Skip to main content

Empathy and Peace

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace

Abstract

The limits and potential of empathy to promote negative and positive peace are explored using a transdisciplinary framework that places peace psychology at its center. For negative peace, the use of empathy to prevent and mitigate violence is examined in relation to two issues that bear on human survival: nuclear armaments and cycles of violence that characterize intrastate conventional wars. For positive peace, defined as the mitigation of structural violence and pursuit of social justice, empathy is examined in relation to two issues that bear on human well-being: climate change and inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, D. (1993). First encounter between children of survivors and children of perpetrators of the Holocaust. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 33(4), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, D., Eland, J., Kleber, R. J., Krell, R., Moore, Y., Sagi, A., Soriano, E., Suedfeld, P., van der Velden, P. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1998). Multigenerational perspectives on coping with the Holocaust experience: An attachment perspective for understanding the developmental sequelae of trauma across generations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, D., & Kassem, F. (2004). Storytelling as a way to work through intractable conflicts: The German-Jewish experience and its relevance to the Palestinian-Israeli context. Journal of Social Issues, 60(2), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 79–104). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2017). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I. (2018). Us vs. them: The failure of globalism. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (1995). Keeping faith: Memoirs of a president. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J., & Laue, J. (1992). A conversation on peacemaking with Jimmy Carter. Washington, DC: National Institute for Disputer Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2015). Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(49), 15078–15083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J. (2006). What is peace psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., Tint, B., & Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63, 540–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. A. (Eds.). (2001). Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century. Prentice-Hall. Open access at http://u.osu.edu/christie/about/peace-conflict-and-violence-peace-psychology-for-the-21st-century/

  • Coleman, P. (2011). The five percent: Finding solutions to seemingly impossible conflicts. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Toward the development of a metaframework – I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo, M. A., & Gerrity, E. (2009). The effects and effectiveness of using torture as an interrogation device: Using research to inform the policy debate. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3(1), 179–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues & Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, N. D. (1989). Empathy training and prosocial behavior. In J. Groebel & R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Aggression and war: Their biological and social bases (pp. 101–111). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. D. (1982). Sanity and survival in the nuclear age: Psychological aspects of war and peace. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedersdorf, C. (2014). Dick Cheney defends the torture of innocents. The Atlantic, December 15. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/12/dick-cheney-defends-the-torture-innocents/383741/

  • Furber, D. (2004). Near as far in the colonies: The Nazi occupation of Poland. The International History Review, 26(3), 541–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garamone, J. (2003). Bush gives Hussein 48 hours to leave Iraq. U.S. Department of Defense http://archive.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=29285

  • Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A., & Segal, E. A. (2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., & Lietz, C. A. (2010). Conceptualising and measuring empathy. British Journal of Social Work, 40(7), 2326–2343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51(5), 496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1994). Peoples against states: Ethnopolitical conflict and the changing world system. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haji, R., & Noguchi, H. (2020). Indirect contact interventions to promote peace in multicultural societies. In N. Balvin & D. J. Christie (Eds.), Children and peace: From research to action (pp. 57–70). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, E. (2014). Emotion, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 6, 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hands Across the Hills. (2019). https://www.handsacrossthehills.org/

  • Heitler, S. (1990). From conflict to resolution. In M. Isenhart & M. Spangle (Eds.), Collaborative approaches to resolving conflict. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Cairns, E., Tausch, N., Hughes, J., Tam, T., & Pinder, C. (2008). Stepping stones to reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Intergroup contact, forgiveness and trust. In The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 199–226). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. J., & Devaraj, S. (2017). The myth and reality of manufacturing in America. Conexis Indiana: Ball State University. https://conexus.cberdata.org/files/MfgReality.pdf

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M., & Yarhi-Milo, K. (2016). The psychological logic of peace summits: How empathy shapes outcomes of diplomatic negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 61(1), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Report. (2018). Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/2018-update

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). https://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/pr_outreach_vietnam_2018.shtml

  • Jervis, R. (2017). Perception and misperception in international politics: New edition. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. (2019, February 5). Republicans and Democrats have grown further apart on what the nation’s top priorities should be. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/05/republicans-and-democrats-have-grown-further-apart-on-what-the-nations-top-priorities-should-be/

  • Keen, S. (2010). Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. H. (2016). Report of the special rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment (Climate change report). United National Human Rights Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoff, N. (2017). Is this genocide? Survivors describe Myanmar soldiers killing men, raping women and burning babies in a Rohingya village. New York Times, December 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/15/opinion/sunday/genocide-myanmar-rohingya-bangladesh.html

  • Leiserowitz, A. (2007). International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change (Human development report, 2008, pp. 1–40).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likowski, K. U., Mühlberger, A., Seibt, B., Pauli, P., & Weyers, P. (2008). Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1065–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayton, D. (2009). Nonviolence and peace psychology. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCue, C. P., & Gopoian, J. D. (2000). Dispositional empathy and the political gender gap. Women & Politics, 21, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meklin, J. (2018). 2018 doomsday clock statement: Science and security board. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2000). Compliance politics: A critical analysis of multilateral arms control treaty enforcement. The Nonproliferation Review, 7(2), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. L. (2014). Peacefulness as a personality trait. In G. K. Sims, L. L. Nelson, & M. R. Puopolo (Eds.), Personal peacefulness: Psychological perspectives (Vol. 20, pp. 7–43). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NPR. (2017, November 2). Group uses marriage counseling methods to help bridge political divide. https://www.npr.org/2017/12/02/567336148/group-uses-marriage-counseling-methods-to-help-bridge-political-divide

  • Osgood, C. E. (1962). An alternative to war or surrender. Oxford, UK: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, K. (2017). The broken ladder: How inequality affects the way we think, live, and die. Chicago: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, H., & Ugrinsky, A. (1994). The presidency and domestic policies of Jimmy Carter. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (2019). World’s autocrats face rising resistance. Human rights watch: World repot 2019 (events of 2018), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, G. K., Nelson, L. L., & Puopolo, M. R. (2014). Personal peacefulness: Psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Raymond, J. D., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (2010). If I look at the mass I will never act: Psychic numbing and genocide. In S. Roeser (Ed.), Emotions and risky technologies (pp. 37–59). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2017). Rethinking nonviolent resistance in the face of right-wing populism. The Conversation, Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/rethinking-nonviolent-resistance-in-the-face-of-right-wing-populism-73629

  • Sonnby–Borgström, M. (2002). Automatic mimicry reactions as related to differences in emotional empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, C., & Melber, H. (2014). Peace diplomacy, global justice and international agency: Rethinking human security and ethics in the spirit of Dag Hammarskjöld. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, J., Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telhami, S. (1990). Power and leadership in international bargaining: The path to the Camp David Accords. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. (Eds.). (2016). Social psychology of political polarization. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Boven, L., Ehret, P. J., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 492–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. (2019, November 18). Healing civic culture one conversation at a time. The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal. https://www.jamesgmartin.center/2019/11/healing-civic-culture-one-conversation-at-a-time/

  • White, R. K. (1984). Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of US-Soviet relations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E., & Wade, N. G. (2019). Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Brummer-Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Zuo, Z., Wang, W., & Han, S. (2009). Do you feel my pain? Racial groupmembership modulates empathic neural responses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8525–8529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 466–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Christie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Christie, D.J., Morrison, D.M. (2022). Empathy and Peace. In: Standish, K., Devere, H., Suazo, A., Rafferty, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0969-5_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics