Abstract
This chapter chronicles the 3-year journey of refining a multidisciplinary science course focused on solutions to environmental sustainability issues. During this time, we developed and applied the principle of just manageable differences to the transformation of the course. Our dual goals were to make the changes from one running of the course to the next such that they tested the ability of the teaching team to orchestrate the learning activities and continuously made the activities more meaningful for students. During the transformation, the design for learning moved from a heavy focus on lecture material and instructor-initiated assignments to more of an ongoing conversation about local sustainability issues and the nature of expertise in the sciences. Changes to the course were introduced during the first lecture session with justifications for each change. Student feedback surveys and course performance metrics were used to evaluate how well the changes were accepted and how meaningful they were with respect to learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
510 million km2 (area of Earth) x 29% (percent of Earth that is land)/700 km2 (area of Singapore) per Singapore = 211,000 Singapores.
- 2.
6 million km2 (area of Amazon Rainforest Basin)/700 km2 (area of Singapore) per Singapore = 8,570 Singapores.
- 3.
400 thousand km2 (area of the American Dust Bowl)/700 km2 (area of Singapore) per Singapore = 571 Singapores.
References
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1(5), 5–22.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Report of the National Research Council). Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Chapter 3: Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61–100.
Canfield, M. R. (2011). Field notes on science & nature. Boston MA: Harvard University Press.
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.
Ghiglione, E., & Dalziel, J. (2007). Design principles for LAMS Version 2 and the LAMS tools contract. Retrieved from: http://lamscommunity.org/dotlrn/clubs/educationalcommunity/.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Heldsinger, S. A., & Humphry, S. M. (2013). Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher-assessment of writing: An empirical study. Educational Research, 55(3), 219–235.
Houghton, J. T., Meiro Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenburg, A., & Maskell, K. (1996). Climate change 1995: The science of climate change. Climatic Change, 584.
Irvine, K., Chua, L., & Eikass, H. S. (2014). The four national taps of Singapore: A holistic approach to water resources management from drainage to drinking water. Journal of Water Management Modeling, 1–11.
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2015). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Kauppinen, T., de Espindola, G. M., Jones, J., Sánchez, A., Gräler, B., & Bartoschek, T. (2014). Linked Brazilian amazon rainforest data. Semantic Web, 5(2), 151–155.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and programmers: Technologies of power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lansing, J. S. (2006). Perfect order: Recognizing complexity in Bali. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Liyanage, C., Elhag, T., Ballal, T., & Li, Q. (2009). Knowledge communication and translation–a knowledge transfer model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 118–131.
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172.
Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. (2016). Singapore’s climate action plan: A climate-resilient Singapore, for a sustainable future. Singapore: Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. Retrieved from https://www.nccs.gov.sg/docs/default-source/publications/a-climate-resilient-singapore-for-a-sustainable-future.pdf.
National Climate Change Secretariat. (2012). Climate change & Singapore: Challenges. Opportunities. Partnerships. National Climate Change Strategy. Singapore: National Climate Change Secretariat. Retrieved from https://www.nccs.gov.sg/docs/default-source/publications/national-climate-change-strategy.pdf.
Ramos, R. D., Goodkin, N. F., Siringan, F. P., & Hughen, K. A. (2017). Diploastrea heliopora Sr/Ca and O-18 records from northeast Luzon, Philippines: An assessment of interspecies coral proxy calibrations and climate controls of sea surface temperature and salinity. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, 32(4), 424–438.
Remington-Doucette, S. M., Hiller Connell, K. Y., Armstrong, C. M., & Musgrove, S. L. (2013). Assessing sustainability education in a transdisciplinary undergraduate course focused on real-world problem solving: A case for disciplinary grounding. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 404–433.
Research and Statistics Unit, Energy Market Authority. (2018). Singapore energy statistics 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ema.gov.sg/cmsmedia/Publications_and_Statistics/Publications/SES18/Publication_Singapore_Energy_Statistics_2018.pdf.
Sharma, B., Steward, B., Ong, S. K., & Miguez, F. E. (2017). Evaluation of teaching approach and student learning in a multidisciplinary sustainable engineering course. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4032–4040.
Sharp, T. (2017). How Big is Earth? Space.com. Retrieved from https://www.space.com/17638-how-big-is-earth.html.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30.
Subramanian, S. (2017). How Singapore is creating more land for itself. New York Times, 20.
Tan, S. C., Koh, J., Wong, W. H., Htun, A. M. M., Dini, D. D., Hong, H., Zary, N., Ong, A., Koh, W. S., Goh, C. C., Chua, C. S., Soo, S., Lee, S. H., Hamid, M. A. A., Tan, Y. Y., Looker, P., Aditya, S., & Khong, A. W. H. (2018). An interim report on the evaluation of NTU’s Technology- Enhanced Learning (TEL) initiative.
Tortajada, C., Joshi, Y. K., & Biswas, A. K. (2013). The Singapore water story: Sustainable development in an urban city state. Routledge.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf.
Worster, D. (2004). Dust bowl: The southern plains in the 1930s. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Zulkifli, M. (2019). Opening Speech by Mr Masagos Zulkifli, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, at the Second Reading of the Singapore Food Agency Bill, on 12 February 2019. Retrieved from https://www.mewr.gov.sg/news/opening-speech-by-mr-masagos-zulkifli–minister-for-the-environment-and-water-resources–at-the-second-reading-of-the-singapore-food-agency-bill–on-12-february-2019.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Riovie Ramos, Sujata Murty, Rino Salman, Molly Moynihan, and Leong Wai for helping us orchestrate the annual evolutions of the course. Gloria Ho not only modeled how to ask questions in a large lecture course to hundreds of students, she always had the correct answer for our administrative queries. Roy Ng Jin Hou and Chin Hock Tan helped to focus us on the course transformation process. Aloysius Ong was instrumental in making the evaluation of the chat activities manageable and meaningful. Ernie Ghiglione heroically saved the day when more than two hundred students inadvertently stress-tested the University LAMS server by simultaneously attempting the Chat and Scribe activity. Wong Chun Yu diligently ensured that the student exam papers and written assignments remained under lock and key until their owners came to sign them out. Our research and course transformation could not have taken place without the support of a startup grant from Nanyang Technological University’s Centre for Research and Development of Learning and Founding Director Lee Sing Kong’s belief that the noblest scientific endeavors always address meaningful social concerns.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartman, K., Koh, J., Goodkin, N.F., Dzulkifli, D.D.B. (2020). Applying Just Manageable Differences as a Guiding Principle for Course Transformations. In: Tan, S., Chen, SH. (eds) Transforming Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4980-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4980-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4979-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4980-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)