Skip to main content

Stacking Different Spatial Statistics in a Novel Recursion Algorithm to Improve the Design of Waste Management Regions in Saskatchewan

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 249))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 273 Accesses

Abstract

Canadians disposed 25 million tonnes of waste in 2018. Some Canadian provinces have implemented regionalized waste management systems such as Alberta and Nova Scotia. In Saskatchewan, the idea of regionalization has been discussed since the 1990s, however, transition to regional systems has been difficult due to the autonomous nature of prairie communities. Currently, the Government of Saskatchewan intends to investigate and encourage regional collaboration among municipalities. Previous work on regionalized waste management systems introduced an algorithm capable of improving and optimizing regions for waste management in various jurisdictions. It was theorized that regions could be optimized when the number of landfills, populated places, and roads across regions was spread evenly; mathematically, regions were optimized when the standard deviation of these parameters was reduced across all regions. Successful application of the tool yielded reductions in the standard deviation these parameters by 4.9–46.1% in Saskatchewan. In more recent work, different spatial statistics such as central feature, mean center, and median center have been substituted into the proposed Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm with varying success. The objectives of this study are to: (i) stack different spatial statistics (mean and median center) on top of the initial CVT algorithm and (ii) compare the results to those using only the CVT algorithm to determine if the stacking method proposed in this study can further improve the results of the CVT algorithm. The results from this study may help to further develop data driven regions for waste management in Saskatchewan and Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamides ED, Mitropoulos P, Giannikos I, Mitropoulos I (2009) A multi-methodological approach to the development of a regional solid waste management system. J Oper Res Soc 60(6):758–770. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602592

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Agovino M, D’Uva M, Garofalo A, Marchesano K (2018) Waste management performance in Italian provinces: efficiency and spatial effects on local governments and citizen action. Ecol Ind 89:680–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolton KF, Curtis FA (1990) An environmental assessment procedure for siting solid waste disposal sites. Environ Impact Assess Rev 10:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(90)90043-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce N, Asha AZ, Ng KTW (2016) Analysis of solid waste management systems in Alberta and British Columbia using provincial comparison. Can J Civ Eng 43:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalkias C, Lasaridi K (2009) A GIS based model for the optimization of municipal solid waste collection: the case study of Nikea, Athens, Greece. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 10(5):640–650

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cubillos M, Wøhlk S (2020) Solution to the maximal covering tour problem for locating recycling drop-off stations. J Oper Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605683.2020.1746701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eagleson S, Escobar F, Williamson I (2002) Hierarchical spatial reasoning theory and GIS technology applied to the automated delineation of administrative boundaries. Comput Environ Urban Syst 26:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Esri (2018) World Street Map. Accessed from https://www.arcgis.com/home/item

  9. Esri (2020) Tool References, Spatial Statistics Toolbox. From https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/an-overview-of-the-spatial-statistics-toolbox.htm. Accessed on 9 Sep 2020

  10. Government of Alberta (2018). Landfills. From https://www.alberta.ca/landfills.aspx. Accessed on 4 Nov 2019

  11. Government of Nova Scotia (1995) Solid waste-resource management strategy. From https://novascotia.ca/nse/waste/swrmstrategy.asp#section02. Accessed on 4 Nov 2019

  12. Government of Saskatchewan (2016) Starting a regional waste management system. From http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/. Accessed on 18 Feb 2020

  13. Government of Saskatchewan (2018) Landfills. From http://www.saskh20.ca/landfill.asp. Accessed on 5 Mar 2019

  14. Government of Saskatchewan (2021) Area transportation planning committee map. https://geohub.saskatchewan.ca/datasets/area-transportation-planning-committe-map. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  15. Kayakutlu G, Daim T, Kunt M, Altay A, Suharto Y (2017) Scenarios for regional waste management. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keske CMH, Mills M, Godfrey T, Tanguay L, Dicker J (2018) Waste management in remote rural communities across the Canadian North: challenges and opportunities. Detritus 2:63–77. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2018.13641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakhan C (2015) North of the 46° parallel: obstacles and challenges to recycling in Ontario’s rural and northern communities. Waste Manage 44:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marchildon GP (2006) Chapter in health services restructuring in Canada: new evidence and new directions. In: Beach CM, Chawkowski R, Deutsch J (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mendenhall W, Sincich T (2007) Statistics for engineering and the sciences, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nixon D (1997) Government of Saskatchewan news release. Funding support program for area transportation planning committees. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/news-and-media/1997/december/18/funding-support-program-for-area-transportation-planning-committees. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  21. Noll D, Wiedenhofer D, Miatto A, Singh SJ (2019) The expansion of the built environment, waste generation and EU recycling targets on Samothraki, Greece: An island’s dilemma. Resour Conserv Recycl 150:104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104405

  22. Okuda I, Thomson V (2007) Regionalization of municipal solid waste management in japan: balancing the proximity principle with economic efficiency. Environ Manage 40:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0194-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Richter A, Ng KTW (2018) Landfill regionalization: a strategic move for all provinces? Technical short paper, Canadian Civil Engineer, ‘CIVIL’ magazine. Can Soc Civil Eng 35(4):18–20

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richter A, Ng KTW, Karimi N, Li RYM (2021a) An iterative tessellation-based analytical approach to the design and planning of waste management regions. Article submitted for publication

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richter A, Ng KTW, Karimi N, Chang W (2021) Developing a novel proximity analysis approach for assessment of waste management cost efficiency in low population density regions. Sustain Cities Soc 102583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102583

  26. Richter A, Ng KTW, Karimi N (2021b) Meshing Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation with spatial statistics to optimize waste management regions. J Clean Prod 295:126465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126465

  27. Richter A, Ng KTW, Karimi N, Wu P, Kashani AH (2019) Optimization of waste management regions using recursive Thiessen polygons. J Clean Prod 234:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodrigues AM, Ferreira JS (2015) Sectors and routes in solid waste collection. CIM Ser Math Sci 4. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20328-7_20

  29. Sarra A, Mazzocchitti M, Nissi E (2020) A methodological proposal to determine the optimal levels of inter-municipal cooperation in the organization of solid waste management systems. Waste Manage 115:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shmelev SE, Powell JR (2006) Ecological-economic modelling for strategic regional waste management systems. Ecol Econ 59:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stabler J, Olfert R (2002) Functional economic areas of the Canadian Prairie Region. Study commissioned by Agriculture and Agrifood Canada. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Functional-Economic-Areas-of-the-Canadian-Prairie-Stabler-Olfert/ae1b146253739adc86128ff6de2e84e113f2d135. Accessed 29 Dec 2020

  32. Statistics Canada (2020a) Table 38-10-0033-01. Materials diverted, by source. https://doi.org/10.25318/3810003301-eng

  33. Statistics Canada (2020b) Table 38-10-0032-01. Disposal of waste, by source. https://doi.org/10.25318/3810003201-eng

  34. Statistics Canada (2020c) Table 38010-0036-01. Local Government Characteristics of the waste management industry. https://doi.org/10.25318/3810003601-eng

  35. Wang C, Lin M, Lin C (2008) Factors influencing regional municipal solid waste management strategies. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 58(7):957–964. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.5-7-957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Ng KTW, Asha AZ (2016) Non-hazardous waste generation characteristics and recycling practices in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Can J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18:715–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang K, Yan H, Zeng H, Xin H, Tao T (2019) A practical multi-objective optimization sectorization model for water distribution network. Sci Total Environ 656:1401–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this paper was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2019-06154) to the corresponding author, using computing equipment funded by FEROF at the University of Regina. The authors are grateful for their support. The views expressed herein are those of the writes and not necessarily those of our research and funding partners.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Richter, A., Ng, K.T.W., Karimi, N. (2023). Stacking Different Spatial Statistics in a Novel Recursion Algorithm to Improve the Design of Waste Management Regions in Saskatchewan. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 249. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1061-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1061-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1060-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1061-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics