Abstract
This chapter is about democratization and citizen participation in the management of cultural heritage. Although heritage is often perceived as a domain of experts, it is key to the daily lives of citizens. Increasingly, as in nearly all sectors of society, citizens demand a voice in the definition and management of heritage, and in the development of planning alternatives and design solutions, amongst others with regard to tourism, leisure and recreation. Here, heritage planning meets a UN sustainable development goal, that of inclusive and equal social justice. Government agencies, heritage professionals and spatial planners are already beginning to open up to the public, aiming to increase inclusiveness, and heritage tourism and recreation is accessible to larger sections of society than ever. However, there is much debate, but little research, on current concepts, tools and procedures for democratization in the access to and definition, appropriation, management and planning of heritage. It is the explicit aim of the EU-funded Project Heriland to explore such concepts, tools and procedures in a series of laboratory contexts throughout Europe, both urban and rural. The Heriland Project is an International Training Network (ITN), funded through the EU Horizon2020 Marie Curie Action (GA 813883; 2019–2023). It is a collaboration of VU University Amsterdam, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Goteborgs Universitet, Universita’ degli Studi Roma Tre, Technische Universiteit Delft, the Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design and 16 associated partners from all over Europe. In this chap. I present one of these labs, that of the so-called Ecomuseo della Via Appia, in a rural context in the southern Italian Apulia region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Heriland Project is an International Training Network (ITN), funded through the EU Horizon2020 Marie Curie Action (GA 813883; 2019–2023). See especially www.heriland.eu
- 2.
Our special thanks go to the Cooperativa Impact and its members, especially Christian Napolitano, Arturo Clavica, Ilaria Ricci, Margherita De Matteis, Sara De Girolamo, Patricia Caprino.
- 3.
Many thanks go to our colleagues of the Soprintendenza archeologia, belle arti e paesaggio per le province di Brindisi, Lecce e Taranto (especially the Soprintendente Arch. Maria Piccarreta, d.ssa Assunta Cocchiaro and d.ssa Annalisa Biffino), the Universita’ degli Studi del Salento (especially proff. Francesco D’Andria, Grazia Semeraro and Francesco Baratti) and the municipalities of Mesagne (the mayor dott. Antonio Matarrelli, Domenico Stella and d.ssa Concetta Franco) and Latiano (the mayor Cosimo Maiorano, d.ssa Margherita Rubino).
- 4.
Art. 13, comma 1, dell’elaborato 2 “Norme tecniche di attuazione”, attached to the proposal of Piano Paesaggistico Territoriale della Regione Puglia (PPTR). Many thanks go to Mr. Enzo Camassa for the end production of the Latiano map.
- 5.
Art. 1 European Landscape Convention, 2000.
References
Alberda K, van Burgers GJ, Burgers H, Karel D, Yntema D (1999) Muro Tenente. Centro messapico nel territorio di Mesagne, a cura di A. Nitti, Mesagne, Italy
Baratti F (2012) Ecomusei, paesaggi e comunità. Esperienze, progetti e ricerche nel, Salento, Sogein, Lecce
Bender B (1992) Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge. Man (N.S.) 27(4):735–755
Borrelli N, Davis P (2012) How culture shapes nature: reflections on ecomuseum practices. Nat Cult 7(1):31–47
Burgers GJ (1998) Constructing Messapian landscapes: settlement dynamics, social organization and culture contact in the margins of Graeco-Roman Italy. Gieben Publishers, Amsterdam
Burgers GJ, Napolitano C (2010) L’insediamento messapico di Muro Tenente. Scavi e ricerche 1998-2009, Mesagne
Burgers GJ, Yntema DG (1999) The settlement of Muro Tenente. Third interim report. Bulletin Antieke Beschaving 74(2):111–132
Burgers GJ, Napolitano C, Piccarreta M (2018) Parco dei Messapi di Muro Tenente: un progetto di sviluppo sostenibile. Bollettino di Archeologia On Line. Direzione Generale Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio IX 2–3:1–19
Corsane G, Holleman W (1993) Ecomuseums: a brief evaluation. In: De Jong R (ed) Museums and the environment. Southern Africa Museums Association, Pretoria, pp 111–125
Crooke E (2010) The politics of community heritage: motivations, authority and control. Int J Herit Stud 16(2):16–29
Davis P (1999) Ecomuseums: a sense of place. A&C Black, London
Davis P (2008) New museologies and the ecomuseum. In: Graham B, Howard P (eds) The Ashgate research reader in heritage and identity. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 397–414
Emerick K (2014) Conserving and managing ancient monuments: heritage, democracy, and inclusion. Heritage Matters Series 14. Boydell Press, Woodbridge
Fairclough G, Harrison R, Jameson J Jr, Schofield J (eds) (2008) A heritage reader. Routledge, Abingdon
Gibson L, Pendlebury J (eds) (2009) Valuing historic environments. Ashgate, Farnham
Guido HF (1973) UNESCO Regional seminar: Round table on the development and the role of museums in the contemporary world. UNESCO document SHC.72/CONF.28/4
Harrison R (2010) Heritage as social action. In: West S (ed) Understanding heritage in practice. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 240–276
Harrison R (2013) Heritage: critical approaches. Routledge, Abingdon
Harvey D (2006) The right to the city. In: Scholar R (ed) Divided cities: the Oxford Amnesty lectures 2003. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 83–103
Hodder I (1992) Theory and practice in archaeology. Taylor & Francis, London
Howard P (2002) The eco-museum: innovation that risks the future. Int J Herit Stud 8(1):63–72
Janssen J, Luiten E, Renes H, Stegmeijer E (2017) Heritage as sector, factor and vector: conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning. Eur Plan Stud 25(9):1654–1672
Kolen J (1995) Recreating (in) nature, visiting history. Second thought on landscape reserves and their role in the preservation and experience of the historic environment. Archaeol. Dialog. 2(2):127–159
Maggi M (2006) Ecomuseums worldwide: converging routes among similar obstacles. Chin Mus 3(3):31–33
van Mensch P (2005) Nieuwe museologie. Identiteit of erfgoed? [New Museology. Identity of heritage?]’. In: van der Laarse R (ed) Bezeten van vroeger. Erfgoed, identiteit en musealisering. Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam, pp 176–192
Neal C (2015) Heritage and participation. In: Waterton E et al (eds) The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp 346–365
Opmeer M, Burgers GJ, Bruinsma R, Janssen R, Napolitano C, Ricci I (2019) Geospatial technologies in support of community enhancement and creating inclusive historical narratives. In: Pyles D, Rish RM, Warner J (eds) Negotiating place and space through digital literacies : research and practice. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte
Smith L (2006) Uses of heritage. Routledge, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burgers, GJ. (2021). Tourism, Leisure and Cultural Heritage: The Challenge of Participatory Planning and Design. In: Suzuki, S., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Tourism and Regional Science. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 53. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3623-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3623-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3622-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3623-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)