Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Social Construct to Legal Innovation: The Offence of Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in England and Wales

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Criminalising Coercive Control

Abstract

In December 2015, a new offence was introduced in England and Wales: controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. This chapter reviews the societal, political, and legislative developments that paved the way for the introduction of that offence. In particular, this chapter discusses an apparent frustration with societal and governmental understandings of what constitutes domestic abuse, particularly in light of continued resistance to utilising the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (UK) to prosecute domestic abuse offenders. A change to those understandings was made possible by the groundbreaking work of Evan Stark, who highlighted that domestic abuse could be better understood as an ongoing strategy of domination, and that the harm inflicted on victims is as much structural (the deprivation of liberty) and psychological (emotional) as it is physical (injuries). This chapter describes and evaluates the attempt in England and Wales to translate Stark’s construct of ‘coercive control’ into the criminal offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett, A. (2017). ‘Greater than the mere sum of its parts’: Coercive control and the question of proof. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 29(4), 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. (2016). Domestic violence: The limitations of a legal response. In S. Hilda & V. Bettinson (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on protection, prevention and intervention. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C., & Bettinson, V. (2015). Is the creation of a discrete offence of coercive control necessary to combat domestic violence? Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 66(2), 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. (2018, February 1). Scotland set to pass “gold standard” domestic abuse law. Guardian (online). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/01/scotland-set-to-pass-gold-standard-domestic-abuse-law.

  • Buckland, R. HC Deb. (2015, January 20), 591(172).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, C. (1990). Women’s rights as human rights: Toward a re-vision of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 12(4), 486–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A. (2007). Domestic violence as a crime of pattern and intent: An alternative reconceptualization. George Washington Law Review, 75, 553–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. (1997/1998). Stalking around the main issue. Kings College Law Journal, 8, 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretney, A., & Davis, G. (1996). Prosecuting ‘domestic’ assault. Criminal Law Review, 3, 162–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service. (2016). Violence Against Women and Girls Crime Report 2015–16. Retrieved from www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/cps_vawg_report_2016.pdf.

  • Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2015). Do we need a specific domestic violence offence? Melbourne University Law Review, 39(2), 434–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2018). Legal systems abuse and coercive control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M. (1992). Understanding women’s responses to domestic violence: A redefinition of battered woman syndrome. Hofstra Law Review, 21, 1191–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, E. (2001). The criminalisation of stalking: Constructing the problem, evaluating the solution. London: Cavendish.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2000). An evaluation of the use and effectiveness of the protection from harassment act 1997, Home Office Research Study 203. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. (2013). Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology, 10(5), 623–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office, Home. (2014a). Strengthening the law on domestic abuse—A consultation. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office, Home. (2014b). Strengthening the law on domestic abuse consultation—Summary of responses. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infield, P., & Platford, G. (2000). The law of harassment and stalking. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. (1998). Rethinking survey research on violence against women. In R. Dobash & R. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M., & McGorrery, P. (2016). Criminalising coercive and controlling behaviour: The next step in the prosecution of family violence? Alternative Law Journal, 41(2), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monckton-Smith, J., Szymanska, K., & Haile, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between stalking and homicide. Gloucestershire: Suzy Lamplugh Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, S. (2009). Redefining domestic violence: Using the violence and control paradigm for domestic violence legislation. Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 29, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povey, D., & Prime, J. (1999). Recorded crime statistics England and Wales, April 1998–March 1999, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 18/99. London: HM Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, H. (2006). The end of domestic violence. Modern Law Review, 69(5), 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, O., & Rees, T. (2001). Harassment: Separate incidents not linked. Criminal Law Review, 318–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, C. (2018, May 8). A domestic-violence expert on Eric Schneiderman and Coercive Control. The Cut. Retrieved from https://www.thecut.com/2018/05/an-abuse-expert-on-schneiderman-and-coercive-control.html.

  • Tuerkheimer, D. (2004). Recognising and remedying the harm of battering: A call to criminalize domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 94(4), 970–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuerkheimer, D. (2013). Breakups. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 25, 51–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, S. (2017, October 11). Shetland man jailed for 30 years of abusing wife. Express. Retrieved from www.express.co.uk/news/uk/865233/Shetland-man-Robert-Simmons-jailed30-years-abusing-wife.

  • Youngs, J. (2015). Domestic violence and the criminal law: Reconceptualising reform. Journal of Criminal Law, 79(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Politics & Sociology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

    Cassandra Wiener

Authors
  1. Cassandra Wiener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassandra Wiener .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Marilyn McMahon

  2. School of Law, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Paul McGorrery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wiener, C. (2020). From Social Construct to Legal Innovation: The Offence of Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in England and Wales. In: McMahon, M., McGorrery, P. (eds) Criminalising Coercive Control . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0652-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0653-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation