Skip to main content

The Indigenous Housing Policy Challenge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Housing Policy in Australia

Abstract

Indigenous peoples remain among the most disadvantaged Australians in terms of their housing needs. This chapter begins by discussing the historical and cultural factors and past policy approaches that helped to shape the specific housing needs of Indigenous Australians in both urban and remote geographic settings. The chapter continues by critically examining contemporary policy approaches to addressing Indigenous disadvantage and the barriers to achieving better housing outcomes. Policy responses are shown to have been complex and highly volatile, characterised by frequent changes in direction and shifting responsibilities across governments. Key challenges in the social housing, home ownership and private rental service systems are described. A central theme is consideration of how housing policies could be better aligned with cultural values and Indigenous aspirations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Australia’s First Peoples are those who are descendent from, identify as and/or are accepted by their community as Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander or both. They may also be referred to as Indigenous Australians. In using the term ‘Indigenous’ in this chapter we do not intend to detract from the distinctive identities of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

  2. 2.

    This is likely to be an underestimate of the total Indigenous population (ABS 2016a).

  3. 3.

    Households with incomes of less than 50% of median equivalised disposable household income (see Chapter 3).

  4. 4.

    Remoteness areas are broad geographical classifications of local areas with common characteristics in relation to accessibility, based on distance from population centres of various sizes. Five categories of remoteness are used: major cities, inner regional, outer regional, remote and very remote. In referring to ‘remote’ areas in this chapter we incorporate ‘very remote’. Similarly, ‘urban and regional’ or ‘cities and towns’ refers to the first three categories above. For further details see ABS (2006).

  5. 5.

    Indigenous households are those with at least one identified Indigenous member.

  6. 6.

    This compares with 1.4% of non-Indigenous Australians who live in remote areas.

  7. 7.

    Health Habitat is a 30-year collaboration of professional architects, doctors, tradespeople and community workers dedicated to healthy housing initiatives in remote Australia and internationally. A core philosophy is skilling local communities to manage and maintain their own housing.

  8. 8.

    Households defined as needing one or more bedrooms to meet an occupancy standard are considered to be overcrowded (for more detail see AIHW2019a).

  9. 9.

    Unacceptable standard housing is defined as having less than four working facilities (for washing people, washing clothes/bedding, storing/preparing food and sewerage) and having more than two major structural problems (e.g. electrical/plumbing problems, major cracks in walls/floors or major roof defects) (ABS 2016a).

  10. 10.

    Empirical assessment of need covers measures of: homelessness, overcrowding, affordability, dwelling condition and connection to essential services (power, water and sewerage) (AIHW2005). Using different affordability and adequacy measures of need underscores the value of multidimensional measures of housing need (as discussed in Chapter 3).

  11. 11.

    This followed the 1967 amendment to the Australian Constitution that gave the Federal Parliament the power to make laws relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

  12. 12.

    The COAG Reform Council was established by COAG in 2008 as a specialist agency independent of all governments to strengthen accountability for their performance across multiple program areas. Accountability for ‘Closing the Gap in Indigenous Disadvantage’ was a nominated priority (COAG Reform Council 2010). Following a change of national government, it was abolished in 2014 and its functions adsorbed into various Commonwealth agencies.

  13. 13.

    The CDEP was gradually dismantled and finally abolished in 2015.

  14. 14.

    By 2016, it was estimated that less than 200 funded ICHOs were still active across Australia (Milligan et al. 2016).

  15. 15.

    Other ‘building blocks’ to overcoming disadvantage were early childhood, schooling, health, economic participation, safe communities, and governance and leadership (COAG2008a).

  16. 16.

    Commonwealth/COAG oversight of these directions gradually fell away following national political upheaval and successive government and administrative changes from 2010. State and territory reporting requirements related to all housing programs under the NHHA (see Chapter 4) are once again subject to a reinvigorated improvement process in 2019.

  17. 17.

    Under NPARIH the Commonwealth identified a limited number of communities it would invest in with the intention to promote growth of larger and more viable settlements. This left many small communities not eligible to receive funds, especially in WA, Queensland, SAand NSW. In operation there was some push back from the original plans, but many small communities became the responsibility of the relevant state government (Habibis et al. 2016).

  18. 18.

    Victoria and Tasmaniaexited NPARIH in 2014 and NSW in 2016.

  19. 19.

    One of the review’s findings was that because the Commonwealth was the sole NPARIH funder, state and territory “jurisdictions lacked sufficient ‘skin in the game’ and hence the necessary incentive to drive efficiencies and improvements” (Towart et al. 2017, p. 3).

  20. 20.

    Commonwealth divestment of remote area housing responsibilities to states and territories sits within a broader context of intergovernmental disputes over funding responsibilities. For example, in 2014, the Commonwealth announced the staged withdrawal of funding for essential services (such as power, water and rubbish) for 150 remote communities (mostly in WA). With affected states resisting replacement funding, this situation has resulted in an extant concern that more communities will be closed, thereby severing connection to land (Madden 2015).

  21. 21.

    See, for example, NSW Government (2015) Foundations for Success, which offers practical guidance for all providers of social housing working with Aboriginal people and communities (http://www.aho.nsw.gov.au/-ASSETS/Housing-providers/documents/foundation-for-success-guide-for-social-housing-providers).

  22. 22.

    Aboriginal Housing Victoria Ltd is registered not-for-profit housing company, which operates under the direction of a skills-based majority Aboriginal board.

  23. 23.

    Victoria’s community housing regulatory system (2005) has two classes of not-for-profit housing organisations: housing providers and housing associations. The latter are “larger, more complex businesses with the skills, expertise and resources to manage, maintain and grow a viable social housing portfolio” (http://www.housingregistrar.vic.gov.au).

  24. 24.

    Small home lending programs tailored to Indigenous clients have periodically operated in some jurisdictions, notably SA, WAandNT (Crabtree et al. 2012b, p. 40).

  25. 25.

    Assistance offered could be a mortgage or part mortgage or a subsidised interest rate, together with financial advice.

  26. 26.

    This data refers to income units not households, which would be a lower number. Indigenous Australians have the same entitlement to RA as non-Indigenous Australians. Social housing tenants with a landlord other than the state/territory public housing authority can receive RA.

  27. 27.

    https://nswats.com.au/.

References

  • Aboriginal Housing Act 1998 No. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ABS. (2006). Statistical Geography Volume 1—Australian Standard Geographical Classification, July 2006 [Internet] (Cat. No. 1216.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1216.0Main+Features1Jul%202006?OpenDocument. Accessed 14 August 2019.

  • ABS. (2016a). Census of Population and Housing: Characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2016 [Internet] (Cat. No. 2076.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2076.0. Accessed 14 August 2019.

  • ABS. (2016b). National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey, 2014–15 [Internet] (Cat. No. 4714.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4714.0. Accessed 14 August 2019.

  • AHDC. (1996, December). Future Directions for Aboriginal Housing in NSW (Report of the Aboriginal Housing Development Committee). Sydney: Aboriginal Housing Development Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • AHO. (2018). Strong Family, Strong Communities: A Strategic Framework for Aboriginal Social Housing in NSW 2018–2028 [Internet]. AHO Brochure Parramatta: Aboriginal Housing Office. Available from: https://www.aho.nsw.gov.au/download?file=628182. Accessed 9 July 2019.

  • AHV. (2018). Annual Report 2018. Melbourne: Aboriginal Housing Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW. (2005). Indigenous Housing Needs 2005—A Multi-Measure Needs Model (Cat. No. HOU 129). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW. (2009). Indigenous Housing Needs 2009—A Multi-Measure Needs Model (Cat. No. HOU 214). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW. (2017). National Social Housing Survey, Detailed Results 2016 (Cat. No. HOU 290). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW. (2019a). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: A Focus Report on Housing and Homelessness (Cat. No. HOU 301). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW. (2019b). National Social Housing Survey 2018, Key Results (Cat. No. HOU 311). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M., Williamson, A., Fernando, P., Eades, S., & Redman, S. (2018). They Took the Land, Now We’re Fighting for a House: Aboriginal Perspectives About Urban Housing Disadvantage. Housing Studies,33(4), 635–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2014). Roles and Responsibilities in Housing and Homelessness (Reform of the Federation White Paper, Issues Paper 2). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2019). Closing the Gap Report 2019. Canberra: Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, N. (2013). Income (Census Papers Paper 11, Indigenous Population Project 2011. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research). Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall-Jones, C., & Corunna, V. (2008). The Housing Careers of Indigenous Urban Households (AHURI Final Report No. 112). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (2004). Managing Social Housing for Indigenous Populations [Internet] (Institute for Social Research). Hawthorn: Swinburne University of Technology. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Terry_Burke3/publication/228755932_Managing_social_housing_for_indigenous_populations/links/00b49532a8b4106ee9000000/Managing-social-housing-for-indigenous-populations.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2019.

  • Cahir, S. (2005). More Bees with Honey: A History of the Aboriginal Housing Board of Victoria 1981–2004. North Fitzroy: Aboriginal Housing Board of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG. (1992). National Commitment to Improved Outcomes in the Delivery of Programs and Services for Aboriginal Peoples and Torres Strait Islanders. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG. (2008a). National Indigenous Reform Agreement (Closing the Gap) (Intergovernmental Agreement on Federal Finance Relations). Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG. (2008b). National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG. (2018a). Partnership Agreement on Closing the Gap 2019–2029. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG. (2018b). COAG Statement on the Closing the Gap Refresh. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG Reform Council. (2010). National Affordable Housing Agreement: Baseline Performance Report for 2008–09. Sydney: COAG Reform Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., & Morris, M. (2005). Sustainable Tenancy for Indigenous Families: What Services and What Policy Support Are Needed? (AHURI Final Report No. 81). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, L., Phibbs, P., Milligan, V., & Blunden, H. (2012a). Principles and Practices of an Affordable Housing Community Land Trust Model (AHURI Research Paper). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, L., Blunden, H., Milligan, V., Phibbs, P., & Sappideen, C. (2012b). Community Land Trusts and Indigenous Housing Options (AHURI Final Report No. 185). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, L., Blunden, H., Phibbs, P., Sappideen, C., Mortimer, D., Shahib-Smith, A., & Chung, L. (2013). The Australian Community Land Trust Manual. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, L., Moore, N., Phibbs, P., Blunden, H., & Sappideen, C. (2015). Community Land Trusts and Indigenous Communities: From Strategies to Outcomes (AHURI Final Report No. 239). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, L., Sappideen, C., Lawler, S., Conroy, R., & McNeill, J. (2019). Enabling Community Land Trusts in Australia. Melbourne: Arena Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (2018, January 18). Tactics Versus Strategy in Indigenous Housing [Internet]. Inside Story. Available from: https://insidestory.org.au/tactics-undermining-strategy-in-indigenous-housing/. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Equal Opportunity Commission. (2009). Accommodating Everyone (Report of the Equal Opportunity Commission). Perth: Equal Opportunity Commission of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eringa, K., Spring, F., Anda, M., Memmott, P., Long, S., & West, M. (2008). Scoping the Capacity of Indigenous Community Housing Organisations (AHURI Final Report No. 125). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatau, P., Coleman, A., Memmott, P., Baulderstone, J., & Slatter, M. (2009). Sustaining At-risk Indigenous Tenancies: A Review of Australian Policy Responses (AHURI Final Report No. 138). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatau, P., Cooper, L., McGrath, N., Edwards, D., Hart, A., Morris, M., et al. (2005). Indigenous Access to Mainstream Public and Community Housing (AHURI Final Report No. 85). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibis, D., Phillips, R., & Phibbs, P. (2019). Housing Policy in Remote Indigenous Communities: How Politics Disrupts Good Policy. Housing Studies,34(2), 252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibis, D., Phillips, R., Phibbs, P., & Verdouw, J. (2014). Progressing Tenancy Management Reform on Remote Indigenous Communities (AHURI Final Report No. 223). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibis, D., Phillips, R., Spinney, A., Phibbs, P., & Churchill, B. (2016). Reviewing Changes to Housing Management on Remote Indigenous Communities (Final Report No. 271). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Berry, M. (2006). Indigenous Housing: Assessing the Long Term Costs and the Optimal Balance Between Recurrent and Capital Expenditure (AHURI Final Report No. 93). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. (2008). Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Public Policy,3(2), 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Habitat. (n.d.). Why the Houses Need Fixing [Internet]. Mona Vale: Health Habitat. Available from: http://healthabitat.com/what-we-do/what-the-housing-data-reveals/why-the-houses-need-fixing. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Housing Registrar. (n.d.). Registered Housing Sector: Housing Association [Internet]. Melbourne: Housing Registrar. Available from: https://chimes.force.com/RegisteredHousing?aType=ha. Accessed 14 August 2019.

  • IBA. (2018). Annual Report 2017–2018. Canberra: Indigenous Business Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, Hon C. (1998, May 20). Aboriginal Housing Bill, Second Reading Speech (pp. 4886–4890). NSW Legislative Assembly, Hansard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S., Memmott, P., & Seelig, T. (2007). An Audit and Review of Australian Indigenous Housing Research (AHURI Final Report No. 102). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, C. (2015, June 30). Forced Closures of Aboriginal Communities in Australia continue [Internet]. Cultural Survival. Available from: https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/forced-closures-aboriginal-communities-australia-continue. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Markham, F., & Biddle, N. (2018). Income, Poverty and Inequality [Internet] (2016 Census Paper 2, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research). Canberra: ANU. Available from: http://caepr.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/CAEPR_Census_Paper_2.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2019.

  • Memmott, P., Moran, M., Birdsall-Jones, C., Fantin, S., Kreutz, A., Godwin, J., et al. (2009). Indigenous Home-Ownership on Communal Title Lands (AHURI Final Report No. 139). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., Martin, C., Phillips, R., Liu, E., Pawson, H., & Spinney, A. (2016). Profiling Australia’s Affordable Housing Industry (AHURI Final Report No. 268). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., Pawson, H., Phillips, R., Martin, C., & Elton Consulting. (2017). Developing the Scale and Capacity of Australia’s Affordable Housing Industry (AHURI Final Report No. 278). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., & Pinnegar, S. (2010). The Comeback of National Housing Policy in Australia: First Reflections. International Journal of Housing Policy,10(3), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., Phillips, R., Easthope, H., & Memmott, P. (2010). Service Directions and Issues in Social Housing for Indigenous Households in Urban and Regional Areas (AHURI Positioning Paper No. 130). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., Phillips, R., Easthope, H., Liu, E., & Memmott, P. (2011). Urban Social Housing for Aboriginal People and Torres Strait Islanders: Respecting Culture and Adapting Services (AHURI Final Report No. 172). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M., Memmott, P., Nash, D., Birdsall-Jones, C., Fantin, S., Phillips, R., & Habibis, D. (2016). Indigenous Lifeworlds, Conditionality and Housing Outcomes (AHURI Final Report No. 260). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATSIHA. (2018). Submission on the Closing the Gap Refresh: Targeting Housing and Homelessness [Internet]. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Housing Authority with National Congress. Available from: https://nationalcongress.com.au/advocacy/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/NATSIHA-Submission-to-Closing-the-Gap-Housing-as-a-new-target-PUBLIC.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Nous Group. (2017). Efficient System Costs of Remote Indigenous Housing [Internet] (Input into the Review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing). Sydney: Nous Group. Available from: https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/Nous-Group-Final-Report-Efficient-system-costs-of-remote-Indigenous-housing.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • NT Government. (2018). Our Community. Our Future. Our Home [Internet]. Darwin: Northern Territory Government. Available from: https://ourfuture.nt.gov.au/home. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Pawson, H., Milligan, V., Wiesel, I., & Hulse, K. (2013). Public Housing Transfers in Australia: Past, Present and Prospective (AHURI Final Report No. 215). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., Parsell, C., Saunders, P., Hill, P., & Liu, E. (2018). Australian Homelessness Monitor 2018 [Internet]. Melbourne: Launch Housing. Available from: https://www.launchhousing.org.au/site/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/LaunchHousing_AHM2018_Report.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2019.

  • Pratt, A., & Bennett, S. (2004). The End of ATSIC and the Future Administration of Indigenous Affairs [Internet] (Current Issues Brief No. 4 2004-05). Canberra: Parliament of Australia. Available from: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/CIB/Current_Issues_Briefs_2004_-_2005/05cib04. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Productivity Commission. (2017). Introducing Competition and Consumer Choice into Human Services [Internet] (Inquiry Report No. 85). Melbourne: Productivity Commission. Available from: https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/human-services/reforms/report. Accessed 16 August 2019.

  • Prout, S. (2008). The Entangled Relationship Between Indigenous Spatiality and Government Service Delivery (CAEPR Working Paper. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research). Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC. (2007). Living in the Sunburn Country: Findings of the Review of the Community Housing and Infrastructure Programme [Internet]. Adelaide: PricewaterhouseCoopers. Available from: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/05_2012/livingsunburntcountry.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Referendum Council. (2017). Final Report of the Referendum Council [Internet]. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Available from: https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/report_attachments/Referendum_Council_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Royal Commission into Family Violence. (2016). Summary and Recommendations (Final Report). Melbourne: Victorian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. (1993). Aboriginal Housing. In C. Paris (Ed.), Housing Australia (pp. 212–227). Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. (2008). Is Home Ownership the Answer? Housing Tenure and Indigenous Australians in Remote (and Settled) Areas. Housing Studies,23(3), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. (2009). Ideology, Evidence and Competing Principles in Australian Indigenous Affairs: From Brough to Rudd via Pearson and the NTER (Discussion Paper No. 289/2009. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research). Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelter SA. (2019). “I Am Tired of Being Treated Like a Second-Class Citizen!” Racial Discrimination in the Private Rental Market. Adelaide: Shelter SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solonec, T. (2000). Racial Discrimination in the Private Rental Market: Overcoming Stereotypes and Breaking the Cycle of Housing Despair in Western Australia. Indigenous Law Bulletin,5(2), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. (2019). Report on Government Services, Part G: Housing and Homelessness [Internet]. Canberra: Productivity Commission. Available from: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2019. Accessed 16 August 2019.

  • Towart, R., Griew, R., Murphy, S., & Pascoe, F. (2017). Remote Housing Review: A Review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008–2018) [Internet]. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Available from: https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/review-of-remote-housing.pdf. Accessed 15 August 2019.

  • Tually, S., Slatter, M., Faulkner, D., & Oakley, S. (2016). The Role of Private Rental Brokerage in Housing Outcomes for Vulnerable Australians (AHURI Final Report No. 263). Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007, September 13). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples [Internet] (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly). Available from. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Wensing, E., & Taylor, J. (2012). Secure Tenure for Home Ownership and Economic Development on Land Subject to Native Title (Discussion Paper No. 31). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hal Pawson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pawson, H., Milligan, V., Yates, J. (2020). The Indigenous Housing Policy Challenge. In: Housing Policy in Australia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0780-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0780-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0779-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0780-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics