Abstract
Flying Ad hoc NETwork (FANET) refers to a self-organizing wireless network that facilitates easy, flexible and inexpensive deployment of flying nodes termed as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). These UAVs communicate with one another without the presence of any fixed network infrastructure. The routing process is responsible for achieving reliable coordination and cooperation among flying nodes to establish reliable routes towards radio access infrastructure that corresponds to Base Station (BS) of FANET. Routing protocols in FANETs play an anchor role in preventing network partitions and link disconnections to guarantee prolonged route lifetime with minimized energy utilization rate. In this paper, an Adaptive Opposition Learning-Improved Slime Mould Algorithm (AOLISMA)-based optimization routing is proposed for ensuring reliable data dissemination among UAVs with extended network lifetime and minimized energy consumption. This AOLISMA routing approach utilizes two randomly selected search agents for determining feasible direction and displacement that aid in better routing process. It adopts random selection of search agents for restricting the limits of exploration and exploitation to establish better balance during the process of routing. It also helps in attaining a near-optimal or optimal route that prolongs network route lifetime. It specifically utilizes opposition learning for adaptive increase in the exploration rate for identifying feasible routes from which, optimal route can be selected based on an objective function for attaining reliable routing. The simulation experiments of the proposed AOLISMA scheme conducted based on throughput, control overhead, mean delay and energy consumption for varying mobility rates of UAVs confirm better performance on par with the baseline GAR, ACOAR and ABCAR approaches taken for comparison.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Khan, M. F., Yau, K. A., Noor, R. M., & Imran, M. A. (2019). Routing schemes in FANETs: A survey. Sensors, 20(1), 38.
Aadil, F., Raza, A., Khan, M., Maqsood, M., Mehmood, I., & Rho, S. (2018). Energy aware cluster-based routing in flying ad-hoc networks. Sensors, 18(5), 1413.
Mahmud, I., & Cho, Y. (2021). LECAR: Location estimation-based congestion-aware routing protocol for sparsely deployed energy-efficient UAVs. Sensors, 21(21), 7192.
Sahingoz, O. K. (2013). Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): Concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), 513–527.
Guillen-Perez, A., & Cano, M. (2018). Flying ad hoc networks: A new domain for network communications. Sensors, 18(10), 3571.
Souza, J., Jailton, J., Carvalho, T., Araújo, J., & Francês, R. (2019). A proposal for routing protocol for FANET: A fuzzy system approach with QoE/QoS guarantee. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019(2), 1–10.
Shankar Subramaniyam, R., & Deva Priya, M. (2016) Black box detection using UAV in FANETs. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (IJMER), 3(1), 69–72.
Balamurugan, A., Sengathir, J., Deva Priya, M., & Christy Jeba Malar, A. (2022) Hybrid marine predators optimization and improved particle swarm optimization-based optimal cluster routing in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). China Communications, 19(6), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2022.06.017
Sengathir, J., & Deva Priya, M. (2023) Selfish node detection scheme based on bates distribution inspired trust factor for MANETs. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.v9i6.3065
Yang, H., & Liu, Z. (2019). An optimization routing protocol for FANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2019(1), 67–79.
Rosati, S., Kruzelecki, K., Heitz, G., Floreano, D., & Rimoldi, B. (2016). Dynamic routing for flying ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(3), 1690–1700.
Bhardwaj, V., & Kaur, N. (2020). An efficient routing protocol for FANET based on hybrid optimization algorithm. In: 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), pp. 252–255
Liu, J., Huo, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Throughput optimization for flying ad hoc network based on position control using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 11(2), 11–21.
Oubbati, O. S., Atiquzzaman, M., Lorenz, P., Tareque, M. H., & Hossain, M. S. (2019). Routing in flying ad hoc networks: Survey, constraints, and future challenge perspectives. IEEE Access, 7(1), 81057
Sundar, K., & Rathinam, S. (2014). Algorithms for routing an unmanned aerial vehicle in the presence of refueling depots. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 11(1), 287–294.
Maakar, S. K., Khurana, M., Chakraborty, C., Sinwar, D., & Srivastava, D. (2022). Performance evaluation of AODV and DSR routing protocols for flying ad hoc network using highway mobility model. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 31(01), 2250008.
Pandey, A., Shukla, P. K., & Agrawal, R. (2020). An adaptive flying ad-hoc network (FANET) for disaster response operations to improve quality of service (QoS). Modern Physics Letters B, 34(10), 2050010.
Naik, M. K., Panda, R., & Abraham, A. (2021). Adaptive opposition slime mould algorithm. Soft Computing, 25(3), 14297–14313.
Ma, Z., Guo, Q., Ma, J., Zhang, Z., Ma, H., Peng, L., & Li, Y. (2019). VaSe-MRP: Velocity-aware and stability-estimation–based multi-path routing protocol in flying ad hoc network. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15(11), 155014771988312.
Wei, X., Yang, H., & Huang, W. (2021). A genetic-algorithm-Based optimization routing for FANETs. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 15(2), 89–98.
Wei, X., & Yang, H. (2020). A routing optimization method based on ACA for FANETs. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 35(05), 2159015.
Guo, K., & Lv, Y. (2020). Optimizing routing path selection method particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 34(12), 2059042.
Hameed, S., Minhas, Q., Ahmed, S., Habib, S., Kamrul Hasan, M., Islam, M., & Khan, S. (2021). An improved iBAT-COOP protocol for cooperative diversity in FANETs. Computers, Materials and Continua, 67(2), 2527–2546.
Kaur, M., Singh, A., Verma, S., Kavita, Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Talib, M. N. (2021). FANET: Efficient routing in flying ad hoc networks (FANETs) using firefly algorithm. Intelligent Computing and Innovation on Data Science, 3(3), 483–490.
Da Costa, L. A., Kunst, R., & Pignaton de Freitas, E. (2021). Q-FANET: Improved Q-learning based routing protocol for FANETs. Computer Networks, 198(2), 108379.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sengathir, J., Deva Priya, M., Christy Jeba Malar, A., Jacob, S.S. (2023). An Adaptive Opposition Learning-Improved Slime Mould Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for Guaranteeing Reliable Data Dissemination in FANETs. In: Sharma, D.K., Peng, SL., Sharma, R., Jeon, G. (eds) Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering . Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 617. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9512-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9512-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9511-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9512-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)