Skip to main content

Determination of Stretch-Corrected Laminar Burning Velocity and Selection of Accurate Analytical Model for Burned Gas Mass Fraction Using Constant Volume Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in IC Engines and Combustion Technology (NCICEC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Constant volume method of determining laminar burning velocity suffers from the limitation that correction for flame stretch of such flames is difficult. For this reason, the constant pressure method is more widely accepted as an accurate method for determination of laminar burning velocity and not constant volume method. In the present work, a stretch correction method has been proposed to get the unstretched laminar burning velocity by carrying out numerical simulations for combustion in a constant volume bomb using a constant volume method. Also, three analytical models for burned gas mass fraction have been assessed by comparing them with numerical results to select the most accurate analytical model to relate burned gas mass fraction to pressure. Unstretched laminar burning velocity of CH4–air mixture at pressures up to 4 bar has been obtained using constant volume method, and the results have been validated against literature. Luijten’s model for burned gas mass fraction was found to be the most accurate amongst the ones investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hinton N, Stone R, Cracknell R (2018) Laminar burning velocity measurements in constant volume vessels-reconciliation of flame front imaging and pressure rise methods. Fuel 211:446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Z, Burke M, Ju Y (2009) Effects of compression and stretch on the determination of laminar flame speeds using propagating spherical flames. Combust Theor Model 13(2):443–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830802632192

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Luijten CCM, Doosje E, de Goey LPH (2009) Accurate analytical models for fractional pressure rise in constant volume combustion. Int J Therm Sci 48:1049–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis B, von Elbe G (1961) Combustion, flames and explosions of gases, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nagy J, Conn J, Verakis H (1969) Explosion development in a spherical vessel. Technical Report RI 7279, US Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogg, B. RUN-1DL (1991) The Cambridge Universal Laminar Flame Code. Technical Report CUED/ATHERMO/TR39, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, England, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. J. Kee, F. M. Rupley, J. A. Miller, M. E. Coltrin, J. F. Grcar, E. Meeks, H. K. Moffat, A. E. Lutz, G. Dixon Lewis, M. D. Smooke, J. Warnatz, G. H. Evans, R. S. Larson, R. E. Mitchell, L. R. Petzold, W. C. Reynolds, M. Caracotsios, W. E. Stewart, P. Glarborg, C. Wang, and O. Adigun (2000) CHEMKIN Collection, Release 3.6, Reaction Design, Inc., San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gu XJ, Haq MZ, Lawes M, Woolley R (2000) Laminar burning velocity and Markstein lengths of methane–air mixtures. Combust Flame 121:41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00142-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rozenchan G, Zhu DL, Law CK, Tse SD (2002) Outward propagation, burning velocities, and chemical effects of methane flames up to 60 ATM. Proc Combust Inst 29:1461–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80179-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayuri Goswami, Sander C.R.Derks, Kris Coumans, Willemyn J.Slikker, Marcelo H.de Andrade Oliveira, Rob J.M.Bastiaans, Carlo C.M.Luijten, L. Philipus H.de Goey, Alexander A.Konnov (2013) The effect of elevated pressures on the laminar burning velocity of methane + air mixtures. Combust Flame 160:1627–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.03.032

  11. Dirrenberger Patricia, Le Gall Hervé, Glaude Roda Bounaceur Pierre-Alexandre, Battin-Leclerc Frédérique (2015) Measurements of laminar burning velocities above atmospheric pressure using the heat flux method-application to the case of n-pentane. Energy Fuels 29:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502036j

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjan Ray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, A., Jangir, V., Ray, A., Ravi, M.R. (2021). Determination of Stretch-Corrected Laminar Burning Velocity and Selection of Accurate Analytical Model for Burned Gas Mass Fraction Using Constant Volume Method. In: Gupta, A., Mongia, H., Chandna, P., Sachdeva, G. (eds) Advances in IC Engines and Combustion Technology. NCICEC 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5996-9_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5996-9_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5995-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5996-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics