Skip to main content

Ridge Regression Model for the Estimation of Total Carbon Sequestered by Forest Species

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics ((FFIM))

Abstract

In this chapter, the study of total carbon sequestration has been taken for Acacia catechu, because of its highest relative dominance, relative density, relative frequency and importance value index in forest land-use system. The ridge regression methods have been used to estimate the total carbon sequestration (dependent variable) of this species in Kandi belt of Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir state located in the foothill zone of Jammu Shivaliks. The explanatory variables diameter at breast height (DBH), height, stem biomass (SB), branch biomass, leaf biomass, below-ground biomass and total above-ground biomass (TB) were chosen for the study. It has been observed that the explanatory variables were highly correlated and indicates the presence of multicollinearity and hence estimates based on the classical ordinary least square method are not precise. Ridge regression method was attempted to deal with the problem of multicollinearity. The results show that the optimum value of ridge constant is 0.02 and the variables DBH, SB and TB are significant variables to increase the total carbon content sequestered by the species Acacia catechu. The estimates of parameters through ridge regression technique were more stable and more reliable than ordinary least square on the basis of size, sign and significance of the regression parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adnan, N., Ahmad, M. H., & Adnan, R. (2006). A comparative study on some methods for handling multicollinearity problems. Matematika, 22(2), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akdeniz, F., & Erol, H. (2003). Mean square error matrix comparison of some biased estimators in linear regression. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 32(12), 2389–2413.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Alin, A. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(3), 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basarir, A., Karli, B., & Bilgic, A. (2006). An evaluation of Turkish agricultural production performance. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8(4), 511–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, B. L., & O’ Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models an applied approach (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-KENT Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, H. G., & Seth, S. K. (1968). A revised survey of forest types of India (p. 404). New Delhi: Government of India Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunst, R. F., & Webster, J. T. (1974). Regression analysis and the problem of multicollinearity. Communication in Statistics, 4(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairiah, K., Dewi, S., Agus, F., Velarde, S., Ekadinata, A., Rahayu, S. & van Noordwijk, M. (2011). Measuring carbon stocks across land use systems: A manual. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SEA Regional Office, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation to nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12, 56–67.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A. E., Kennard, R. W., & Baldwin, K. F. (1975). Ridge regression: Some simulations. Communication in Statistics, 4, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal, U. C., & Khanna, A. S. (2004). Comparison of some biased estimators with ordinary least square in regression analysis of lactation records in buffaloes. Indian Journal of Dairy Sciences, 57(4), 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1984). Econometric methods (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthouse, E. C. (1999). Ridge regression and direct marketing scoring models. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(4), 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokany, K., Raison, R. J., & Prokushkin, A. S. (2006). Critical analysis of root: Shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 12, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi, J. D. S., Manhas, R. K., & Chauhan, P. S. (2003). Carbon allocation in different components of some tree species of India: A new approach for carbon estimation. Current Science, 85(11), 1528–1531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasha, G. R., & Shah, M. A. A. (2004). Application of ridge regression to multicollinear data. Journal of Research (science), 15(1), 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, G. W., & Christopher, J. P. (2001). Generalized ridge regression and a generalization of the Cp statistic. Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(7), 911–922.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sufian, A. J. M. (2010). An analysis of poverty-a ridge regression approach. In Proceedings of 4th International multi-conference on Society, Cybernetics, and Informatics (IMSCI-2010), June 29–July 2, 2010. Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinod, D. H. (1976). Application of new ridge regression methods to a study of bell system scale economies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 835–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. C., Thompson, R., & Dentiam, M. C. (2000). Marker assisted selection using ridge regression. Genetically-Research, 75(2), 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeniay, O., & Goktas, A. (2002). A comparison of partial least squares regression with other prediction methods. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 31, 99–111.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly thankful to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions to improve the quality of the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, M., Kumar, B., Mahajan, V., Bhat, M.I.J. (2020). Ridge Regression Model for the Estimation of Total Carbon Sequestered by Forest Species. In: Chandra, G., Nautiyal, R., Chandra, H. (eds) Statistical Methods and Applications in Forestry and Environmental Sciences. Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1476-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics