Skip to main content

International and European Obligations on the Belgian State to Protect Cultural Heritage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation
  • 338 Accesses

Abstract

Since the second half of the last century an increasing number of international and European rules have been adopted for the protection of cultural heritage. This transnational legal framework is applied by the Belgian State, even though the degree of applicability varies according to two criteria: the immediacy of application and the direct effect (also called direct applicability). The cross-cutting question through the analysis of this panel of rules imposing regulatory duties on States is how these rules have been applied in Belgian law and whether the burden required of the competent public authorities has increased in this area. It is important to note at this stage that most of these conventions are weak in terms of concrete implementation mechanisms and often have few binding monitoring bodies (except for the European Union). The obligations set out in these are not always precise but have nevertheless generally exerted some influence on Belgian legislators. The aim is therefore not to list every obligation contained in each ratified convention, but rather to measure the impact of the convention and the degree of constraint (notably through direct effect) that accompanies it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Law of 10 August 1960 approving the following international acts: (a) Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, Regulations for its Execution, Final Act and Resolutions; (b) Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, signed at The Hague on 14 May 1954, M.B., 16 November 1960.

  2. 2.

    Act of 13 May 2003 approving the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, adopted in Paris on 14 November 1970, M.B., 19 June 2009. Belgium added a declaration upon ratification: “For Belgium, the expression ‘cultural goods’ shall be interpreted as being limited to the objects listed in the Annex to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3911/92 of 9 December 1992, as amended, on the export of cultural goods and in the Annex to Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993, as amended, on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State”.

  3. 3.

    It was approved by the three Regions and entered into force in Belgian law on 24 October 1996 (M.B., 6 November 1996).

  4. 4.

    Belfries of Belgium and France (1999), Flemish Beguinages (1998), Cathedral of Our Lady of Tournai (2000), Complex Maison-Ateliers-Musée Plantin-Moretus (2005), Major residences of the architect Victor Horta (Brussels) (2000), The Grand-Place of Brussels (1998), The historical centre of Bruges (2000), The four lifts of the Canal du Centre and their site, La Louvière and Le Roeulx (Hainaut) (1998), The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an exceptional contribution to the Modern Movement (2016), Neolithic flint mines of Spiennes (Mons) (2000), Palais Stoclet (2009), Major Mining Sites of Wallonia (2012). The natural site of the Soignes Forest, part of the Primary Beech Forests of the Carpathians and other European regions, was inscribed in July 2017.

  5. 5.

    M.B. 25 October 2013; After obtaining the following assents as it is again a mixed treaty: See the Decree of the Flemish Community/Flemish Region of 16 July 2010 (M.B. of 9 August 2010), the Decree of the French Community of 19 April 2012 (M.B. of 26 June 2012), the Decree of the German-speaking Community of 19 March 2012 (M.B. of 18 April 2012), the Decree of the Walloon Region of 26 April 2012 (M.B. of 22 May 2012) and the Ordinance of the Brussels-Capital Region of 4 September 2008 (M.B. of 30 September 2008—Ed. 5).

  6. 6.

    Law of 4 April 2014 on the protection of underwater heritage, M.B., 18 April 2014.

  7. 7.

    Flemish Decree of 10 February 2006 assenting to the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, done at Paris on 17 October 2003, M.B. 14 March 2006; Decree of the French Community of 17 February 2006 assenting to the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, adopted on 17 October 2003 and done at Paris on 3 November 2003, M.B. 15 March 2006; Decree of the German-speaking Community of 13 March 2006 approving the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, done in Paris on 17 October 2003, M.B. 10 April 2006.

  8. 8.

    Decree to support the exploitation of cultural heritage in Flanders (cited as: Cultural Heritage Decree of 24 February 2017), M.B., 4 April 2017 and effective as of 14 April 2017.

  9. 9.

    Act of 19 July 2013 assenting to the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions and the Annex, adopted in Paris on 20 October 2005, M.B. 30 October 2013.

  10. 10.

    See Decree of the Flemish Community/Flemish Region of 6 May 2011 (M.B. of 15 June 2011), Decree of the French Community of 2 June 2006 (M.B. of 7 August 2006), Decree of the German-speaking Community of 30 October 2006 (M.B. of 4 January 2007), Decree of the Walloon Region of 10 November 2006 (M.B. of 28 November 2006), Order of the Brussels-Capital Region of 3 May 2007 (M.B. of 21 May 2007).

  11. 11.

    European Cultural Convention of 19 December 1954 entered into force on 5 May 1955; ratification by Belgium on 11 May 1955 and entry into force on the same day.

  12. 12.

    Ratified by Belgium on 17 September 1992, following the assent law of 8 June 1992 (M.B., 29 October 1992).

  13. 13.

    Ratified by Belgium on 8 October 2010 (entry into force on 9 April 2011), following the assent law of 23 June 2008 (M.B. 30 March 2011) and the decree of the Flemish Community/Flemish Region of 11 June 2010 (M.B. 19 July 2010), the Decree of the French-speaking Community of 17 December 2003 (M.B. 21 January 2004), the Decree of the German-speaking Community of 28 January 2008 (M.B. 22 February 2008), the Decree of the Walloon Region of 10 April 2003 (M.B. 4 March 2004 and 5 March 2004) and the Order of the Brussels-Capital Region of 20 May 1994 (M.B. 3 October 2002).

  14. 14.

    Ratified by Belgium on 28 October 2004 (entered into force on 1 February 2005), following the assent law of 15 June 2004 (M.B. 24 November 2004) and the Decree of the French Community of 19 December 2002 (M.B. 22 January 2003), the Decree of the Flemish Community/Flemish Region of 18 July 2003 (M.B. 5 September 2003—Ed. 2), the Decree of the German-speaking Community of 17 May 2004 (M.B. 30 July 2004), the Decree of the Walloon Region of 20 December 2001 (M.B. 30 January 2002), the Ordinance of the Brussels-Capital Region of 13 February 2003 (M.B. 5 May 2003).

  15. 15.

    Not yet ratified by Belgium: the assents given to date are almost complete (the Federal State is missing): decree of the Flemish Region of 14 February 2014 assenting to the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, signed in Faro on 27 October 2005 (M.B. 24 March 2014); decree of the Walloon Region of 2 July 2015 assenting to the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, done at Faro on 27 October 2005 (M.B. 14 July 2015); decree of 2 July 2015 assenting, with regard to the competences of the French Community, the exercise of which has been transferred to the Walloon Region, to the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, done at Faro on 27 October 2005 (M.B. 14 July 2015); Decree of 2 November 2015 assenting to the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, done at Faro on 27 October 2005 (M.B. 2 December 2015); Ordinance of the Brussels-Capital Region of 11 May 2017 assenting to the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, done at Faro on 27 October 2005 and signed in Strasbourg on 25 June 2012 (M.B. 30 May 2017).

  16. 16.

    M.B., December 21, 1996.

  17. 17.

    Act of 4 May 2016 amending the Act of 28 October 1996 on the restitution of cultural property unlawfully removed from the territory of certain foreign States, M.B., 23 May 2016.

References

  • Bugnion, F. (2004). The Genesis of the Legal Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. ICRL, 86(854), 313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carducci, G. (1997). La restitution internationale des biens culturels et des objets d’art volés ou illicitement exportés:  Droit commun, Directive CEE, Conventions de l’Unesco et d’Unidroit. L.G.D.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casier, F. (2014). Les régimes de protection en droit international humanitaire, les mesures de mise en oeuvre et leur application en Belgique (p. 21). https://www.ismllw-be.org/session/2014-05-22-CASIER%20F-Texte%20final.pdf.

  • Commission v Italian Republic, C7/68 (European Court of Justice 10 décembre 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Consorts Stoclet, 210.958 (Conseil d’État 2 février 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. (s.d.). Consulté 10 juillet 2020, à l’adresse. https://blogs.encatc.org/culturalheritagecountsforeurope/.

  • Cultural Heritage in the European Union: A Critical Inquiry into Law and Policy. (2019). In A. Jakubowski, K. Hausler, & F. Fiorentini (Éds.), Cultural heritage in the European Union. Brill Nijhoff. https://brill.com/view/title/36548. Accessed 5 July 2020.

  • de Clippele, M.-S. (2013). Quand l’art ouvre la voie au droit: Le palais Stoclet. Journal Des Tribunaux, 4(6506), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Clippele, M.-S. (2014). Quand l’équilibre devient art – Le Conseil de l’Europe et la balance des intérêts des propriétaires et de la collectivité en matière de patrimoine culturel. Revue Trimestrielle Des Droits De l’homme, 3(100), 913–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Clippele, M.-S. (2020). Le patrimoine culturel immobilier en Région wallonne. Guide De Droit Immobilier, 92, 191–250. https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:229400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarsin, B. (2019). Verscheurd tussen koper en eigenaar—De kunst om de kloof in het goederenrecht te dichten. Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 2, 493–606. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/555518.

  • Demarsin, B. (2020). Recente ontwikkelingen in de kunsthandel. In VRG-Alumni (Éd.), Recht in beweging—27ste VRG-Alumnidag 2020 (Gompel&Scavina, pp. 153–178). Gompel&Svacina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draye, A. M. (2007). De bescherming van het roerend en onroerend erfgoed: Wet-, decreet- en regelgeving van kracht binnen het Vlaams Gewest/de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. Larcier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducastelle, J.-P. (2013). Le patrimoine culturel immatériel de la Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles. In S. Cachat, L’administration du patrimoine culturel immatériel en Europe. Organisation, réglementation et procédures (pp. 80‒91).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, H. (1996). Le pluralisme idéologique et l’autonomie culturelle en droit public belge. 2: De 1970 à 1993 (Vol. 2). FUSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission & Directorate-General for Education, Y., Sport and Culture. (2019). Illicit trade in cultural goods in Europe : Characteristics, criminal justice responses and an analysis of the applicability of technologies in the combat against the trade: final report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/183649.

  • Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH, C-531/07 (European Court of Justice 30 avril 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraoua, R. (1986). Convention concernant les mesures à prendre pour interdirer et empêcher l’importation, l’exportation et le transfert de propriété illicites des biens culturels (UNESCO Doc. CC-86/WS/40; p. 45). Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest, B. (2007). Le Patrimoine immatériel en Belgique francophone: Un modèle pour le Québec. Rabaska: Revue D’ethnologie De l’Amérique Française, 5, 47–70. https://doi.org/10.7202/019025ar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenen, A. C. C. (2018). UNIDROIT 1995: Tackling the illicit trafficking of cultural property through private law means: An evaluation of the appropriateness of the 1995 Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects to Cultural Property Theft in comparative perspective [Datawyse/Universitaire Pers Maastricht]. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20181002ag.

  • Hachez, I. (2008). Le principe de standstill dans le droit des droits fondamentaux: Une irréversibilité relative (1st éd.). Sakkoulas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haumont, F., Swennen, F., Tondreau, E., Kruger, T., Sanders, H., & Van Overbeeke, F. (2012). Opportunité et conséquences de la ratification par la Belgique de la Convention UNIDROIT relative aux biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés/Opportuniteit en gevolgen van de toetreding door België tot het Unidroit 1995-verdrag inzake gestolen of illegaal uitgevoerde cultuurgoederen (p. 367). Direction du Patrimoine Culturel - Kunsten en Erfgoed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (2006). Een nieuwe sleuteltekst voor erfgoedbeleid in de 21e eeuw. De kaderconventie van de Raad van Europa over de bijdrage van cultureel erfgoed aan de samenleving (Faro, 27/10/2005. Mores, 7(1), 11–13. https://www.academia.edu/3638829/Een_nieuwe_sleuteltekst_voor_erfgoedbeleid_in_de_21e_eeuw._De_kaderconventie_van_de_Raad_van_Europa_over_de_bijdrage_van_cultureel_erfgoed_aan_de_samenleving_Faro_27_10_2005.

  • Kono, T. (2010). The impact of uniform laws on the protection of cultural heritage and the preservation of cultural heritage in the 21st century. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004180444.I-786.

  • Lalive, P. (1997). La Convention d’UNIDROIT sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés (du 24 juin 1995). Revue Suisse De Droit International Et Européen, 1, 13–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, L. (2014). Over reizende violen, music performance, digitale antifonaria, en hoe het recht dit allemaal bespeelt. In D. Arts (Éd.), Mundi et Europae civis: Liber amicorum Jacques Steenbergen (pp. 93–130). Larcier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, I., Godart, M.-F., & Metalidis, I. (2004). La mise en oeuvre de la Convention européenne du paysage et l’organisation du Prix du paysage (pp. 67–70).

    Google Scholar 

  • Négri, V. (Éd.). (2014). Le patrimoine culturel, cible des conflits armés: De la guerre civile espagnole aux guerres du 21e siècle. Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, P. J. (2007). Commentary on the 1970 Unesco Convention (Second Edition). Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, R. (2010). Protection fo Cultural Property Under International Criminal Law. Melb. J. Int’l L., 13, 339–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, R. (2002). European Cultural Heritage—Volume II. Council of Europe Pub: A review of policies and practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prott, L. V. (2000). Biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés: Commentaire relatif à la convention d’ Unidroit (1995). Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’Éducation, la Science et la Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport d’information concernant l’optimisation de la coopération entre l’autorité fédérale et les entités fédérées en matière de lutte contre le vol d’oeuvres d’art (No 6‑357; p. 56). (2018). Sénat de Belgique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romainville, C. (2014). Le droit à la culture, une réalité juridique—Le régime juridique du droit de participer à la vie culturelle en droit constitutionnel et en droit international. Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romainville, C. (Ed.). (2015). European law and cultural policies: Droit européen et politiques culturelles. P.I.E: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, C. (2014). La restitution internationale des biens culturels: Analyse de l’efficacité d’un système fragmenté. Annales Droit De Louvain, 4, 557–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sur la piste du trafic d’antiquités en Belgique. (2020, février 19). parismatch.be. https://parismatch.be/actualites/societe/371865/sur-la-piste-du-trafic-dantiquites-en-belgique.

  • Toman, J. (1994). La protection des biens culturels en cas de conflit armé, Commentaires de la Convention de La Haye du 14 mai 1954. Éditions Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Drooghenbroeck, S., & Delgrange, X. (2002). La signature de la Convention-cadre sur la protection des minorités nationales et les mesures de protection des minorités contenues dans les lois spéciales. Administration Publique, 26, 273–287. https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:125700.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Sophie de Clippele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Clippele, MS. (2021). International and European Obligations on the Belgian State to Protect Cultural Heritage. In: Niglio, O., Lee, E.Y.J. (eds) Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0309-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics