Skip to main content

Psychological and Sociological Aspects of Heutagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education
  • 530 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we address heutagogy’s psychological and sociological aspects. We first present the self-determination theory (SDT), which postulates three basic human needs as the driving forces of learning: the need for a sense of competence, the need for a sense of autonomy, and the need for a sense of relatedness. Then we discuss Ranciere’s circle-power problem, which focuses on emancipation and equality. We conclude by discussing the democratic and social justice aspects of heutagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. (2014). Autonomy, agency and the self. In B. Fultner (Ed.), Jürgen Habermas key concepts (pp. 91–115). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Feinberg, O., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2017). reducing violence in non-controlling ways: A change program based on self-determination theory. The Journal of Experimental Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1277336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belt, E. (2014). Applying heutagogy in online learning: The side model. In L. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 178–185). ISBN: 1502785307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. In B. Gros, et al. (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2016). Strategies for implementing self-determined learning (Heutagogy) within education: A comparison of three institutions (Australia, South Africa, and Israel). Master’s Thesis. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canţer, M. (2012). E-heutagogy for lifelong e-learning. Procedia Technology, 1, 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2010). Toward a theory of teacher education for social justice. In M. Fullan, A. Hargreaves, D. Hopkins, & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (2nd ed., pp. 445–467). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). Self-determination theory. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 21). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26036-4.

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (trans: Ramos, M. B.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase, S. (2014). An introduction to self-determined learning (Heutagogy). In L. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning (p. 5). ISBN: 139781502785307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., & Evelein, F. G. (2016). Relations between student teachers’ basic needs fulfillment and their teaching behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlycka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, C. A., Binnie, V. I., & Tricio, J. A. (2018). Motivational profiles and their relationships with basic psychological needs, academic performance, study strategies, self-esteem, and vitality in dental students in Chile. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 15(11), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciere, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation (translated, with an Introduction: Ross, K.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002) Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). New York: The University of Rochester Press. https://books.google.co.il/books?hl=iw&lr=&id=DcAe2b7L-RgC&oi=fnd&pg=PP11&dq= hand+book+of+self+determination+theory&ots=dryO5BX1Zi&sig=FtUB4oMwomCJomHM 0T2B476H_hQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=hand%20book%20of%20self%20determination% 20theory&f=false.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I., & Friere, P. (1987). Pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. London: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenshaw, K. F., Revelo, R., Earl, K. A., & Herman, G. L. (2016). Using self determination theory principles to promote engineering students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1194–1207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amnon Glassner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glassner, A., Back, S. (2020). Psychological and Sociological Aspects of Heutagogy . In: Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4144-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4144-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4143-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4144-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics