Skip to main content

An Adaptive Opposition Learning-Improved Slime Mould Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for Guaranteeing Reliable Data Dissemination in FANETs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 617))

Abstract

Flying Ad hoc NETwork (FANET) refers to a self-organizing wireless network that facilitates easy, flexible and inexpensive deployment of flying nodes termed as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). These UAVs communicate with one another without the presence of any fixed network infrastructure. The routing process is responsible for achieving reliable coordination and cooperation among flying nodes to establish reliable routes towards radio access infrastructure that corresponds to Base Station (BS) of FANET. Routing protocols in FANETs play an anchor role in preventing network partitions and link disconnections to guarantee prolonged route lifetime with minimized energy utilization rate. In this paper, an Adaptive Opposition Learning-Improved Slime Mould Algorithm (AOLISMA)-based optimization routing is proposed for ensuring reliable data dissemination among UAVs with extended network lifetime and minimized energy consumption. This AOLISMA routing approach utilizes two randomly selected search agents for determining feasible direction and displacement that aid in better routing process. It adopts random selection of search agents for restricting the limits of exploration and exploitation to establish better balance during the process of routing. It also helps in attaining a near-optimal or optimal route that prolongs network route lifetime. It specifically utilizes opposition learning for adaptive increase in the exploration rate for identifying feasible routes from which, optimal route can be selected based on an objective function for attaining reliable routing. The simulation experiments of the proposed AOLISMA scheme conducted based on throughput, control overhead, mean delay and energy consumption for varying mobility rates of UAVs confirm better performance on par with the baseline GAR, ACOAR and ABCAR approaches taken for comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khan, M. F., Yau, K. A., Noor, R. M., & Imran, M. A. (2019). Routing schemes in FANETs: A survey. Sensors, 20(1), 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aadil, F., Raza, A., Khan, M., Maqsood, M., Mehmood, I., & Rho, S. (2018). Energy aware cluster-based routing in flying ad-hoc networks. Sensors, 18(5), 1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahmud, I., & Cho, Y. (2021). LECAR: Location estimation-based congestion-aware routing protocol for sparsely deployed energy-efficient UAVs. Sensors, 21(21), 7192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sahingoz, O. K. (2013). Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): Concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), 513–527.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guillen-Perez, A., & Cano, M. (2018). Flying ad hoc networks: A new domain for network communications. Sensors, 18(10), 3571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Souza, J., Jailton, J., Carvalho, T., Araújo, J., & Francês, R. (2019). A proposal for routing protocol for FANET: A fuzzy system approach with QoE/QoS guarantee. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shankar Subramaniyam, R., & Deva Priya, M. (2016) Black box detection using UAV in FANETs. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (IJMER), 3(1), 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Balamurugan, A., Sengathir, J., Deva Priya, M., & Christy Jeba Malar, A. (2022) Hybrid marine predators optimization and improved particle swarm optimization-based optimal cluster routing in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). China Communications, 19(6), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2022.06.017

  9. Sengathir, J., & Deva Priya, M. (2023) Selfish node detection scheme based on bates distribution inspired trust factor for MANETs. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.v9i6.3065

  10. Yang, H., & Liu, Z. (2019). An optimization routing protocol for FANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2019(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosati, S., Kruzelecki, K., Heitz, G., Floreano, D., & Rimoldi, B. (2016). Dynamic routing for flying ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(3), 1690–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhardwaj, V., & Kaur, N. (2020). An efficient routing protocol for FANET based on hybrid optimization algorithm. In: 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), pp. 252–255

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J., Huo, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Throughput optimization for flying ad hoc network based on position control using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 11(2), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oubbati, O. S., Atiquzzaman, M., Lorenz, P., Tareque, M. H., & Hossain, M. S. (2019). Routing in flying ad hoc networks: Survey, constraints, and future challenge perspectives. IEEE Access, 7(1), 81057

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sundar, K., & Rathinam, S. (2014). Algorithms for routing an unmanned aerial vehicle in the presence of refueling depots. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 11(1), 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maakar, S. K., Khurana, M., Chakraborty, C., Sinwar, D., & Srivastava, D. (2022). Performance evaluation of AODV and DSR routing protocols for flying ad hoc network using highway mobility model. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 31(01), 2250008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandey, A., Shukla, P. K., & Agrawal, R. (2020). An adaptive flying ad-hoc network (FANET) for disaster response operations to improve quality of service (QoS). Modern Physics Letters B, 34(10), 2050010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naik, M. K., Panda, R., & Abraham, A. (2021). Adaptive opposition slime mould algorithm. Soft Computing, 25(3), 14297–14313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma, Z., Guo, Q., Ma, J., Zhang, Z., Ma, H., Peng, L., & Li, Y. (2019). VaSe-MRP: Velocity-aware and stability-estimation–based multi-path routing protocol in flying ad hoc network. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15(11), 155014771988312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei, X., Yang, H., & Huang, W. (2021). A genetic-algorithm-Based optimization routing for FANETs. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 15(2), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, X., & Yang, H. (2020). A routing optimization method based on ACA for FANETs. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 35(05), 2159015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo, K., & Lv, Y. (2020). Optimizing routing path selection method particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 34(12), 2059042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hameed, S., Minhas, Q., Ahmed, S., Habib, S., Kamrul Hasan, M., Islam, M., & Khan, S. (2021). An improved iBAT-COOP protocol for cooperative diversity in FANETs. Computers, Materials and Continua, 67(2), 2527–2546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaur, M., Singh, A., Verma, S., Kavita, Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Talib, M. N. (2021). FANET: Efficient routing in flying ad hoc networks (FANETs) using firefly algorithm. Intelligent Computing and Innovation on Data Science, 3(3), 483–490.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Da Costa, L. A., Kunst, R., & Pignaton de Freitas, E. (2021). Q-FANET: Improved Q-learning based routing protocol for FANETs. Computer Networks, 198(2), 108379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Deva Priya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sengathir, J., Deva Priya, M., Christy Jeba Malar, A., Jacob, S.S. (2023). An Adaptive Opposition Learning-Improved Slime Mould Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for Guaranteeing Reliable Data Dissemination in FANETs. In: Sharma, D.K., Peng, SL., Sharma, R., Jeon, G. (eds) Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering . Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 617. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9512-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9512-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9511-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9512-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics