Abstract
New condensed modes of designing require new ways of differentiating design tasks. This paper presents a conceptual framework, the Task Ladder, which proposes such differentiation. It is based on a study of Small and Medium sized Enterprises and the tasks they work within ‘design sprints’ as part of a Danish design-driven business development programme. The real-time study of a number of case companies’ sprint processes indicated that the companies’ experiences with the sprint format, and the needs and obstacles that arose in the process, related to the scope and scale of the design sprint task in question. This gave rise to the investigation of the scope differences between design sprint tasks, which resulted in the conceptualisation of a task scale represented by the Task Ladder. The Task Ladder features four task scale levels that vary on several aspects, but overall, on degree of ‘openness’ of the task. This paper accounts for the development of the framework and discusses the usefulness of it, including interviews with design professionals who have used the Task Ladder in their work. The interviews demonstrate the usefulness of the Task Ladder in practice, stating that it provides an understanding and language to talk about development stages in design processes and hence serves as a tool for alignment of expectations, tracking of process progress, and planning future design processes. Finally, the Task Ladder lays the ground for further research on how design sprints can be adapted to meet different needs at the different task levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Quotes are translated from Danish.
References
Ball, L.J., Christensen, B.T.: Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Des. Stud. 30(2), 169–186 (2009)
Boden, M.A.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Basic Books, New York (1991)
Bordal, S.A.: Unfuzzing Design: How Progress is Made Towards Unknown Goals. Design School Kolding, Denmark (2018)
British Design Council 2005: The Framework for Innovation, British Design Council, viewed 10 April 2021. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond
Brocke, J.V., Lippe, S.: Identifying and managing creative tasks in collaborative is research projects. Proj. Manage. J. 44(6), 94–113 (2013)
Cash, P., Kreye, M.: Exploring uncertainty perception as a driver of design activity. Des. Stud. 54, 50–79 (2018)
Chandrasekaran, B.: Design problem solving. A task analysis. AI Mag. 11(4), 59–71 (1990)
Christensen, B.T., Ball, L.J.: Fluctuating epistemic uncertainty in a design team as a metacognitive driver for creative cognitive processes’. In: Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation, pp. 249–270. CRC Press (2017)
Coughlan, T., Johnson, P.: An exploration of constraints and end user development in environments for creative tasks. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 24(5), 444–459 (2008)
Crawford, L., Pollack, J.: Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. Int. J. Project Manage. 22, 645–653 (2004)
Darke, J.: The primary generator and the design process. New directions in environmental design research. Des. Stud. 1(1), 36–44 (1979)
Deken, F., Kleinsmann, M., Aurisicchio, M., Lauche, K., Bracewell, R.: Tapping into past design experiences: knowledge sharing and creation during novice-expert design consultations. Res. Eng. Design 23(3), 203–218 (2012)
Getzels, J.W., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: The creative vision: a longitudinal study of problem finding in art. J. Aesthet. Art Criticism (1976)
Goel, V., Pirolli, P.: The structure of design problem spaces. Cogn. Sci. 16, 395–429 (1992)
Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., Kowitz, B.: Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, London (2016)
McMullen, J.S., Shepherd, D.A.: Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31(1), 132–152 (2006)
Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)
Nielsen, S.L., Klyver, K., Rostgaard, M.E., Bager, T.: Entrepreneurship in Theory and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2012)
Onarheim, B.: Creativity under constraints: creativity as balancing ‘constrainedness’. Copenhagen Business School (2012)
Oppl, S., Stary, C.: Facilitating shared understanding of work situations using a tangible tabletop interface. Behav. Inform. Technol. 33(6), 619–635 (2014)
Perrow, C.: A framework for the comparative analysis of organisations. Am. Soc. Rev. 32(2), 194–208 (1967)
Reitman, W.R.: ‘Heuristic Decision Procedures, Open Constraints, and the Structure of Ill-defined Problems’. In: Shelly, M.W., Bryan, G.L. (eds.) Human Judgement and Optimality. Wiley, New York (1964)
Simon, H.A.: The structure of ill structured problems. Artif. Intell. 4(3/4), 181–201 (1973)
Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organisations. The Free Press, New York (1976)
Sinek, S.: Start With Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. Penguin Books Ltd., London (2011)
Stacey, M.K., Eckert, C.M.: Reshaping the box: creative designing as constraint satisfaction. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 11(3/4), 241–255 (2010)
Stokes, P.D.: Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough. Springer, New York (2006)
Turner, J.R., Cochrane, R.A.: Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. Int. J. Project Manage. 11(2), 93–102 (1993)
Walker, W.E., et al.: Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr. Assess. 4(1), 5–17 (2003)
Yu, B.Y., Honda, T., Sharqawy, M., Yang, M.: Human behavior and domain knowledge in parameter design of complex systems. Des. Stud. 45, 242–267 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bordal, S.A. (2022). Design Sprint Task Ladder: Scaling Design Tasks for New Modes of Designing. In: Bruyns, G., Wei, H. (eds) [ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes. IASDR 2021. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_114
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_114
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4471-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4472-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)