Abstract
India’s Adivasi and Dalit population—officially termed the “Scheduled Tribes” (ST) and the “Scheduled Castes” (SC)—have faced, and continue to face, many social disadvantages. This Chapter examines one such discrimination that these groups face and the existing nature of their rights over groundwater. It explores three significant challenges faced by them as regards accessing groundwater resources: firstly, the individual ownership of groundwater tied to the concept of private land ownership; secondly, the practice of untouchability, discrimination and the social exclusion of such communities from using public water structures; and thirdly, the social subjugation by dominant castes and elites that hinders their pursuit for water justice. In doing so, this chapter examines the ideal proposed by the 2016 Model Groundwater Bill to remove private monopoly over groundwater and vest its control and management with the State in public trust. The central argument that it forwards is that this may enable the impoverished and the marginalized better access to the much-needed clean water for their survival, provided that the constitutional and legislative protections afforded to them are effectively enforced. This could also alleviate the everyday struggles faced by the Adivasi and Dalit population in accessing water.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Suhag [1].
- 2.
niti aayog, composite water management index 22 (2018).
- 3.
india const. arts. 14 and 15.
- 4.
Id. at art. 15, cl. (2), sub-cl. (b).
- 5.
Id. at art. 17.
- 6.
gov’t of india, census 2011 a-5 union primary census , Abstract.
- 7.
india const. arts. 366(24) and 366(25).
- 8.
gov’t of india, annual report 2019–2020 Annexure-5B (2020).
- 9.
Idat. Annexure-9A (2020).
- 10.
Listed by the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950.
- 11.
Government of India [2].
- 12.
Trust and Kennedy [3].
- 13.
india const. arts. 15(4), 124A, 243D, 243T, 46, 330, 332, 338, 338A, 338B, 339 and 340, and Schedule V.
- 14.
The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, §§ 2(a), 4(iv) and 7.
- 15.
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, §§3(1)(g), 3(1)(x), 3(1)(za)(A).
- 16.
The Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention, Jun. 5, 1959, C107.
- 17.
Id. at art. 1(1)(b); G.A. Res. 61/295, preamble, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Oct. 2, 2007).
- 18.
Bijoy and Nongbri [4].
- 19.
Id.
- 20.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [5].
- 21.
The United Nations Water Conference [6].
- 22.
Misiedjan and Gupta [7, p. 81]; See generally Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru, Human Rights Committee, CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 (Apr. 24, 2009).
- 23.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, supra note 20, at ¶ 7.
- 24.
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Agenda 21, Rio Declaration, Forest Principles, ¶ 18 of Chaps. 14, 18 and 26 (1992).
- 25.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, supra note 20, at ¶ 16(d).
- 26.
Berlin Conference, Berlin Rules on Water Resources, art. 20 (2004).
- 27.
G.A. Res. 61/295, arts. 25 and 26, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Oct. 2, 2007).
- 28.
See International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights art. 26, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S.171; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights art. 2(2), Dec. 16, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3.
- 29.
The Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention art. 2(2), Jun. 5, 1959, C107.
- 30.
See generally Acton v. Blundell152 Eng. Rep. 123 (1843).
- 31.
The Indian Easements Act, 1882, § 7, illus. (g).
- 32.
Vani [8, pp. 443–444].
- 33.
Id.
- 34.
See State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd., AIR 2005 SC 1646, ¶391 (India).
- 35.
The National Water Policy, 2012, p. 4.
- 36.
The revised Model Groundwater Bill, 2017, which was sent to the Indian Government, has not been made publicly available, and hence, this chapter relies on the 2016 version; see also the Model Bill for the Conservation, Protection, Regulation and Management of Groundwater, 2016.
- 37.
Id. at §9(1).
- 38.
Id. at§§ 9(2), 9(3), 9(4).
- 39.
M. C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1SCC388 (India).
- 40.
State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd., AIR2005SC1646, ¶390 (India).
- 41.
Perumatty Gram Panchayat v. State of Kerala, 2004 (1) KLJ 414, ¶ 12 (India).
- 42.
PTI [9].
- 43.
Advocacy Statement: HRC42—IDSN and MRG on the right to water and caste-based discrimination, minority rights grp. (Sept. 9, 2019), https://minorityrights.org/advocacy-statements/hrc42-idsn-and-mrg-on-the-right-to-water-and-caste-based-discrimination/.
- 44.
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR1991SC420, ¶6 (India).
- 45.
The Model Groundwater Bill, 2016, §§ 3(a) and 3(i).
- 46.
Id. at §4(1).
- 47.
Id. at §4(2).
- 48.
The Model Groundwater Bill 2016, §5(1).
- 49.
nat’l comm’n for scheduled tribes, special report: good governance for tribal dev. & admin. 12(2012).
- 50.
Id. at 29.
- 51.
Dutta et al. [10, pp. 68–69].
- 52.
- 53.
See generally Sekhri [13, pp. 76–102].
- 54.
human rights watch, a report by human rights watch for the united nations world conference against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. durban, south africa 5 (2001).
- 55.
Dutta et al., supra note 52, pp. 67–77.
- 56.
For example, Rig Veda (Hymn XXIII, Verse 22).
- 57.
Guru [14].
- 58.
Navsarjan Trust and RFK Center, supra note 12, at 54–55.
- 59.
Indo-Asian News Service [15].
- 60.
Abhiyan et al. [16].
- 61.
See generally Johns [17, pp. 3–5].
- 62.
Dutta et al., supra note 52, at 74.
- 63.
Dutta et al., supra note 52, p. 73.
- 64.
Dutta et al., supra note 52, p. 75.
- 65.
Navsarjan Trust and RFK Center, supra note 12, p. 44.
- 66.
Id.; Dutta et al., supra note 52, p. 64.
- 67.
Abhiyan et al., supra note 62, p. 11.
- 68.
Hindus of Kannamapalaiyam Village v. Kaikkolar Christians, 1910; MariappaNadan v. VaithilingaMudaliar, 1913.
- 69.
NarhariDamodarVaidya v. B. R. Ambedkar, 1937(39) BOMLR1295 (India).
- 70.
State of Karnataka v. AppaBaluIngale, AIR1993SC1126 (India).
- 71.
Id. at ¶ 11, 13 and 36.
- 72.
Purohit [18].
- 73.
Teltumbde [19].
- 74.
The report instead only discusses state-wise cases of obstruction of usage of public places inid. pp. 524, 620.
- 75.
Johari [20].
- 76.
See State of Maharashtra v. Prakash D. Patil,Crl. A. No. 608 of 1977 (India).
- 77.
Naz [21, p. 89].
- 78.
Johns, supra note 63, p. 2.
- 79.
See generally Guru, supra note, p. 59.
- 80.
Navsarjan Trust and RFK Center, supra note 12, p. 44.
- 81.
Naz, supra note 80, p. 92; Soni [22].
- 82.
Naz, supra note 80, p. 92.
- 83.
Naz, supra note 80, pp. 92, 93.
- 84.
- 85.
Moench [25, pp. A-49].
- 86.
State of Karnataka v. AppaBaluIngale, AIR1993SC1126 (India), ¶16.
- 87.
Sampat [26, pp. 108–109].
- 88.
Argade and Narayanan [27, p. 881].
- 89.
Sampat, supra note 90, p. 109.
- 90.
Parmar [28, pp. 200–201].
- 91.
See generally Ramaiah [29].
- 92.
State of Karnataka v. AppaBaluIngale, AIR1993SC1126 (India), ¶13.
- 93.
Baxi [30, pp. 186–191].
References
Suhag R (2016) Overview of groundwater in India. PRS India. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id9504.html
Government of India (2018) State/UT-wise number of entries in the central list of OBCs. Ministry Soc J Empower. http://socialjustice.nic.in/UserView/index?mid=76674
Trust N, Kennedy RF, Center for Justice & Human Rights (2010) Understanding untouchability: a comprehensive study of practices and conditions in 1589 villages. Int’l Dalit Solid Netw 33. https://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Untouchability_Report_Navsarjan_2010.pdf
Bijoy CR, Nongbri T (2013) Country technical note on Indigenous peoples’ issues: Republic of India. IFAD and AIPP. https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/40224860/india_ctn.pdf/8557878b-b3bb-4437-bcd3-563180de1165
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2003) General comment no. 15: the right to water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the Covenant). OHCHR. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d11.pdf
The United Nations Water Conference (1997) Report of the United Nations water conference, Mar Del Plata. U.N. Doc. E/CONF. 70/29
Misiedjan D, Gupta J (2014) Indigenous communities: analyzing their right to water under different international legal regimes. Utrecht Law Rev 10
Vani MS (2009) Groundwater law in India: a new approach. In: Iyer R (ed) Water and the laws in India. SAGE Publications
PTI (2018) 27% of tribal population do not have access to safe source of drinking water: Govt. Times of India, April 5. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/27-of-tribal-population-do-not-have-access-to-safe-source-of-drinking-water-govt/articleshow/63630834.cms
Dutta S, Sinha I, Parashar A (2018) Dalit women and water: availability, access and discrimination in rural India. J Soc Inclusion Stud 4(1)
Oskarsson P (2018) Landlock: paralysing dispute over minerals on Adivasi land in India. ANU Press
Yadu CR, Vijayasuryan CK (2016) Triple exclusion of dalits in land ownership in Kerala. Soc Change 46(3)
Sekhri S (2014) Wells, water, and welfare: the impact of access to groundwater on rural poverty and conflict. Am Econ J Appl Econ 6(3)
Guru G (2009) Archaeology of untouchability. Econ Polit Wkly 44(37)
Indo-Asian News Service (2019) Dalits not allowed to touch water, tankers servicing upper caste villages in UP’s Bundelkhand. India Today, July 3. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/dalits-not-allowed-to-touch-water-tankers-servicing-upper-caste-villages-in-up-bundelkhand-1560960-2019-07-03
Abhiyan RG et al (2014) Violations of the right to water and sanitation: submission to the UN special rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, Ms. Catarina De Albuquerque for her annual thematic report to The Human Rights Council, p 11
Johns H Stigmatization of Dalits in access to water and sanitation in India. National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights (NCDHR). https://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/user_folder/pdf/New_files/UN/HRC/Stigmatization_of_dalits_in_access_to_water_sanitation.pdf
Purohit M (2015) Water untouched: a film on Dalits’ lack of access. India Water Portal. https://www.indiawaterportal.org/articles/water-miles-away-dalits
Teltumbde A (2018) Why the ‘misuse’ of the SC/ST act is nothing but a bogey. Econ Times, April 6. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/why-the-misuse-of-the-sc/st-act-is-nothing-but-a-bogey/articleshow/63648662.cms?from=mdr
Johari A (2018) Supreme Court says SC/ST atrocities act is misused. So what explains the low conviction rates? Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/article/873072/supreme-court-says-sc-st-atrocities-act-is-misused-so-what-explains-the-low-conviction-rates
Naz F (2015) Water, water lords, and caste: a village study from Gujarat, India. Capital Nat Soc 26(3)
Soni J (2006) Water accessibility and marginalisation of dalits some observation of rural Gujarat. Prepared for the workshop titled Water, law and the commons organised by the International Environmental Law Research Centre
Joshi D, Fawcett B (2001) Water, Hindu mythology and an unequal social order in India. In: Presented at the second conference of the international water history association, p 9
Agarwal A, Kimondo J, Moreno G, Tinker J (1981) Water, sanitation, health—for all? Prospects for the international drinking water supply and sanitation decade, 1981–1990. Earthscan, London
Moench M (1998) Allocating the common heritage debates over water rights and governance structures in India. Econ Polit Wkly 33(26)
Sampat P (2007–2008) Swajaldhara or ‘Pay’-Jal-Dhara: right to drinking water in Rajasthan. Econ Polit Wkly 42(52)
Argade P, Narayanan NC (2019) Undercurrents of participatory groundwater governance in Rural Jalna, Western India. Water Alter 12(3)
Parmar P (2015) Indigeneity and legal pluralism in India: claims, histories, meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ramaiah A (2007) Laws for Dalit rights and dignity: experiences and responses from Tamil Nadu. Rawat Publications, Jaipur
Baxi U (1988) Untouchables access to water: two moralities of law enforcement. In: Baxi U (ed) Law and poverty: critical essays. NM Tripathi, Bombay
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dr. Tony George Puthucherril for his valuable comments and encouragement and Ms. Tamanna for her research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramakrishnan, A. (2021). Caste Realities and the Struggles of India’s Adivasi and Dalit Population in Accessing Groundwater. In: Khan, S.A., Puthucherril, T.G., Paul, S.R. (eds) Groundwater Law and Management in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2617-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2617-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2616-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2617-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)