Abstract
Science and technology has a prominent influence in the modern world. From the transition of the little science to the big science, there are many different factors involved in the development of science. How to improve the public understanding of science is going to be an important issue for most societies and cultures, especially in Taiwan, where technological industries play an important role in the economy by combining both negative and positive effects.
Based on in-depth studies and careful literature review, this chapter explores the relationships among science education, science communication , and social studies of science in Taiwan. According to the implication, and compared with the new trend of international studies, this chapter aims to build a new developmental diagram depicting public communication of science and technology in Taiwan. These results would likely provide a solid base from which the different academic groups may communicate, interact, and thus benefit from its usage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Big science” refers to team type and large economic-scale scientific development pattern, and “little science” refers to individual and small economic-scale scientific development pattern. Such terminology was proposed by Price in early 1960, when he largely calculated the number of scientists, scientific magazines, and scientific papers in the history and found that there was index growth in science industry scale in about the year 200, and it doubled every 15 years. In other words, science has turned from “little science” into “big science”
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Reference
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Norris, S. (2013). Call for papers: Bridging science education and science communication research. http://edu.technion.ac.il/userfiles/docs/Science%20communication-education%20Special%20issue%20-call%20for%20papers.pdf. (Accessed 25 Jun 2013)
Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 79–95.
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brossard, D., & Lewnstein, B. V. (2011). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science. In L. Kahlor & P. A. Stout (Eds.), Communicating science-new agendas in communication (pp. 11–39). New York: Routledge..
Bucchi, M., & Mazzolini, R. G. (2003). Big science, little news: Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946–1997. Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), 7–24.
Bucchi, M. (1998). Science and the media: Alternative routes in scientific communication. New York: Routledge.
Bucchi, M. (2008). Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 57–76). New York: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 244–269). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Chen, H. A. (2003). Mediated science. Scientific Development, 369, 84–85.
Cheng, Y. C. (2003). Production of science news in a social context-gene technology as an example. Mass Communication Research, 74, 121–147.
Chiou, C. T. (2002). From “NIMBY” to “YIMBY”: Problems and solutions of environmental protest in Taiwan. Taiwanese Journal of Political Science, 17, 33–56.
Chiu, Y. C. (2009). Who talks in the news? A news coverage analysis of medical dispute. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 15, 217–248.
Chou, K. T. (2004). “Dialogue” between monopolistic scientific rationality and tacit (submerged) social rationality: A discussion of risk culture between local public, scientists, and the state. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 56, 1–63.
Clemens, E. S. (1986). Of asteroid and dinosaurs: The role of the press in shaping the scientific debates. Social Studies of Science, 16, 421–456.
Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2002). The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 225–241.
Dunwoody, S. (2010). Foreword: Building a context for the next century of science communication. In L. Kahlor & P. A. Stout (Eds.), Communicating science-new agendas in communication (pp. vii–vix). New York: Routledge.
Galison, P. (1992). The many faces of big science. In P. Galison & B. Hevly (Eds.), Big science: The growth of large-scale research (pp. 1–17). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Han, S. P. (1990). Present situation and problems of technological news reports in Taiwan. Science Monthly, 21(8), 617–620.
Hsieh, Y. C. (1992). News analyses of national technological conference. Mass Communication Research, 46, 131–147.
Hsieh, Y. C. (2005). Science communication in the information era. In Feng, C. S. (Ed), Reflection and conscience? The 70 years for the department of journalism in NCCU (pp. 187–205).Taipei Department of Journalism, NCCU.
Hsu, M. L. (2005). News or advertising? Representations and reflections of medical risk information in the news media. Mass Communication Research, 83, 83–125.
Hsu, M. L., Chen, R. Y., Chang, H. C., Lai, I. F., & Lin, C. Y. (2006). News reading and attitudes toward people living with HIV/AIDS: A message design experiment on Taiwanese young adults. Mass Communication Research, 87, 1–49.
Huang, H. B. (1995). Contemporary science education reform. Guidance of Elementary Education, 34(1), 18–23.
Huang, C. J. (2006). A preliminary investigation of general education. Course based on science news reading and writing: “Science, news and life” as an example. Nanhua General Education Research, 3(1), 67–88.
Huang, C. J. (2012a). An extension of science education-reflections of an academic visiting on science communication in Europe. Science Education Monthly, 346, 12–27.
Huang, C. J. (2012b). Double media disasters in non-Western societies? An analysis of compiled science news in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 12th international public communication of science and technology conference, Florence.
Huang, C. J. (2013). What science are you singing? - A study of the science image in Taiwan pop music. Paper presented at The 2013 STS Annual Meeting, National Taiwan University.
Huang, C. J., & Jian, M. J. (2008). “What have scientists created?” – students’ image toward technology when they read science news reports. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 1–49.
Huang, C. J., Yang, W. G., Chin, C. C., & Chen, H. A. (2008). Whose STS? Similarities and differences between science education and science studies. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 16(6), 585–603.
Irwin, A., & Michael, M. (2003). Science, social theory and public knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Jabr, F. (2012) “Geology porn: The science and art of Bjork’s ‘Mutual Core’ music video.”Scientific American blogs, November 15, 2012. Available at: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/2012/11/15/geology-porn-the-science-and-art-of-bjorks-mutual-core-music-video/. (Accessed May 25 2013).
Kerckhove, D. D. (1995). The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality. Toronto: Somerville House Pub.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
LaFollete, M. C. (1994). Editorial: Changing our name, adding new voices, renewing responsibility: Science communication. Science Communication, 16(3), 3–10.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lee, M. Y. (2012). Scientific literacy: A new attitude towards science learning. Scientific American (Taiwan Version), 130, 64–73.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex.
Lin, K. M., & Chen, D. S. (2005). Deliberative democracy citizen participation technological policy consensus conference deliberative polls. Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science. Technology and Medicine, 3, 1–50.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century england. Bruges: St. Catherines Press.
Miller, I. D. (1983). The American people and science policy: The role of public attitudes in the policy process. New York: Pergamon.
Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 115–120.
Millar, R. (1997). Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve? In R. Levinson & J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis? (pp. 87–101). London: Routledge.
Ogawa, M. (2011). A new age of cooperation and collaboration between school science education research and science communication research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(1), 9–11.
PISA (2009). http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009keyfindings.htm.
PISA (2012). http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm.
Price, D. J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science. London: Columbia University Press.
Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2006). Announcing cultural studies of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 1–5.
Royal Society. (1985). The public understanding of science. London: Royal Society.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409.
Stocklmayer, S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). New experiences and old knowledge: Towards a model for the personal awareness of science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 835–858.
Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts: New models, new practices (pp. 119–138). Brussels Springer
Tsai, C. Y., Huang, T. C., Chou, C. Y., Wu, Y. Y., Chiu, H. L., Liu, C. J., Hung, F. J. & Chao, D. (2010). Gender differences in public understanding of and attitudes toward science in Taiwan. Paper presented at 21st International Conference on Chemical Education. Taipei, Taiwan.
Tseng, W. C. (2006, Oct 29). The simple-minded journalist in HSR news. The Liberty Times
Wang, C. H. (1995). Learning and teaching in STS. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 115–137.
Wang, T. P. (2005). Content analysis of the public science articles on NMNS newsletters and research of teachers’ reading preferences. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung.
Wang, L. J., & Fang, N. S. (2004, Nov 2). News or drama?China Times
Wynne, B. (1995). Public understanding of science. In S. Jasnoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 361–388). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yang, Y. J., & Hsu, M. L. (2012). Perception and communication of environmental risk: A case study of situational publics regarding global warming. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 22, 169–210.
Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. London: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huang, CJ. (2016). Public Communication of Science and Technology in Taiwan. In: Chiu, MH. (eds) Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-471-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-472-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)