Abstract
The quality of laboratory animals is an essential component of reproducible biomedical research. The introduction of transgenic laboratory animals has transformed biomedical research but has complicated the management of colonies and the production of immunodeficient strains. Quality control in laboratory animals has emerged as a critical attribute in facility management to ensure high-quality, reproducible experimental data. The quality of laboratory animals is influenced by many factors. Among these factors, genetic purity and health status are the most important factors. Outbred animals are heterozygous, and their high genetic diversity resembles genetic polymorphism of humans, whereas inbred laboratory animals are characterized by homozygosity and represent a narrow genetic repertoire. Nucleic acid markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms, random amplified polymorphic DNA, microsatellite DNA, DNA fingerprints, and single nucleotide polymorphism are typically used as genetic markers of quality control in laboratory animals. Health monitoring is usually accomplished by a microbiological quality control program. Bacteria, viruses, and parasites cause considerable morbidity and mortality in laboratory animals and affect the quality of the research program. For microbiological monitoring, representative samples from a group of animals are tested for specific etiological agents to classify the health status of the colony. Health monitoring is critical in immunodeficient and disease-susceptible research animal models so that they remain free of opportunistic and pathogenic organisms. In this chapter, an overview of the various aspects of laboratory animal quality control is presented with special emphasis on health and genetic monitoring.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization (2020) Quality Control, https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/control/en/ Accessed 24 June 2020
Baker DG (1998) Natural pathogens of laboratory mice, rats, and rabbits and their effects on research. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:231–266
Bhatt PN, Jacoby RO, Morse HC, New AE (1986) Viral and mycoplasma infections of laboratory rodents: effects on biomedical research. Academic Press, Orlando, FL
Lussier G (1988) Potential detrimental effects of rodent viral infections on long-term experiments. Vet Res Commun 12:199–217
Nicklas W, Hornberger FR, IIIgen-Wilcke B, Jacobi K, Kraft V, Kunstyr I, Mahler M, Meyer H, Gabi Pohlmeyer-Esch G (1999) Implications of infectious agents on results of animal experiments. Lab Anim 33(suppl 1):39–87
Knight DP, Paine JE, Speller DCE (1983) A selective medium for Pasteurella multocida and its use with animal and human specimens. J Clin Pathol 36:591–594
Frebourg NB, Berthelot G, Hocq R, Chibani A, Lemeland JF (2002) Septicemia due to Pasteurella pneumotropica: 16S rRNA sequencing for diagnosis confirmation. J Clin Microbiol 40:687–689
Lentsch RH, Wagner JE, Owens DR (1979) Comparison of techniques for primary isolation of respiratory mycoplasma pulmonis from rats. Infect Immun 26:590–593
Deeb BJ, Kenny GE (1967) Characterization of mycoplasma pulmonis variants isolated from rabbits I. identification and properties of isolates. J Bacteriol 93:1416–1424
Ohtsuka M, Kikuchi K, Shundo K, Okada K, Higashide M, Sunakawa K, Hiramatsu K (2009) Improved selective isolation of Bordetella pertussis by use of modified Cyclodextrin solid medium. J Clin Microbiol 47:4164–4167
Amao H, Saito M, Takahashi KW, Nakagawa M (1990) Selective medium for Corynebacterium kutscheri and localization of the organism in mice and rats. Jikken Dobutsu (Japanese) 39:519–529
Rygg M, Bruun CF (1992) Rat bite fever (Streptobacillus moniliformis) with septicemia in a child. Scand J Infect Dis 24:535–540
Elliott SP (2007) Rat bite fever and Streptobacillus moniliformis. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:13–22
Park SH, Ryu S, Kang DH (2012) Development of an improved selective and differential medium for isolation of salmonella spp. J Clin Microbiol 50:3222–3226
Rogers L, Power K, Gaora PO, Fanning S (2016) Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae: occurrence and detection. Encyclopedia of Food and Health:545–551
Luperchio SA, Newman JV, Dangler CA, Schrenzel MD, Brenner DJ, Steigerwalt AG, Schauer DB (2000) Citrobacter rodentium, the causative agent of transmissible murine colonic hyperplasia, exhibits clonality: synonymy of C. rodentium and mouse-pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 38:4343–4350
Lipman NS, Hemberger FR (2003) Rodent quality assurance testing: use of sentinel animal systems. Lab Anim 32:36–43
Mähler M. (Convenor), Berard M, Feinstein R et al. (2014). FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, Guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Lab Anim 48:178-192
Festing MFW (1991) Genetic quality control of laboratory animals used in aging studies. Neurobiol Aging 12:673–677
Hedricj HJ (2012) The laboratory mouse, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA
Mekada K, Abe K, Murakami A, Nakamura S, Nakata H, Moriwaki K et al (2009) Genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains. Exp Anim 58:141–149
Geurts N, Martens E, Verhenne S, Lays N, Thijs G, Magez S et al (2011) Insufficiently defined genetic background confounds phenotypes in transgenic studies as exemplified by malaria infection in Tlr9 knockout mice. Rénia L, editor. PLoS One 6:e27131
Fahey JR, Katoh H, Malcolm R, Perez AV (2013) The case for genetic monitoring of mice and rats used in biomedical research. Mamm Genome 24:89–94
Fontaine DA, Davis DB (2016) Attention to background strain is essential for metabolic research: C57BL/6 and the international knockout mouse consortium. Diabetes 65:25–33
Dobrowolski P, Fischer M, Naumann R (2018) Novel insights into the genetic background of genetically modified mice. Transgenic Res 27:265–275
Further Readings
Petkov PM, Ding Y, Cassell MA, Zhang W, Wagner G, Sargent EE, Asquith S, Crew V, Johnson KA, Robinson P, Scott VE, Wiles MV (2004) An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 14:1806–1811
Reardon S (2016) A mouse’s house may ruin experiments. Nature 530:264
National Research Council (2011) The guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. The National Academies Press (US), Washington, DC ISBN-13: 978-0-309-15400-0. ISBN-10: 0-309-15400-6
Nicklas W, Homberger FR, Illgen Wilcke B et al (1999) Implications of infectious agents on results of animal experiments. Lab Anim 33(Suppl 1):S39–S87
Livingston RB, Riley LK (2003) Diagnostic testing of mouse and rat colonies for infectious agents. Lab Anim 32:44–51
Hansen AK (1999) Handbook of laboratory animal bacteriology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Baker DG (2007) Flynn’s parasites of laboratory animals, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Ames IA
Groen A (1977) Identification and genetic monitoring of mouse inbred strain using biochemical polymorphism. Lab Anim 11:209–214
Festing MFW (1977) Inbred strains in biomedical research. MacMillan, London
Jackson Laboratories (2020) The Jackson Laboratory http://www.jax.org Accessed 28 June 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barman, T.K. (2021). Quality Control of Laboratory Animals. In: Nagarajan, P., Gudde, R., Srinivasan, R. (eds) Essentials of Laboratory Animal Science: Principles and Practices. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0987-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0987-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0986-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0987-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)