Abstract
Currently, there are a variety of flexible ureteroscopes available, including fiber-optic and digital flexible ureteroscopes. Despite the technological advancement of flexible ureteroscopes, durability remains a major concern.
Disposable flexible ureteroscopes aim at overcoming the main boundaries of their reusable counterparts.
Herein, we report the characteristics, advantages, and limitations of single-use flexible ureteroscopes, according to the current studies published in literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ordon M, Urbach D, Mamdani M, et al. The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis. J Urol. 2014;192(5):1450–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.095.
Bagley DH. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, "disposable" endoscope. Urology. 1987;29(3):296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(87)90074-4.
Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, et al. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol. 2006;176(2):607–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.059.
Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, et al. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2347–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.031.
Gu SP, Huang YT, You ZY, et al. Clinical effectiveness of the PolyScope™ endoscope system combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary calculi with a diameter of less than 2 cm. Exp Ther Med Aug. 2013;6(2):591–5. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1184.
Schlager D, Hein S, Obaid MA, et al. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1139–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0454.
Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, et al. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model. J Endourol. 2016;30(6):655–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0051.
Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, et al. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study. World J Urol. 2017;35(5):809–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x.
Usawachintachit M, Isaacson DS, Taguchi K, et al. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2017;31(5):468–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0027.
Ozimek T, Schneider MH, Hupe MC, et al. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1226–30. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0427.
Dale J, Kaplan AG, Radvak D, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope. J Endourol. 2017;35(6):903–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0237.
Talso M, Proietti S, Emiliani E, et al. Comparison of flexible ureterorenoscope quality of vision: an in vitro study. J Endourol. 2018;32(6):523–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0838.
Dragos LB, Somani BK, Keller EX, et al. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S359–70. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.09.17.
Moore B, Proietti S, Giusti G, et al. Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(2):165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.002.
Tom WR, Wollin DA, Jiang R, et al. Next-generation single-use ureteroscopes: an in vitro comparison. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1301–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0447.
Leveillee RJ, Kelly EF. Impressive performance: new disposable digital ureteroscope allows for extreme lower pole access and use of 365 μm Holmium laser fiber. J Endourol Case Rep. 2016;2(1):114–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2016.0051.
Johnston TJ, Baard J, de la Rosette J, et al. A clinical evaluation of the new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope (UscopePU3022): an international prospective multicentered study. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(4):453–61. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1787.
Memon AG, Naeem Z, Zaman A, et al. Occupational health related concerns among surgeons. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2016;10(2):279–91.
Healy KA, Pak RW, Cleary RC, et al. Hand problems among endourologists. J Endourol. 2011;25(12):1915–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0128.
Ludwig WW, Lee G, Ziemba JB, et al. Evaluating the Ergonomics of Flexible Ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1062–6.
Proietti S, Somani B, Sofer M, et al. The “Body Mass Index” of flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1090–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0438.
Teplitsky SL, Leong JY, Calio B, et al. Ergonomics in endourology: measurement of force for deflection in contemporary ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2021;35(2):215–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0369.
Martin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Mushin H, et al. The economic implications of a reusable flexible digital ureteroscope: A Cost-benefit analysis. J Urol. 2017;197:730–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.085.
Davis NF, Quinlan MR, Browne C, et al. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2018;36(4):529–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2131-4.
Marchini GS, Torricelli FC, Batagello CA, et al. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(4):658–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0880.
Davis NF, McGrath S, Quinlan M, et al. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2018;32(3):214–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0001.
Ventimiglia E, Somani BK, Traxer O. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction? Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):113–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000700.
Somani BK, Talso M, Bres-Niewada E. Current role of single-use flexible ureteroscopes in the management of upper tract stone disease. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):183–4. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1937.
Proietti S, Somani BK, Pietropaolo A, et al. Italian endourological panorama: results from a national survey. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(2):190–5. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1623.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Proietti, S., Pavia, M.P., Rico, L., Yeow, Y., Basulto-Martinez, M., Giusti, G. (2022). Disposable Flexible Ureteroscopes. In: Zeng, G., Parikh, K., Sarica, K. (eds) Flexible Ureteroscopy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2936-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2936-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2935-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2936-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)