Skip to main content

Preferences in the Detailing Process Among Young and Senior Physicians

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning in Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 498))

  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

Detailing is the method of communication in which a healthcare professional is conveyed about a product of a pharmaceutical industry. It is important to understand the preferences of physicians in the detailing process as physician have to cater to the treatment of patients and also keep themselves updated about the advancements made in the pharmaceutical industry. Hence, this study aims to highlight the preferences of physicians in the detailing process based on two different age groups of physicians, young and adult. Seven parameters: convenience of timing, day, interaction time, technology failure, duration of detailing, personalized information and social interaction skills of medical representatives were taken for the study. 425 physicians were approached, and their viewpoints were taken on a seven point Likert scale for the variables identified for the study. It was found that physicians above 45 years are more flexible in providing time to the medical representatives than physicians of age 25–45, and they expect more personalized information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harindranath RM, Sivakumaran B (2021) Pharmaceutical promotion: a literature review and research agenda. New Tech Brand Manag Healthc Sect 44–63

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee S, Dash SK (2011) Effectiveness of e-detailing as an innovative pharmaceutical marketing tool in emerging economies: views of health care professionals of India 11(3):204–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745790411413631

  3. Bernewitz T (2001) e-Detailing: where does it fit in pharmaceutical sales. ZS Assoc 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gönül FF, Carter FJ (2009) Impact of e-detailing on the number of new prescriptions. Heal Care Manag Sci 13(2):101–111

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heutschi R, Legner C, Schiesser A, Barak V, Österle H (2016) Potential benefits and challenges of e-detailing in Europe 3(4):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jmm.5040130

  6. Sridhar S, Mantrala MK, Albers S (2014) Pharmaceutical detailing elasticities: a meta-analysis, 531–556

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alkhateeb FM, Doucette WR (2009) Influences on physicians’ adoption of electronic detailing (e-detailing) 34(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538150902779402

  8. Nandy M, Pal B (2015) Pharmaceutical marketing and product promotion: a paradigm shift in indian pharmaceutical industry (IPI). Adhyayan A J Manag Sci 5(02):27–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prounis C (2003) What doctors want. Pharm Exec 23(5):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Areefi MA, Hassali MA, Mohamed Ibrahim MIB (2013) Physicians’ perceptions of medical representative visits in Yemen: a qualitative study. BMC Heal Serv Res 13(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Molloy W et al (2002) Assessing the quality of drug detailing. J Clin Epidemiol 55(8):825–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ventura K, Baybars M, Dedeoglu AO (2012) A new debate for Turkish physicians: e-detailing. Health Mark Q 29(4):362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Montoya ID (2008) E-detailing: information technology applied to pharmaceutical detailing. Expert Opin Drug Saf 7(6):635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davidson T, Sivadas E (2004) Details drive success. Physicians are responding to electronics sales calls. Mark Health Serv 24(1):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kwak E-S, Chang H (2016) Medical representatives’ intention to use information technology in pharmaceutical marketing. Healthc Inform Res 22(4):342–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhadko SV, Mostafa A (2018) The possibilities of using information and communication technologies in the work of medical representatives

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parekh D, Kapupara P, Shah K (2016) Digital pharmaceutical marketing: a review. Res J Pharm Technol 9(1):108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horiz 53(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jawaid M, Ahmed SJ (2018) Pharmaceutical digital marketing and its impact on healthcare physicians of Pakistan: a national survey. Cureus 10(6)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boehm EW, Brown EG, Molvar K (2001) Pharma’s detailing overhaul. Forrester Rep

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bates A, Bailey E, Rajyaguru I (2002) Navigating the e-detailing maze. J Med Mark 2(3):255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Trucco MY, Amirkhanova S (2006) Transforming pharmaceutical marketing through e-detailing: case studies and recommendations. In: The 8th IEEE international conference on e-commerce technology and the 3rd IEEE international conference on enterprise computing, e-commerce, and e-services (CEC/EEE’06), 2006, p 25

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nalini R, Alamelu R, Amudha R, Badrinath, Ganesh Kumar D (2017) E-detailing—empowering doctors in digital era. Res J Pharm Technol 10(8):2663–2667

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gleason M (2001) Internet detailing opens the doctor’s door as this case study shows, the use of cyberspace technology to reach target physicians can give companies a competitive edge with a positive return on investment. Med Mark Media 36(1):80–87

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. McKillen D (2002) E-detailing gaining acceptance among physicians an e-detailing study conducted by Manhattan research shows that physicians are embracing this mode of detailing in increasing numbers. Med Mark Media 37(9):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hincapie A et al (2021) Perceptions of the provision of drug information, pharmaceutical detailing and engagement with non-personal promotion at a large physicians network: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 11(1):e041098

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saibal Kumar Saha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saha, S.K., Sarangi, A., Munjal, S., Dhar, P., Jha, A. (2023). Preferences in the Detailing Process Among Young and Senior Physicians. In: Deva Sarma, H.K., Piuri, V., Pujari, A.K. (eds) Machine Learning in Information and Communication Technology . Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 498. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5090-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5090-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5089-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5090-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics