Introduction
Disability studies, a discipline that critically examines the meaning and implications of the social construction of dis/ability, provides a useful framework through which to understand the systemic oppression of disabled students, the construction of disability/ability in education, and disability-based oppression more broadly. Disability studies scholars and disability rights activists have long rejected the medical model of disability, which treats disability as an individual deficiency that necessitates medical intervention to “fix.” A disability studies perspective, on the other hand, understands disability as socially produced. Disablement is situated within social, political, and economic structures that ascribe its meaning within a particular place at a given historical moment. This framework illuminates how disability has been forged as an identity by those who share experiences of...
References
Abberley, P. (1997). The limits of classical social theory in the analysis and transformation of disablement. In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, present future (pp. 25–44). Leeds: The Disability Press.
Erevelles, N. (2000). Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory, 50(1), 25–47.
Gleeson, B. (1997). Disability studies: A historical materialist view. Disability and Society, 12(2), 179–202. doi:10.1080/09687599727326.
Gleeson, B., & Kearns, R. (2001). Remoralising landscapes of care. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 61–80. doi:10.1068/d38j.
Goodley, D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334.
Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 25(5), 631–644.
Meekosha, H. (2004). Drifting down the Gulf Stream: Navigating the cultures of disability studies. Disability & Society, 19(7), 721–733. doi:10.1080/0968759042000284204.
Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2010). Disability as multitude: Re-working non-productive labor power. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2), 179–193.
Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability Handicap & Society, 7(2), 101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
Oliver, M. J. (1999). Capitalism, disability, and ideology: A materialist critique of the normalization principle. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 163–173). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Russell, M. (2001). Disablement, oppression, and the political economy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(2), 87–95.
Russell, M. (2002). What disability civil rights cannot do: Employment and political economy. Disability & Society, 17(2), 117–135.
Russell, M., & Malhotra, R. (2002). Capitalism and disability. Socialist Register, 38, 211–228.
Shakespeare, T. (2010). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 266–273). New York: Routledge.
Wiener, D., Ribeiro, R., & Warner, K. (2009). Mentalism, disability rights and modern eugenics in a ‘brave new world’. Disability & Society, 24(5), 599–610.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jaffee, L. (2016). Marxism and Disability Studies. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_279-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_279-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education