Skip to main content
  • 2598 Accesses

Abstract

The quality of laboratory animals is an essential component of reproducible biomedical research. The introduction of transgenic laboratory animals has transformed biomedical research but has complicated the management of colonies and the production of immunodeficient strains. Quality control in laboratory animals has emerged as a critical attribute in facility management to ensure high-quality, reproducible experimental data. The quality of laboratory animals is influenced by many factors. Among these factors, genetic purity and health status are the most important factors. Outbred animals are heterozygous, and their high genetic diversity resembles genetic polymorphism of humans, whereas inbred laboratory animals are characterized by homozygosity and represent a narrow genetic repertoire. Nucleic acid markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms, random amplified polymorphic DNA, microsatellite DNA, DNA fingerprints, and single nucleotide polymorphism are typically used as genetic markers of quality control in laboratory animals. Health monitoring is usually accomplished by a microbiological quality control program. Bacteria, viruses, and parasites cause considerable morbidity and mortality in laboratory animals and affect the quality of the research program. For microbiological monitoring, representative samples from a group of animals are tested for specific etiological agents to classify the health status of the colony. Health monitoring is critical in immunodeficient and disease-susceptible research animal models so that they remain free of opportunistic and pathogenic organisms. In this chapter, an overview of the various aspects of laboratory animal quality control is presented with special emphasis on health and genetic monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (2020) Quality Control, https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/control/en/ Accessed 24 June 2020

  2. Baker DG (1998) Natural pathogens of laboratory mice, rats, and rabbits and their effects on research. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:231–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatt PN, Jacoby RO, Morse HC, New AE (1986) Viral and mycoplasma infections of laboratory rodents: effects on biomedical research. Academic Press, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lussier G (1988) Potential detrimental effects of rodent viral infections on long-term experiments. Vet Res Commun 12:199–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicklas W, Hornberger FR, IIIgen-Wilcke B, Jacobi K, Kraft V, Kunstyr I, Mahler M, Meyer H, Gabi Pohlmeyer-Esch G (1999) Implications of infectious agents on results of animal experiments. Lab Anim 33(suppl 1):39–87

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knight DP, Paine JE, Speller DCE (1983) A selective medium for Pasteurella multocida and its use with animal and human specimens. J Clin Pathol 36:591–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frebourg NB, Berthelot G, Hocq R, Chibani A, Lemeland JF (2002) Septicemia due to Pasteurella pneumotropica: 16S rRNA sequencing for diagnosis confirmation. J Clin Microbiol 40:687–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lentsch RH, Wagner JE, Owens DR (1979) Comparison of techniques for primary isolation of respiratory mycoplasma pulmonis from rats. Infect Immun 26:590–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deeb BJ, Kenny GE (1967) Characterization of mycoplasma pulmonis variants isolated from rabbits I. identification and properties of isolates. J Bacteriol 93:1416–1424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohtsuka M, Kikuchi K, Shundo K, Okada K, Higashide M, Sunakawa K, Hiramatsu K (2009) Improved selective isolation of Bordetella pertussis by use of modified Cyclodextrin solid medium. J Clin Microbiol 47:4164–4167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amao H, Saito M, Takahashi KW, Nakagawa M (1990) Selective medium for Corynebacterium kutscheri and localization of the organism in mice and rats. Jikken Dobutsu (Japanese) 39:519–529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rygg M, Bruun CF (1992) Rat bite fever (Streptobacillus moniliformis) with septicemia in a child. Scand J Infect Dis 24:535–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elliott SP (2007) Rat bite fever and Streptobacillus moniliformis. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park SH, Ryu S, Kang DH (2012) Development of an improved selective and differential medium for isolation of salmonella spp. J Clin Microbiol 50:3222–3226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers L, Power K, Gaora PO, Fanning S (2016) Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae: occurrence and detection. Encyclopedia of Food and Health:545–551

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luperchio SA, Newman JV, Dangler CA, Schrenzel MD, Brenner DJ, Steigerwalt AG, Schauer DB (2000) Citrobacter rodentium, the causative agent of transmissible murine colonic hyperplasia, exhibits clonality: synonymy of C. rodentium and mouse-pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 38:4343–4350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipman NS, Hemberger FR (2003) Rodent quality assurance testing: use of sentinel animal systems. Lab Anim 32:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mähler M. (Convenor), Berard M, Feinstein R et al. (2014). FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, Guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Lab Anim 48:178-192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Festing MFW (1991) Genetic quality control of laboratory animals used in aging studies. Neurobiol Aging 12:673–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hedricj HJ (2012) The laboratory mouse, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mekada K, Abe K, Murakami A, Nakamura S, Nakata H, Moriwaki K et al (2009) Genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains. Exp Anim 58:141–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Geurts N, Martens E, Verhenne S, Lays N, Thijs G, Magez S et al (2011) Insufficiently defined genetic background confounds phenotypes in transgenic studies as exemplified by malaria infection in Tlr9 knockout mice. Rénia L, editor. PLoS One 6:e27131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fahey JR, Katoh H, Malcolm R, Perez AV (2013) The case for genetic monitoring of mice and rats used in biomedical research. Mamm Genome 24:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fontaine DA, Davis DB (2016) Attention to background strain is essential for metabolic research: C57BL/6 and the international knockout mouse consortium. Diabetes 65:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobrowolski P, Fischer M, Naumann R (2018) Novel insights into the genetic background of genetically modified mice. Transgenic Res 27:265–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Petkov PM, Ding Y, Cassell MA, Zhang W, Wagner G, Sargent EE, Asquith S, Crew V, Johnson KA, Robinson P, Scott VE, Wiles MV (2004) An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 14:1806–1811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon S (2016) A mouse’s house may ruin experiments. Nature 530:264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2011) The guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. The National Academies Press (US), Washington, DC ISBN-13: 978-0-309-15400-0. ISBN-10: 0-309-15400-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas W, Homberger FR, Illgen Wilcke B et al (1999) Implications of infectious agents on results of animal experiments. Lab Anim 33(Suppl 1):S39–S87

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston RB, Riley LK (2003) Diagnostic testing of mouse and rat colonies for infectious agents. Lab Anim 32:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AK (1999) Handbook of laboratory animal bacteriology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DG (2007) Flynn’s parasites of laboratory animals, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Ames IA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groen A (1977) Identification and genetic monitoring of mouse inbred strain using biochemical polymorphism. Lab Anim 11:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Festing MFW (1977) Inbred strains in biomedical research. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Laboratories (2020) The Jackson Laboratory http://www.jax.org Accessed 28 June 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarani Kanta Barman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barman, T.K. (2021). Quality Control of Laboratory Animals. In: Nagarajan, P., Gudde, R., Srinivasan, R. (eds) Essentials of Laboratory Animal Science: Principles and Practices. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0987-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics