Skip to main content

Pre-Service Teachers Representing Socioscientific Aspects of Scientists’ Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education

Part of the book series: Learning Sciences for Higher Education ((LSHE))

Abstract

Developing learning sequences focused on socioscientific issues often begins with public controversy and introduces a variety of perspectives—economic, local values, political considerations, as well as scientific and engineering research. Many issues can be considered from a post-normal science perspective, where the involvement of the public in the scientific process and the complexity of the science are acknowledged. However, these issues of complexity and attention to public policy can often be part of the driving force behind scientists’ work. In this chapter, we describe a project in which pre-service teachers (PSTs) and undergraduate science students worked with science researchers to translate their research, focusing on the nature of their practice including personal commitments, into online learning modules for application in lower secondary classrooms. The aim was to enliven and extend classroom practice through the representation of contemporary science. Several scientists, and resulting learning modules, focused on sustainability issues such as top predators in ecosystems, brumbies in sensitive alpine environments, or frontier materials design focused on sustainable practice. Our contention is that, by focusing on sustainability contexts through the experience of scientists, many of whom are passionate advocates, students can come to learn science through the wider context of a socially responsible agenda. We describe the nature of these classroom materials, the process of their creation, the challenges of translating scientists’ work into classroom activity, and the educative potential of this approach for tertiary students and scientists alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACARA. (2021). Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

  • Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 863–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G. F. (2013). Forging school-scientist partnerships: A case of easier said than done? Journal of Science Education & Technology, 22(6), 858–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G., & Trewen, A. (2013). Developing school-scientist partnerships: Lessons for scientists from Forests-of-life. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 22(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2013). Knowing and learning about science in primary school ‘Communities of Practice’: The views of participating scientists in the MyScience project. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1005–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2014). “Because we weren’t actually teaching them, we thought they weren’t learning”: Primary teacher perspectives from the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (Eds.). (2015). The age of STEM: Policy and practice in science, technology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grcevich, J., Pagnotta, A., Mac Low, M. M., Shara, M., Flores, K., Nadeau, P. A., ... & Zachowski, M. (2015, January). Preparing new Earth Science teachers via a collaborative program between Research Scientists and Educators. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #225 (Vol. 225, pp. 240–304).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. F. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, O., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., Tytler, R., & Barraza, L. (2014). Developing and using an S3R model to analyze reasoning in web-based cross-national exchanges on sustainability. Science Education, 98(3), 517–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, O., Simonneaux, L., & Tytler, R. (2017). Engaging with socially acute questions: Development and validation of an Interactional Reasoning Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), 825–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.

  • Office of the Chief Scientist. (2016). STEM Programme Index 2016. Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2016/01/spi-2016-stem-programme-index-2016-2/

  • Raphael, J., & White, P. J. (2021). Transdisciplinarity: Science and drama education developing teachers for the future. In P. J. White, J. Raphael, & K. van Cuylenburg (Eds.), Science and Drama: Contemporary and creative approaches to teaching and learning (Chapter 9). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J., & Funtowicz, S. O. (1999). Post-normal science: An insight now maturing. Futures, 31, 641–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Clark, J. C. (2017). Community-school collaborations in science: Towards improved outcomes through better understanding of boundary issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 643–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., Williams, G., White, P., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Upstill, G., Roper, E., & Dziadkiewicz, N. (2015). Building productive partnerships for STEM education: Evaluating the model and outcomes of the Scientist and Mathematicians in Schools program. Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvakas, M., White, P., & Tytler, R. (2021). Contemporary science practice in the classroom: A phenomenological exploration into how online curriculum resources can facilitate learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(13), 2087–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. J. & Raphael, J. (In Press). Drama for teaching controversial issues in science. In D. McGregor (Ed.), Researching Learning Science Through Drama: Exploring a Range of International Perspectives. ESERA Book Series. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P., Tytler, R., & Palmer, S. (2018). Exploring models of interaction between scientists and pre-service teachers. In S. Dinham, R. Tytler, D. Corrigan, & D. Hoxley (Eds.), Reconceptualising maths and science teacher education (pp. 92–110). ACER press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J. M., Jungblut, D., Catena, A. N., & Rubenstein, D. I. (2013, December). Field-Based Teacher Research: How Teachers and Scientists Working Together Answers Questions about Turtle Nesting Ecology while Enhancing Teachers’ Inquiry Skills. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2013, pp. ED14B-04).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 711–740). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peta J. White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

White, P.J., Tytler, R. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers Representing Socioscientific Aspects of Scientists’ Work. In: Hsu, YS., Tytler, R., White, P.J. (eds) Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education. Learning Sciences for Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1839-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1840-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics