Skip to main content

A Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning Techniques for Driver Distraction Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Innovations in Computing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 1001))

Abstract

Driving any transport vehicle carries a significant amount of risk. Driving, on the other hand, is a necessity that cannot be ignored or replaced with something safer. The only thing that can be done in this concern is by taking precautionary measures to make driving safer and reducing the injuries and death to almost 0. The distracted driving model was built with the aim of achieving accident-free roads, with no threat and danger of any accident. This model accomplishes this task by detecting the behavior of the driver while driving the vehicle and inform the driver of any distraction which can possibly result in an accident. For this purpose, the machine learning model is trained to categorize the real-time received images of the driver into various classes of distractions. The distracted driver model has been developed on various different models. The accuracy of the predictions made by each of the models is compared to finally achieve the model which can best suit the requirement and provide highly accurate results. After performing a validation check on all the algorithms, KNN model has best accuracy and found out that KNN over LDA had ~99% accuracy which will give near about accurate detection of drivers’ distraction. We also validated it on PCA and PCA over LDA too where PCA gave the accuracy of ~81% PCA over LDA gave ~76%, but LDA gave us the best accuracy, i.e., ~99%. The authors can assist the government in detecting drivers who engage in practices such as drunk driving, rash driving, texting, calling, eating, drinking, and many more by properly implementing this model. The laws can be implemented successfully and easily using this paradigm because no human intervention is necessary. The paper discusses about building a machine learning model for detecting distractions of the driver while driving. The paper comprehensively discusses the steps and methodology required for creating such model. Finally, results were calculated for respective algorithms and based on those selections can be made as per the requirement of the user. It is difficult to choose the best algorithm or the technique that will fit as per the user’s requirement. Therefore, this paper tried to draw a comparison among the various techniques by calculating the values of different parameters and helps the users to select the best technique as per their requirement. Selection of the technique would vary for different users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rau P (2005) Drowsy driver detection and warning system for commercial vehicle drivers: field operational test design, analysis, and progress. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA (Google Scholar)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Research note on “Traffic safety facts” by U.S. Department of transportation national highway Traffic safety Administration, March 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hossain MU et al (2022) Automatic driver distraction detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Intell Syst Appl 14:200075

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Government of India (2016) Road accidents in India. [Online]. Available: https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Road_Accidents_in_India_2016.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  5. Federal Communication Commission (2016) The dangers of distracted driving

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2017) Distracted driving

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tian R, Li L, Chen M, Chen Y, Witt GJ (2013) Studying the effects of driver distraction and traffic density on the probability of crash and near-crash events in naturalistic driving environment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 14(3):1547–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Regan MA, Hallett C, Gordon CP (2011) Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accid Anal Prev 43:1771–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Willis S (2002) Shorter oxford english dictionary on historical principles, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan S, Guvensan MA, Yavuz AG, Karalurt Y (2015) Driver behavior analysis for safe driving: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(6):3017–3032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Institutes of Health Research (2014) Distracted driving raises crash risk

    Google Scholar 

  12. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) Distracted driving. 15 Jan 2020

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2020) Policy Statement and Compiled FAQs on Distracted Driving. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (Online). 25 Jan 2020

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Bao S, Kolmanovsky IV, Yin X (2018) Visual-manual distraction detection using driving performance indicators with naturalistic driving data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(8):2528–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iranmanesh SM, Mahjoub HN, Kazemi H, Fallah YP (2018) An adaptive forward collision warning framework design based on driver distraction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(12):3925–3934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Business Insider (2017) Tesla fatal crash. (Online). Available: https://www.businessinsider.in/New-details-about-the-fatal-Tesla-Autopilotaccident-reveal-the-drivers-last-minutes/articleshow/59238933.cms. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  17. The Guardian (2018) Uber fatal crash (Online). Available: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jun/22/driver-wasstreaming-the-voice-when-uber-self-driving-car-crashed-say-police. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  18. Zhang X, Zheng N, Wang F, He Y (2011) Visual recognition of driver hand-held cell phone use based on hidden CRF. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on vehicular electronics and safety, July 2011, pp 248–251

    Google Scholar 

  19. Das N, Ohn-Bar E, Trivedi MM (2015) On performance evaluation of driver hand detection algorithms: challenges, dataset, and metrics. In: Proceedings of IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Sep 2015, pp 2953–2958

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seshadri K, Juefei-Xu F, Pal DK, Savvides M, Thor CP (2015) Driver cell phone usage detection on strategic highway research program (SHRP2) face view videos. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, June 2015, pp 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  21. Le THN, Zheng Y, Zhu C, Luu K, Savvides M (2016) Multiple scale faster-RCNN approach to driver cell-phone usage and hands on steering wheel detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, June 2016, pp 46–53

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ohn-Bar E, Martin S, Tawari A, Trivedi MM (2014) Head, eye, and hand patterns for driver activity recognition. In: Proceedings of 22nd international conference on pattern recognition, Aug 2014, pp 660–665

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao CH, Zhang BL, He J, Lian J (2012) Recognition of driving postures by contourlet transform and random forests. IET Intell Trans Syst 6(2):161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao C, Zhang B, Zhang X, Zhao S, Li H (2012) Recognition of driving postures by combined features and random subspace ensemble of multilayer perceptron classifiers. Neural Comput Appl 22:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. State Farm (2016) Distracted driver detection competition (Online). Available: https://www.kaggle.com/c/state-farm-distracted-driverdetection. Accessed: 15 Jan 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garima Srivastava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Srivastava, G., Singh, S. (2023). A Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning Techniques for Driver Distraction Detection. In: Singh, Y., Singh, P.K., Kolekar, M.H., Kar, A.K., Gonçalves, P.J.S. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Innovations in Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1001. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9876-8_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics