Skip to main content

Staging by Radiological Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diseases of the Gallbladder

Abstract

CT and MRI are two major radiological modalities for staging assessment for gallbladder cancer. Overall diagnostic performance of multidetector-row CT for T factor is over 80%, whereas those for N and M factors are around 50% (sensitivity) and 70% (sensitivity), respectively. As for MR imaging, overall diagnostic performance for T and N factors is reportedly over 80–90% (accuracy) and around 70% (sensitivity), respectively. For the assessment of N and M factors, the usefulness of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values has also been reported. Adding FDG-PET or ADC information may not only enhance the diagnosis when CT or MRI findings are equivocal but also be independent biomarkers to predict the prognosis of gallbladder cancer patients. With the usage of these state-of-the-art radiological modalities, relatively high accuracy can be achieved for gallbladder cancer staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallbladder cancer stages. American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/gallbladder-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/staging.html.

  2. Standard imaging technique in gastrointestinal organs. Chapter 5, gastrointensitnal tract. In: Japanese Radiological society ed. The Japanese Imaging Guideline 2016. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2016. P268–272, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshimitsu K, Nishihara Y, Okamoto D, Ushijima Y, Nishie A, Yamaguchi K, et al. Magnetic resonance differentiation between T2 and T1 gallbladder carcinoma: significance of subserosal enhancement on the delayed phase dynamic study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:854–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shinagawa Y, Sakamoto K, Sato K, Ito E, Urakawa H, Yoshimitsu K. Usefulness of new subtraction algorithm in estimating degree of liver fibrosis by calculating extracellular volume fraction obtained from routine liver CT protocol equilibrium phase data: Preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jun;103:99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sakamoto K, Shinagawa Y, Inoue K, Morita A, Urakawa H, Fujimitsu R, et al. Obliteration of the biliary system after administration of an oral contrast medium is probably due to regurgitation: a pitfall on MRCP. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2016;15(1):137–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SJ, Lee JM, Lee JY, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI, et al. Analysis of enhancement pattern of flat gallbladder wall thickening on MDCT to differentiate gallbladder cancer from cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):765-71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shindo J, de Aretxabala X, Aloia TA, Roa JC, Roa I, Zimmitti G, et al. Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg. 2015;261:733–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SJ, Lee JM, Lee ES, Han JK, Choi BI. Preoperative staging of gallbladder carcinoma using biliary MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):314-21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kaneko K, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, Chijiiwa K, et al. Anatomy and clinical importance of cholecystic venous drainage: helical CT observations during injection of contrast medium into the cholecystic artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Aug;169(2):505-10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Shinozaki K, Aibe H, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, et al. Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder: evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Aug;179(2):423-8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weber SM, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Jarnagin WR. Staging laparoscopy in patients with extrahepatic biliary carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2002;235:392–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarnagin WR, Bodniewicz J, Dougherty E, Conlon K, Blumgart LH, Fong Y. A prospective analysis of staging laparoscopy in patients with primary and secondary hepatobiliary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:34–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Savornin Lohman EAJ, de Bitter TJJ, van Laarhoven CJHM, Hermans JJ, de Haas RJ, de Reuver PR. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for the detection of lymph node metastases in gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan;110:156-62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engels JT, Balfe DM, Lee JK. Biliary carcinoma: CT evaluation of extrahepatic spread. Radiology. 1989;172(1):35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalra N, Suri S, Gupta R, Natarajan SK, Khandelwal N, Wig JD. MDCT in the staging of gallbladder carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(3):758–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohtani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, Muto T, Hatakeyama K. Spread of gallbladder carcinoma: CT evaluation with pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21(3):195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oikarinen H, Päivänsalo M, Lähde S, Tikkakoski T, Suramo I. Radiological findings in cases of gallbladder carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 1993;17(3):179–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JH, Kim TK, Eun HW, Kim BS, Lee MG, Kim PN, et al. Preoperative evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma: efficacy of combined use of MR imaging, MR cholangiography, and contrast-enhanced dualphase three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16(6):676–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz LH, Black J, Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Blumgart L, Gruen D, et al. Gallbladder carcinoma: findings at MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26(3):405–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng JH, Wan YL, Hung CF, Ng KK, Pan KT, Chou AS, et al. Diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma. Evaluation with dynamic MR imaging, Clin Imaging. 2002;26(3):177–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaza RK, Gulati M, Wig JD, Chawla YK. Evaluation of gall bladder carcinoma with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Australas Radiol. 2006;50(3):212–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramos-Font C, Gómez-Rio M, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Jiménez-Heffernan A, Sánchez Sánchez R, Llamas-Elvira JM. Ability of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(3):218-24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leung U, Pandit-Taskar N, Corvera CU, D’Angelica MI, Allen PJ, Kingham TP, et al. Impact of pre-operative positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Nov;16(11):1023-30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morine Y, Shimada M, Imura S, Ikemoto T, Hanaoka J, Kanamoto M, et al. Detection of Lymph Nodes Metastasis in Biliary Carcinomas: Morphological Criteria by MDCT and the Clinical Impact of DWI-MRI. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Jun;62(140):777-81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Standard imaging technique in gastrointestinal organs. Chapter 5, gastrointensitnal tract. In: Japanese Radiological society ed. The Japanese Imaging Guideline 2016. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2016. p. 307–10, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, et al. Liver metastasis from gallbladder carcinoma: anatomic correlation with cholecystic venous drainage demonstrated by helical computed tomography during injection of contrast medium in the cholecystic artery. Cancer. 2001 Jul 15;92(2):340-8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Min JH, Kang TW, Cha DI, Kim SH, Shin KS, Lee JE, et al. Apprarent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):411-21.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hwang JP, Lim I, Na II, Cho EH, Kim BI, Choi CW, et al. Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography in patients with gallbladder cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jun;48(2):114-20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JY, Kim HJ, Yim SH, Shin DS, Yu JH, Ju DY, et al. Primary tumor maximum standardized uptake value measured on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography is a prognostic value for survival in bile duct and gallbladder cancer. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;62(4):227-33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kengo Yoshimitsu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yoshimitsu, K. (2020). Staging by Radiological Imaging. In: Chung, J., Okazaki, K. (eds) Diseases of the Gallbladder. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6010-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6010-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6009-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6010-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics