Skip to main content

Paradoxes of Young People’s Political Participation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Establishing Geographies of Children and Young People

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the complexities and paradoxes of young people’s political participation and related activism, agency, and practices. The chapter explores the ways in which young people face a range of contradictory perceptions around their political participation. They are perceived as being part of hopeful, positive, and egalitarian politics at the same time as they are considered to not have the skills or capacity to be effective political actors. This chapter contains five sections and a conclusion. The introduction (Sect. 1) provides an overview and calls for caution around the terms “youth” and “young people.” In Sect. 2, the normative positioning of young people as political agents, drawing largely from liberal political thought and its critiques based in the West, is detailed. Here the political subject in liberalism is scrutinized for its validity but also for its inadequacy. Section 3 describes a pedagogy, or a set of discourses and practices that sustains social order, and that emphasizes the creation of self-governing citizens. Section 4 of this chapter outlines the ways that this pedagogy is operationalized and enacted by institutions and civil society organizations and discusses the implications for the creation of political subjects. It engages with the expectations around youthful citizenship and the “common good.” Section 5 focuses on definitions of politics and the importance of redefining politics. It examines the relationality between acts and politics. The conclusion considers the kinds of politics such political subjects enact and questions surrounding active and activist citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahams, N. (1992). Towards reconceptualising political action. Sociological Inquiry, 62, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvachez, E. (2009). Surpranational citizenship building and the UN: Is the UN engaged in a ‘citizenization’ process? Global Governance, 15, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basok, T., & Ilcan, S. (2006). In the name of human rights: Global organizations and participating citizens. Citizenship Studies, 10, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (2010). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2001). Freedom’s children. In U. Beck & E. Beck-Gensheim (Eds.), Individualisation (pp. 156–171). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyte, H. (2003). A different kind of politics: John Dewey and the meaning of citizenship in the 21st century. The Good Society, 12(2), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerna, M. (1994). Universality of human rights and cultural diversity: Implementation of human rights in different socio-cultural contexts. Human Rights Quarterly, 16, 740–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1986). An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 97, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (2005). Neither seen nor heard: Children’s citizenship in contemporary democracies. Citizenship Studies, 9, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC. (2015). Youth engagement in the transition from MDGs to SDGs: What will it take. In Informal summary United Nations economic and social council youth forum http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/youth2015/pdf/informal_summary.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC. (2018) .The role of youth in building sustainable and resilient urban and rural communities. Informal Summary United Nations Economic and Social Council Youth Forum, https://www.un.org/ecosoc/sites/www.un.org.ecosoc/files/files/en/2018doc/2018_ecosoc_youth_forum_summary.pdf.

  • Etzioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of community. New York: Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farthing, R. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: Representing the ‘issue’ of youth participation in politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(2), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaus, G. (2000). Political concepts and political theories. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Translated by T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. (2014a). Subject, action and polis: Theorizing political agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. (2014b). The global as a field: Children’s rights advocacy as a transnational practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. (2013). Rereading the universal declaration of human rights: Plurality and contestation, not consensus. Journal of Human Rights, 12, 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2006). Not just growing up, but going on: Children’s geographies as becomings: Materials, spacings, bodies, situations. Children’s Geographies, 4(3), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilcan, S., & Basok, T. (2004). Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice and the responsibilization of citizens. Citizenship Studies, 8, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. (2006). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. Isin & G. Neilsen (Eds.), Acts of Citizenship (pp. 15–43). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2014). On South Bank: The production of public space. Farnsworth: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K., & Häkli, J. (2011). Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography, 30(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M. (1999). Liberalism, pluralism, and political education: Paradox or paradigm? Oxford Review of Education, 25(1–2), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillian.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1861[2006]). Considerations on Representative Government. Boston: IndyPublish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. (2013). ‘An instruction in good citizenship’: Scouting and the historical geographies of citizenship education. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S., & Waite, C. (2017). Brands of youth citizenship and the politics of scale: National Citizen Service in the United Kingdom. Political Geography, 56, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. (2003). Educating the national citizen in neoliberal times: From the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., Attoh, K., & Staeheli, L. (2014). Whose city? What politics? Contentious and non-contentious spaces on Colorado’s front range. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014550460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa-Mitha, M. (2005). A difference-centred alternative to theorization of children’s citizenship rights. Citizenship Studies, 9(4), 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutua, M. (2002). Human rights: A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, K. (2009). Between citizenship and human rights. Sociology, 43, 1067–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ober, J. (2013). Democracy’s wisdom: An Aristotelian middle way for collective judgement. American Political Science Review, 107, 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykett, J. (2010). Citizenship education and narratives of pedagogy. Citizenship Studies, 14, 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2008). Hatred of Democracy. Translated by S. Corcoran. In Corcoran. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. (2011). The autonomous animal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2010). Poverty capital: Microfinance and the making of development. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1998). An education for America: Tocqueville, Hawthorne, Emerson. In S. Hoffman & D. Thompson (Eds.), Redeeming American political thought (pp. 65–79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, T. (2007). Children, young people, UNICEF and participation. Children’s Geographies, 51, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, T. (2010). Taking young people as political actors seriously: Opening the borders of political geography. Area, 42, 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L., & Hammett, D. (2010). Educating the new national citizen: Education, political subjectivity and divided societies. Citizenship Studies, 14(6), 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L., Ehrkamp, P., Leitner, H., & Nagel, C. (2012). Dreaming the ordinary: Daily life and the complex geographies of citizenship. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 628–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L., Marshall, D., Jeffrey, A., Nagel, C., and Hammett, D. (2014). Producing citizenship in divided societies. YouCitizen working paper 2. Available at www.youcitizen.org/images/Working%20Paper%202_Producing%20Citizenship%20in%20Divided%20Societies.pdf. Last viewed 13 Feb 2015.

  • Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins: Transactional bodies, pragmatism, and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn A. Staeheli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Staeheli, L.A. (2019). Paradoxes of Young People’s Political Participation. In: Skelton, T., Aitken, S. (eds) Establishing Geographies of Children and Young People. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-041-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics