Abstract
The chain of custody is described as the procedure for preserving and recording facts. The chain of custody is the most thorough and evaluative method of documenting data. In a legal proceeding, it aids in testing the validity and permissibility of facts relevant to a crime. The validity of the evidence can be determined by comparing the evidence gathered to that found at the crime scene. Evidence, whether tangible or intangible, plays an important role in criminal investigations. It aids in the recovery of a crime, as well as the recognition of the likely assailant or culprit, ensuring their authenticity which is necessary to maintain superiority. The chain of custody is a set of measures that begins when an investigator takes custody of evidence at a crime scene and is followed by each inspector general officer throughout the investigation. The chain of evidence report provides a detailed list of the individuals who gathered the evidence, processed the evidence, transported the evidence, and when and by whom the evidence was examined. The officials’ ethical and professional responsibilities include maintaining the chain of custody. Evidence mislabeling, evidence modification, unauthorized personal access, and inadequate storage are all examples of these circumstances of the evidence that results in breakdown of chain of custody. If the custody chain is broken during the investigation, the evidence becomes tainted with the crime, which may make it more difficult to convict.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lee HC, Pagliaro EM (2013) Forensic evidence and crime scene investigation. J Forensic Invest 1(1):5
Houck MM, Siegel JA (2015) Fundamentals of forensic science. Elsevier ltd.
Badiye A, Menezes RG (2020) Chain of custody. Statpearls Publishing LLC
Giova G (2011) Improving chain of custody in forensic investigation of electronic digital systems. Int J Comput Sci Network Secur 11(1):1–9
Rendle DF (2019) Forensic applications of Xray powder diffraction. Int Tables Crystallogr H., Ch. 7.2:737–751. https://doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000976
Jasmin C, Zoran C (2012) Chain of custody and life cycle of digital evidence. Comput Technol Appl 3:126–129
Khan JI, Kennedy TJ, Christian DR (2011) Forensic documentation. Basic Principles of Forensic Chem:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-437-7_6
Evans MM, Stagner PA (2010) Maintaining the chain of custody evidence handling in forensic cases. AORN J 78(4):563–569
Palmbach TM (2016) Crime scene investigation and examination: chain of evidence. Encyclopaedia Forensic Legal Med 1:679–685
Asif I et al (2019) Forensic laboratory practices and quality. Trends Environ Forensics Pak:1–13
Kiley W et al. (2013). The biological evidence preservation handbook: Best practices for evidence handlers. National institute of standards and technology (NISTIR 7928)
Cassandra V (2018) In: Ashraf M, Fisher CP (eds) Forensic evidence management from crime scene to the courtroom. Taylor and Francis group
Ramadhani S et al (2017) Post- genesis digital forensics investigation. Int J Sci Res Sci Technol 3(6):164–166
Tomlinson JJ, Elliot-Smith W, Radosta T (2015) Laboratory information management system chain of custody: reliability and security. J Autom Methods Manage Chem:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/JAMMC/2006/74907
Baxter E Jr (2015) Evidence collection and packaging. Complete crime scene investigation. Taylor and Francis group
Gooneratne I (2016) Chain of custody in forensic practice. Sri Lanka J Forensic Med Sci Law 7(2):1–2
Benner J (2009) Establish a transparent chain-of-custody to mitigate risk and ensure quality of specialized samples. Biopreserv Biobank 7(3):151–153. [PubMed]
Jaffee WB, Trucco E, Teter C, Levy S, Weiss RD (2008) Focus on alcohol & drug abuse: ensuring validity in urine drug testing. Psychiatr Serv 59(2):140–142. [PubMed]
Tomlinson JJ, Elliott-Smith W, Radosta T (2006) Laboratory information management system chain of custody: reliability and security. J Autom Methods Manage Chem 2006:74907. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Bórquez P (2011) Importance of chain of custody of evidences. Rev Med Chil 139(6):820–821. [PubMed]
Ludes B, Geraut A, Väli M, Cusack D, Ferrara D, Keller E, Mangin P, Vieira DN (2018) Guidelines examination of victims of sexual assault harmonization of forensic and medico-legal examination of persons. Int J Legal Med 132(6):1671–1674. [PubMed]
Kleypas DA, Badiye A. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): May 23, 2020. Evidence Collection
Kiely TF (2006) Science, forensic science and evidence. Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis group
Reitnauer AR (2018) Crime scene response and evidence collection. Secur Supervision Manage:443–459
Huang LH, Lin PH, Tsai KW, Wang LJ, Huang YH, Kuo HC, Li SC (2017) The effects of storage temperature and duration of blood samples on DNA and RNA qualities. PLoS One 12:e0184692
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sisodia, U. (2022). Chain of Custody: Scaling the Investigation to the Event. In: Singh, J., Sharma, N.R. (eds) Crime Scene Management within Forensic Science. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6683-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6683-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6682-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6683-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)