Skip to main content

Dynamic Education Background: Procure the Maximum Initiation from PBL for Education Naïve Bayes Algorithm for Machine Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data, Engineering and Applications

Abstract

The main advancement in the field of engineering education is learning somewhat which is based on the problem. This term surely applied to any learning environment in which students drive learning. It is presented in such a way that students understand the problem before moving toward its solution and accordingly they need to gain new information. For the fourth year of the Computer Science and Engineering degree curriculum, this research introduces the knowledge of a formal problem-based learning procedure for educating a preliminary research component in the naive Bayesian method of machine learning. At the beginning of the module, the Naïve Bayes Algorithm design problem was introduced to students. For seven weeks, a small crowd of undergraduates were operated for this assignment, at the same time the instructor served as the information acquisition facilitator. Every week, brief, written information was composed as the learner evaluation, so that the learning environments were ensured. Due to COVID-19, most of the offline classes were suspended so this PBL experiment and the written reports are conducted /collected through the online mode. A list of guidelines to assist academic interest in pursuing PBL with a similar strategy is outlined in the report.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fauziyah N, Lant CL, Budayasa IK, Juniati D (2019) Cognition processes of students with high functioning autism spectrum disorder in solving mathematical problems. Int J Instr 12(1):457478. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12130a

  2. Geller EH, Son JY, Stigler JW (2017) Conceptual explanations and understanding fraction comparisons. Learn Instr 52:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Learninstruc.2017.05.006

  3. Gultepe N, Celik AY, Kilic Z (2013) Exploring effects of high school students ‘mathematical processing skills and conceptual understanding of chemical concepts on algorithmic problem solving. Aust J Teacher Educ 38(10):106–122. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n10.1

  4. Jena PC (2014) Cognitive styles and problem solving ability of under graduate students. Int J Educ Psychol Res 3(2):71–76.10

    Google Scholar 

  5. ZA, Abdullah NH, Anthony E, Salleh BM, Kamarulzaman R (2016) Does problem-based learning improve problem solving skills?—A study among business undergraduates at Malaysian Premier Technical University. Int Educ Stud 9(5):166. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p166.11

  6. Karaçam S, Digilli Baran A (2015) The effects of field dependent/field independent cognitive styles and motivational styles on students’ conceptual understanding about direct current circuits. Asia- Pac Forum Sci Learn Teach 16(2), ar.6

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez BP (2014) Theme The 21st century adult learner. Educ Res Rev 12(8):540–548. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2928

  8. Loyens SMM, Jones SH, Mikkers J, van Gog T (2015) Problem-based learning as a facilitator of conceptual change. Learn Instr 38:34–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.03.002

  9. Margunayasa IG, Dantes N, Marhaeni AAIN, Suastra IW (2019) The effect of guided inquiry learning and cognitive style on science learning achievement. Int J Instruc 12(1):737–750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12147a

  10. Mustofa RF, Hidayah Y (2020) The effect of problem-based learning on lateral thinking skills. Int J Instr 13(1):463–474

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palupi BS, Subiyantoro S, Rukayah, Triyanto (2020) The effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning (GIL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for explanatory writing skill. Int J Instr 13(1):713–730.https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13146a

  12. Reigeluth CM, Cheliman MC (2009) Instructional-design theories and model: building a common knowledge base, vol III. Taylor and Francis Publiser, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodzalan SA, Saat MM (2015) The perception of critical thinking and problem solving skill among malaysian undergraduate students. Proc Soc Behav Sci 172(2012):725–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.425

  14. Sangestani G, Khatiban M (2013) Comparison of problem-based learning and lecture-based learning in midwifery. Nurse Educ Today 33(8):791–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.03.010

  15. Saricayir H, Ay S, Comek A, Cansiz G, Uce M (2016) Determining students’conceptual understanding level of thermodynamics. J Educ Train Stud 4(6):69–79. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i6.1421

  16. Sellah L, Jacinta K, Helen M (2017) Analysis of student- teacher cognitive styles interaction: an approach to understanding learner performance. J Educ Pract 8(14):10–20

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strobel J, van Barneveld A (2009) When is PBL more effective? a meta- synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdiscip J Problem-Based Learn 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046

  18. Sudarman, Setyosari P, Kuswandi D, Dwiyogo WD (2016) The effect of learning strategy and cognitive style toward mathematical

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cuschieri S, Grech V, Savona-Ventura C (2018) WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): how to write a scientific thesis. Early Human Dev 127:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARLHUMDEV.2018.07.012

  20. Dahl B (2018) What is the problem in problem-based learning in higher education mathematics. Eur J Eng Educ 43(1):112–125.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1320354

  21. Mack C (2016) How to write a good scientific paper: review articles. J Micro/Nanolith, MEMS, MOEMS 15. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.15.2.020101

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishnu Kumar Mishra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mishra, V.K., Mishra, M., Sheetlani, J., Sah, R.D., Mishra, A., Kurariya, S. (2022). Dynamic Education Background: Procure the Maximum Initiation from PBL for Education Naïve Bayes Algorithm for Machine Learning. In: Sharma, S., Peng, SL., Agrawal, J., Shukla, R.K., Le, DN. (eds) Data, Engineering and Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 907. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4687-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4687-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4686-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4687-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics