Skip to main content

Public Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Urbanism

Abstract

In this chapter we explore ‘Public Cities’, asking who the public is, how publics make claims for and of cities and how we can consider these claims in light of the built environment profession’s commitments to justice and participatory governance. In particular, the chapter considers belonging, inclusion and exclusion from both the idea of ‘the public’ and public spaces themselves, and how these dynamics can be configured along racial, gendered, classed and even species lines. We propose an understanding of ‘the public’ as multiple, diverse, porous and shifting, and consider what this means for the design and governance of public space. Further, this chapter explores trends currently shaping ‘public cities’, including neoliberalism, commodification, securitisation, gentrification, neo-colonialism and the policing of public space, and outlines some of the ways that the production, use and governance of the public realm can reveal some of the key conflicts, tensions and possibilities of contemporary urbanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhandari V (2006) Civil society and the predicament of multiple publics. Comp Stud South Asia Afr Middle East 26(1):36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatman-Thomas N (2017) From transients to residents: urban Indigeneity in Israel and Australia. J Hist Geogr 58:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2009) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Plan Theory 8(3):242–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (2015) Undoing the demos: neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books, Brooklyn

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Browne S (2015) Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2016) Rethinking vulnerability and resistance. In: Butler J, Gambetti Z, Sabsay L (eds) Vulnerability in resistance. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 12–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona M (2014) The place-shaping continuum: a theory of urban design process. J Urban Des 19(1):2–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona M (2015) Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative. J Urban Int Res Placemaking Urban Sustain 8(4):373–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona M, Wunderlich FM (2012) Capital spaces: the multiple complex public spaces of a global city. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona M, Tiesdell S, Heath T, Oc T (2010) Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM (1992) Public space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee J, Rogers P (2008) Rebordering the city for new security challenges: from counter-terrorism to community resilience. Space Polity 12(1):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J, Steil J (2009) Introduction: finding justice in the city. In: Marcuse P, Connolly J, Novy J et al (eds) Searching for the just city: debates in urban theory and practice. Routledge, London, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JL (2005) Making better decisions through citizen involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1992) Fortress Los Angeles: the militarization of urban space. In: Sorkin M (ed) Variations on a Theme Park: the new American city and the end of public space. Hill and Wang, New York, pp 154–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas C (2007) Barricades and boulevards: material transformations of Paris, 1795–1871. Interstices: J Archit Related Arts 8:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey K (2009) Becoming places: urbanism/architecture/identity/power. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey K, Wood S (2015) Public/private urban interfaces: type, adaptation, assemblage. J Urban Int Res Placemaking Urban Sustain 8(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England P (2015) Regulatory obesity, the Newman diet and outcomes for planning law in Queensland. Environ Plan Law J 32(1):60–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon F (2008) Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayyad A (2017) The criminalization of gentrifying neighborhoods. The Atlantic. Retrieved 8/2/19, from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/the-criminalization-of-gentrifying-neighborhoods/548837/

  • Fishel S (2017) The microbial state: global thriving and the body politic. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher M (2009) Capitalist realism: is there no alternative? Zero Books, Winchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester K (2019) In the shadow of justice: post-war liberalism and the remaking of political philosophy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (2000) The good city: in defense of utopian thinking. Int J Urban Reg Res 24(2):460–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl J (2010) Cities for people. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham M (1999) Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Aust Humanit Rev 45:181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2012) Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (2006) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies, 2nd edn. Rydin Y, Thornley A. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett C, Seini M, MacCallum D, Osborne N (2011) Neoliberalism, mineral development and indigenous people: a framework for analysis. Aust Geogr 42(3):309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin EF (2008) The city as the site of the social. In: Isin EF (ed) Recasting the social in citizenship. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 261–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iveson K (2017) ‘Making space public’ through occupation: the Aboriginal Tent Embassy, Canberra. Environ Plan A: Econ Space 49(3):537–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LK (2017) The complications of colonialism for gentrification theory and Marxist geography. J Law Soc Policy 27(1):43–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones D (2017) Decolonising space. Decolonisation, sovereignty and the city (panel discussion). Brisbane Free University, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela H (2000) ‘The gaze without eyes’: video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space. Prog Hum Geogr 24(2):243–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen SC, Johnson JT (2017) Being together in place: indigenous coexistence in a more than human world. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latimore J (2018) Indigenous people are being displaced again – by gentrification. Retrieved 10/1/19, from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/apr/09/indigenous-people-are-being-displaced-again-by-gentrification-aboriginal-redfern-west-end-fitzroy

  • Latour B (2014) Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Lit Hist 45(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (2003) The urban revolution. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Legacy C (2016) Is there a crisis of participatory planning? Plan Theory 16(4):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legacy C, Curtis C, Scheurer J (2017) Planning transport infrastructure: examining the politics of transport planning in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth. Urban Policy Res 35(1):44–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legacy C, Cook N, Rogers D, Ruming K (2018) Planning the post-political city: exploring public participation in the contemporary Australian city. Geogr Res 56(2):176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehr P (2019) Counter-terrorism technologies: a critical assessment. Springer Nature, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Low SM (2006) The erosion of public space and the public realm: paranoia, surveillance and privatization in New York City. City Soc 18(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons L (2007) A curious space ‘in-between’: the public/private divide and gender-based activism in Singapore. Gend Technol Dev 11(1):27–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour A (2003) Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour A (ed) (2010) Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour A, Hull A, Healey P (2001) The governance of place: space and planning processes. Ashgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse P (2006) Security or safety in cities? The threat of terrorism after 9/11. Int J Urban Reg Res 30(4):919–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2005) For space. SAGE Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe A (2003) Necropolitics. Publ Cult 15(1):11–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell MG, Wonders NA (2009–2010) Keeping migrants in their place: technologies of control and racialized public space in Arizona. Soc Justice 36(2):54–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D (2014) The right to the city: social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery J (1998) Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. J Urban Des 3(1):93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson A (2018) Unsettling white Australia: sovereignty, homelessness and the nature of Indigenous belonging. ABC Religion & Ethics. ABC Online

    Google Scholar 

  • Németh J, Hollander J (2010) Security zones and New York City’s shrinking public space. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(1):20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orum AM, Neal ZP (2010) Common ground?: readings and reflections on public space. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne N, Carlson A, Butler C (2019) Human rights to the city: urban ecologies and indigenous justice. In: May JR, Daly E (eds) Encyclopedia of human rights and the environment: legality, indivisibility, dignity and geography. Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp 436–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Palamar C (2010) From the ground up: why urban ecological restoration needs environmental justice. Nat Cult 5(3):277–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pataki DE (2015) Grand challenges in urban ecology. Front Ecol Evol 3:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter L (2018) Framing relations between planning and Indigenous peoples. In: Jackson S, Porter L, Johnson LC (eds) Planning in Indigenous Australia: from imperial foundations to postcolonial futures. Routledge, New York, pp 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadik-Khan J, Solomonow S (2017) Streetfight: handbook for an urban revolution. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski J (2020) Too smart: how digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock L (1997) From Main Street to fortress: the future of malls as public spaces, or ‘shut up and shop’. Just Policy: J Aust Soc Policy 9:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock L (2003) Cosmopolis II: mongrel cities in the 21st century. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki M (2009) Delivering transportation infrastructure through public-private partnerships: planning concerns. J Am Plan Assoc 76(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen E (2008) Design for diversity: exploring socially mixed neighborhoods. Architectural Press, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd Z (2016) An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. J Hist Sociol 29(1):4–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd Z (2017) Fish, Kin and Hope: tending to water violations in amiskwaciwâskahikan and Treaty Six territory. Afterall J Art Context Enq 43:102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss F (2005) Space, the city and social theory: social relations and urban forms. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan C (2016) Contemporary curatorial practice and the politics of public space. In: Shaw DB, Humm M (eds) Radical space: exploring politics and practice. Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, London, pp 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigneswaran D, Iveson K, Low S (2017) Problems, publicity and public space: a resurgent debate. Environ Plan A: Econ Space 49(3):496–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyce M (2006) Shopping malls in Australia: the end of public space and the rise of ‘consumerist citizenship’? J Sociol 42(3):269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlquist C, Evershed N, Allam L (2018, 28 August) We examined every Indigenous death in custody since 2008. This is why. The Guardian. Retrieved 4 February 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/aug/28/we-examined-every-indigenous-death-in-custody-since-2008-this-is-why

  • Watson I (2009) Sovereign spaces, caring for country, and the homeless position of Aboriginal peoples. South Atl Q 108(1):27–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamanifard H, Alizadeh T, Coiacetto E, Sipe N (2016) Why some places do better than others? A closer look at urban public space management. Paper presented at the 9th international urban design conference, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamanifard H, Alizadeh T, Bosman C (2018) Towards a framework of public space governance. Cities 78:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamanifard H, Alizadeh T, Bosman C, Coiacetto E (2019) Measuring experiential qualities of urban public spaces: users’ perspective. J Urban Des 24(3):340–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X (2017) Identifying consumerist privately owned public spaces: the ideal type of mass private property. Urban Stud 54(15):3464–3479

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Osborne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Osborne, N., Alizadeh, T. (2020). Public Cities. In: Rogers, D., Keane, A., Alizadeh, T., Nelson, J. (eds) Understanding Urbanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4386-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4386-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4385-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4386-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics