Skip to main content

Action, Sensation and the Kinetic Body: The Stardom of Hrithik Roshan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stardom in Contemporary Hindi Cinema

Abstract

At the turn of the twenty-first century, the spectre of the Muslim, inexorably bound up with the figure of the Islamist terrorist, triggers a diversity of cinematic engagements in Bombay cinema. In the aftermath of 9/11, the Islamist terrorist is seen to possess a commanding global presence, transnational mobility and the capacity to unleash spectacular violence. The anxiety, dread, horror and fascination set in motion by terror-related violence and death-dealing become the vectors along which cinematic affect begins to travel. The Islamist terrorist, both visible and spectral, not only haunts and transfigures the diegetic world of Bombay cinema but inaugurates a new constellation of films whose affective registers reanimate the cinematic image. This emergent constellation is born when the “war film ” becomes liberated from the confines of the combat zone and is catapulted onto a transnational arena. The soldier and spy merge into a singular figuration fusing the violent impulse of the former with the itinerant impulse of the latter inaugurating thereby a “new” cinema of action and sensation. Therefore, the soldier-spy films of Sunny Deol (Maa Tujhe Salaam, Verma in Maa Tujhe Salaam. Indian Movies, 2002, The Hero: A Love Story of a Spy, Sharma in The Hero: Love Story of a Spy. Time Magnetics, 2003, Jaal: The Trap, Dhanoa in Jaal: The Trap. Parth Productions, 2003) become early cinematic experiments in speed, movement and sensation. Running parallel to the soldier-spy films , another set of chronologically overlapping films produce a new force field of affects. The terrorist, who was thus far the hero’s antagonist, becomes the protagonist when the body of the star collides with that of the terrorist. Hrithik Roshan, in his early films Fiza (Mohammed in Fiza. UTV Motion Pictures et al. 2000) and Mission Kashmir, (Chopra in Mission Kashmir. Vidhu Vinod Chopra Productions, 2000) is arguably the first star on whose body these aspirations come to be inscribed. As the body of the star fuses with that of the terrorist, new possibilities in the realm of affect and signification are inaugurated. This essay argues that Hrithik Roshan’s stardom is inextricable from the movement and sensation of the new action cinema whose kinetic and affective energies have been unleashed by the spectre of the terrorist. Conversely, the kinesis of the new action cinema is driven by a star body that finds full and spectacular display through not just films but ads and campaigns for global brands . The emergence of Hrithik as a star also marks a significant moment in the history of Bollywood action cinema. Driven by the balletic athleticism of Hrithik’s star body and the pioneering innovations in action choreography, Bollywood witnesses the arrival of “wire-fu” films like Krrish (Roshan in Krrish. Filmkraft Productions, 2006), Dhoom 2 (Gadhvi in Dhoom 2. Yash Raj Films, 2006) and Krrish 3 (Roshan in Krrish 3. Filmkraft Productions, 2013) that allow action choreography to become spectacularly airborne. Central to the stardom of Hrithik Roshan is the sensational allure of kinetic and aerial mobility . It is through this sensorium that this essay contemplates the first decade of Hrithik Roshan’s stardom .

I place the word “new” in quotes because the new is never entirely new. It is inevitably constituted through both continuity and rupture. The challenge lies in identifying the “newness of the new”.

For a detailed discussion, see Violence and the Spectral Muslim, Action, Affect and Bombay Cinema at the turn of the twenty-first Century, Ph.D. dissertation by Shohini Ghosh, School of Arts and Aesthetics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, 2017.

This is not to argue that all new action films are driven by narratives of terrorism but that its new kinetic and affective energies have indeed been unleashed by the spectre of the terrorist.

Combining “wirework” with “kung fu”, “wire-fu” refers to stunts where wires and pulleys allow its practitioners to perform stunts that are usually impossible for the human body to perform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hrithik Roshan started his career as a first assistant to his father Rakesh Roshan for films like King Uncle, (1993) Karan Arjun (1995) and Koyla (1997) before he was launched in Kaho Na… Pya Hai. As a child artist, he appeared in films like Aap Ke Deewane (Surendra Mohan 1980), Aasha (directed by Hrithik’s maternal grandfather J. Om Prakash 1980) and Bhagwan Dada (Om Prakash 1986).

  2. 2.

    For example, Ashok Kumar (Kismet, 1942), Nargis (Anhonee, 1952), Dev Anand (Hum Dono) Dilip Kumar (Ram Aur Shyam, 1967), Sharmila Tagore (An Evening in Paris, 1967), Rajesh Khanna (Aradhana, 1969), Amitabh Bachchan (Satte Pe Satta, Bemisaal and Desh-Premee, 1972: Don and Kasme Vaade, 1978 and 1978): Hema Malini (Seeta Aur Geeta, 1972), Sridevi (Chaalbaaz, 1982; Lamhe, 1991) and Shah Rukh Khan (Duplicate, 1998; Paheli, 2005; Don 2: The Chase Begins, 2006, Fan, 2016).

  3. 3.

    http://www.rediff.com/money/2001/may/05roshan.htm (Last accessed: 28 October 2018).

  4. 4.

    For another discussion of Hrithik Roshan’s body , see “From Superman to Shahenshah: Stardom and the Transnational Corporeality of Hrithik Roshan” by Nandana Bose (2013:158–178). The essay is exceptional for taking seriously male “to-be-looked-at-ness” and makes the point that the cinematic body of Roshan engenders both straight and queer spectatorial pleasures (159). However, the essay is unable to extricate itself from the tired framework of understanding body displays through “objectification”, “commodification” (165) and the supposed sin of “gratuitous eroticization of the Roshan body ”(163).

  5. 5.

    Suketu Mehta writes that the sudden success of Hrithik’s debut film resulted in him being elevated in Mission Kashmir from number 3 on the star list to number 1.

  6. 6.

    Chinese martial arts films have a long history of using wires to make characters fly or execute stunts for stunts in mid-air. Wirework also allows the actors to focus their energies on executing complex body movements without expending energy on gaining height (Hunt 2003: 166).

  7. 7.

    Tony Ching Siu-Tung Ching is an internationally acclaimed action director from Hong Kong whose credits include A Chinese Ghost Story (Ching Siu-Tung 1987), Shaolin Soccer (Chow 2001), Hero (2002) and House of Flying Daggers (2004), the last two directed by Zhang Yimou.

  8. 8.

    Wu Shu (which literally means martial arts) is a national sport in China and draws from Northern styles of “kung fu” and other gymnastic performances. The differences between Northern and Southern styles of kung fu are popularly expressed in the phrase “Northern Leg, Southern Fist”. The North was flat and therefore the emphasis on high-flying kicks supposedly to knock enemies off their horses (Hunt 2003: 168).

  9. 9.

    In the Dhoom series, the antagonists—played by John Abraham, Hrithik Roshan and Aamir Khan, respectively—are the protagonists. While the two cops, Jai and Ali (played by Abhishekh Bachchan and Uday Chopra) remain constant, the coveted role of the antagonist keeps changing. In all three films, the most dangerous weapon possessed by the master heisters is agility of mind and the body .

References

  • Abel, M. (2007). Violent affect: Literature, cinema, and critique after representation. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. (2004). Trauma thrills: Notes on early action cinema. In Taskar Y (Ed.), Action and adventure cinema (pp. 17–30). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharucha, R. (2014). Terror and performance. New Delhi: Tulika Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, I., & Allen, R. (2009). Islamicate cultures of Bombay cinema. New Delhi: Tulika Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, N. (2013). From Superman to Shahenshah: Stardom and the transnational corporeality of Hrithik Roshan. In Meheli Sen & Anustup Basu (Eds.), Figurations in Indian Film (pp. 236–252). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, A. (2007). King of Bollywood: Shah Rukh Khan and the Seductive World of Indian Cinema. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, J. (2004). The Matrix. BFI Modern Classics, London: BFI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, E. (2009). The speed handbook: Velocity, pleasure, modernism. Durham-London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. (1996). The Terminator. British Film Institute, BFI Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. (2017). Violence and the apectral Muslim: Action, affect and Bombay Cinema at the turn of the 21st Century. Unpublished dissertation submitted to the School of Arts and Aesthetics, Jawaharlal Nehru University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. (2003). Kung fu Masters: Stardom, performance and ‘authenticity’ in Hong Kong Martial Arts Films. In M. Jancovich, A. L. Reboll, J. Sringer & A. Willis. (Eds.), Defining Cult Movies. Manchester-NY: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2014). The Heist Film: Stealing with Style. London-NY: Wallflower Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S. (2004). Maximum City: Bombay Lost and Found. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, H. (2012). Action Movies: The Cinema of Striking Back. London: Wallflower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Y. (2002). Spectacular Bodies: Gender. London, Routledge: Genre and Action Cinema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Y. (2004). Introduction: action and adventure cinema. In The Hollywood Action and Adventure Cinema (pp. 1–13). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1998). Melodrama Revised.’ In N. Browne (Ed.), Refiguring American Film Genres: Theory and History. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shohini Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, S. (2020). Action, Sensation and the Kinetic Body: The Stardom of Hrithik Roshan. In: Viswamohan, A., Wilkinson, C. (eds) Stardom in Contemporary Hindi Cinema. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0191-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics