Abstract
Friendship is commonly considered a relatively free relationship, allowing individuals to interact unhindered by social norms and structures. At the same time, friendship formation seems to be highly gendered, with relations between (cis) people of the same gender representing an implicit norm. This can be attributed to heteronormativity, which structures patterned interactions between men and women and does so differently in romantic love versus friendship. Yet how does this operate at the interactional level? How do those leading cross-gender friendships experience and navigate this normative order? Drawing on qualitative data from interviews with cross-gender friends in Germany, I use the concept of ‘doing gender’ – and extend it to sexuality – in order to analyse how the everyday practices and meaning-making of friendship are linked to heteronormativity. I find that gender is often ‘forgotten’ on an immediate, interactional level, yet re-enters the picture through a type of symbolic boundary-work in which the interviewees desexualise their friendship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is not to say that there is no sex in friendship relations, or that it is absent from those of my interviewees; yet in their narratives, the interviewees discursively dispel sex from friendship.
Bibliography
Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66.
Bachmann, L. (2014). Female friendship and gender transformation. European Journal of Women's Studies, 21(2), 165–179.
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.
Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547.
Blatterer, H. (2015). Everyday friendships. Intimacy as freedom in a complex world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.
Brake, E. (2011). Minimizing marriage: Marriage, morality, and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Breuer, F., Muckel, P., & Dieris, B. (2019). Reflexive grounded theory. Eine Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Bruckner, E., & Knaup, K. (1993). Women’s and men’s friendships in comparative perspective. European Sociological Review, 9(3), 249–266.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2010). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory: Paperback edition (Sage Handbooks). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..
Budgeon, S. (2008). Couple culture and the production of singleness. Sexualities, 11(3), 301–325.
Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Cronin, A. M. (2015). Gendering friendship: Couple culture, heteronormativity and the production of gender. Sociology, 49(6), 1167–1182.
Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21(1), 106–127.
Elliott, K. (2017). Navigating Mobile Masculinities: Young Men in Melbourne and Berlin. Doctoral thesis, Monash University.
Foucault, M. (1996). Friendship as a way of life. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Foucault, volume I, ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 155–160). New York: New Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gildemeister, R. (2008). Soziale Konstruktion von Geschlecht: “Doing gender”. In S. M. Wilz (Ed.), Geschlechterdifferenzen — Geschlechterdifferenzierungen (pp. 167–198). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Goedecke, K. (2018). “Other guys don’t hang out like this”: Gendered friendship politics among Swedish, middle-class men. Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University.
Hirschauer, S. (2001). Das Vergessen des Geschlechts: Zur Praxeologie einer Kategorie sozialer Ordnung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 41, 208–235.
Hirschauer, S., Hoffmann, A., & Stange, A. (2015). Paarinterviews als teilnehmende Beobachtung. Präsente Abwesende und zuschauende DarstellerInnen im Forschungsgespräch. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1503306; https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.3.2357. Accessed 2 April 2021.
Honneth, A. (2011). Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Jackson, S. (2006). Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: the complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121.
Jurczyk, K., Lange, A., & Thiessen, B. (2014). Doing family. Warum Familienleben nicht mehr selbstverständlich ist. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
Katz, J. (2005). The invention of heterosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Klesse, C. (2011). Shady characters, untrustworthy partners, and promiscuous sluts: Creating bisexual intimacies in the face of heteronormativity and biphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2–3), 227–244.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.
Linek, L. (2017). Zwischen höchstpersönlicher Liebesanerkennung und zweckrationalem Kalkül. Auf der Suche nach einer Soziologie der Freundschaft. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 27, 559–587.
Nötzoldt-Linden, U. (1994). Freundschaft. Zur Thematisierung einer vernachlässigten soziologischen Kategorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21(7–8), 525–543.
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660.
Richardson, D. (2000). Rethinking sexuality. London: SAGE Publications.
Risman, B. J. (2009). From doing to undoing: Gender as we know it. Gender & Society, 23(1), 81–84.
Roseneil, S. (2004). Why we should care about friends: An argument for queering the care imaginary in social policy. Social Policy and Society, 3, 409–419.
Roseneil, S. (2006). Foregrounding friendship. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of gender and women’s studies (pp. 322–341). London: SAGE.
Schobin, J., Leuschner, V., Flick, S., Alleweldt, S., Heuser, E. A., & Brandt, A. (2016). Freundschaft heute. Eine Einführung in die Freundschaftssoziologie. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Seidman, S. (1997). Difference troubles: Queering social theory and sexual politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seidman, S. (2005). From the polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight. The power, the promise and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 39–62). New York/Oxford: Routledge.
Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological form of the Group. II. American Journal of Sociology, 8, 158–196.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Swain, S. O. (1992). Men’s friendship with women: Intimacy, sexual boundaries, and the informant role. In P. M. Nardi (Ed.), Men’s friendships (pp. 153–172). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
Weston, K. (1997). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wimbauer, C., & Motakef, M. (2017). Das Paarinterview. Methodologie, Methode, Methodenpraxis. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind. New Jersey: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wright, P. H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions and also the following for their comments on earlier drafts: Julia Teschlade, Almut Peukert, Christine Wimbauer, Mona Motakef and the members of the ‘Sociology of Work and Gender Relations’ colloquium at Humboldt-Universität in Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Transcription Guidelines
Appendix: Transcription Guidelines
- (.):
-
short break, less than a second
- (2):
-
number of seconds of a break
- …:
-
omission
- no :
-
emphasis
- rel-:
-
breaking-off
- /B: bla /:
-
interjection by speaker B
- [ ]:
-
begin and end of an overlap
- (laughing):
-
paraverbal and nonverbal communication
- D&G/217:
-
cited paragraph, e.g. paragraph 217, from joint interview with D. and G.;
individual interviews are abbreviated with a single letter
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Linek, L. (2021). Forgetting Gender While Desexualising Friendship? Heteronormativity and Everyday Practices of Cross-Gender Friendship Among Adults in Germany. In: Wahlström Henriksson, H., Goedecke, K. (eds) Close Relations. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0792-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0792-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0791-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0792-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)