Skip to main content

A Multi-objective Optimization Method Based on Nelder–Mead Simplex Search Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Applied Mechanical Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

In this paper, a method based on Nelder and Mead’s simplex search method is developed for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Unlike other multi-objective optimization algorithms based on classical methods, this method does not require any a priori knowledge about the problem. Moreover, it does not need any pre-defined weights or additional constraints as it works without scalarizing the multi-objective problem. The algorithm works with a population of points and is capable of generating a multitude of Pareto optimal solutions. Equipped with the constraint handling strategy adopted in this work, the method is found to be competitive with respect to the existing algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    To compare two points on the basis of dominance, a front value is assigned to each point depending on the front on which the point lies. All the points on a particular front have the same front value which is equal to the number of points which are dominated by that front.

  2. 2.

    For discussion on R and \(\delta \) in the expression, see Mehta and Dasgupta [13].

  3. 3.

    The authors gratefully acknowledge the availability of the source codes for NSGA-II algorithm on the Web site http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/codes.shtml, from where these were downloaded on September 8, 2011.

References

  1. Chankong V, Haimes Y (1983) Multiobjective decision making: theory and methodology, vol 8. North-Holland, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, vol 16. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb K, Srinivasan A (2006) Innovization: innovating design principles through optimization. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, pp 1629–1636

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb K, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Zitzler E (2002) Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. In: WCCI. IEEE, pp 825–830

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fonseca C, Fleming P (1995) An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evol Comput 3(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koduru P, Dong Z, Das S, Welch S, Roe J, Charbit E (2008) A multiobjective evolutionary-simplex hybrid approach for the optimization of differential equation models of gene networks. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(5):572–590. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2008.917202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuriger G, Grant F (2011) A lexicographic Nelder Mead simulation optimization method to solve multi-criteria problems. Comput Ind Eng 60:555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kursawe F (1991) A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization. In: Parallel problem solving from nature, pp 193–197

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lis J, Eiben Á (1996) A multi-sexual genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: 1997 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 59–64

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martínez, S., Coello, C.: A proposal to hybridize multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with non-gradient mathematical programming techniques. In: Parallel problem solving from nature—PPSN X, pp 837–846

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez S, Montanando A, Coello Coello C (2011) A nonlinear simplex search approach for multi-objective optimization. In: 2011 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 2367 –2374. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2011.5949910

  13. Mehta VK, Dasgupta B (2012) A constrained optimization algorithm based on the simplex search method. Eng Optim 44(5):537–550

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Poloni C, Giurgevich A, Onesti L, Pediroda V (2000) Hybridization of a multi-objective genetic algorithm, a neural network and a classical optimizer for a complex design problem in fluid dynamics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 186(2–4):403–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaffer JD (1984) Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms (artificial intelligence, optimization, adaptation, pattern recognition). Ph.D. thesis, Nashville, TN, USA. AAI8522492

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schott J (1995) Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization. Technical report. DTIC Document

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka M, Watanabe H, Furukawa Y, Tanino T (1995) GA-based decision support system for multicriteria optimization. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. Intelligent systems for the 21st century, vol 2. IEEE, pp 1556–1561

    Google Scholar 

  19. Viennet R, Fonteix C, Marc I (1996) Multicriteria optimization using a genetic algorithm for determining a pareto set. Int J Syst Sci 27(2):255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(6):712–731. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zitzler E (1999) Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications. Shaker Verlag, Aachen-Maastricht, Berichte aus der Informatik

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms—a comparative case study. In: Parallel problem solving from nature—PPSN V. Springer, pp 292–301

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Kumar Mehta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mehta, V.K., Dasgupta, B. (2020). A Multi-objective Optimization Method Based on Nelder–Mead Simplex Search Method. In: Voruganti, H., Kumar, K., Krishna, P., Jin, X. (eds) Advances in Applied Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1201-8_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1201-8_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1200-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1201-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics