Skip to main content

Writing the ‘Local’, Provincial and Public into Area Narratives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fieldwork and the Self

Part of the book series: Asia in Transition ((AT,volume 12))

  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I reflect on the context of knowledge production in area studies and highlight the provincialising of border and peripheral regions as a result of state-centric approaches. Consequently, how do area scholars incorporate in their studies provincial narratives that are central to a locality but censored or omitted in the national narrative? What sources inform us of these local narratives? Drawing on my field research in Thailand and the Thailand–Malaysia border region, I explore the possibilities of ‘denationalising’ area studies through the intersections between sources, identities, localities and hierarchies of knowledge production in transnational and national spaces. The discussion suggests that the interdisciplinary methodology adopted in researching area studies must also be mirrored in the teaching of area studies, which is somewhat lacking at present.

Some material in this chapter first appeared in Mala Rajo Sathian (2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pattani is the name of a province in southern Thailand. The spelling ‘Patani’ refers to the area that was under the rule of the former sultanate of Patani that included the present southern Thai provinces of Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat.

  2. 2.

    Kahn sees provincialising as taking place when the East omits to engage with Europe and Euro-American knowledge. Goh extends the argument that inter-Asian approaches to assert Asia as authentic do not function to deconstruct knowledge, they only reify Asia, which is similar to the method of the Orientalists (see Kahn 2016; Goh 2019: 502).

  3. 3.

    Syed Farid Alatas points to the erroneous understanding of the spatial binary of the Malay world based on hulu–hilir, adding that a third dimension, laut (sea), has been overlooked (see Syed Farid Alatas Chap. 10 in this volume). In Patani, hilir (coastal) may also include the sea (as it is an extension of the lowland/coastal area); likewise, hulu (inland) can also include the hills and mountainous regions (as darat rather than hilir is used by the people to refer to inland areas).

  4. 4.

    Information from documents prepared by Shaharil Talib, the first academic staff member of Southeast Asian studies at Universiti Malaya and subsequently its head of department. I have verified the data with Hanafi Hussin (now associate professor in Southeast Asian studies) and Jojie Samuel, the current Malaysian ambassador to Thailand. Both Hanafi Hussin and Jojie Samuel were among the pioneering cohort of undergraduates in the programme.

  5. 5.

    The Southeast Asian Studies Programme at the National University of Singapore had a similar country-based module but it is no longer offered. At present there are courses covering field visits to a few select countries in the region.

References

  • Andaya, Barbara Watson. 2017. Keynote address, 7th International Conference on Southeast Asia (ICONSEA), Kuala Lumpur, 6–7 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. A life beyond boundaries: A memoir. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations [ASEAN]. 1976. The Declaration of ASEAN Concord, Bali, Indonesia, 24 February 1976. https://asean.org/?static_post=declaration-of-asean-concord-indonesia-24-february-1976. Accessed 28 Jan 2021.

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatthip Nartsurpha. 1999. The Thai village economy in the past, trans. Chris Baker and Pasuk Phongpaichit. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Kuan-Hsing. 2010. Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua Beng Huat, Ken Dean, Ho Engseng, Ho Kong Chong, Jonathan Rigg, and Brenda Yeoh. 2019. Area studies and the crisis of legitimacy: A view from South East Asia. South East Asia Research 27(1): 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, Michael Kelly. 2005. Hegemony and the politics of culture and identity in Thailand. Critical Asian Studies 37(4): 523–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, Robert. 2012. The past as threat, the past as promise: The historical writing of Anthony Reid. In Anthony Reid and the study of the Southeast Asian past, ed. Geoff Wade and Li Tana, 31–44. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curaming, Rommel A. 2015. Postcolonial criticism and Southeast Asian studies: Pitfalls, retreat, and unfulfilled promises. Suvannabhumi: Multi-disciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 7(2): 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Jennifer W. 1991. Family and state: The formation of a Sino-Thai tin-mining dynasty, 1797–1932, ed. Craig J. Reynolds. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diokno, Maria Serena I. 2010. Expeditious knowledge: Supporting Southeast Asian studies in the region. Jati: Journal of the Department of Southeast Asian Studies, Special issue 15: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, and Maitrii Aung-Thwin. 2016. Regional Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Special issue: Plural Identities in Southeast Asia 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duara, Prasenjit. 2015. The crisis of global modernity: Asian traditions and a sustainable future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1958. Modjokuto: Religion in Java. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, Puspadhar. 2002. Cultural affinities between Tai Ahom of Assam and Thai of Thailand. Nakhon Phanom: Rajabhat Institute Nakhon Phanom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh Beng-Lan. 2010. Southeast Asian perspectives on area studies in a global age. Jati: Journal of the Department of Southeast Asian Studies, Special issue 15: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Disciplines and area studies in the global age: Southeast Asian reflections. In Decentring and diversifying Southeast Asia: Perspectives from the region, ed. Goh Beng-Lan, 1–59. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The future of Asian studies: A personal view. In Asian Studies, 26–39. Printed on the Occasion of the Inauguration of the AS8 Building, 2–3 October. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. The question of cultural incommensurability: An intercultural interpretation arising out of Southeast Asia. American Anthropologist 121(2): 498–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafi Hussin, and Mala Rajo Sathian. 2018. SEAS in SEA: Emergence, development, rebranding and sustainability of Southeast Asian studies in Malaysia. Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 23(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heryanto, Ariel. 2000. Asians studying other Asians in Asia: What difference does it make? SEAS Bulletin 2/00: 4–7, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Can there be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian studies? Moussons 5: 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Peter A. 2019. South East Asian area studies beyond Anglo-America: Geopolitical transitions, the neoliberal academy and spatialized regimes of knowledge. South East Asia Research 27(1): 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Joel S. 2003. Anthropology as cosmopolitan practice? Anthropological Theory 3(4): 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Other Malays: Nationalism and cosmopolitanism in the modern Malay world. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Asia, modernity, and the pursuit of the sacred: Gnostics, scholars, mystics, and reformers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Victor T. 2016. Southeast Asian studies: Insiders and outsiders, or is culture and identity a way forward? Suvannabhumi: Multi-disciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 8(1): 17–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. The construction of Southeast Asia as an academic field of study: Personages, programmes and problems. Gadong: Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Institute of Asian Studies, IAS Working Paper No. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kono, Yasuyuki, Nathan Badenoch, and Mario Ivan Lopez. 2019. Bridging the disciplinary divide: 50 years of research at the Center for Southeast Asian Studies. Kyoto: Kyoto University, Japan-ASEAN Transdisciplinary Studies Project (J-ASEAN), Center for Southeast Asian Studies (CSEAS), Japan-ASEAN Transdisciplinary Studies Working Paper Series Vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krongchai Hatta. 1998. Pattani: Kan ka lae kan muang kan pokrong nai adit [Pattani: Trade, politics and administration in the past]. Pattani: Project for Pattani Studies, Department of Humanities and Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E.R. 1964. Political systems of highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leur, Jacob Cornelis van. 1955. Indonesian trade and society: Essays in Asian social and economic history. The Hague: W. van Hoeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathian, Mala Rajo. 1995. Northern Siam, 1867–1910: The impact of missionaries and teak traders. MA thesis, Universiti Malaya.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Protestant mission in northern Siam: Foundation and contribution. Sejarah: Journal of the Department of History 5(5): 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Approaches to Southeast Asian studies: Beyond the ‘comfort zone’. Suvannabhumi: Multi-disciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 7(1): 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, and Ngeow Yeok Meng. 2014. Essentialising ethnic and state identities: Strategic adaptations of ethnic Chinese in Kelantan, Malaysia. Asian Studies Review 38(3): 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendel, Willem van. 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6): 647–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Southeast Asia: An idea whose time is past? Bijdragen tot de Taal, Land- en Volkenkunde 168(4): 497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. 2009. The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsul, A.B. 2010. Southeast Asian studies as a form of knowledge: What the future holds for Southeast Asian studies in Southeast Asia. Jati: Journal of the Department of Southeast Asian Studies, Special issue 15: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smail, John R.W. 1961. On the possibility of an autonomous history of modern Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian History 2(2): 72–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedly, Mary Margaret. 1999. The state of culture theory in the anthropology of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 431–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Eric C. 2013. In defence of Southeast Asia: A case for methodological regionalism. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, Special issue 1(2): 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thongchai Winichakul. 1994. Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Writing at the interstices: Southeast Asian historians and postnational histories in Southeast Asia. In New terrains in Southeast Asian history, ed. Abu Talib Ahmad and Tan Liok Ee, 3–29. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Athens: Ohio University Press, Research in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mala Rajo Sathian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sathian, M.R. (2021). Writing the ‘Local’, Provincial and Public into Area Narratives. In: Jammes, J., King, V.T. (eds) Fieldwork and the Self. Asia in Transition, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2438-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2438-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2437-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2438-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics