Skip to main content

Understanding China’s Rise Through the Eyes of Scholars and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How China Sees the World
  • 810 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter summarizes the findings of the book. We further show that Chinese international relations (IR) scholars perceive the United States to pose the greatest threat to China’s national security, but a direct military confrontation between the two countries in the near future unlikely. If Chinese IR scholars can be seen as a reliable proxy measure of Chinese leadership, our study suggests that China has a benign and somewhat (over)optimistic perception on US–China relations before Trump’s “trade war” with China in early 2018. While the trade war might eventually be resolved, it will not be the end of US–China competition for prestige and leadership in the international system. How to share international leadership will be a challenge for both countries in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ross Terrill, “What Does China Want?” Wilson Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2005): 50–61; Jeffrey W. Legro, “What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power,” Perspectives on Politics 5, no. 3 (2007): 515–534; Timothy R. Heath, “What Does China Want? Discerning the PRC’s National Strategy,” Asian Security 8, no. 1 (2012): 54–72.

  2. 2.

    Yan Xuetong, “From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 2 (2014): 153–184.

  3. 3.

    Kai He and Huiyun Feng, “Leadership Transition and Global Governance: Role Conception, Institutional Balancing, and the AIIB,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 12, no. 2 (2019): 153–178.

  4. 4.

    “Xi Jinping signals China will champion free trade if Trump builds barriers,” The Guardian, 18 January 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/17/china-xi-jinping-china-free-trade-trump-globalisation-wef-davos.

  5. 5.

    Pan Deng, “China and LAC are becoming close friends through BRI,” China Global Television Network (CGTN), 28 April 2019. https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d514f32457a4d34457a6333566d54/index.html.

  6. 6.

    The term “true friend” might have contributed to the low sense of friendship. In Chinese understanding, a “true friend” (真正的朋友) means someone you can rely on in times of difficulties and someone who will support you under any circumstance. A “true friend” also evokes a sense of loyalty and trust based on the past and history. Therefore, our question might have set too high a bar for countries to be qualified as a “true friend” of China.

  7. 7.

    Kat Devin, “5 Charts on Global Views of China,” Pew Research Center, 19 October 2018, available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/19/5-charts-on-global-views-of-china/.

  8. 8.

    Michael Pillsbury, The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2015). For a good critical review, see Alastair Iain Johnston, “Shaky Foundations: The ‘Intellectual Architecture’ of Trump’s China Policy,” Survival 61, no. 2 (2019): 189–202.

  9. 9.

    Graham Allison, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017).

  10. 10.

    The Economist, “A New Kind of Cold War,” 16 May 2019, available at: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/05/16/a-new-kind-of-cold-war.

  11. 11.

    See The White House, “National Security Strategy of the United States of America,” Washington DC, December 2017, p. 2.

  12. 12.

    Xuetong Yan, “From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 2 (2014): 153–184.

  13. 13.

    Prestige is closely related to, but differs from, power. Power is about getting what you want despite resistance, but prestige is about getting others to do, and even want, what you want.

  14. 14.

    Joseph Nye Jr., The Powers to Lead (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 19.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiyun Feng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Feng, H., He, K., Li, X. (2019). Understanding China’s Rise Through the Eyes of Scholars and Beyond. In: How China Sees the World. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0482-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0482-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0481-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0482-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics