Skip to main content

Disposable Flexible Ureteroscopes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flexible Ureteroscopy

Abstract

Currently, there are a variety of flexible ureteroscopes available, including fiber-optic and digital flexible ureteroscopes. Despite the technological advancement of flexible ureteroscopes, durability remains a major concern.

Disposable flexible ureteroscopes aim at overcoming the main boundaries of their reusable counterparts.

Herein, we report the characteristics, advantages, and limitations of single-use flexible ureteroscopes, according to the current studies published in literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ordon M, Urbach D, Mamdani M, et al. The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis. J Urol. 2014;192(5):1450–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagley DH. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, "disposable" endoscope. Urology. 1987;29(3):296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(87)90074-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, et al. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol. 2006;176(2):607–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, et al. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2347–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu SP, Huang YT, You ZY, et al. Clinical effectiveness of the PolyScope™ endoscope system combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary calculi with a diameter of less than 2 cm. Exp Ther Med Aug. 2013;6(2):591–5. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlager D, Hein S, Obaid MA, et al. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1139–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, et al. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model. J Endourol. 2016;30(6):655–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, et al. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study. World J Urol. 2017;35(5):809–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Usawachintachit M, Isaacson DS, Taguchi K, et al. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2017;31(5):468–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozimek T, Schneider MH, Hupe MC, et al. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1226–30. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dale J, Kaplan AG, Radvak D, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope. J Endourol. 2017;35(6):903–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Talso M, Proietti S, Emiliani E, et al. Comparison of flexible ureterorenoscope quality of vision: an in vitro study. J Endourol. 2018;32(6):523–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dragos LB, Somani BK, Keller EX, et al. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S359–70. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.09.17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore B, Proietti S, Giusti G, et al. Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(2):165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tom WR, Wollin DA, Jiang R, et al. Next-generation single-use ureteroscopes: an in vitro comparison. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1301–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leveillee RJ, Kelly EF. Impressive performance: new disposable digital ureteroscope allows for extreme lower pole access and use of 365 μm Holmium laser fiber. J Endourol Case Rep. 2016;2(1):114–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2016.0051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston TJ, Baard J, de la Rosette J, et al. A clinical evaluation of the new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope (UscopePU3022): an international prospective multicentered study. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(4):453–61. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Memon AG, Naeem Z, Zaman A, et al. Occupational health related concerns among surgeons. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2016;10(2):279–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Healy KA, Pak RW, Cleary RC, et al. Hand problems among endourologists. J Endourol. 2011;25(12):1915–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludwig WW, Lee G, Ziemba JB, et al. Evaluating the Ergonomics of Flexible Ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1062–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Proietti S, Somani B, Sofer M, et al. The “Body Mass Index” of flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1090–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teplitsky SL, Leong JY, Calio B, et al. Ergonomics in endourology: measurement of force for deflection in contemporary ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2021;35(2):215–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Mushin H, et al. The economic implications of a reusable flexible digital ureteroscope: A Cost-benefit analysis. J Urol. 2017;197:730–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis NF, Quinlan MR, Browne C, et al. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2018;36(4):529–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2131-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marchini GS, Torricelli FC, Batagello CA, et al. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(4):658–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis NF, McGrath S, Quinlan M, et al. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2018;32(3):214–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ventimiglia E, Somani BK, Traxer O. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction? Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):113–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Somani BK, Talso M, Bres-Niewada E. Current role of single-use flexible ureteroscopes in the management of upper tract stone disease. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):183–4. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Proietti S, Somani BK, Pietropaolo A, et al. Italian endourological panorama: results from a national survey. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(2):190–5. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Proietti, S., Pavia, M.P., Rico, L., Yeow, Y., Basulto-Martinez, M., Giusti, G. (2022). Disposable Flexible Ureteroscopes. In: Zeng, G., Parikh, K., Sarica, K. (eds) Flexible Ureteroscopy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2936-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2936-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2935-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2936-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics