Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Until Run2 in 2015, this search has used an inclusive tagger for SM Higgs boson and top quark, requiring higher mass of large-R jets. On the other hand, the difference between VLQ signal and the dominant background of \(t\bar{t}\,+{\ge }\)1b is the existence of boosted Higgs boson. A boosted Higgs boson tagger is promising to discriminate the signal from backgrounds and to improve the sensitivity. In the first part of this chapter, the exclusive Higgs boson and top quark taggers are defined and optimised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The purity is not estimated for \(t\bar{t}+\mathrm {jets}\) backgrounds since the backgrounds do not include the Higgs bosons.

  2. 2.

    For the Higgs boson tagger, the small-R jet mass can be used. But the uncertainty on the mass for the small mass range can be derived from the Run1 measurement.

  3. 3.

    For the top quark tagger, the upper thresholds of mass and constituents are not set in order to develop a high acceptance tagger with a minimum set of requirements.

  4. 4.

    It is not necessary to check the sensitivity in this case because the validation regions are not used for searching for excesses of data but for the validation of the background estimation.

  5. 5.

    It is not necessary to check the sensitivity in this case because the validation regions are not used for the searching for excesses of data but for the validation of the background estimation.

References

  1. ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Search for new phenomena in \(t\bar{t}\) final states with additional heavy-flavour jets in 13.2 \(fb^{-1}\) of \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. ATLAS-CONF-2016-104. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2220371

  2. Delaunay B (1934) Sur la sphere vide. Bull Acad Sci USSR Classe Sci Math Natl 7:793

    Google Scholar 

  3. ATLAS Collaboration (2017) Jet reclustering and close-by effects in ATLAS Run 2. ATLAS-CONF-2017-062. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2275649

  4. Aad G et al (2015) Search for production of vector-like quark pairs and of four top quarks in the lepton-plus-jets final state in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP 08:105. arXiv:1505.04306 [hep-ex]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daiki Yamaguchi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yamaguchi, D. (2019). Optimisations of Heavy Object Tagging and Event Categorisation. In: Search for New Phenomena in Top-Antitop Quarks Final States with Additional Heavy-Flavour Jets with the ATLAS Detector. Springer Theses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0932-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics