Skip to main content

How to Perform Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy: Step by Step

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Management of Urinary Stone

Abstract

Semi-rigid ureteroscopy is a fundamental procedure with high success rate that all urologists should be familiar with. Even if the ureteroscopy is commonly performed, there are many details between each step. We summarized the tips and tricks for both diagnostic and therapeutic uses. Follow these surgical steps to help surgeons avoid unwanted complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Whitehurst LA, Somani BK. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy: indications, tips, and tricks. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):39–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1025-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tran H, Arsovska O, Paterson RF, Chew BH. Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(11–12):E921–4. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jessen JP, Breda A, Brehmer M, Liatsikos EN, Millan Rodriguez F, Osther PJ, et al. International collaboration in endourology: multicenter evaluation of prestenting for ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):268–73. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D, Xue W, Roelofs A, Duvdevani M, et al. Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) Ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int. 2016;117(4):648–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lo CW, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Chang SJ. Effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics against post-ureteroscopic lithotripsy infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Infect. 2015;16(4):415–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2014.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, et al. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol. 1991;146(6):1487–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38146-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chew BH, Flannigan R, Kurtz M, Gershman B, Arsovska O, Paterson RF, et al. A single dose of intraoperative antibiotics is sufficient to prevent urinary tract infection during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2016;30(1):63–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knopf HJ, Graff HJ, Schulze H. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic stone removal. Eur Urol. 2003;44(1):115–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00189-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cybulski PA, Joo H, Honey RJ. Ureteroscopy: anesthetic considerations. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31(1):43–7., viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-0143(03)00087-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rukin NJ, Somani BK, Patterson J, Grey BR, Finch W, McClinton S, et al. Tips and tricks of ureteroscopy: consensus statement part I. basic ureteroscopy. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(4):439–46. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.605a.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cetti RJ, Biers S, Keoghane SR. The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):31–3. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588411x12851639106990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ambani SN, Faerber GJ, Roberts WW, Hollingsworth JM, Wolf JS Jr. Ureteral stents for impassable ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2013;27(5):549–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bourdoumis A, Tanabalan C, Goyal A, Kachrilas S, Buchholz N, Masood J. The difficult ureter: stent and come back or balloon dilate and proceed with ureteroscopy? What does the evidence say? Urology. 2014;83(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Tsivian M, Ghaffar M, Patel N, Ferrandino MN, et al. Balloon dilation of the ureter: a contemporary review of outcomes and complications. J Urol. 2015;194(2):413–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Somani BK, Ploumidis A, Pappas A, Doizi S, Babawale O, Dragos L, et al. Pictorial review of tips and tricks for ureteroscopy and stone treatment: an essential guide for urologists from PETRA research consortium. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S371–80. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.06.04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wollin DA, Carlos EC, Tom WR, Simmons WN, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. Effect of laser settings and irrigation rates on ureteral temperature during holmium laser lithotripsy, an in vitro model. J Endourol. 2018;32(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed M, Pedro RN, Kieley S, Akornor JW, Durfee WK, Monga M. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology. 2009;73(5):976–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jung H, Osther PJ. Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Springerplus. 2015;4:373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyritzis SI, Wiklund NP. Ureteral strictures revisited…Trying to see the light at the end of the tunnel: a comprehensive review. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):124–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Emiliani E, Breda A. Laser endoureterotomy and endopyelotomy: an update. World J Urol. 2015;33(4):583–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1405-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petros FG, Li R, Matin SF. Endoscopic approaches to upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am. 2018;45(2):267–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2017.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Song T, Liao B, Zheng S, Wei Q. Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2012;40(1):67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0385-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, de la Rosette J, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;179(2):424–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moon TD. Ureteral stenting—an obsolete procedure? J Urol. 2002;167(5):1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pilcher JM, Patel U. Choosing the correct length of ureteric stent: a formula based on the patient's height compared with direct ureteric measurement. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(1):59–62. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2001.0737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barrett K, Foell K, Lantz A, Ordon M, Lee JY, Pace KT, et al. Best stent length predicted by simple CT measurement rather than patient height. J Endourol. 2016;30(9):1029–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Palmer JS, Palmer LS. Determining the proper stent length to use in children: age plus 10. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 2):1566–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim BS, Choi JY, Jung W. Does a ureteral stent with a smaller diameter reduce stent-related bladder irritation? A single-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. J Endourol. 2020;34(3):368–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lamb AD, Vowler SL, Johnston R, Dunn N, Wiseman OJ. Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of alpha-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1894–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10170.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author’s contributions: All the authors contributed to the chapter. Yung-Ting Cheng collected the references and completed manuscript editing. Chen-Hsun Ho critically reviewed the manuscript and offered the materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, YT., Ho, CH. (2021). How to Perform Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy: Step by Step. In: Ng, A.C.F., Wong, M.Y., Isotani, S. (eds) Practical Management of Urinary Stone. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4193-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4193-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4192-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4193-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics