Skip to main content

Caste Realities and the Struggles of India’s Adivasi and Dalit Population in Accessing Groundwater

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Groundwater Law and Management in India

Abstract

India’s Adivasi and Dalit population—officially termed the “Scheduled Tribes” (ST) and the “Scheduled Castes” (SC)—have faced, and continue to face, many social disadvantages. This Chapter examines one such discrimination that these groups face and the existing nature of their rights over groundwater. It explores three significant challenges faced by them as regards accessing groundwater resources: firstly, the individual ownership of groundwater tied to the concept of private land ownership; secondly, the practice of untouchability, discrimination and the social exclusion of such communities from using public water structures; and thirdly, the social subjugation by dominant castes and elites that hinders their pursuit for water justice. In doing so, this chapter examines the ideal proposed by the 2016 Model Groundwater Bill to remove private monopoly over groundwater and vest its control and management with the State in public trust. The central argument that it forwards is that this may enable the impoverished and the marginalized better access to the much-needed clean water for their survival, provided that the constitutional and legislative protections afforded to them are effectively enforced. This could also alleviate the everyday struggles faced by the Adivasi and Dalit population in accessing water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Suhag [1].

  2. 2.

    niti aayog, composite water management index 22 (2018).

  3. 3.

    india const. arts. 14 and 15.

  4. 4.

    Id. at art. 15, cl. (2), sub-cl. (b).

  5. 5.

    Id. at art. 17.

  6. 6.

    gov’t of india, census 2011 a-5 union primary census , Abstract.

  7. 7.

    india const. arts. 366(24) and 366(25).

  8. 8.

    gov’t of india, annual report 2019–2020 Annexure-5B (2020).

  9. 9.

    Idat. Annexure-9A (2020).

  10. 10.

    Listed by the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950.

  11. 11.

    Government of India [2].

  12. 12.

    Trust and Kennedy [3].

  13. 13.

    india const. arts. 15(4), 124A, 243D, 243T, 46, 330, 332, 338, 338A, 338B, 339 and 340, and Schedule V.

  14. 14.

    The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, §§ 2(a), 4(iv) and 7.

  15. 15.

    The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, §§3(1)(g), 3(1)(x), 3(1)(za)(A).

  16. 16.

    The Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention, Jun. 5, 1959, C107.

  17. 17.

    Id. at art. 1(1)(b); G.A. Res. 61/295, preamble, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Oct. 2, 2007).

  18. 18.

    Bijoy and Nongbri [4].

  19. 19.

    Id.

  20. 20.

    Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [5].

  21. 21.

    The United Nations Water Conference [6].

  22. 22.

    Misiedjan and Gupta [7, p. 81]; See generally Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru, Human Rights Committee, CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 (Apr. 24, 2009).

  23. 23.

    Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, supra note 20, at ¶ 7.

  24. 24.

    United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Agenda 21, Rio Declaration, Forest Principles, ¶ 18 of Chaps. 14, 18 and 26 (1992).

  25. 25.

    Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, supra note 20, at ¶ 16(d).

  26. 26.

    Berlin Conference, Berlin Rules on Water Resources, art. 20 (2004).

  27. 27.

    G.A. Res. 61/295, arts. 25 and 26, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Oct. 2, 2007).

  28. 28.

    See International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights art. 26, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S.171; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights art. 2(2), Dec. 16, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3.

  29. 29.

    The Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention art. 2(2), Jun. 5, 1959, C107.

  30. 30.

    See generally Acton v. Blundell152 Eng. Rep. 123 (1843).

  31. 31.

    The Indian Easements Act, 1882, § 7, illus. (g).

  32. 32.

    Vani [8, pp. 443–444].

  33. 33.

    Id.

  34. 34.

    See State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd., AIR 2005 SC 1646, ¶391 (India).

  35. 35.

    The National Water Policy, 2012, p. 4.

  36. 36.

    The revised Model Groundwater Bill, 2017, which was sent to the Indian Government, has not been made publicly available, and hence, this chapter relies on the 2016 version; see also the Model Bill for the Conservation, Protection, Regulation and Management of Groundwater, 2016.

  37. 37.

    Id. at §9(1).

  38. 38.

    Id. at§§ 9(2), 9(3), 9(4).

  39. 39.

    M. C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1SCC388 (India).

  40. 40.

    State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd., AIR2005SC1646, ¶390 (India).

  41. 41.

    Perumatty Gram Panchayat v. State of Kerala, 2004 (1) KLJ 414, ¶ 12 (India).

  42. 42.

    PTI [9].

  43. 43.

    Advocacy Statement: HRC42—IDSN and MRG on the right to water and caste-based discrimination, minority rights grp. (Sept. 9, 2019), https://minorityrights.org/advocacy-statements/hrc42-idsn-and-mrg-on-the-right-to-water-and-caste-based-discrimination/.

  44. 44.

    Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR1991SC420, ¶6 (India).

  45. 45.

    The Model Groundwater Bill, 2016, §§ 3(a) and 3(i).

  46. 46.

    Id. at §4(1).

  47. 47.

    Id. at §4(2).

  48. 48.

    The Model Groundwater Bill 2016, §5(1).

  49. 49.

    nat’l comm’n for scheduled tribes, special report: good governance for tribal dev. & admin. 12(2012).

  50. 50.

    Id. at 29.

  51. 51.

    Dutta et al. [10, pp. 68–69].

  52. 52.

    See Oskarsson [11, vol. 14, pp. 29–50]; accord Yadu and Vijayasuryan [12, pp. 1–16].

  53. 53.

    See generally Sekhri [13, pp. 76–102].

  54. 54.

    human rights watch, a report by human rights watch for the united nations world conference against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. durban, south africa 5 (2001).

  55. 55.

    Dutta et al., supra note 52, pp. 67–77.

  56. 56.

    For example, Rig Veda (Hymn XXIII, Verse 22).

  57. 57.

    Guru [14].

  58. 58.

    Navsarjan Trust and RFK Center, supra note 12, at 54–55.

  59. 59.

    Indo-Asian News Service [15].

  60. 60.

    Abhiyan et al. [16].

  61. 61.

    See generally Johns [17, pp. 3–5].

  62. 62.

    Dutta et al., supra note 52, at 74.

  63. 63.

    Dutta et al., supra note 52, p. 73.

  64. 64.

    Dutta et al., supra note 52, p. 75.

  65. 65.

    Navsarjan Trust and RFK Center, supra note 12, p. 44.

  66. 66.

    Id.; Dutta et al., supra note 52, p. 64.

  67. 67.

    Abhiyan et al., supra note 62, p. 11.

  68. 68.

    Hindus of Kannamapalaiyam Village v. Kaikkolar Christians, 1910; MariappaNadan v. VaithilingaMudaliar, 1913.

  69. 69.

    NarhariDamodarVaidya v. B. R. Ambedkar, 1937(39) BOMLR1295 (India).

  70. 70.

    State of Karnataka v. AppaBaluIngale, AIR1993SC1126 (India).

  71. 71.

    Id. at ¶ 11, 13 and 36.

  72. 72.

    Purohit [18].

  73. 73.

    Teltumbde [19].

  74. 74.

    The report instead only discusses state-wise cases of obstruction of usage of public places inid. pp. 524, 620.

  75. 75.

    Johari [20].

  76. 76.

    See State of Maharashtra v. Prakash D. Patil,Crl. A. No. 608 of 1977 (India).

  77. 77.

    Naz [21, p. 89].

  78. 78.

    Johns, supra note 63, p. 2.

  79. 79.

    See generally Guru, supra note, p. 59.

  80. 80.

    Navsarjan Trust and RFK Center, supra note 12, p. 44.

  81. 81.

    Naz, supra note 80, p. 92; Soni [22].

  82. 82.

    Naz, supra note 80, p. 92.

  83. 83.

    Naz, supra note 80, pp. 92, 93.

  84. 84.

    Joshi and Fawcett [23], quoting the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes, 1980 cited in Agarwal et al. [24].

  85. 85.

    Moench [25, pp. A-49].

  86. 86.

    State of Karnataka v. AppaBaluIngale, AIR1993SC1126 (India), ¶16.

  87. 87.

    Sampat [26, pp. 108–109].

  88. 88.

    Argade and Narayanan [27, p. 881].

  89. 89.

    Sampat, supra note 90, p. 109.

  90. 90.

    Parmar [28, pp. 200–201].

  91. 91.

    See generally Ramaiah [29].

  92. 92.

    State of Karnataka v. AppaBaluIngale, AIR1993SC1126 (India), ¶13.

  93. 93.

    Baxi [30, pp. 186–191].

References

  1. Suhag R (2016) Overview of groundwater in India. PRS India. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id9504.html

  2. Government of India (2018) State/UT-wise number of entries in the central list of OBCs. Ministry Soc J Empower. http://socialjustice.nic.in/UserView/index?mid=76674

  3. Trust N, Kennedy RF, Center for Justice & Human Rights (2010) Understanding untouchability: a comprehensive study of practices and conditions in 1589 villages. Int’l Dalit Solid Netw 33. https://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Untouchability_Report_Navsarjan_2010.pdf

  4. Bijoy CR, Nongbri T (2013) Country technical note on Indigenous peoples’ issues: Republic of India. IFAD and AIPP. https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/40224860/india_ctn.pdf/8557878b-b3bb-4437-bcd3-563180de1165

  5. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2003) General comment no. 15: the right to water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the Covenant). OHCHR. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d11.pdf

  6. The United Nations Water Conference (1997) Report of the United Nations water conference, Mar Del Plata. U.N. Doc. E/CONF. 70/29

    Google Scholar 

  7. Misiedjan D, Gupta J (2014) Indigenous communities: analyzing their right to water under different international legal regimes. Utrecht Law Rev 10

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vani MS (2009) Groundwater law in India: a new approach. In: Iyer R (ed) Water and the laws in India. SAGE Publications

    Google Scholar 

  9. PTI (2018) 27% of tribal population do not have access to safe source of drinking water: Govt. Times of India, April 5. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/27-of-tribal-population-do-not-have-access-to-safe-source-of-drinking-water-govt/articleshow/63630834.cms

  10. Dutta S, Sinha I, Parashar A (2018) Dalit women and water: availability, access and discrimination in rural India. J Soc Inclusion Stud 4(1)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oskarsson P (2018) Landlock: paralysing dispute over minerals on Adivasi land in India. ANU Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yadu CR, Vijayasuryan CK (2016) Triple exclusion of dalits in land ownership in Kerala. Soc Change 46(3)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sekhri S (2014) Wells, water, and welfare: the impact of access to groundwater on rural poverty and conflict. Am Econ J Appl Econ 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guru G (2009) Archaeology of untouchability. Econ Polit Wkly 44(37)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Indo-Asian News Service (2019) Dalits not allowed to touch water, tankers servicing upper caste villages in UP’s Bundelkhand. India Today, July 3. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/dalits-not-allowed-to-touch-water-tankers-servicing-upper-caste-villages-in-up-bundelkhand-1560960-2019-07-03

  16. Abhiyan RG et al (2014) Violations of the right to water and sanitation: submission to the UN special rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, Ms. Catarina De Albuquerque for her annual thematic report to The Human Rights Council, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johns H Stigmatization of Dalits in access to water and sanitation in India. National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights (NCDHR). https://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/user_folder/pdf/New_files/UN/HRC/Stigmatization_of_dalits_in_access_to_water_sanitation.pdf

  18. Purohit M (2015) Water untouched: a film on Dalits’ lack of access. India Water Portal. https://www.indiawaterportal.org/articles/water-miles-away-dalits

  19. Teltumbde A (2018) Why the ‘misuse’ of the SC/ST act is nothing but a bogey. Econ Times, April 6. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/why-the-misuse-of-the-sc/st-act-is-nothing-but-a-bogey/articleshow/63648662.cms?from=mdr

  20. Johari A (2018) Supreme Court says SC/ST atrocities act is misused. So what explains the low conviction rates? Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/article/873072/supreme-court-says-sc-st-atrocities-act-is-misused-so-what-explains-the-low-conviction-rates

  21. Naz F (2015) Water, water lords, and caste: a village study from Gujarat, India. Capital Nat Soc 26(3)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soni J (2006) Water accessibility and marginalisation of dalits some observation of rural Gujarat. Prepared for the workshop titled Water, law and the commons organised by the International Environmental Law Research Centre

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joshi D, Fawcett B (2001) Water, Hindu mythology and an unequal social order in India. In: Presented at the second conference of the international water history association, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal A, Kimondo J, Moreno G, Tinker J (1981) Water, sanitation, health—for all? Prospects for the international drinking water supply and sanitation decade, 1981–1990. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moench M (1998) Allocating the common heritage debates over water rights and governance structures in India. Econ Polit Wkly 33(26)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sampat P (2007–2008) Swajaldhara or ‘Pay’-Jal-Dhara: right to drinking water in Rajasthan. Econ Polit Wkly 42(52)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Argade P, Narayanan NC (2019) Undercurrents of participatory groundwater governance in Rural Jalna, Western India. Water Alter 12(3)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parmar P (2015) Indigeneity and legal pluralism in India: claims, histories, meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramaiah A (2007) Laws for Dalit rights and dignity: experiences and responses from Tamil Nadu. Rawat Publications, Jaipur

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baxi U (1988) Untouchables access to water: two moralities of law enforcement. In: Baxi U (ed) Law and poverty: critical essays. NM Tripathi, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Tony George Puthucherril for his valuable comments and encouragement and Ms. Tamanna for her research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhilasha Ramakrishnan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramakrishnan, A. (2021). Caste Realities and the Struggles of India’s Adivasi and Dalit Population in Accessing Groundwater. In: Khan, S.A., Puthucherril, T.G., Paul, S.R. (eds) Groundwater Law and Management in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2617-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2617-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2616-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2617-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics