Skip to main content

Soil-Borne Pathogen-Mediated Root Rot Diseases of Sugar Beet and Their Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sugar Beet Cultivation, Management and Processing

Abstract

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is the most important, nutritious, and forage crop globally. World’s one fourth of sugar production is dependent only on sugar beet crop. Every year, farmers suffer a havoc production loss due to biotic stresses. Soil-borne pathogen-mediated root rot diseases of sugar beet are considered as a key constrain for beet cultivation. Various soil-borne pathogens like Rhizoctonia solani, Macrophomina phaseolina, Sclerotium rolfsii, Aphanomyces cochlioides, Phytophthora drechsleri, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-betae, and Phoma sp. cause root rot symptoms. Various symptomatic characterizations such as wilting of whole shoot system, brownish-black discoloration at the petiole, and rotting of root with cracked holes on the upper surface are observed in infected plant. Disease progress maximally depends on susceptible epidemiological factors which have a crucial role in pathogenesis. Disease incidence level varies from 25 to 65% in minor to major infected plants, although all the pathogenic attacks may not occur in the same time. Yield loss can be estimated by the production loss which is because of reduced sugar quantity at the farm stage and postharvest losses in storage. Application of disease and stress resistant varieties, biological and cultural practices, chemical method, and soil quality control (water holding capacity, micro-macro nutrient deficiency, soil pH, soil salinity) are the possible management practices against root rot disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PCNB:

Penta Chloro Nitro Benzene

SAM:

Shoot apical meristem

References

  • Abada KA (1994) Fungi causing damping-off and root-rot on sugar-beet and their biological control with Trichoderma harzianum. Agric Ecosyst Environ 51(3):333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agribusiness Handbook (2009) Sugar beet white sugar. Food and Agriculture Organization, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali ME, Meah MB (2007) Effect of carrier in the formulation of Trichoderma based biopesticide for controlling seedling diseases of eggplant. Bangladesh J Plant Pathol 23(1/2):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Amein T (2006) Soil borne pathogens infecting sugar beet in southern Sweden. Plant Pathol J 5(3):356–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantner JR, Windels CE (2004, June) Sugar beet seedling age and susceptibility to Aphanomyces cochlioides. In Abstr. Phytopathology, vol 94, p S10

    Google Scholar 

  • Brar NS, Dhillon BS, Saini KS, Sharma PK (2015) Agronomy of sugar beet cultivation—a review. Agric Rev 36(3):184–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buddemeyer J, Märländer B (2005) Genotypic reaction of sugar beet to Rhizoctonia solani root and crown rot—susceptibility, yield and quality at different levels of infestation. J Plant Dis Prot 112:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugbee WM, Cole DF (1981) The effect of seed infected with Phoma betae on rot and sucrose yield of stored sugar beet. Phytopathology 71:357–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhre C, Kluth C, Bürcky K, Märländer B, Varrelmann M (2009) Integrated control of root and crown rot in sugar beet: combined effects of cultivar, crop rotation, and soil tillage. Plant Dis 93:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttner G, Pfahler B, Petersen J (2003) Rhizoctonia root rot in Europe-incidence, economic importance and concept for integrated control. Proc. 1st joint IIRB-ASSBT congress, 26–1st March 2003, San Anonio (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttner G, Pfahler B, Marlander B (2004) Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Plant Breed 123:158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campell L, Klotz K (2006) Post-harvest storage losses associated with Aphanomyces root rot of sugar beet. J Sugar beet Res 43(4):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohm J, Minoche A, Holtgräwe D et al (2014) The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 505:546–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer AT, Szabo LJ, Windels CE (2004) Characterization and spatial distribution of Aphanomyces cochlioides in sugarbeet fields. J Sugar Beet Res 41(1–2):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmer WH (1997) Influence of chloride and nitrogen form on Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of table beet. Plant Dis 81:635–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farag AA, Abdrabbo MA, Taher MS, Farag HA, Rasha MA, Radwan HA (2017) Comparative study of the production of sugar crops under limited water. Egypt J Agric Res 95:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson LE (2010) Interaction of Rhizoctonia solani and Rhizopus stolonifer causing root rot of sugar beet. Plant Dis 94:504–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haque ME, Parvin MS (2021) Sugar beet, it ‘disease rhizoctonia root rot, and potential biological agents. Agric Biol Res 37(1):96–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS (2008) Incidence and severity of foot/collar rot in some varieties of eggplant and its control by Trichoderma based biopesticide. MS thesis, submitted to the Dept. of Plant Pathology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, pp. 35–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen BJ (2006) Root rot diseases of sugar beet. Proc Nat Sci Matica Srpska Novi Sad 110:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen B, Kephart K, Zidack N, Johnston M, Ansley J (2005) Effect of fungicide and fungicide application timing on reducing yield loss to Rhizoctonia crown and root rot. Sugar Beet Res Extension Rep 35:224–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahan N, Sultana N, Zinat SR, Hossain I, Hossain DM (2017) Biological control of Sclerotium rot of sugarbeet. Bangladesh J Plant Pathol 33(1&2):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakueinezhad M, Taheri P, Mahmoudi SB, Tarighi S (2018) Resistance assessment and biochemical responses of sugar beet lines against Pythium aphanidermatum, causing root rot. Eur J Plant Pathol 151:307–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karadimos DA, Karaoglanidis GS, Klonari K (2007) First report of charcoal rot of sugar beet caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in Greece. Plant Dis 86(9):1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karla HW (2020) Sugar beet pulp shortage and alternative energy sources for beef cattle. University of Nebraska-Lincoln website. https://beef.unl.edu/beefwatch/2020/sugar-beet-pulp-shortage-and-alternative-energy-sources-beef-cattle

  • Khettabi N, Ezzahiri B, Louali L, Oihabi A (2004) Effect of nitrogen fertilizers and Trichoderma harzianum on Sclerotium rolfsii. Agronomie 24:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick S, Jacbsen BJ, Braun- Kiewnick A, Eckhoff JLA, Bergman J (2001) Integrated control of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of sugar beet with fungicides and antagonistic bacteria. Plant Dis 85:718–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni VN, Rana DK, Wielandt N (2013) Sugar beet a potential new crop for sugar and ethanol production in India. Souvenir-IISR-industry interface on research and development initiatives for sugar beet in India, 28–29 May, sugar beet breeding outpost of IISR IVRI campus, Mukteswar, Nainital. Organized by Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research (ICAR) and Association of Sugarcane Technologists of India, pp 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Qi A, Khan MF (2019) Age-dependent resistance to Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet. Plant Dis 103(9):2322–2329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorito M, Woo SL (2015) Trichoderma: a multi-purpose tool for integrated pest management. Principles of plant-microbe interactions. Springer, pp 345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Mall AK, Misra V, Santeshwari, Pathak AD, Srivastava S (2021) Sugar beet cultivation in India: prospects for bio-ethanol production and value added co-products. Sugar Tech 23:1218–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01007-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moliszewska EB, Piszczek J (2008) Occurrence of sugar beet root rot (Aphanomyces cochlioides) in Poland. Phytopathol Pol 47:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay AN, Thakur RP (1970) Fusarium root rot of sugarbeet: outbreaks and new records. Plant Prot Bull FAO 18:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabi MN (2010) Efficacy of IMP lab biopesticides in controlling foot rot of some selected crops. An M.S. Thesis, submitted to the Department of Plant Pathology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, pp. 36

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) Section 8—sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). In: Safety assessment of transgenic organisms, Volume 1: OECD consensus documents. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264095380-11-en

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Panth M, Hassler SC, Baysal-Gurel F (2020) Methods for management of soilborne diseases in crop production. Agriculture 10:16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10010016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul SK, Mahmud NU, Gupta DR, Surovy MZ, Rahman M, Islam MT (2021) Characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii causing root rot of sugar beet in Bangladesh. Sugar Tech 23(5):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00984-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prova A, Akanda AM, Islam S, Hossain M (2018) Characterization of Sclerotinia Sclerotium, an emerging fungal pathogen causing blight in hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus). Plant Pathol J 34(5):367–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rush CM, Winter SR (1990) Influence of previous crops on Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of sugar beet. Plant Dis 71:421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider CL, Whitney ED (1986) Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. In: Whitney ED, Duffus JE (eds) Compendium of beet diseases and insects. American Phytopathological Society, St. Pauls, MN, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Singh HB (2004) Control of collar rot in mint (Mentha spp.) caused by Sclerotium rolfsii using biological means. Curr Sci 87(3):632–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SN (2004) Management of Sugarbeet Diseases. In: Mukerji KG (ed) Fruit and vegetable diseases. disease management of fruits and vegetables, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48575-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SN, Misra SR, Singh K (1986) Evaluation of fungitoxicants against Rhizoctonia bataticola causing charcoal root rot of sugarbeet. Indian J Sugarcane Technol 3:89–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SN, Singh RP, Tripathi RC (1999) A Fusarium root rot of sugarbeet—a new record. National Sympsoium on seed health care and phytosanitation for sustainable agriculture. Indian Phytopathological Society (mid-eastern zone), IISR, Lucknow February 17–19 (abstracts), pp. 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausbaugh CA, Gillen AM (2008) Bacteria and yeast associated with sugarbeet root rot at harvest in the intermountain west. Plant Dis 92:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su G, Suh SO, Schneider RW, Russin JS (2001) Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathology 91:120–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Windels CE (2000) Aphanomyces root rot on sugar beet. Plant Health Progress 1(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2000-0720-01-DG

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windels CE, Kuznia RA, Call J (1997) Characterization and pathogenicity of Thanatephorus cucumeris from sugar beet in Minnesota. Plant Dis 81:245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Das, S., Pattanayak, S. (2022). Soil-Borne Pathogen-Mediated Root Rot Diseases of Sugar Beet and Their Management. In: Misra, V., Srivastava, S., Mall, A.K. (eds) Sugar Beet Cultivation, Management and Processing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2730-0_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics