Skip to main content

Forgetting Gender While Desexualising Friendship? Heteronormativity and Everyday Practices of Cross-Gender Friendship Among Adults in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Close Relations

Part of the book series: Crossroads of Knowledge ((CROKNOW))

Abstract

Friendship is commonly considered a relatively free relationship, allowing individuals to interact unhindered by social norms and structures. At the same time, friendship formation seems to be highly gendered, with relations between (cis) people of the same gender representing an implicit norm. This can be attributed to heteronormativity, which structures patterned interactions between men and women and does so differently in romantic love versus friendship. Yet how does this operate at the interactional level? How do those leading cross-gender friendships experience and navigate this normative order? Drawing on qualitative data from interviews with cross-gender friends in Germany, I use the concept of ‘doing gender’ – and extend it to sexuality – in order to analyse how the everyday practices and meaning-making of friendship are linked to heteronormativity. I find that gender is often ‘forgotten’ on an immediate, interactional level, yet re-enters the picture through a type of symbolic boundary-work in which the interviewees desexualise their friendship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not to say that there is no sex in friendship relations, or that it is absent from those of my interviewees; yet in their narratives, the interviewees discursively dispel sex from friendship.

Bibliography

  • Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, L. (2014). Female friendship and gender transformation. European Journal of Women's Studies, 21(2), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatterer, H. (2015). Everyday friendships. Intimacy as freedom in a complex world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brake, E. (2011). Minimizing marriage: Marriage, morality, and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, F., Muckel, P., & Dieris, B. (2019). Reflexive grounded theory. Eine Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, E., & Knaup, K. (1993). Women’s and men’s friendships in comparative perspective. European Sociological Review, 9(3), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2010). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory: Paperback edition (Sage Handbooks). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Budgeon, S. (2008). Couple culture and the production of singleness. Sexualities, 11(3), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A. M. (2015). Gendering friendship: Couple culture, heteronormativity and the production of gender. Sociology, 49(6), 1167–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21(1), 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. (2017). Navigating Mobile Masculinities: Young Men in Melbourne and Berlin. Doctoral thesis, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1996). Friendship as a way of life. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Foucault, volume I, ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 155–160). New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildemeister, R. (2008). Soziale Konstruktion von Geschlecht: “Doing gender”. In S. M. Wilz (Ed.), Geschlechterdifferenzen — Geschlechterdifferenzierungen (pp. 167–198). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goedecke, K. (2018). “Other guys don’t hang out like this”: Gendered friendship politics among Swedish, middle-class men. Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S. (2001). Das Vergessen des Geschlechts: Zur Praxeologie einer Kategorie sozialer Ordnung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 41, 208–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S., Hoffmann, A., & Stange, A. (2015). Paarinterviews als teilnehmende Beobachtung. Präsente Abwesende und zuschauende DarstellerInnen im Forschungsgespräch. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1503306; https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.3.2357. Accessed 2 April 2021.

  • Honneth, A. (2011). Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2006). Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: the complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurczyk, K., Lange, A., & Thiessen, B. (2014). Doing family. Warum Familienleben nicht mehr selbstverständlich ist. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2005). The invention of heterosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. (2011). Shady characters, untrustworthy partners, and promiscuous sluts: Creating bisexual intimacies in the face of heteronormativity and biphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2–3), 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linek, L. (2017). Zwischen höchstpersönlicher Liebesanerkennung und zweckrationalem Kalkül. Auf der Suche nach einer Soziologie der Freundschaft. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 27, 559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nötzoldt-Linden, U. (1994). Freundschaft. Zur Thematisierung einer vernachlässigten soziologischen Kategorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21(7–8), 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. (2000). Rethinking sexuality. London: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. J. (2009). From doing to undoing: Gender as we know it. Gender & Society, 23(1), 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseneil, S. (2004). Why we should care about friends: An argument for queering the care imaginary in social policy. Social Policy and Society, 3, 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseneil, S. (2006). Foregrounding friendship. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of gender and women’s studies (pp. 322–341). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schobin, J., Leuschner, V., Flick, S., Alleweldt, S., Heuser, E. A., & Brandt, A. (2016). Freundschaft heute. Eine Einführung in die Freundschaftssoziologie. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1997). Difference troubles: Queering social theory and sexual politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (2005). From the polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight. The power, the promise and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 39–62). New York/Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological form of the Group. II. American Journal of Sociology, 8, 158–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. O. (1992). Men’s friendship with women: Intimacy, sexual boundaries, and the informant role. In P. M. Nardi (Ed.), Men’s friendships (pp. 153–172). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, K. (1997). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbauer, C., & Motakef, M. (2017). Das Paarinterview. Methodologie, Methode, Methodenpraxis. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind. New Jersey: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions and also the following for their comments on earlier drafts: Julia Teschlade, Almut Peukert, Christine Wimbauer, Mona Motakef and the members of the ‘Sociology of Work and Gender Relations’ colloquium at Humboldt-Universität in Berlin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leoni Linek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Transcription Guidelines

Appendix: Transcription Guidelines

(.):

short break, less than a second

(2):

number of seconds of a break

…:

omission

no :

emphasis

rel-:

breaking-off

/B: bla /:

interjection by speaker B

[ ]:

begin and end of an overlap

(laughing):

paraverbal and nonverbal communication

D&G/217:

cited paragraph, e.g. paragraph 217, from joint interview with D. and G.;

individual interviews are abbreviated with a single letter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Linek, L. (2021). Forgetting Gender While Desexualising Friendship? Heteronormativity and Everyday Practices of Cross-Gender Friendship Among Adults in Germany. In: Wahlström Henriksson, H., Goedecke, K. (eds) Close Relations. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0792-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0792-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0791-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0792-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics