Abstract
The economic disruption precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic has put a spotlight on the localism discourse globally. Amidst the worldwide upsurge in right-wing sentiment, left-wing progressive ideas of localism are being appropriated by far-right governments and political parties to promote chauvinistic ethnic nationalism. India’s ruling regime is also promoting policies around localism, bolstered by the country’s history of Swadeshi discourse. Swadeshi was an anti-consumption movement started by M. K. Gandhi as an anti-colonial, non-violent movement against the British regime. Swadeshi was conceptualized as both a boycott of British goods and a protest against colonial economic policies and emphasized the revival of indigenous industry and the political goal of self-rule. However, in its current distorted avatar, neo-Swadeshi borrows heavily from Hindutva, the militant Hindu nationalist ideology that seeks to create a masculine Hindu nation. Neo-Swadeshi is the neo-liberal form of the state-temple-corporate complex mediated by conspicuous consumption. Using Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory and Nico Carpentier’s conceptualization of a “discursive-material knot” to further our study’s theoretical depth, we examine the intersection of the neo-Swadeshi discourse and the localism discourse in India. We find a departure between the two discourses as the neo-Swadeshi discourse is anti-MNC and anti-globalization while the localism discourse, as articulated by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, aims to attract MNCs to shift their supply bases from China to India. These irreconcilable and antagonistic objectives of the two discourses jeopardize policy frameworks and their materialization. In post-structuralist parlance, the master signifier of Swadeshi becomes a floating signifier due to inconsistencies within the discourse, thus rendering the project localism a vain exercise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aloysius, G. (1994). Trajectory of Hindutva. Economic & Political Weekly, 29(24), 1450–1452. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4401329
Asian Development Bank. (2020). ADB BRIEFS. In ADB BRIEFS.
Bayly, C. A. (1986). The origins of Swadeshi (home industry): Cloth and Indian society, 1700-1930 In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things (pp. 285–311). Campbridge University Press.
Bloomberg. (2020, October 19). Covid pandemic cuts US’ lead over China as most powerful nation in Asia. The Hindu Business Line. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/world/covid-pandemic-cuts-americas-lead-over-china-as-most-powerful-nation-in-asia/article32890143.ece
Cambefort, M., & Pecot, F. (2020). Theorizing rightist anti-consumption. Marketing Theory, 20(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119895792
Carpentier, N. (2017). The discursive-material knot: Cyprus in conflict and community media participation. Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4331-3754-9
Desai, S. (2020, June 22). Localism in Covid times? The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/Citycitybangbang/localism-in-covid-times/
Howarth, D. (1998). Discourse theory and political analysis. In E. Scarbrough & E. Tanenbaum (Eds.), Research strategies in the social sciences: A guide to new approaches. Oxford Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198292376.003.0012
Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse (concepts in the social sciences) (p. 176). http://www.amazon.com/Discourse-Concepts-Social-Sciences-Howarth/dp/0335200702
Howarth, D. (2015a). Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, populism, and critique. In Routledge innovators in political theory (Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Howarth, D. (2015b). Gramsci, hegemony and post-Marxism. In M. McNally (Ed.) Antonio Gramsci. Critical explorations in contemporary political thought (pp. 195–213). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334183_11
Inamdar, N. (2020, May 18). Coronavirus: Can India replace China as world’s factory? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-52672510
Jaffrelot, C. (2009). Hindu nationalism: A reader. Princeton University Press.
Jenkins, S. (2020, March 20). Coronavirus has exposed a desperate need for localism. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/20/coronavirus-has-exposed-a-desperate-need-for-localism.
Jørgensen, B. M., & Phillips, L. J. (2019). Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory. In Discourse analysis as theory and method.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy. In Hegemony and socialist strategy (2nd ed.). Verso.
Marttila, T. (2015). Post-foundational discourse analysis: From political difference to empirical research. Springer.
Marttila, T. (2019a). Discourse, culture and organization. Discourse, Culture and Organization, 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3
Marttila, T. (2019b). Post-foundational discourse analysis: Theoretical premises and methodological options. In T. Marttila (Ed.) Discourse, culture and organization. Postdisciplinary studies in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_2
Nanda, M. (2009). The god market: How globalization is making India more Hindu. Monthly Review Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Parasher, A. (1979). The designation mleccha for foreigners in early India. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 40, 109–120.
Parasher, A. (1984). Indo European philology and etymology or mleccha. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 45, 92–100.
Park, M. (2013). The trouble with eco-politics of localism: Too close to the far right? Debates on ecology and globalization. Article, 5(2), 318–343.
Pathak-narain, P. (2017, July 30). Inside Patanjali: Here’s what life is like in Baba Ramdev’s company. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/fmcg/inside-patanjali-heres-what-life-is-like-in-baba-ramdevs-company/articleshow/59824892.cms
Sarkar, S. (2014). Modern times: India 1880s–1950s, environment, economy, culture. Permanent Black.
Sreekumar, H., & Varman, R. (2019, February). The development of political consumerism in India. In The Oxford handbook of political consumerism (pp. 26–46). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190629038.013.27
Srivastava, S. (2015). Modi-masculinity: Media, manhood, and “traditions” in a time of consumerism. Television and New Media, 16(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415575498
Sutherland, C. (2005). Nation-building through discourse theory. Nations and Nationalism, 11(2), 185–202.
Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek (Vol. 301). Blackwell Publishers Oxford.
Varman, R., & Belk, R. W. (2009). Nationalism and ideology in an anticonsumption movement. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1086/600486
Vikas, R. M., Varman, R., & Belk, R. W. (2015). Status, caste, and market in a changing Indian village. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3), 472–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv038
Venugopal, V. & Aulakh, G. (2020). Time to re-nehotiate equations with China: Swadeshi organisations to government. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/time-to-re-negotiate-equations-with-china-swadeshi-organisations-to-govt/articleshow/75242555.cms?from=mdr
Walton, S., & Boon, B. (2014). Engaging with a Laclau & Mouffe informed discourse analysis: A proposed framework. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-10-2012-1106
Žižek, S. (2014). Event: Philosophy in transit. Penguin UK. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IeILAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT6&dq=zizek+2014o&ots=Duea2LhBuA&sig=oX2fTpmntm84UzF4-er_IgT2hkc
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anis, S., French, J.A. (2022). COVID-19 and India’s Flirtation with Localism. In: Kwok, A.O.J., Watabe, M., Koh, S.G. (eds) COVID-19 and the Evolving Business Environment in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2749-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2749-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2748-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2749-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)