Abstract
Socioscientific issues (SSI) are complex, controversial, uncertain, and value-laden issues, encompassing interdisciplinary knowledge for which there is no consensus in the scientific realm of producers of knowledge, and their teaching requires a change in the educational paradigm. Teachers of scientific disciplines are destabilized, as the didactic formats of the SSI field differ from the pedagogical formats of their own disciplinary culture. These different teaching contexts are thus likely to put the teachers’ professional identity under stress by subjecting them to new professional dilemmas both in their relationship to the profession and in their relationship to themselves. We analyze how experienced and novice teachers negotiate these difficulties and show how experienced teachers reconcile the different strata of their professional identity (disciplinary and SSI). In particular, they assume their values as a driving force behind their commitment to teaching SSI and they have gradually changed their work context to reduce the risk of teaching. We suggest that the professional development for future teachers should be based on pedagogical guides to make them feel safe in the classroom, it should also include training in ethics to deal with professional dilemmas, as well as interdisciplinary and team work to bring together disciplinary professional identities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amos, R., & Levinson, R. (2019). Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: An approach for engaging with the 2030 sustainable development goals through school science. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 11(1), 29–49.
Avraamidou, L. (2014). Studying science teacher identity: Current insights and future research directions. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 145–179.
Avraamidou, L. (2016). Studying science teacher identity. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 1–14). SensePublishers.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
Bencze, L. (2017). STEPWISE: A framework prioritizing altruistic actions to address socioscientific issues. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE (pp. 19–45). Springer International Publishing.
Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E. G., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: Defending and extending “science-in-context.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 825–851.
Bernard, M.-P., & Albert, M. (2018). Intégration d’enjeux relatifs au vivant en classe : Points de vue d’enseignants et d’enseignantes en biologie au Québec. Recherches en Didactique des Sciences et des Techniques, 18, 79–102.
Bossér, U., Lundin, M., Lindahl, M., & Linder, C. (2015). Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core elements in their classroom practices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 159–176.
Bryce, T., & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 717–733.
Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377.
Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers’ social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319–333.
Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: A large scale and in depth study. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 599–617.
Gohier, C., Anadon, M., Bouchard, Y., Charbonneau, B., & Chevrier, J. (2001). La construction identitaire de l’enseignant sur le plan professionnel: Un processus dynamique et interactif. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 1, 3–32.
Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching. Science & Education, 28(6), 639–667.
Izadinia, M. (2013). A review of research on student teachers’ professional identity. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 694–713.
Journell, W. (2011). The disclosure dilemma in action: A qualitative look at the effect of teacher disclosure on classroom instruction. Journal of Social Studies Research, 35(2), 217–244.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications Inc.
Legardez, A. (2017). Propositions pour une modélisation des processus de didactisation sur des Questions Socialement Vives. Sisyphus, 5(2), 79–99.
Panissal, N., & Vieu, C. (2018). Débat sur une question socialement vive de nanomédecine en formation continue des enseignants. Recherche en Didactique des Sciences et des Technologies, 18, 161–181.
Panissal, N., Jeziorski, A., & Legardez, A. (2016). Une étude des postures enseignantes adoptées lors des débats sur des questions socialement vives (QSV) liées aux technologies de la convergence (NBIC) menés avec des élèves de collège. Dire, 8, 48–64.
Pedretti, E. G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: Problems of identity and ideology. Science & Education, 17(8), 941–960.
Pillen, M., Beijaard, D., & den Brok, P. (2013). Tensions in beginning teachers’ professional identity development, accompanying feelings and coping strategies. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 240–260.
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376.
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274.
Schutz, P. A., Nichols, S. L., & Schwenke, S. (2018). Critical events, emotional episodes, and teacher attributions in the development of teacher identities. In Research on teacher identity (pp. 49–60). Springer.
Simonneaux, J., Simonneaux, L., Hervé, N. J.-L., Nédélec, L., Molinatti, G., Cancian, N. M., & Lipp, A. (2017). Menons l’enquête sur des questions d’education au développement durable dans la perspective des questions socialement vives. Revue des Hautes écoles pédagogiques et institutions assimilées de Suisse romande et du Tessin, 22, 143–160.
Sund, P. (2016). Discerning selective traditions in science education: A qualitative study of teachers’ responses to what is important in science teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 387–409.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 697–726). Routledge.
Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, Learning And Research (pp. 277–305). Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panissal, N., Hervé, N. (2022). Teaching SSI: Implications with Respect to Teachers’ Professional Identity. In: Hsu, YS., Tytler, R., White, P.J. (eds) Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education. Learning Sciences for Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1839-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1840-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)