Abstract
While academic qualifications are important in securing jobs, it is inarguable that ethics and integrity are also crucial in the workplace. These concerns are serious and disconcerting given the reports of rampant academic dishonesty within higher education institutions (HEIs). For graduates who think that cheating is acceptable, concepts like ‘morality’, ‘virtue’, and ‘truth’ are subsumed under the imperative of getting the grade. Studies show that there is a significant relationship between academic cheating and students’ potential unethical behavior in the workplace, which is a troubling indicator in terms of overall human resource and national development. This study addresses the issue of undergraduates’ moral reasoning by focusing on their perceptions’ of academic dishonesty and what drives them to cheat. This study employed a descriptive research design method using a self-report questionnaire to collect data from 288 (72 males and 216 females) randomly selected undergraduate students from different programs of study in a Malaysian HEI. The findings reveal that almost two-thirds (59.8 %) of the respondents felt that academic dishonesty is rampant. Interestingly though, while close to 90 % responded positively when asked “are you sure another student cheated during a quiz/exam?”, almost 80 % indicated they would not report such acts of dishonesty. Reasons for this phenomenon is a telling indicator of the undergraduates’ moral reasoning and it is one that HEIs should attempt to re-orientate by way of curricular and pedagogical strategies in order to advocate the culture of academic integrity and by default, professional ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adesile, M. I., & Oseni, R. A. (2011). Academic dishonesty among Tertiary Institution students: An exploration of the societal influences using SEM analysis. International Journal of Education, 3(2), 1–15. Retrieved on April 12, 2014, from www.macrothink.org/ije
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Che Ku Hisam. (2008). Tracking the academic dishonesty at the Malaysian higher education. [Online Article]. Retrieved December 1, 2012, from http://www1.tganu.uitm.edu.my/upena/dokumen/AcadmeicDishonesty.doc
Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181–198.
Etter, B. K., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2004, October 20–23). The role of moral philosophy in promoting academic integrity among engineering students. A paper presented at the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2011). Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29, 100–103. Elsevier.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to design and evaluation research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150. Retrieved on April 21, 2014, from http://debdavis.pbworks.com/
Liddell, D. L., & Cooper D. L. (2012). Moral development in higher education. New Directions for Student Services, no. 139, Fall 2012 © Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley Online Library. Retrieved on November 12, 2014, from wileyonlinelibrary.com. doi:10.1002/ss.20018.
Lynnette, S., & James, R. (2001). An examination of student cheating in the two-year college. Retrieved November 21, 2013, from http://www.essay-911.com/essay-encyclopedia/examination.htm
McCabe, D. (2005). Levels of cheating and plagiarism remain high. Retrieved November 21, 2012, from The Center for Academic Integrity Website: http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and the workplace: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77.
Parmjit, S., Roslind, X. T., & Mohd Adlan, R. (2014). Fit or unfit? Perspectives of employers and university instructors of graduates’ generic skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123(2014), 315–324. Retrieved on April 21, 2014, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/
Paula, W. (2004). Academic original sin: Plagiarism, the Internet, and librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(3), 237–242.
Smith, M., Ghazali, N., & Siti Fatimah, N. (2007). Attitudes towards plagiarism among undergraduate accounting students: Malaysian evidence. Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia. Retrieved October 12, 2012, from www.emeraldinsight.com/1321-7348.htm
Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105. ISSN 1812-9129. Retrieved October 1, 2011, from http://www.isetl.org/ijthe/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, P., Thambusamy, R. (2016). “To Cheat or Not To Cheat, That is the Question”: Undergraduates’ Moral Reasoning and Academic Dishonesty. In: Fook, C., Sidhu, G., Narasuman, S., Fong, L., Abdul Rahman, S. (eds) 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_58
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-663-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-664-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)