Abstract
Driving any transport vehicle carries a significant amount of risk. Driving, on the other hand, is a necessity that cannot be ignored or replaced with something safer. The only thing that can be done in this concern is by taking precautionary measures to make driving safer and reducing the injuries and death to almost 0. The distracted driving model was built with the aim of achieving accident-free roads, with no threat and danger of any accident. This model accomplishes this task by detecting the behavior of the driver while driving the vehicle and inform the driver of any distraction which can possibly result in an accident. For this purpose, the machine learning model is trained to categorize the real-time received images of the driver into various classes of distractions. The distracted driver model has been developed on various different models. The accuracy of the predictions made by each of the models is compared to finally achieve the model which can best suit the requirement and provide highly accurate results. After performing a validation check on all the algorithms, KNN model has best accuracy and found out that KNN over LDA had ~99% accuracy which will give near about accurate detection of drivers’ distraction. We also validated it on PCA and PCA over LDA too where PCA gave the accuracy of ~81% PCA over LDA gave ~76%, but LDA gave us the best accuracy, i.e., ~99%. The authors can assist the government in detecting drivers who engage in practices such as drunk driving, rash driving, texting, calling, eating, drinking, and many more by properly implementing this model. The laws can be implemented successfully and easily using this paradigm because no human intervention is necessary. The paper discusses about building a machine learning model for detecting distractions of the driver while driving. The paper comprehensively discusses the steps and methodology required for creating such model. Finally, results were calculated for respective algorithms and based on those selections can be made as per the requirement of the user. It is difficult to choose the best algorithm or the technique that will fit as per the user’s requirement. Therefore, this paper tried to draw a comparison among the various techniques by calculating the values of different parameters and helps the users to select the best technique as per their requirement. Selection of the technique would vary for different users.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rau P (2005) Drowsy driver detection and warning system for commercial vehicle drivers: field operational test design, analysis, and progress. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA (Google Scholar)
Research note on “Traffic safety facts” by U.S. Department of transportation national highway Traffic safety Administration, March 2017
Hossain MU et al (2022) Automatic driver distraction detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Intell Syst Appl 14:200075
The Government of India (2016) Road accidents in India. [Online]. Available: https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Road_Accidents_in_India_2016.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
Federal Communication Commission (2016) The dangers of distracted driving
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2017) Distracted driving
Tian R, Li L, Chen M, Chen Y, Witt GJ (2013) Studying the effects of driver distraction and traffic density on the probability of crash and near-crash events in naturalistic driving environment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 14(3):1547–1555
Regan MA, Hallett C, Gordon CP (2011) Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accid Anal Prev 43:1771–1781
Willis S (2002) Shorter oxford english dictionary on historical principles, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA
Kaplan S, Guvensan MA, Yavuz AG, Karalurt Y (2015) Driver behavior analysis for safe driving: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(6):3017–3032
National Institutes of Health Research (2014) Distracted driving raises crash risk
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) Distracted driving. 15 Jan 2020
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2020) Policy Statement and Compiled FAQs on Distracted Driving. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (Online). 25 Jan 2020
Li Z, Bao S, Kolmanovsky IV, Yin X (2018) Visual-manual distraction detection using driving performance indicators with naturalistic driving data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(8):2528–2535
Iranmanesh SM, Mahjoub HN, Kazemi H, Fallah YP (2018) An adaptive forward collision warning framework design based on driver distraction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(12):3925–3934
Business Insider (2017) Tesla fatal crash. (Online). Available: https://www.businessinsider.in/New-details-about-the-fatal-Tesla-Autopilotaccident-reveal-the-drivers-last-minutes/articleshow/59238933.cms. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
The Guardian (2018) Uber fatal crash (Online). Available: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jun/22/driver-wasstreaming-the-voice-when-uber-self-driving-car-crashed-say-police. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
Zhang X, Zheng N, Wang F, He Y (2011) Visual recognition of driver hand-held cell phone use based on hidden CRF. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on vehicular electronics and safety, July 2011, pp 248–251
Das N, Ohn-Bar E, Trivedi MM (2015) On performance evaluation of driver hand detection algorithms: challenges, dataset, and metrics. In: Proceedings of IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Sep 2015, pp 2953–2958
Seshadri K, Juefei-Xu F, Pal DK, Savvides M, Thor CP (2015) Driver cell phone usage detection on strategic highway research program (SHRP2) face view videos. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, June 2015, pp 35–43
Le THN, Zheng Y, Zhu C, Luu K, Savvides M (2016) Multiple scale faster-RCNN approach to driver cell-phone usage and hands on steering wheel detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, June 2016, pp 46–53
Ohn-Bar E, Martin S, Tawari A, Trivedi MM (2014) Head, eye, and hand patterns for driver activity recognition. In: Proceedings of 22nd international conference on pattern recognition, Aug 2014, pp 660–665
Zhao CH, Zhang BL, He J, Lian J (2012) Recognition of driving postures by contourlet transform and random forests. IET Intell Trans Syst 6(2):161–168
Zhao C, Zhang B, Zhang X, Zhao S, Li H (2012) Recognition of driving postures by combined features and random subspace ensemble of multilayer perceptron classifiers. Neural Comput Appl 22:175–184
State Farm (2016) Distracted driver detection competition (Online). Available: https://www.kaggle.com/c/state-farm-distracted-driverdetection. Accessed: 15 Jan 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Srivastava, G., Singh, S. (2023). A Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning Techniques for Driver Distraction Detection. In: Singh, Y., Singh, P.K., Kolekar, M.H., Kar, A.K., Gonçalves, P.J.S. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Innovations in Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1001. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9876-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9876-8_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9875-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9876-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)