable and egalitarian growth: A brief research summary. PERI Working Paper 62, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Favero, C. A., Giavazzi, F., & Flabbi, L. (1999). The transmission mechanism of monetary policy in Europe: Evidence from banks balance sheets. NBER Working Paper No. 7231, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, D. (1998). The transmission of monetary policy in Israel IMF Working Paper No. 114, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A. (2008). The effect of monetary policy on real commodity prices. In NBER chapters, asset prices and monetary policy (pp. 291–333), National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, S. L. (2013). The effects of financial development in the short and long run: Theory and evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J. (2020a) Helicopter money: This time is now. In R. Baldwin, B. Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the covid economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes (pp. 57–62). London,, Center for Economic and Policy Research: CEPR Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J., & Monacelli, T. (2005). Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy review of economic studies, 72, 707–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J. (2020b). The effects of a money-financed fiscal stimulus. Journal of Monetary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaotti, E., & Secchi, A. (2006). Journal of Money. Credit and Banking, 38(8), 2013–2037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlash, S., & Smets, F. (1995). The monetary transmission mechanism: Evidence from the G7 countries. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1219, Centre for Economic and Policy Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, M. K. (1993). Inflation: Review and outlook. Yojana, 36(24), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghura, D., Leite, C. A., Tsangarides, C. (2002). Is growth enough? Macroeconomic policy and poverty reduction. IMF Working Paper 118, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, P.-O. (2020). Flattening the pandemic and recession curves. In R. Baldwin, B. Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes (pp. 31–40). London, Centre for Economic and Policy Research: CEPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, A. (2014). Understanding high inflation trend in India. South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, 4(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, A., & Pujari, A. K. (2005). Identifying long run supply curve in India. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 3(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrieri, V., Lorenzoni, G., Straub, L., & Werning, I. (2020). Macroeconomic Implications of COVID-19: Can negative supply shocks cause demand shortages?. SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3570096

  • Henzel, S., Hlsewig, O., Mayer, E., & Wollmershuser, T. (2009). The price puzzle revisited: Can the cost channel explain a rise in inflation after a monetary policy shock? Journal of Macroeconomics, 31, 268–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg, C., Mayer, C., & Sinai, T. (2005). Assessing high house prices: Bubbles, fundamentals and misperceptions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, B., & Bogdanova, B. (2012). Taylor rules and monetary policy: A global “Great Deviation. Switzerland: BIS Quarterly Review. Bank for International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtemoller, O., & Mallick, S. (2016). Global food prices and monetary policy in an emerging market economy: The case of India. Journal of Asian Economics, 46, 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. (2006). The choice of inflation targetingAn empirical investigation. International Journal of Economics and Economic Policy Springer, 3(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015). Evolving monetary policy frameworks in low-income and other developing countries. IMF Policy Paper. https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2015/102315.pdf

  • Inoue, I., & Hamori, S. (2009). An empirical analysis of money demand function in India. Economic Bulletin, 29(2), 1225–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardak, T., & Wrobel, E. (2009). The monetary transmission mechanism in Tunisia: Recent developments. The Journal of Developing Areas, 48(1), 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, R. (2008). Inflation targeting in India: Issues and prospects. International Review of Applied Economics, 22(2), 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, V. K. (2012). Impact of monetary policy of India with special reference to CRR, repo and reverse repo in curbing inflation and econometric study. Management Insight, 8(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelton, S. (2020). The deficit myth: modern monetary theory and the birth of the people’s economy. Hachette UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanan, R. (1999). Inflation targeting: Issues and relevance for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(34), 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, M., & Ravi, S. (2009). The Effect of Interest Rate on Household Consumption: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India. Available at SSRN 1346813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, M., & Ravi, S. (2010). Elasticity of intertemporal substitution in consumption: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment. Available at SSRN 1673140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, K. (2016). Monetary policy behaviour in India. Journal of Business Thought, 6(April 2015–March 2016), 44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, K., & Dastidar, A. G. (2019). Monetary policy transmission in India: Interest rate puzzle. IUP Journal of Applied Economics, 18(3), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashik, B. K. (2011). Understanding inflation and controlling it. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(41), 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katkhate, D. (2006). Inflation targeting: Much ado about something. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(49), 5031–5033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khundrakpam, J. K., Pattanaik, S. (2010). Global crisis, fiscal response and medium-term risks to inflation in India. RBI Occasional Papers 31(2): 1–29, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  • Khundrakpam, J. K., Jain, R. (2012). Monetary policy transmission in India: A peep inside the black box. RBI Working Paper Series 11/2012, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2020). The case for permanent stimulus. In R. Baldwin & B. Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes (pp. 213–219). London: CEPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumail, A. R. S., Bushra, N., & Mirza, N. (2012). Inflation targeting as a plausible monetary framework for India. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1(12), 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Vashisht, P., & Kalita, G. (2010). Food inflation: Contingent and structural factors. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(10), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Krishna, G. D., Bhardwaj, S. (n.d) IFC is it a good framework for monetary policy of India?. Centre for Policy Research www.cprindia.org. Accessed 5 July, 2020

  • Lane, P. (2020). The monetary policy package: An analytical framework. In R. Baldwin, B. Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes. CEPR Press, London, pp. 139–144, Centre for Economic and Policy Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Loayza, N., & Shankar, R. (2000). Private saving in India. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(3), 571–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., & Krishna, S. (2015). The effect of crude oil prices on inflation and interest rates in India. Evidence from DCC-GARCH Model. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2472558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, H., & Agarwal, S. (2007). Impact of real interest rates on real output growth in India: A long-run analysis in a liberalized financial regime. The Singapore Economic Review, 52(2), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Donald, J. (2020). China’s economy rebounds. Time 16 July, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S. (1995). Symposium on the Monetary transmission mechanism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A., & Mishra, V. (2009). Pre-conditions for inflation targeting in an emerging economy—The case of India. Development Research Unit Working Paper Series 08–09. Monash University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., Montiel, P., & Sengupta, R. (2016). Monetary transmission in developing countries: Evidence from India. IMF Working Paper No.167, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, R. (2008). The role of fiscal and monetary policy in sustaining growth with stability in India. Asian Economic Policy Review, 3(2), 209–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, D. (2012). Evidence on interest rate channel of monetary policy transmission in India. RBI Working Paper No. 6, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, D. (2014). Why is recent food inflation in India so persistent?. Annual Lalit Doshi Memorial Lecture, Xavier’s Chapter, delivered at the St. Xavier’s College, Mumbai on 13th January 2014. Available via Reserve Bank of India Speeches. https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_ViewBulletin.aspx?Id=14731#f3. Accessed 3 July, 2020.

  • Mohanty, M. S., Klau, M. (2004). Monetary policy rules in emerging market economies: Issues and evidence. BIS Working Papers 149, Bank for International Settlements, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojon, B., Peersman, G. (2001). A VAR description of the effects of monetary policy in the individual countries of the Euro area, ECB Working Paper No. 92, European Central Bank, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj, R. (2013). India’s Dream Run, 2003–08: Understanding the boom and its aftermath. Economic and Political Weekly, 48, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, S. (2020). Making history: Coronavirus and negative oil prices. Global risk insights. May 29, 2020 (https://globalriskinsights.com/2020/05/making-history-coronavirus-and-negative-oil-prices/)

  • Nelson, E. (2002). Direct effects of base money on aggregate demand: Theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(4), 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, E. D., & Floerkemeir, H. (2006). Transmission mechanism of monetary policy in Armenia: Evidence from VAR analysis. IMF Working Paper 248, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2005). Global capital markets: integration, crisis, and growth. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1995). Mirage of fixed exchange rates. NBER Working Paper 5191, Naional Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendahl, C., & Springford, J. (2020). Bold policies needed to counter with coronavirus recession. In R. Baldwin & B. Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes (pp. 145–150). London: CEPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OstaEraghi, A. (2015). The effectiveness of monetary policy in India: An ARDL analysis of Cointegration. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5(11), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavani, M., & Rahimi, M. (2009). Sources of inflation in Iran: An application of the ARDL approach. International Journal of Applied Economics and Quantitative Studies, 6(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, D. K. (2007). Inflation, growth and poverty. Yojana, 51, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, A. (2010). Study of inflation in India: A Cointegrated VAR approach. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 8(1), 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra, M. D., & Kapur, M. (2010). A monetary policy model for India. Macroeconomics and finance in emerging market economies, 5(1), 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, M. D., Ray, P. (2010). Inflationary expectations and monetary policy in India: An empirical exploration. IMF Working Paper No. 84, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattnaik, R. K., & Samantaraya, A. (2006). Indian experience of inflation—A review of the evolving process. Economic and Political weekly, 41(4), 349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, B. P. (2009). In search of the Phillips curve for India. Journal of Asian Economics, 20(4), 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, B., & Zaman, H. (2015). When and why does Bangladesh’s inflation differ from Indian’s? Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 8(1–2), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posen, A. (2020). Containing the economic nationalist virus through global coordination. In R. Baldwin & B. Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes (pp. 203–212). London: CEPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourroy, M., Carton, B., & Coulibaly, D. (2016). Food prices and inflation targeting in emerging economies. International Economics, 146, 108–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. (2020). Dr Raghuram’s Rajan prescription on how to stimulate the economy. BFSI News, Economic Times, May 9. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/raghuram-rajan-explains-how-best-to-stimulate-the-economy/articleshow/75640636.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, J., Khundrakpam, J. K., & Das, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of monetary and fiscal policy interaction in India. RBI Working Paper No. 15, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajwade, A. V. (2007). Inflation and monetary policy. Yojana, 51, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakshit, M. (2016). India’s post-crisis macroeconomic slowdown: Some perspectives. Money & Finance, ICRA Bulletin, 49–84, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, M. (2004). Do broad money, output and prices count in India? Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(8–9), 982–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami, R., & Slok, T. (1998). The real effects of monetary policy in the European Union: What are the differences? Economics Review, 45(2), 374–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, V. (1993). How important is the credit channel in the transmission of monetary policy? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangarajan, C., & Arif, R. (1990). Money output and prices—A macro econometric model. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(16), 837–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, R., Jain, R., & Dhal, S. C. (2007). India’s potential economic growth: Measurement issues and policy implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(17), 1563–1572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. (2013). Monetary policy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RBI. (2005). Report on Currency and Finance. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • RBI. (2013). Real interest rate impact on investment and growth—What the empirical evidence for India suggests. Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai: Report on Currency and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • RBI. (2014). Report of the expert committee to revise and strengthen the monetary policy framework. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • RBI. (2020). Quarterly Estimates of Households’ Financial Assets and Liabilities. RBI Bulletin, June, 2020 https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_ViewBulletin.aspx?Id=18994

  • RBI Press Release. (2019–20). Press Release by Yogesh Dayal, Chief General Manager, Department of Communication, Central Office, RBI. Press Release: 2019–2020/2130. https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/PressRelease/PDFs/PR21302E204AFFBB614305B56DD6B843A520DB.PDF

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Sbrancia, M. B. (2011). The liquidation of government debt. NBER Working Paper 16893, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India. (2020, April 9). COVID 19 to accentuate growth slowdown, impact on inflation ambiguous. Economic Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (1990). New evidence on the monetary transmission mechanism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 21(1), 149–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, C., & Romer, D. (1999). Monetary policy and the well-being of the poor. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review. 1st Quarter, 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. (1993). Openness and inflation: Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 869–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, K., Kar, S., & Sahu, J. (2014). The political economy of economic growth in India 1993–2013. ESID Working Paper No.44. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. www.effective-states.org

  • Sengupta, K. (1991). Procurement prices and inflation. Yojana, 35(18), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, N. (2014). Changes in transmission channels of monetary policy in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(49), 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman, S. (2005). Effective inflation management. Yojana, 49, 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shnkar, S. (1992). Bringing inflation under control. Yojana, 36(8), 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D. (2007). Speculation holds the key. Yojana, 51, 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty, M. (2020). Personal Loans are now 28% of total bank credit, Times of India (April 6, 2020) https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/personal-loans-are-now-28-of-total-bank-credit/articleshow/74999627.cms

  • Sikdar, S. (2006). Principles of macroeconomics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar, S. (2013). Capital flows and exchange rate management. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. (2006). Inflation targeting: International experience and prospects for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(27), 2958–2961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. (2011). How Asymmetric is the Monetary Policy Transmission to Financial Markets in India?. RBI Occasional Papers, 32(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., & Kalirajan, K. (2006). Monetary policy in India: Objectives, reaction and policy effectiveness. Review of Applied Economics, 2(2), 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, S. (1998). Are budget deficits inflationary? Yojana, 42(7), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2002). An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the Euro Area. ECB Working Paper 171, European Central Bank, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, N., Mahambare, V., & Ramachandran, M. (2006). Modelling inflation in India: A critique of the structural approach. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 4(2), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (1995). The monetary transmission mechanism: An empirical framework. Journal of Economic Perspectives American Economic Association, 9(4), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (2000). The monetary transmission mechanism and the evaluation of monetary policy rules. Central Bank of Chile Working Paper No. 87. Santiago, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trichet, J. C. (2011). Introductory statement to the press conference. European Central Bank, Frankfurt, October6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuteja, U. (2008). Protect poor from food inflation. Economic Times, December 31. https://m.economictimes.com/protect-poor-from-food-inflation/articleshow/3915846.cms

  • Ummat, R. C. (1992). An agenda for containing inflation. Kurukshetra, 40(7), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virmani, V. (2004). Operationalising taylor-type rules for the indian economy: Issues and some results (1992Q3 2001Q4). IIMA Working Paper 2004–07-04, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. E. (2009). Using monetary policy to stabilize economic activity. In Jackson Hole symposium, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (2011). Reconsidering the role of food prices in inflation. IMF Working Paper No. 71

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellen, J. L. (2011). Unconventional monetary policy and central bank communication. Speech at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business U.S. Monetary Policy Forum. New York. February 25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ananya Ghosh Dastidar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Details of measures adopted by the RBI to deal with the economic situation due to COVID-19 on May 22, 2020

  • RBI announced a new Targeted Long-Term Repo Operation (TLTRO 2.0) of Rs 50,000 crore (in several tranches, and further possibility of expansion if needed) for mid- and small-sized nonbank financial companies (NBFCs) and microfinance institutions (MFIs) which have been more severely impacted by the disruptions of pandemic due to COVID-19.

  • The RBI Governor, Shaktikanta Das announced a reduction in the repo rate by 40 basis points, from 4.4 to 4% and reverse repo rate to 3.35%, which would help in releasing surplus funds for providing higher credit for investment in the productive sectors of the economy.

  • A special refinance facility of Rs 50,000 crore for National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Rs 25,000 crore), the Small Industries Development Bank of India (Rs 15,000 crore) and the National Housing Bank (Rs 10,000 crore) to meet sectoral credit needs since they are facing difficulties in raising finances from the market.

  • Ways and Means Advances (WMAs)Footnote 32 limit of states and union territories has been increased by 60% over and above the limit as on March 31, 2020, in order to provide greater comfort to states to deal with the present crisis.

  • A major relaxation has been given in the asset classifications norm, wherein the moratorium period will be excluded while considering the 90-day NPA norm for those accounts for which lending institutions decide to grant moratorium or deferment and which were standard as on March 1, 2020. The NBFCs are thereby allowed to grant relaxed NPA classification to their borrowers and; the banks will need to maintain additional provisioning of 10% on standstill accounts.

  • An extension has been given for the implementation of a resolution plan for stressed assets (or likely NPAs) by 90 days. Under this, now the banks need not maintain additional provisioning of 20%, which they did earlier within 210 days of such default. LCR requirement was brought down from 100 to 80% with immediate effect.

  • In order to enable banks to save on capital in the present uncertain times, the RBI has decided that scheduled commercial banks and cooperative banks shall not make any further dividend pay-outs from profits pertaining to FY 2019–20. This may be reviewed based on the financial position of banks at the end of the second quarter of the financial year 2019–20.

  • The liquidity coverage ratioFootnote 33 for scheduled commercial banks has been brought down from 100 to 80% in two phases.

  • NBFCs’ loans to delayed commercial real estate projects can be extended by a year without restructuring. Additionally, these loans to be given similar benefits as given by scheduled commercial banks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dastidar, A.G., Kaur, K. (2021). An Evaluation of Monetary Policy in India: A Sustainable Development Perspective. In: Dasgupta, P., Saha, A.R., Singhal, R. (eds) Sustainable Development Insights from India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4830-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics