Skip to main content

Intersectional Euro-Muslim Women: Western Political and Feminist Responses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Framing Hijab in the European Mind
  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter goes through Muslim women’s image in Europe from the colonial area until the neo-colonial contemporary image. This chapter follows Gunther Dietz’s approach in analyzing the hijab practice. First, to delineate the subject, which consists of two elements in this book: 1) European Muslim woman and 2) the hijab. Then, to analyze the reasons behind considering these two subjects as “problematic” in Europe. Finally, this chapter proposes Maria Caterina La Barbera’s intersectional feminist approach as a potential solution for an inclusive feminist discourse. The analysis of this section covers the dispute on faith and traditions among feminists, the confusion on the term Islamic feminism, and the legislative texts in the Islamic resources that demand the veiling practice. Finally, this chapter provides a comparative analysis between the Islamic religious legislation and the UDHE on women’s right to vestment. This chapter finds out that the different understandings of women’s sexuality and gender equality in the public sphere between the Islamic approach and the secular approach are the main trigger of dispute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Badran (2002).

  2. 2.

    Ang-Lygate (1996) and Said (2002).

  3. 3.

    Haddad (2007).

  4. 4.

    Hoodfar (1992).

  5. 5.

    Muñoz (2010) and Haddad (2007).

  6. 6.

    De Beauvoir (1952).

  7. 7.

    Muñoz and Grosfoguel (2012).

  8. 8.

    For example, Syrian government, led by the only political party in the country, Al-Baèz; banned the hijab of the students but not teachers at the public schools until 1999, when the president, Bashar Al-Assad, the son; passed a Republican Decree that allowed veiling.

  9. 9.

    Abu-Lughod (2002).

  10. 10.

    The right to vestment is included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art. 19 UNDHR. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

  11. 11.

    Khader (2016).

  12. 12.

    Mahmood (2005).

  13. 13.

    Alexander (2006) and Volpp (2011).

  14. 14.

    Said (2002), Amiraux (2007), and Jouili (2009).

  15. 15.

    La Barbera (2007).

  16. 16.

    La Barbera uses this term as an alternative of “the multiracial feminism” to avoid the racial elements of the equation.

  17. 17.

    La Barbera (2009).

  18. 18.

    Sibai (2018).

  19. 19.

    La barbera indicates that African women had been enforced to break down their experiences, to provide one fragment of it as a “meaningful whole” and give up all other constituent parts of themselves. By which, gender essentialism reduced multiple discrimination to a problem of arithmetical sum.

  20. 20.

    The term Islamic feminism appeared in Iran by Afsaneh Najmabadeh and Ziba Mir-Hosseini, and Turkia, Yesim Arat and Feride Acar, to express a new feminist paradigm by the mid of the 90s. The term is circulated by Muslims across the world.

  21. 21.

    Patriarchy is a historically specific mode of rule by fathers 42 that, in its religious and traditional forms, assumes a real as well as symbolic continuum between the ‘‘Father/fathers’’ that is, between a patriarchalized view of God as Father/male, and a theory of father-right, extending to the husband’s claim to rule over his wife and children (Barlas 2006: 12).

  22. 22.

    A broader definition of patriarchy is as a politics of sexual differentiation that privileges males by ‘‘transforming biological sex into politicized gender, which prioritizes the male while making the woman different (unequal), less than, or the ‘Other’’’ (Barlas 2006: 12).

  23. 23.

    Barlas (2006).

  24. 24.

    Engineer (2007).

  25. 25.

    Amanda Keddie signifies that Muslim women voice is silent in Australia. And it is imperative to provide greater opportunities for listening to Muslim women and girls who are who are finding places of agency within the religious, gendered and racialized discourse that shape their identities, it is the voices in the current environment that tend to be silenced (Keddie, 2016).

  26. 26.

    Tohidi draws a difference between the connotation of the term “Islamic feminism” and “Muslim feminism”. She states: “I personally find the term ‘Muslim feminist/m’(a Muslim who is feminist) less troubling and more pertinent to current realties than the term ‘Islamic feminism.’ The term ‘Islamic feminism,’on the other hand, seems to be more appropriate to be used and conceived as an analytical concept in feminist research and feminist theology, or as a discourse. The definition of either term, however, is difficult since a Muslim feminist (believer) would probably define it differently from a laic social scientist like myself” (2003: 138). I use the “Islamic feminism2 to refer to the movement and “Muslim feminist” to refer to the individuals (see explanation in the introduction).

  27. 27.

    Reported in Omaima Abu Baker “Islamic feminism? What’s in a name?” (2001: 4).

  28. 28.

    Abortion is not forbidden in Islam. It is restricted by specific conditions related to the mother’s and the baby’s situations. The court in Morroco did not assure if Ra’uf had an abortion or not. And if yes, no one questioned if it was carried out through the Islamic conditions.

  29. 29.

    Islamweb.net Fatwa number:30898. https://fatwa.islamweb.net/fatwa/index.php?page=showfatwa&lang=&Option=FatwaId&Id=%3Cspan%20style=%27color:red%27%20%3E30898%3C/span%3E.

  30. 30.

    Boulos (2019b).

  31. 31.

    The Pakistani and Syrian representors in the drafting committee were form secular background. The Saudi Arabian representor was a Lebanese Christian. It is to say, the Islam thoughts in the UDHR was minimal. Boulos asserts on the importance of a cross culutral dialogue to over come the lack of Islamic perspective in the UDHR.

  32. 32.

    Boulos (2019a).

  33. 33.

    It is important to point out that, from an Islamic perspective, the Quran can not be translated, since God's way of revelation in the Arabic language is not something incidental, but rather something essential to its meaning. Translating the Quranic text will decay the depth of its meanings. Therefore, we have to keep in mind that the verses that will be reproduced throughout the text are but an interpretation of the Koran.

  34. 34.

    The English translación is adopted from Mohammad Asad interpretation of the Holy Quran.

  35. 35.

    These two verses also lead us to another social reality at the time of revelation. Muslim women lived with men in the time of the prophet, without limiting them to the domestic space, or being hidden behind an integral veil. Muslim received these verses to regulate existing (gender) public relations.

  36. 36.

    The verse is the following: “But if any of you devoutly obeys God and his Apostle and does good deeds, on her shall We bestow her reward twice-over: for We shall have readied for her a most excellent sustance [in life to come] (Al-Noor: 31).

  37. 37.

    Homa Hoodfar (1992: 40) opines that all the narrations of the hijab in the Quranic text are directed to the prophet’s wives. Yet, the four Islamic shools indicates that not all of them are directed to the wives of the prophets. Only those which are referred to in this text. Hoodfar also cited the wrong verses in her article.

  38. 38.

    When this verse was revealed, Muslim women immediately tore off their cloaks to cover. Muslim women met the criteria of this verse immediately.

  39. 39.

    Amer (2014).

  40. 40.

    Gómez (2019).

  41. 41.

    Find the full text in https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

  42. 42.

    Asad (2003).

  43. 43.

    Bhargava and Reifeld (2005).

  44. 44.

    Habermas (1991).

  45. 45.

    Savage (2004) and Joppke (2009).

  46. 46.

    Amiraux (2007).

  47. 47.

    Scott (2009).

  48. 48.

    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/mar/14/employers-can-ban-staff-from-wearing-headscarves-european-court-rules.

  49. 49.

    Moore (2007).

  50. 50.

    Entwistle (2015).

  51. 51.

    Hopkins and Greenwood (2013).

  52. 52.

    Marco (2008) and Dwyer (1999).

  53. 53.

    Sibai (2010), Moghadam (2010), and KhirAllah (2015).

  54. 54.

    I use the word “claim” because, as I mentioned in the previous chapter, the Secular dimension of the Euro-identity is nourished in an opposition to the Muslim visibility in the public sphere.

  55. 55.

    Jouili (2009) and Moors and Salih (2009).

  56. 56.

    Eseverri C.M., Khir-Allah G. (Working paper) Controlling Muslim Youth Association through Unique representation, Complutense University. 

  57. 57.

    Jouili (2009).

  58. 58.

    Amiraux (2007).

  59. 59.

    Esposito (1999).

  60. 60.

    Balibar (2004).

  61. 61.

    Cesari (1999).

  62. 62.

    Alvi (2013).

  63. 63.

    Ozouf (1995).

  64. 64.

    Fassin (2005).

  65. 65.

    The Muslim identity is above the gender identity, no difference in front of God between men or women. The preference standards is based on the good deeds of each. Although this is not well recognized in several Muslim countries because of the power of traditions, this self-identification dominates the construction of Euro-Muslims identity who learn “pure” Islam away from traditions.

  66. 66.

    In the Spanish context, at least in Madrid, parents count a positive point for the elementary schools that ban the mini skirt and shorts.

  67. 67.

    Hammoudi (2006).

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (2002). Do Muslim women really need saving? American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, L. (1982). Western ethnocentrism and perceptions of the harem. Feminist Studies, 8(3), 521–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, L. (1986). Women and the advent of Islam. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society11(4), 665–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, L. (2000). The women of Islam. Transition, 83, 78–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. J. (2006). Pedagogies of crossing: Meditations on feminism, sexual politics, memory, and the sacred. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvi, A. (2013). Concealment and revealment. Current Anthropology, 54(2), 177–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amer, S. (2014). What is veiling? UNC Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiraux, V. (2007). The headscarf question: What is Really the issue. In S. Amghar, A. Boubekeur, & M. Emerson (Eds.), European Islam: Challenges for public policy and society. CEPS

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang-Lygate, M. (1996). Everywhere to go but home: On (re)(dis)(un) location. Journal of Gender Studies, 5(3), 375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. (p. 184). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badran, M. (2002). Islamic feminism: What’s in a name? Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 569(2002), 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Badran, M. (2009). Feminism in Islam: Secular and religious convergences. Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. (2004). Dissonances dans la laïcité. Mouvements, 3, 148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas, A. (2006). Four stages of Denial, or my on-again, off-again affair with feminism: Response to Margot Badran. Ithaca College (p. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, R., & Reifeld, H. (Eds.). (2005). Civil society, public sphere and citizenship: Dialogues and perceptions. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, S. (2019a). Integrating Muslim women within european societies: Muslim human rights discourse and the cross-cultural approach to human rights in Europe. In Challenging the borders of justice in the age of migrations (pp. 243–262). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, S. (2019b). Towards reconstructing the meaning of inhuman treatment or punishment: A human capability approach. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 12, 35–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. (1999). The re-Islamization of Muslim immigration in Europe. In G. M. Munoz (Ed.), Islam, modernism and the West: cultural and political relations at the end of the millennium. IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist theory, 9(1), 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex. Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M. G. (2003). Current controversies in feminist theory. Annual review of political science, 6(1), 399–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. (1999). Veiled meanings: Young British Muslim Women and the negotiation of differences. Gender, Place and Culture, 6(1), 5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineer, A. A. (2007). Islam in contemporary world. Sterling Publishers Pvt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, J. (2015). The fashioned body: Fashion, dress and social theory. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J. L. (1999). Clash of civilization? Contemporary images of Islam in the west. In G. M. Munoz (Ed.), Islam, modernism and the West: cultural and political relations at the end of the millennium. IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, E. (2005). L'inversion de la question homosexuelle. Editions Amsterdam/Multitudes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M. A. (1997). Knowing the universal declaration of human rights. Notre Dame Law Review, 73, 1153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, L. (2019). Diccionario de islam e islamismo. Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, Y. (2007). The post-9/11 hijab as icon. Sociology of Religion, 68(3), 253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammoudi, A. (2006). A season in Mecca: Narrative of a pilgrimage. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoodfar, H. (1992). The veil in their minds and on our heads: The persistence of colonial images of Muslim women. Resources for Feminist Research, 22(3/4), 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, N., & Greenwood, R. M. (2013). Hijab, visibility and the performance of identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2009). Veil. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouili, J. (2009). Negotiating secular boundaries: Pious micro-practices of Muslim women in French and German public spheres. Social Anthropology, 17(4), 455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khader, S. J. (2016). Do Muslim women need freedom? Traditionalist feminisms and transnational politics. Politics & Gender, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • KhirAllah, G. (2015). Veiling and revealing identity: The linguistic representation of the hijab in the British Press. In M. C. La Barbera (Ed.), Identity and migration in Europe: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 229–249). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Barbera, M. C. (2007). Una reflexión crítica a través del pensamiento de Susan Okin sobre género y justicia. Cuadernos Electrónicos De Filosofía Del Derecho, 16, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • La Barbera, M. C. (2009). Multicentered feminism: Revisiting the “female genital mutilation” discourse. Compostampa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marco, O. (2008). The hijabization process: Some “mindful” bodies uncovered. Quaderns De La Mediterrània, 9(9), 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (2010). Feminist activism in the Arab region and beyond: Linking research to policy reform and social change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. M. (2007). Visible through the veil: The regulation of Islam in American law. Sociology of Religion, 68(3), 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A., & Salih, R. (2009). ‘Muslim women’ in Europe: Secular normativities, bodily performances and multiple publics. Social Anthropology, 17(4), 375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, G. M. (2010). Esto alimenta a la derecha islamófoba. https://elpais.com/diario/2010/04/22/sociedad/1271887205_850215.html. 22 April 2010.

  • Muñoz, M. G., & Grosfoguel, R. (2012). La islamofobia a debate. La genealogía del miedo al Islam y la construcción de los discursos antiislámicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozouf, M. (1995). Les mots des femmes: essai sur la singularité française. Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2007). Islam terrorist radicalization in Europe. In S. Amghar, A. Boubekeur, & M. Emerson (Eds.), European Islam: Challenges for public policy and society. CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (2002). Orientalismo. 1990 (M. L. Fuentes, Trans.). Debate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salih, R. (2009). Muslim women, fragmented secularism and the construction of interconnected ‘publics’ in Italy. Social Anthropology, 17(4), 409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, T. M. (2004). Europe and Islam: Crescent waxing, cultures clashing. Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (2009). The politics of the veil. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sibai, S. A. (2010a). Quítame este velo, porque solita yo no puedo. Published in www.masdeunavez.blogspot.com.es.

  • Sibai, S. A. (2018). La cárcel del feminismo: Hacia un pensamiento islámico decolonial (Vol. 13). Ediciones AKAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasi, B. (2004). Laïcité et République. Rapport de la commission de réflexion sur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tohidi, N. (2003). “Islamic feminism”: Perils and promises. Middle Eastern Women on the move.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpp, L. (2011). Framing cultural difference: Immigrant women and discourses of tradition. Differences, 22(1), 91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata-Barrero, R., & Diez-Nicolas, J. (2012). Islamophobia in Spain? Political rhetoric rather than a social fact. In M. Helbling (Ed.), Islamophobia in the West: Measuring and explaining individual attitudes (pp. 83–97). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khir-Allah, G. (2021). Intersectional Euro-Muslim Women: Western Political and Feminist Responses. In: Framing Hijab in the European Mind. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1653-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics