Abstract
The aim of this study is to testify the hypothesis on the transitive nature of the current geo-economic confrontation in the Arctic and to identify the specific features of geo-economic rivalry in the Arctic. The research methods are: a combination of historical and logical approaches, analysis and synthesis, a systems approach, comparative analysis, and a geo-economic approach. The case of the Arctic presented in the chapter identifies that the geo-economics of the twenty-first century, along with the control of resources and space as before, is strongly seeking the control of innovation, technology, entrepreneurship, and innovative skills. The current geo-economic situation shows that the significance of the Arctic Region and the severity of competition between its main geo-economic actors for world trade waterway priority and natural resource extraction increases dramatically. The authors argue the fact that two powerful geo-economic blocs are being formed in the Arctic: the United States and its western allies on the one hand, and Russia and China on the other. The research leads to the conclusion that the permanent growth of geo-economic influence of China inevitably takes place in the Arctic zone. Among geo-economic participants of the second level, the energy and mineral Russian multinationals are emphasized, whose active participation in Arctic waterways and resources exploration enhance the growing scale of Russian geo-economic operations and its overall impact in the region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aalto, P. (2016). Modernization of the Russian energy sector: Constraints on utilizing Arctic offshore oil resources. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(1), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2015.1113509
Brutschin, E., & Schubert, S. (2016). Icy waters, hot tempers, and high stakes: Geopolitics and geo-economics of the Arctic. Energy Research and Social Science, 16, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.020
Chanysheva, A., & Ilinov, A. (2021). The future of Russian Arctic oil and gas projects: Problems of assessing the prospects. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(5), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050528
Conde, E., & Sanchez, S. I. (Eds.). (2017). Global challenges in the Arctic region: Sovereignty, environment and geopolitical balance. Routledge.
Guangmiao, X. (2016). China’s Arctic interests and policy: History, legal ground and implementation. World Economy and International Relations, 60(2), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-2-52-62. (In Russian).
Hsiung, W. C. (2016). China and Arctic energy: Drivers and limitations. Polar Journal, 6(2), 27.
Konina, N. (2018a). Evolution of the largest multinational German companies. Contemporary Europe, 18(2), 49–59. (In Russian).
Konina, N. (2018b). Issues of modern geo-economics. International Trends, 16(2), 186–196. (In Russian).
Konina, N. (Eds.). (2021). Digital strategies in a global market: Navigating the fourth industrial revolution. Springer (number 978-3-030-58267-8, September). https://ideas.repec.org/b/spr/sprbok/978-3-030-58267-8.htm
Konyshev, V., & Sergunin, A. (2018). U.S.-Russia relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or competition? World Economy and International Relations, 62(9), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111. (In Russian).
Kozmenko, S. Y., Masloboev, V. A., & Matviishin, D. A. (2018). Justification of economic benefits of Arctic LNG transportation by sea. Journal of Mining Institute, 233(5), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2018.5.554
Kravchuk, A. (2020). Norway’s economic policy in the Arctic. World Economy and International Relations, 64(5), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-101-108. (In Russian).
Kuang, Z., & Ou, K. (2019). China’s new Arctic policy. World Economy and International Relations, 63(7), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-7-84-91. (In Russian).
Lukin, Yu. F. (2010). Velikiy peredel Arktiki. Arkhangel’sk: Severnyy (Arkticheskiy) federal’nyy universitet. https://rucont.ru/efd/176955. (In Russian).
Lukin, A. (2021). The Russia–China entente and its future. International Politics, 58, 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00251-7
Sapir, E. V., & Karachev, I. A. (2020). Challenges of a new investment policy: Investment promotion and protection. Finance: Theory and Practice, 24(3), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-3-118-131. (In Russian).
Selin, V. (2011). Modern geo-economic positioning in the Russian Arctic. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 102–117. (In Russian).
Seo, H.-K., Pak, J.-K., & Chistov, I. (2021). Goals and objectives of the state policy of the Republic of Korea in the Arctic. World Economy and International Relations, 65(8), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-8-90-96. (In Russian).
Sharma, B. (2020). China’s emerging Arctic engagements: Should India reconsider its approach towards the polar north? Maritime Affairs, 16(1), 46–67.
Zagorskii, A. (2019). China accepts rules in the Arctic. World Economy and International Relations, 63(7), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-7-76-83. (In Russian).
Zhuravel, V. (2016). China, Republic of Korea and Japan in the Arctic: Politics, economy, security. Arctic and North, 24, 112–144. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.24.112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Konina, N.Y., Sapir, E.V. (2022). Geoeconomic Aspects of Arctic Exploration. In: Pak, E.V., Krivtsov, A.I., Zagrebelnaya, N.S. (eds) The Handbook of the Arctic. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9250-5_7-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9250-5_7-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9249-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9250-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences